Abstract
Study design: To study the short- and long-term medical complications encountered in tetraplegic spinal cord injured persons (TSCI) and to give prominence to both the medical and socio-economic factors with which they are respectively associated.
Methods: The Tetrafigap Study is a multicentre epidemiological survey carried out using self-administered questionniares studying the global long-term outcome of TSCI patients after the initial phase of rehabilitation.
Results: The data for 1668 patients were analyzed. The rate of rehospitalisations was 74.4% with on average three stays per patient and as reported causes, in descending order: urinary complications, systematic follow-up, pressure sores, respiratory complications, contractures, bowel complications, pains and secondary fractures of the lower limbs. At the time of the survey, 84.7% of patients mentioned awkward contractures, 73.8% pains, 55.9% embarrassing urinary leakage and 14.1% pressure sores. With regard to persons suffering from complete motor lesion, urinary complications and pressure sores were more frequently reported, whereas for persons suffering from incomplete motor lesions, awkward contractures and pains were more frequent. In the elderly, pains were more often mentioned, and pressure sores and pain were also the most common in patients coming from lower socio-professional status. Contractures and pain decreased with time. All these complications but pressure sores and pain are statistically interrelated.
Conclusion: The medical complications of spinal cord injured persons are frequent, they are linked to biological, psychological and environmental factors, and are interrelated. Therefore, seeking mid- and long-term risk factors must be given priority in order to better adapt attempts at increasing secondary prevention.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Thanks to advances in emergency medicine and intensive care techniques, the survival rate of spinal cord injured persons (SCI) has considerably improved.1,2,3 Similarly, improved knowledge in physical medicine and rehabilitation and the setting up of centres specialising in SCI patients has allowed a significant increase in life expectancy among them, with a large number of patients back home.4
These persons thus constitute a growing and ageing population, whose specificity, particularly with regard to medical aspects is not well known in the mid- and long-term.
Most of the major studies conducted on this subject do not differentiate paraplegic and tetraplegic persons,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18 and when they do so, they mainly deal with short-term outcome.19
As time goes by, the major risk is the occurrence of secondary complications, often causes of morbidity and death, leading to an increase in the number of rehospitalisations, an increase in direct and indirect costs and a general worsening in the person's quality of life.15,20
It is, therefore, particularly relevant to study and follow-up these persons in the long term. In France, the Tetrafigap survey serves this need as it examines the prevalence of medical complications in tetraplegic spinal cord injured persons (TSCI) reported in the long term, makes a comparative analysis of the various complications and the clinical and environmental factors with which they are respectively associated.
Methods
The Tetrafigap survey was developed under the aegis of the ‘International French-speaking association of paraplegic therapy groups’. It is a multi-centre epidemiological survey; its protocol and methodology are described in detail in part I.21
The survey included persons with complete or incomplete TSCI, aged 16 years or over at the time of injury, 18 years or over at the time of the survey, and with a minimum 2-year delay. Their injury had resulted in an admission to one of the rehabilitation units which had agreed to take part in the project (35 departments or centres).
Each patient, who had given his/her informed consent to take part in the survey, received a questionnaire to fill in, based on the long-term outcome, dealing with several themes and particularly with a medical section.
The socio-demographic characteristics of the study population and the causes of initial injury were described in Part II.22
The survey population involved 1668 patients. Their characteristics are summarised in Table 1.
The complications leading to rehospitalisation following discharge were registered as cumulative incidence:
-
Have you been rehospitalised since the end of re-education? (yes/no)
-
If you have been rehospitalised:
– How many times?
– How long in total (in months)?
-
What were the causes: systematic assessment, pressure sore(s), urinary complications, respiratory complications, bowel complications, pains, osteoma(s), awkward contractures, non-surgical upper limb fractures, surgical upper limb fractures, non-surgical lower limb fractures, surgical lower limb fractures, other causes to be specified
-
Did some complications occur during those rehospitalisations, if so, please describe them?
The items relative to complications present during the survey were registered as prevalence data:
-
Have you had one or more pressure sores (presently)? (yes/no)
-
Have you had any awkward urinary leakages? (never/sometimes/often)
-
Have you had any awkward contractures? (never/sometimes/often)
-
Have you had any embarrassing bowel leakages? (never/sometimes/often)
-
Have you had any perspiration attacks? (never/sometimes/often)
-
Have you had any other complications? (never/sometimes/often)
-
If so, please describe them?
-
Have you had any pains? (never/sometimes/often)
-
If so, please indicate the intensity (between 0 and 10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the most awful pain)?
The statistical analysis was carried out with parametric (analysis of variance) and non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney, Kruskall-Wallis tests and Pearson's χ2 independence test), with univariate correlations. The threshold of significance taken into account was P=0.05.
Results
Complications leading to rehospitalisation following discharge
Mean time elapsed since the accident is 12.9 years (median 11.2 years with extreme from 2 to 40, Figure 1). During this period, the reported rate of rehospitalisation was 74.4%, with a median number of three per patient and a bimodal distribution, 85% of patients were rehospitalised less than six times, 10% 10 times or more and only 5% between seven and nine times (Figure 2). As expected with such cumulative incidence data, the number of rehospitalisation increased with length of time after the accident (P=0.001) but the two figures do not have the same distribution.
The mean cumulated length of stay was 6.1 months, but the median was only 2 months. The causes of rehospitalisation are shown in Table 2. Urinary complications were the most common reported causes (32.1%), then systematic follow-up (27.7%) and pressure sores (19.7%). The open item ‘other causes’ was filled in by 14.4% of patients to describe rehospitalisation regarding functional surgery of the upper limbs (35.5%), urological or genital surgery (23%), and other surgical procedures (66%). These were common answers but were not exclusive, as the same patient could report several of these complications.
Further complications arose or were discovered during 15% of these rehospitalisations, first of all infections (35%) then skin complications (26.2%).
Complications present at the time of the survey
Three types of complications were reported by over half the persons: awkward contractures (84.7%), pain (73.8%, of which 36% reported severe pain higher than seven out of 10 on an analogic visual scale), and lastly, embarrassing urinary leakage (55.9%). Other reported complications were perspiration attacks (33.7% with 11.3% of frequent fits), loss of bowel control (36.5% of which 4.5% were frequent), and pressure sores for 14.1% of the persons at the time of the survey (cf. Table 3). These different complications are strongly interrelated, in a significant way, except for pressure sores and pain (P=0.18). On the other hand, they differed regarding the factors to which they were associated.
Special attention has to be given to the link between the age at the time of the accident, time elapsed between the accident and the survey and the rate of complete neurological deficit: the persons whose injury occurred with the greatest time elapsed between injury and time of the survey, were those who had had the accident at the youngest age (P=0.001), they also presented more often with a complete neurological lesion (P=0.001).
Awkward contractures
These were significantly more frequent in patients with an incomplete motor lesion (P=0.002), who were older, be it at the time of injury (P<0.001) or at the time of the survey (P=0.003), and in those whose accident was recent (P=0.009). The results are shown in Table 4.
Pain
The presence of pain was correlated with an incomplete motor and sensory lesion at the time of the survey (P=0.003), with an older age, either at the time of injury (P<0.001), or that of the survey (P<0.001). Pain is more frequent in TSCI persons whose injury was recent (P=0.05) and with lower socio-professional status at the time of injury (P=0.001): the rates were higher for retirees, the unemployed, for those who had never attended school or who had a low educational level, whether or not the persons had incomplete or complete motor lesions (cf. Table 5).
Embarrassing urinary leakage
Frequent urinary leakage was correlated with subjects with a complete neurological lesion (P<0.001). There was no correlation with the subject's age, either at the time of injury (P=0.69) or of the survey (P=0.39), time since injury (P=0.69), occupational status at the time of injury (P=0.78), the level of education (P=0.81) or academic achievement (P=0.37) (cf. Table 6).
Pressure sores
The presence of pressure sores is correlated with complete motor and sensory lesion (P<0.001 and P=0.002, respectively), previous history of pressure sores in the acute phase (P<0.001) or during subsequent evolution (P<0.001). They were significantly more frequent in subjects whose injury occurred at a younger age (P<0.001), whereas the age at the time of the survey was no longer a relevant factor (P=0.07). The presence of pressure sores increased with time elapsed since injury (P<0.001), but we have to remember that in our population, the longest delay from injury is linked to the rate of complete neurological lesion (P=0.001).
Pressure sores were more frequently reported by subjects with the lowest socio-economic status: unemployment at the time of injury (P<0.001), low educational level (P=0.03) or limited academic achievement (P<0.001). The lowest rates of pressure sores are observed with active subjects, or with subjects with a higher level of education (cf. Table 7).
These results are all the more significant in that there is no difference in academic achievement between persons with either complete or incomplete motor or sensory lesion.
Discussion
This survey is the largest, as far as the number of persons questioned is concerned, and which is aimed at specifically studying the mid- and long-term outcome of TSCI persons. The survey was performed by means of a self-administered questionnaire and so obtained the patient's personal views of their own situation. We have to raise the point that most of our data are based on subjective responses. Subjective data are less reliable than objective data (patients in the same condition may report their condition differently because their perception is different) but subjective data are key factors to health service access. This choice was not only an argument for feasibility of the survey with the size of the population being studied, it was an assumed choice to access the individual's point of view about their complications rather than medical considerations. However, another part of the survey is aimed at gathering objective data. Looking at these methodological concerns, quality of response was controlled and internal coherence of data was verified and corrected.
Medical, functional, psychological and social data could be recorded simultaneously. This multi-dimensional aspect is essential because it makes it possible to better understand the mutual interaction between physiology and the environment as a whole. However, we have to highlight that this is not an analysis of risk factors for each complication, but an analysis of clinical and environmental associated factors.
The initial, biographical characteristics of the survey population did not differ from those of other epidemiological studies.6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17
Generally speaking, the major finding highlighted in this work is the very high occurrence of some complications in these persons: over half reported contractures, urinary leakage and/or pain.
It also arises that certain persons, in the mid- and long-term, presented a growing risk of complications; this vulnerability which cannot be entirely attributed to a higher level of impairment.
We have to stress the incidence of differential mortality bias in some complications: older age patients, patients with higher injury level or complete lesion are more likely to die before the survey is conducted. This differential mortality bias affects the relationship between time after injury and prevalence of medical complications. It increases with advancing time after injury.
Rehospitalisations
In the present study, the analysis of the number and duration of hospitalisations between initial injury and the survey allowed us to highlight a smaller sub-group of persons who were hospitalised more frequently and above all for a longer duration of stay than the overall survey population: this may be explained by a higher degree of impairment23,24,25,26,27 but also by differences in educational level,24,25 socio-economic status,25,28,29 or again by a poorer adaptation to disability.24 This finding also appears in some other studies on spinal cord injured persons in general. According to Meyers et al,30 8% of injured persons make up 22% of rehospitalisations and 59% of the care burden.
In this study, the number of rehospitalisations increased with time through a cumulative phenomenon. In the literature, its incidence is higher during the first 5 years, then it decreases, as though some equilibrium had been reached, it then increases again after approximately 20 years of evolution.15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27 Urinary complications and pressure sores are the two main reasons for hospital readmissions in people with chronic spinal cord injury.27 With the passing of time some complications are reported less frequently: awkward contractures, pain, whereas others are more frequent: perspiration attacks, pressure sores, which may be attributed to a lesser vigilance towards prevention and to the ageing of the body's different physiological systems.
Combinations of complications
Frequent association between these complications was noted, except between pressure sores and pain. This lack of link may be explained by the different types of lesions which favour them: incomplete ones for pain and complete ones for pressure sores. These were not, therefore, the same subjects. Moreover, motor and sensory conservation, associated with the presence of pain, is a protecting factor against pressure sores through its role as an alarm.
Many such associations can be found in the literature either concerning pressure sores,31,32,33,34,35 urinary complications36 or pain.37,38,39 They are linked to the complex, unstable physiological balance after a spinal cord lesion. An initially localised imbalance starts a chain of changes which result in the more or less rapid emergence of complications and the creation of real vicious circles.40
Awkward contractures
Contractures were the most frequent complications reported by spinal cord injured persons. In this study only 15% of subjects had none; yet paradoxically, very few studies on their prevalence exist. They seem to be favoured by incomplete neurological lesion in this survey and in other studies.41,42,43 Dimitrijevic et al,44 noted that partial preservation of cerebral influence on the sub-lesion spinal cord contributes to the occurrence of hyper-excitability which may be found in the form of spasticity and osteotendinous hyper-reflexiveness. Contractures diminish with time, probably owing to the occurrence of atrophic changes in sub-lesion muscle fibres: amyotrophic sclerosis and loss of compliance.
Pain
An overall rate of 73.8% of persons suffering pain was noted, of which 35.5% had frequent pain, with one third in severe pain. In studies which do not distinguish paraplegic and tetraplegic SCI persons, this rate varies from 14% to 94%, according to whether or not the lowest intensity is taken into account, with a majority of studies reporting a prevalence of about 60% to 70%, with 20% to 30% of intense pain.37,38,39,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53
The age, whether at the time of injury or at the time of the survey was correlated with the presence of pain, this is confirmed by the majority of studies.14,37,38,39,50,54,55 For Richards,55 age would represent the best predictive factor for pain occurrence. The explanation could be the decrease in plasticity of the central nervous system with age, as far as neurogenic pain is concerned,39 as well as over-use of supra-lesional joints for osteo-articular pains.56
A greater frequency of pain was noted in patients suffering from incomplete neurologic lesions – a correlation which is also confirmed by most of the publications38,39,50,52,55,56,57,58 and is also found in persons with a lower socio-professional status, either before the injury or at the time of the survey: unemployment, low level of education or poor academic achievement, which underlines the importance of the psychosocial component when considering pain.53,54,55,58,59,60
Embarrassing urinary leakage
No other study could be found showing, as in the present case, that there are very few factors associated with the presence of urinary leakage, apart from factors linked to the severity of clinical condition: complete motor and sensory lesion, connection with all the other complications. This complication seems to be the reflection of a more severe impairment, and independent from more individual or environmental factors. Although it is not significant, it can be noted that urinary leakage tends to be more frequent in women.
Skin complications
The major risk factor reported in the literature is first and foremost the complete neurological nature of the lesion well before the difference in the level of lesion between tetraplegics and paraplegics.26,31,32,33,35,41,54,56,61,62 Previous histories of skin complications are also a major risk factor in the occurrence of pressure sores. On the one hand, this is due to the fragility of skin around scars but, and on the other hand, more especially because it is a risk factor of a relapse, whatever the level of the lesion.35,63,64 In this study, the rate increases from factor 3 to 4 and for Berkley,63 a factor of 4. This vulnerability may be linked to more severe impairments, to maladjusted behaviour,28,65,66 to low socio-economic and educational status: low level of education, unemployment.31,32,33,35,64,67
Conclusion
The TSCI persons who took part in this survey reported a very high percentage of complications, which were, for the most part, interrelated. This rate may increase due to the ever-increasing survival rate among subjects of increasingly higher level of neurologic lesions, and the ageing of the existing population. It is thus important to care for the long-term outcome of these patients, a field on which few researchers have been focusing as compared to the initial phase of rehabilitation. Associated factors have been identified in a general way and for each principal complication. Contractures were more frequent in subjects with incomplete neurological impairment. Pain was also correlated with the incomplete aspect of the lesion but also with older age and poor socio-professional status. Urinary leakage reflects the degree of impairment. Skin complications are strongly correlated with the degree of impairment, in addition to previous history of sores and with an unstable psychosocial status. These data underline the interest for continuing research in this domain, while taking into account the different aspects which make up the individual. Early identification of risk factors and a better understanding of the neo-physiological balance of spinal cord injured persons will allow better secondary and tertiary prevention policies and to favour the inclusion of severely disabled persons, while still continuing efforts with regard to primary prevention.
References
De Vivo MJ et al. Seven-year survival following spinal cord injury Arch Neurol 1987 44: 872–875
De Vivo MJ et al. A cross-sectional study of the relationship between age and current health status for persons with spinal cord injuries Paraplegia 1992 30: 820–827
Le CT, Price M . Survival from Spinal Cord Injury J Chron Dis 1982 35: 487–492
De Vivo MJ, Richards JS, Stover SL, Go BK . Spinal Cord Injury: Rehabilitation adds life to years West J Med 1991 154: 602–606
De Vivo MJ et al. The influence of age at time of spinal cord injury on rehabilitation outcome Arch Neurol 1990 47: 687–691
De Vivo MJ et al. Outcomes of the older patient with spinal cord injury Paraplegia ASIA Meeting 1987
Shingu H et al. A nationwide epidemiological survey of spinal cord injuries in Japan from January 1990 to December 1992 Paraplegia 1995 33: 183–188
Frankel HL et al. Long-term survival in spinal cord injury: a fifty year investigation Spinal Cord 1998 36: 266–274
Nakajima A, Honda S . Physical and social condition of rehabilited spinal cord injury patients in Japan: a long term review Paraplegia 1988 26: 165–176
Mesard L et al. Survival after spinal cord trauma. A life table analysis Arch Neurol 1978 35: 78–83
Dincer F, Oflazer A, Beyazova M . Traumatic spinal cord injuries in Turkey Paraplegia 1992 30: 641–646
Hartkopp A et al. Survival and cause of death after traumatic spinal cord injury. A long-term epidemiological survey from Denmark Spinal Cord 1997 35: 76–85
Minaire P et al. Life expectancy following spinal cord injury: a ten-years survey in the Rhone-Alpes region, France, 1969–1980 Paraplegia 1983 21: 11–15
Whiteneck GG et al. Mortality, morbidity, and psychosocial outcomes of persons spinal cord injured more than 20 years ago Paraplegic 1992 30: 617–630
Harvey C et al. New estimates of the direct costs of traumatic spinal cord injuries: results of a nationwide survey Paraplegia 1992 30: 834–850
Acton A et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury in Arkansas, 1980 to 1989 Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993 74: 1035–1040
Kraus JF et al. Incidence of traumatic spinal cord lesions J Chron Dis 1975 28: 471–492
Hart C, Williams E . Epidemiology of spinal cord injuries: a reflection of changes in South African society Paraplegia 1994 32: 709–714
Daverat P, Gagnon M, Dartigues JF . Initial factors predicting survival in patients with a spinal cord injury J Neurol, Neurosurg Psych 1989 52: 403–406
Berkowitz M, Harvey C, Greene CG, Wilson SE . The economic consequences of traumatic spinal cord injury New York: Demos Publications 1992
Ravaud JF et al. The Tetrafigap survey on the long-term outcome of tetraplegic spinal cord injured individuals: Part I. Protocol and methodology Spinal Cord 1998 36: 117–124
Ravaud JF, Delcey M, Desert JF the TETRAFIGAP Group. The Tetrafigap Survey on the long-term outcome of tetraplegic spinal cord injured persons, Part III: Demographic characteristics and initial cause of injury Spinal Cord 2000 38: 164–172
De Jong G . Physical disability and public policy SCI Am 1983 248: 40–49
Davidoff G et al. Rehospitalization after initial rehabilitation for acute spinal cord injury: incidence and risk factors Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990 71: 121–124
Ivie CS, De Vivo MJ . Predicting unplanned hospitalizations in persons with spinal cord injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994 75: 1182–1188
Young JS, Northrup RE . Rehospitalization in year 2 and 3 following spinal cord injury Model system's SCI 1980 1: 21–26
Savic G, Short DJ, Weitzenkamp D, Charlifue S, Gardner BP . Hospital readmissions in people with chronic spinal cord injury Spinal Cord 2000 38: 371–377
Anderson TP . Psychosocial factors associated with pressure sores Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979 60: 341–346
Swanson ED . Relationship between locus-of-control expectancy and successful rehabilitation of spinal cord injured Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University 1976
Meyers AR et al. Rehospitalization and spinal cord injury: cross-sectional survey of adults living independently Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985 66: 704–708
Byrne DW, Salzberg CA . Major risk factors for pressure ulcers in the spinal cord disabled: a literature review Spinal Cord 1996 34: 255–263
