Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Rapid ordering of barcoded transposon insertion libraries of anaerobic bacteria

Abstract

Commensal bacteria from the human intestinal microbiota play important roles in health and disease. Research into the mechanisms by which these bacteria exert their effects is hampered by the complexity of the microbiota, the strict growth requirements of the individual species and a lack of genetic tools and resources. The assembly of ordered transposon insertion libraries, in which nearly all nonessential genes have been disrupted and the strains stored as independent monocultures, would be a transformative resource for research into many microbiota members. However, assembly of these libraries must be fast and inexpensive in order to empower investigation of the large number of species that typically compose gut communities. The methods used to generate ordered libraries must also be adapted to the anaerobic growth requirements of most intestinal bacteria. We have developed a protocol to assemble ordered libraries of transposon insertion mutants that is fast, cheap and effective for even strict anaerobes. The protocol differs from currently available methods by making use of cell sorting to order the library and barcoded transposons to facilitate the localization of ordered mutations in the library. By tracking transposon insertions using barcode sequencing, our approach increases the accuracy and reduces the time and effort required to locate mutants in the library. Ordered libraries can be sorted and characterized over the course of 2 weeks using this approach. We expect this protocol will lower the barrier to generating comprehensive, ordered mutant libraries for many species in the human microbiota, allowing for new investigations into genotype–phenotype relationships within this important microbial ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic of the entire process of sorting the transposon-insertion library and mapping the barcodes.
Fig. 2: Analysis workflow to locate mutant strains in the ordered library.
Fig. 3: Sorting schematic.
Fig. 4: Cryostock creation schematic.
Fig. 5: Schematic of pooling strategy.
Fig. 6: Statistics of the 40-plate ordered library.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The sequencing data used in this study are publicly available on NCBI as part of BioProject PRJNA573294. The sequence reads from the Bar-seq experiment on pools of the ordered library are available as part of BioSample SAMN12807646. The sequence reads from the RB-TnSeq experiment on the ordered library are available as part of BioSample SAMN12809978. Plate reader output files, microscopy images and extracted growth parameters that support the findings of this study (Supplementary Figs. 24) are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Code availability

The code required for locating insertion mutants in ordered libraries is available on BitBucket (https://bitbucket.org/kchuanglab/resolve_barcode_position/src). These scripts rely on previously published code available on BitBucket (https://bitbucket.org/berkeleylab/feba/src). The code in this protocol has been peer reviewed.

References

  1. Gentile, C. L. & Weir, T. L. The gut microbiota at the intersection of diet and human health. Science 362, 776–780 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tramontano, M. et al. Nutritional preferences of human gut bacteria reveal their metabolic idiosyncrasies. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 514–522 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liberati, N. T. et al. An ordered, nonredundant library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 transposon insertion mutants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 103, 2833–2838 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. De Berardinis, V. et al. A complete collection of single-gene deletion mutants of Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 174 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodman, A. L. et al. Identifying genetic determinants needed to establish a human gut symbiont in its habitat. Cell Host Microbe 6, 279–289 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Porwollik, S. et al. Defined single-gene and multi-gene deletion mutant collections in Salmonella enterica sv Typhimurium. PLoS ONE 9, e99820 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vandewalle, K. et al. Characterization of genome-wide ordered sequence-tagged Mycobacterium mutant libraries by Cartesian Pooling-Coordinate Sequencing. Nat. Commun. 6, 7106 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baym, M., Shaket, L., Anzai, I. A., Adesina, O. & Barstow, B. Rapid construction of a whole-genome transposon insertion collection for Shewanella oneidensis by Knockout Sudoku. Nat. Commun. 7, 13270 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Koo, B.-M. et al. Construction and analysis of two genome-scale deletion libraries for Bacillus subtilis. Cell Syst. 4, 291–305.e297 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dale, J. L. et al. Comprehensive functional analysis of the Enterococcus faecalis core genome using an ordered, sequence-defined collection of insertional mutations in strain OG1RF. mSystems 3, e00062–00018 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Baba, T. & Mori, H. The construction of systematic in-frame, single-gene knockout mutant collection in Escherichia coli K-12. Methods Mol. Biol. 416, 171–181 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lampe, D. J., Akerley, B. J., Rubin, E. J., Mekalanos, J. J. & Robertson, H. M. Hyperactive transposase mutants of the Himar1 mariner transposon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 96, 11428–11433 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goryshin, I. Y. & Reznikoff, W. S. Tn5 in vitro transposition. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7367–7374 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dodd, D. et al. A gut bacterial pathway metabolizes aromatic amino acids into nine circulating metabolites. Nature 551, 648 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Goodman, A. L., Wu, M. & Gordon, J. I. Identifying microbial fitness determinants by insertion sequencing using genome-wide transposon mutant libraries. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1969 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Anzai, I. A., Shaket, L., Adesina, O., Baym, M. & Barstow, B. Rapid curation of gene disruption collections using Knockout Sudoku. Nat. Protoc. 12, 2110 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Erlich, Y. et al. DNA Sudoku—harnessing high-throughput sequencing for multiplexed specimen analysis. Genome Res. 19, 1243–1253 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wetmore, K. M. et al. Rapid quantification of mutant fitness in diverse bacteria by sequencing randomly bar-coded transposons. mBio 6, e00306–e00315 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Price, M. N. et al. Mutant phenotypes for thousands of bacterial genes of unknown function. Nature 557, 503 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hughes, S. R. et al. High-throughput screening of cellulase F mutants from multiplexed plasmid sets using an automated plate assay on a functional proteomic robotic workcell. Proteome Sci. 4, 10 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, H. et al. Functional genetics of human gut commensal Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron reveals metabolic requirements for growth across environments. Cell Rep 34, 108789 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shatalin, K., Shatalina, E., Mironov, A. & Nudler, E. H2S: a universal defense against antibiotics in bacteria. Science 334, 986–990 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Holt, J.G., Kreig, N. R., Sneath, P. H. A., Staley J. T. & Williams S. T. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology 9th edn (Williams & Willkins, 1994).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Huang lab for helpful discussions. This work was supported in part by the Allen Discovery Center at Stanford University on Systems Modeling of Infection (to K.C.H.) and NIH grants RM1 GM135102 (to A.M.D. and K.C.H.) and R01 AI147023 (to K.C.H.). K.C.H. is a Chan Zuckerberg Biohub Investigator. The authors also acknowledge the hospitality of the Aspen Center for Physics, which is supported by NSF grant PHY-1607611. The following reagents were obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH as part of the Human Microbiome Project: Lactobacillus reuteri, strain CF48-3A, HM-102; Clostridium innocuum, strain 6_1_30, HM-173; Clostridium symbiosum, strain WAL-14163, HM-309; Bacteroides finegoldii, strain CL09T03C10, HM-727; Parabacteroides johnsonii, strain CL02T12C29, HM-731.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.L.S., A.M.D. and K.C.H. conceived the study. A.L.S. designed experiments and collected data. A.L.S. and R.C. analyzed the data. A.L.S., R.C., A.M.D. and K.C.H. interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerwyn Casey Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Protocols thanks Buz Barstow and Matthew Waldor for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Key references using this protocol

Price, M. N. et al. Nature 557, 503 (2018): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0124-0

Liu, H. et al. Cell Rep. 34, 108789 (2021): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108789

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–5, Supplementary Results and Supplementary Tables 1–3.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shiver, A.L., Culver, R., Deutschbauer, A.M. et al. Rapid ordering of barcoded transposon insertion libraries of anaerobic bacteria. Nat Protoc 16, 3049–3071 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-021-00531-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-021-00531-3

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing