Abstract
The appropriateness of surgical removal of lower third molars was audited in relation to 500 consecutive patients referred to hospital for third molar management during 1993/4. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria were used as the validating standard. Immediately after patients had been seen for treatment planning, research workers repeated history taking and clinical examination and recorded the treatment that was planned. Appropriateness of treatment planning was then assessed. A total of 95% of patients had bilateral and 5% had unilateral lower third molars (976 teeth in all); 69% were partially erupted, 35% unerupted and 5% fully erupted. There was a weak correlation between eruption status of bilateral third molars. The most frequent reason for removal of third molars (31%) was pericoronitis, though the next most frequent reason was that the contralateral tooth had been scheduled for removal under general anaesthesia. Allowing this as a legitimate reason for surgery, of 859 teeth scheduled for removal, 59% were justified according to NIH criteria. Some 169 (34%) of patients might have avoided surgery altogether if NIH criteria had been the basis for intervention and a further 147 (30%) could have been scheduled for removal of only one lower third molar. These findings suggest that criteria for removal other than NIH criteria are being applied. Further research is necessary to identify these
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brickley, M., Shepherd, J. An investigation of the rationality of lower third molar removal, based on USA National Institutes of Health criteria. Br Dent J 180, 249–254 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809044
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809044
This article is cited by
-
The effects of NICE guidelines on the management of third molar teeth
British Dental Journal (2012)
-
The mesioangular third molar – to extract or not to extract? Analysis of 776 consecutive third molars
British Dental Journal (2009)
-
Dental general anaesthetic receipt among Australians aged 15+ years, 1998–1999 to 2004–2005
BMC Oral Health (2008)
-
Effectiveness of strategies to disseminate and implement clinical guidelines for the management of impacted and unerupted third molars in primary dental care, a cluster randomised controlled trial
British Dental Journal (2004)
-
Trends in oral surgery in England and Wales 1991–2000
British Dental Journal (2002)