Garber SL, Rintala DH, Don Rossi C . Reported pressure ulcer prevention and management techniques by persons with spinal cord injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996 77: 744–749
Salzberg CA, Byrne DW, Cayten CG . A new pressure ulcer risk assessment scale for individuals with spinal cord injury Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996 4: 96–104
Sumiya T et al. A survey of wheelchair use by paraplegic individuals in Japan. Part 2: Prevalence of pressure sores Spinal Cord 1997 35: 595–598
Vidal J, Sarrias M . An analysis of the diverse factors concerned with the development of pressure sores in spinal cord injured patients Paraplegia 91 29: 261–267
Stone JM et al. Chronic gastrointestinal problems in spinal cord injury patients: a prospective analysis Am J Gastroenterol 1990 85: 1114–1119
Demirel G et al. Pain following spinal cord injury Spinal Cord 1998 36: 25–28
Fenollosa P et al. Chronic pain in the spinal cord injured: statistical approach and pharmacological treatment Paraplegia 1993 31: 722–729
Stormer S et al. Chronic pain/dysaesthesiae in spinal cord injury patients: results of a multicentre study Spinal Cord 1997 35: 446–455
Krause JS, Crewe NM . Long term prediction of self-reported problems following spinal cord injury Paraplegia 1990 28: 186–202
Lin K et al. Quality of life of spinal cord injured patients in Taiwan: a subgroup study Spinal Cord 1997 35: 841–849
Little JW, Michlesen P, Umlauf R . Lower extremity manifestations of spasticity in chronic spinal cord injury Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1989 68: 32–36
Maynard FM, Karunas RS, Waring WP . Epidemiology of spasticity following traumatic spinal cord injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990 71: 566–569
Dimitrijevic MR, Dimitrijevic MM, Fragenel J . Suprasegmentally induced motor unit activity in paralyzed muscles of patients with established spinal cord injury Ann Neurol 1984 16: 216–221
Nepomuceno C et al. Pain in patients with spinal cord injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979 60: 605–608
Ien H et al. Upper extremity pain in the postrehabilitation spinal cord injured patient Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992 73: 44–48
Woolsley RM . Chronic pain following spinal cord injury J Am Paraplegia Soc 1986 9: 39–41
Lamid S et al. Chronic pain in spinal cord injury: comparison between inpatients and outpatients Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985 66: 777–778
Britell CW, Mariano AJ . Chronic pain in spinal cord injury Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: State of the Art Reviews Philadelphia: Philadelphia, Hanley & Belfus Inc 1991 pp. 71–81
Wagner-Anke AG, Stenehjem AE, Kvalvik Stanghelle J . Pain and life quality within 2 years of spinal cord injury Paraplegia 1995 33: 555–559
Christensen FL, Jensen TS . Disturbances of sensation and pain in patients with spinal cord lesions (Danish) Ugeskr Loeger 1991 153: 3466–3469
Mariano AJ . Chronic pain and spinal cord injury Clin J Pain 1992 8: 87–92
Rintala DH, Loubser PG, Castro J, Hart KA et al. Chronic pain in a community-based sample of men with spinal cord injury: prevalence, severity, and relationship with impairment, disability, handicap, and subjective well-being Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998 79: 604–614
Levi R, Hulting C, Seiger A . The Stockholm Spinal Cord Injury Study: 2. Associations between clinical patients characteristics and post-acute medical problems Paraplegia 1995 33: 585–594
Richards JS . Chronic pain and spinal cord injury: review and comment Clin J Pain 1992 8: 119–122
Knutsdottir S . Spinal cord injuries in Iceland 1973–1989. A follow up study Paraplegia 1993 31: 68–72
Subbarao JU, Klopfstein J, Turpin R . Prevalence and impact of wrist and shoulder pains in patients with spinal cord injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979 60: 605–609
Summers JD et al. Psychosocial factors in chronic spinal cord injury pain Pain 1991 47: 183–189
Dew MA et al. A causal analysis of factors affecting adjustment to spinal cord injury Rehabilitation Psychology 1985 30: 39–46
Kennedy P et al. Factors associated with acute and chronic pain following traumatic spinal cord injuries Spinal Cord 1997 35: 814–817
McKinley WO et al. Long-term medical complications after traumatic spinal cord injury: a regional model systems analysis Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999 80: 1402–1410
