Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

The structure of a virus-encoded nucleosome

Abstract

Certain large DNA viruses, including those in the Marseilleviridae family, encode histones. Here we show that fused histone pairs Hβ-Hα and Hδ-Hγ from Marseillevirus are structurally analogous to the eukaryotic histone pairs H2B-H2A and H4-H3. These viral histones form ‘forced’ heterodimers, and a heterotetramer of four such heterodimers assembles DNA to form structures virtually identical to canonical eukaryotic nucleosomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Structure and conservation of Marseillevirus nucleosome.
Fig. 2: General architecture of histones.
Fig. 3: DNA binding and acidic patch conservation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Cross-linking data are available from PRIDE via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD024220. Cryo-EM density maps are deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank under accession numbers EMD-23529 and EMD-23530. The atomic models are deposited in the PDB under accession numbers PDB 7LV8 and PDB 7LV9. All other data are available in the main manuscript or extended data section. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Talbert, P. B., Meers, M. P. & Henikoff, S. Old cogs, new tricks: the evolution of gene expression in a chromatin context. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 283–297 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kornberg, R. D. Chromatin structure: a repeating unit of histones and DNA. Science 184, 868–871 (1974).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Luger, K., Mader, A. W., Richmond, R. K., Sargent, D. F. & Richmond, T. J. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature 389, 251–260 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mattiroli, F. et al. Structure of histone-based chromatin in Archaea. Science 357, 609–612 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bowerman, S., Wereszczynski, J. & Luger, K. Archaeal chromatin ‘slinkies’ are inherently dynamic complexes with deflected DNA wrapping pathways. Elife 10, e65587 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Yutin, N., Wolf, Y. I., Raoult, D. & Koonin, E. V. Eukaryotic large nucleo-cytoplasmic DNA viruses: clusters of orthologous genes and reconstruction of viral genome evolution. Virol. J. 6, 223 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Aherfi, S., Colson, P. & Raoult, D. Marseillevirus in the pharynx of a patient with neurologic disorders. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 22, 2008–2010 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Arantes, T. S. et al. The large Marseillevirus explores different entry pathways by forming giant infectious vesicles. J. Virol. 90, 5246–5255 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Boyer, M. et al. Giant Marseillevirus highlights the role of amoebae as a melting pot in emergence of chimeric microorganisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 21848–21853 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Erives, A. J. Phylogenetic analysis of the core histone doublet and DNA topo II genes of Marseilleviridae: evidence of proto-eukaryotic provenance. Epigenetics Chromatin 10, 55 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wakamori, M. et al. Intra- and inter-nucleosomal interactions of the histone H4 tail revealed with a human nucleosome core particle with genetically-incorporated H4 tetra-acetylation. Sci. Rep. 5, 17204 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bilokapic, S., Strauss, M. & Halic, M. Histone octamer rearranges to adapt to DNA unwrapping. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 101–108 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Taverna, S. D., Li, H., Ruthenburg, A. J., Allis, C. D. & Patel, D. J. How chromatin-binding modules interpret histone modifications: lessons from professional pocket pickers. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1025–1040 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Tachiwana, H. et al. Crystal structure of the human centromeric nucleosome containing CENP-A. Nature 476, 232–235 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McGinty, R. K. & Tan, S. Recognition of the nucleosome by chromatin factors and enzymes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 37, 54–61 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Valencia-Sánchez, M. I. et al. Structural basis of Dot1L stimulation by histone H2B lysine 120 ubiquitination. Mol. Cell 74, 1010–1019.e6 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Armache, K. J., Garlick, J. D., Canzio, D., Narlikar, G. J. & Kingston, R. E. Structural basis of silencing: Sir3 BAH domain in complex with a nucleosome at 3.0 Å resolution. Science 334, 977–982 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Dorigo, B., Schalch, T., Bystricky, K. & Richmond, T. J. Chromatin fiber folding: requirement for the histone H4 N-terminal tail. J. Mol. Biol. 327, 85–96 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shogren-Knaak, M. et al. Histone H4-K16 acetylation controls chromatin structure and protein interactions. Science 311, 844–847 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lowary, P. T. & Widom, J. New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 276, 19–42 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dyer, P. N. et al. Reconstitution of nucleosome core particles from recombinant histones and DNA. Methods Enzymol. 375, 23–44 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohi, M., Li, Y., Cheng, Y. & Walz, T. Negative staining and image classification – powerful tools in modern electron microscopy. Biol. Proced. Online 6, 23–34 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Li, X. et al. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 10, 584–590 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Suloway, C. et al. Automated molecular microscopy: the new Leginon system. J. Struct. Biol. 151, 41–60 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Slabinski, L. et al. XtalPred: a web server for prediction of protein crystallizability. Bioinformatics 23, 3403–3405 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schwede, T., Kopp, J., Guex, N. & Peitsch, M. C. SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3381–3385 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. McGuffin, L. J., Bryson, K. & Jones, D. T. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 16, 404–405 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System v.1.8 (Schrodinger, LLC, 2015).

  36. Chen, Z. L. et al. A high-speed search engine pLink 2 with systematic evaluation for proteome-scale identification of cross-linked peptides. Nat. Commun. 10, 3404 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank W. Rice and B. Wang for helping with data collection at NYU cryo-EM Shared Resource. We thank NYU Microscopy Laboratory for helping with negative-stain microscopy. We thank the HPC Core at NYU Langone Health for computer access and support. We thank J.-P. Armache for feedback. This work in the Armache laboratory was supported by a grant from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. S.A.-A. is supported by Molecular Biophysics T32 grant (5T32GM088118). E.N. and N.V. are supported by the NIH grant R01 GM127267, Blavatnik Family Foundation and by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. P.T. and S.H. are supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Some of this work was performed at the Simons Electron Microscopy Center and National Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy located at the New York Structural Biology Center, supported by grants from the Simons Foundation (SF349247), NYSTAR and the NIH National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM103310), with additional support from Agouron Institute (F00316) and NIH (OD019994 and RR029300).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.I.V.-S., S.A.-A., M.W., J.Z., P.D.I., R.L., N.V. and A.E. performed the research. K.-J.A., M.I.V.-S. and S.A.-A. analyzed and interpreted the data. K.-J.A., M.I.V.-S. and S.A.-A. designed the research and wrote the manuscript, with input from R.L., E.N., B.L.S., P.T. and S.H.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karim-Jean Armache.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Anke Sparmann was the primary editor on this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Phylogenetic and structural characterization of Marseillevirus histones and their higher-order assemblies.

a, A protein sequence alignment based on the Marseillevirus histone heterotetrameric structure was used to infer the phylogenetic relationships of the separate histone moieties (N- and C- terminal halves) from each the two histone doublet genes from three different Marseilleviridae genomes. This tree shows that each of the four viral histone domains (Hβ and Hα from the Hβ-Hα gene, and Hδ and Hγ from the Hδ-Hγ gene) is related to one of the four canonical eukaryotic core histone families. Furthermore, the C-terminal halves of each viral histone doublet are distantly related to eukaryotic core histone sub-families that come in distinctive functional variants (Hα → H2A + variants, and Hγ → H3 + variants). This phylogeny was computed using Bayesian inference on 193 alignment columns (Materials & Methods). Histone domains encoded by various archaeal genomes were used as an outgroup clade to determine root placement. b, SDS-PAGE gel of Msv histones stained with Coomassie blue (left) and PAGE native gel with different dilutions of Msv and Xenopus nucleosome assemblies stained with ethidium bromide (right). Each sample was run independently twice (n = 2). c, Crosslinking mass spectrometry revealed intramolecular (gray lines) and intermolecular (red lines) contacts between histones. d, Negative stain electron microscopy image of glutaraldehyde crosslinked viral histone assemblies. This image shows presence of round, nucleosome shaped particles.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Cryo-EM analysis of sample of Marseillevirus nucleosome.

Data were collected on Titan Krios 300 kV microscope. a, Raw cryo-EM images of Msv nucleosome were collected as described in Materials and Methods. Individual particles are highlighted in green circles. b, Representative 2D class averages selected from the dataset. c, Two representative views of the 3.4 Å 3D reconstruction Msv nucleosome. d, Fourier Shell Correlation plot of the 3.4 Å Msv nucleosome between two independently refined half maps (measured at FSC = 0.143). e, Euler angle distribution of assignment of particles used to generate the final 3.4 Å reconstruction. The length of every cylinder is proportional to the number of particles assigned to the specific orientation. f, Two different views of the heat map of the Msv nucleosome cryo-EM density colored by local resolution.

Extended Data Fig. 3 3D Classification scheme of samples of Marseillevirus nucleosome.

Detailed summary of classification of Msv dataset collected on Titan Krios operated at 300 kV. The two classes from the first 3D classification were further processed to leading to the ‘heterotetrameric’ and ‘heterotrimeric’ Msv nucleosomes.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Gallery of the Coulomb map showing the fitting of the model to the density in some regions of the reconstruction.