Krausse JS . Secondary conditions and spinal cord injury: a model for prediction and prevention Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1996 2: 58–70
Berkley LR, Dilustro JF, Salazar AM . Spinal cord injury: a 25-year morbidity and mortality study Military Medicine 1997 2: 141–147
Rodriguez GP, Garber SL . Prospective study of pressure risk in spinal cord injured patients Paraplegia 1994 34: 150–158
Krause JS . Skin sores after spinal cord injury: relationship to life adjustment Spinal Cord 1998 36: 51–56
Sapountzi-Krepia D et al. Post traumatic paraplegics living in Athens: The impact of pressure sores and UTIs on everyday life activities Spinal Cord 1999 36: 432–437
Shea JD, Sepulveda JA . Pressure sore profile Proc Am Spinal Injury Assoc 1985 1: 1–2
Acknowledgements
The TETRAFIGAP Survey was carried out thanks to grants from the following organisations which we wish to thank: HANDITEC the ‘Association de Gestion de fonds pour l'Insertion Professionnelle Des Personnes Handicapes’, (AGEFIPH), the ‘Association des Paralyses de France’ (APF) the ‘Fondation des Mutuelles Du Mans-Fondation de France, the ‘Fondation Suisse de la paraplegie’, the ‘Centre European d'analyses des Risques (CEESAR), the ‘Institut pour la Recherche sur la moelle Epiniere’, (IRME). The authors also wish to thank Papa Abdou (APF) for carrying out statistical analyses and Karine Traverse and Françoise Marchand (INSERM/RFRH) for their assistance with translation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Additional information
See Appendix
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Appendix
The Tetrafigap survey, carried out under the aegis of the ‘Association Francophone Internationale des Groupes d'Animation de la Paraplégie’ (AFIGAP), was achieved thanks to the participation of the Tetrafigap group which involves a steering committee including D Boulongne, M Delcey, JF Desert, M Maury, JP Pedelucq, JF Ravaud and M Tramblay and the 35 associated teams mentioned below:
1 Berck-Hôpital franco-américain (Dr Allas)
2 Berck-Centre Hélio-marin (Dr Chikhi)
3 Bichat (Pr Bedoiseau)
4 Bois-Guillaume (Pr Beuret-Blanquart)
5 Bordeaux (Pr Barat, Dr Petit)
6 Bouffémont (Dr Thévenin-Lemoine)
7 Bourbon-Lancy (Drs Malier, Estéve)
8 Bruxelles (Drs Heilporn, Biefnot)
9 Cerbère (Dr Enjalbert, M. Rosebande)
10 Charleville Mézières (Drs Delrez, Skoda)
11 Club de loisirs et d'entraide de Garches
12 Coubert (Dr Désert)
13 Garches (Prs Bussel et Dizien, Dr Lortat-Jacob et Tramblay)
14 Genève-Hôpital Cantonal Universitaire, (Pr Chantraine, Dr Castagnier)
15 Giens (Drs Boucand et Tournebise)
16 Invalides (INI, Dr Dumurgier, Dr Barouti)
17 Kerpape (Drs Busnel, Cormerais, Pédelucq)
18 La Membrolle sur Choisille (Dr Chauvet)
19 L'Arche (Drs Egon, Isambert)
20 La Tour-de-Gassies (Dr N'Guyen Van Tam, Dr Wiart)
21 Lay-Saint-Christophe (Dr Grugerolle, Dr Thisse)
22 L'Hospitalet-Montoire (Dr Simon)
23 Limoges (Prs Labrusse et Dudognon, Dr Munoz)
24 Lyon-Henry Gabrielle (Pr Boisson)
25 Lyon-Henry Gabrielle (Pr Eyssette, Dr Frenay)
26 Marseille-Clinique St-Martin (Dr Chapuis-Ducoffre)
27 Marseille-Valmante (Drs Benezet et Allovon)
28 Montpellier-Propara (Dr. O'Hanna, Dr Rouays-Mabit)
29 Mulhouse (Dr Jacob-Chia)
30 Nantes (Pr Mathé, Drs Perrouin-Verbe et Rome)
31 Neufmoutiers-en-Brie-Les Lycéens (Dr François)
32 Pen-Bron (Dr Tanguy)
33 Rennes Beaulieu (Pr Brissot, Dr Gallien)
34 Saint-Hilaire du Touvet (Dr Pauget)
35 Strasbourg (Dr Pinelli)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klotz, R., Joseph, P., Ravaud, J. et al. The Tetrafigap Survey on the long-term outcome of tetraplegic spinal cord injured persons: Part III. Medical complications and associated factors. Spinal Cord 40, 457–467 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101317
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101317
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
International spinal cord injury socio-demographic basic data set (version 1.0)
Spinal Cord (2023)
-
Utilization of health care providers by individuals with chronic spinal cord injury
Spinal Cord (2021)
-
Prevalence and associated factors of pain in the Swiss spinal cord injury population
Spinal Cord (2017)
-
Should sperm be cryopreserved after spinal cord injury?
Basic and Clinical Andrology (2013)
-
Frequency and age effects of secondary health conditions in individuals with spinal cord injury: a scoping review
Spinal Cord (2013)