Fitting of the model to the Cryo-EM density of different regions of the Msv histones Hα, Hβ, Hγ, Hδ. The model is color coded as in Fig. 1.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Specific contacts of Msv histone forced dimers with the DNA.

a, Cryo-EM density of Msv nucleosome at two different thresholds showing the flexibility of the DNA ends in the Msv nucleosome. Two different views of the Coulomb map at contouring level of 6.5 sigma (top) and 5 sigma (bottom). At a lower contouring, the full length of the DNA (147 bp) is still visible but only 121 bp are stabilized and coordinates can be assigned. The map is color coded as in Fig. 1. b, Close up of the model and cryo-EM map fitting of specific contacts between the Hδ-Hγ connector and the DNA. c, Overview of the Hβ-Hα DNA interface. d, Comparison of interactions between Hβ-Hα with DNA (left) and H2B and H2A with DNA (right). e, Interactions of Hδ-Hγ with the DNA (left) and H3 and H4 with the DNA (right). Human nucleosome (PDB ID 5AV9).

Extended Data Fig. 6 Sequence conservation between Msv and eukaryotic histones.

Sequence alignment depicting secondary structures of Msv, human and A. castellanii histones. The secondary structure is shown for Msv and Human histones only. No structural data is available for A. castellanii. Shades of green indicate identical (dark green) and similar (light green) residues. Sequence alignments were performed with Clustal Omega from UniPort. A summary of structural and sequence alignments is shown in Extended Data Fig. 10.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Msv ‘heterotrimeric’ nucleosome.

a-e, Model of the ‘heterotrimeric’ Msv nucleosome with modeled DNA fitting inside the ‘heterotrimeric’ Msv cryo-EM map. a-c, Three different views, d, close up of the region where DNA is missing and e, close-up of the region where DNA is protruding. f-j, Model of the ‘heterotetrameric’ Msv nucleosome fitting inside the ‘heterotetrameric’ Msv cryo-EM map. f-h, Three different views, i and j, close ups of the regions shown in d and e. k-o, Model of the ‘heterotrimeric’ Msv nucleosome without the modeled DNA fitting inside the ‘heterotrimeric’ Msv cryo-EM map. k-m, Three different views, n and o, close ups of the regions shown in d and e. p-t, Docking of a model of a ‘hexameric’ eukaryotic nucleosome (PDB ID 5AV9) produced taking off one of the dimers H2B and H2A and fitted inside the ‘hexameric’ Xenopus cryo-EM map EMD-3929. Please note that we did not rebuilt the DNA in this model. p-r, Three different views, s and t,. close ups of the regions shown in d and e. Maps and models are color coded as Fig. 1. The blue square shows the missing DNA region and the arrow the missing Hβ-Hα (or H2B and H2A) histones.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Differences between Msv and eukaryotic histone tails.

Comparison of the N-terminal tails of the Msv nucleosome with the Xenopus nucleosome (PDB ID 1KX5) for: a, N-terminal Hα (top left) vs H2A (top right), C-terminal Hα (bottom left) vs H2A (bottom right). b, N-terminal Hβ vs H2B, c, N-terminal Hγ vs H3 and d, N-terminal Hδ vs H4. The models are color coded as in Fig. 1. The histone tail residues are indicated.

Extended Data Fig. 9 The contacts between Msv Hγ and DNA ends.

Comparison of interactions between DNA terminus with a, Hγ in Msv, b, canonical H3 in human (PDB ID 5AV9) and c, CENP-A in centromeric human nucleosomes (PDB ID 3AN2). d-e, Overview (top) and close-up (bottom) of the contacts established between Hδ α1 helix and Hγ αN helix of the d, Msv and e, human nucleosome (PDB ID 5AV9). Differences in the interface between Msv Hδ α1 helix with Hγ αN helix when compared to H4 α1 helix with H3 αN helix could contribute to increased flexibility of the DNA ends in the Msv nucleosome. The nucleosome is color coded as in Fig. 1.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Comparison between Msv, eukaryotic and archaeal nucleosomes.

a, Two different views of (top) archaea (PDB ID 5T5K), (middle) Msv and (bottom) human (PDB ID 5AV9) nucleosomes. b, RMSD and sequence conservation between histones in different organisms. Structural alignment and identity were obtained using the SSM algorithm in Coot. All the values of similarity and the sequence alignment with A. castellanii were obtained with BLASTp from NCBI. Only one homodimer from Archaea was possible to be aligned to the heterodimers for other organisms.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Table 2.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

Unfiltered cross-links in the Msv nucleosome.

Source data

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Unprocessed SDS–PAGE gel of Msv histones and PAGE native gel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valencia-Sánchez, M.I., Abini-Agbomson, S., Wang, M. et al. The structure of a virus-encoded nucleosome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 28, 413–417 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-021-00585-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-021-00585-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing