Abstract
The origin of the low current on/off ratio at room temperature in dual-gated bilayer graphene field-effect transistors is considered to be the variable range hopping in gap states. However, the quantitative estimation of gap states has not been conducted. Here, we report the systematic estimation of the energy gap by both quantum capacitance and transport measurements and the density of states for gap states by the conductance method. An energy gap of ~250 meV is obtained at the maximum displacement field of ~3.1 V/nm, where the current on/off ratio of ~3 × 103 is demonstrated at 20 K. The density of states for the gap states are in the range from the latter half of 1012 to 1013 eV−1cm−2. Although the large amount of gap states at the interface of high-k oxide/bilayer graphene limits the current on/off ratio at present, our results suggest that the reduction of gap states below ~1011 eV−1cm−2 by continual improvement of the gate stack makes bilayer graphene a promising candidate for future nanoelectronic device applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The main issue of downscaling in the Si field-effect transistors (FETs) is the short channel effect in which the gate control is weakened by the drain bias. Based on an analysis of the electrical potential distribution in the channel region, it is well known that the short channel effect can be neglected when the channel length is ~6 times longer than the scaling length 1,2, where N, εch, εox, tch and tox are the effective gate number, dielectric constants for the channel and gate insulator and thickness of the channel and the gate oxide. This perspective attracts great attention to two-dimensional (2D) layered channels in the FET application because of their rigidly controllable atomic thickness (tch < 1 nm), as well as the low dielectric constant (εch = ~4) for typical 2D layered channels3,4. Although old-but-new 2D channels, such as transition metal dichalcogenides, black phosphorus and so on, have been intensively investigated recently5,6,7,8,9, bilayer graphene with an electrostatically tunable band gap still has an advantage over the high performance device from the viewpoint of mobility due to the smaller effective mass (mBLG = ~0.03710, mBP = 0.1311 and mMoS2 = ~0.3712).
The suppression of conductivity in bilayer graphene has so far been reported by many researchers by applying an external electrical field13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24. Optical spectroscopic measurements, such as angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy25 and infrared spectroscopy14,26,27, confirmed the band gap formation. However, the large current on/off ratio (Ion/Ioff) of ~106 is obtained only at the quite low temperature of 300 mK17, not at room temperature. The reason is explained by the variable range hopping in gap states13,15,17,18,19. Therefore, the main target issue for bilayer graphene is a low current on/off ratio at room temperature. At the zero-order approximation, there will intrinsically be no interface states in bilayer graphene because there are no dangling bonds on the basal plane, compared with Pb centers in the SiO2/Si system, assigned by the electron spin resonance measurement28,29,30. Although the strong disorder at the channel edge was expected to act as a main conduction path, the transport measurement in the Corbino geometry excluded this idea19. The origin of the gap states remains an open question. So far, detailed measurements on the density of states (Dit) and the time constant (τit) for gap states have not been reported.
Contrary to the transport measurement, the extraction of the quantum capacitance (CQ) through the capacitance measurements (C-V) of bilayer graphene provides direct information on the density of states (DOS) of bilayer graphene, consequently, the energy gap (EG), because it is regarded as the energy cost of inducing the carriers in graphene and is directly related as CQ = e2DOS31. Although there are a few reports on CQ measurement for bilayer graphene32,33,34, the comparison of EG estimated both from I-V and C-V has not been done yet. Moreover, in principle, the mobile carrier response to a small-signal alternating current voltage at a certain frequency is measured in the C-V measurement. The capture and emission process of mobile carriers at the trap levels distributed throughout the band gap can be extracted as a deviation from the ideal carrier response without any trap levels under the assumption of the equivalent circuit. This technique is known as the conductance method34.
In this work, we present the systematic extraction of EG as a function of the displacement field (), which determines the band structure of bilayer graphene, from both I-V and C-V. The conductance measurements are carried out to extract Dit and τit; then, the possible origins of the gap states are discussed.
Bilayer graphene FTEs with a high quality top gate insulator
Recently, we have demonstrated a considerable suppression of the low-field leakage through high-k Y2O3 on monolayer graphene by applying high-pressure O2 annealing35. The same process was applied to bilayer graphene FETs. The improved electrical quality of the insulators provides access to the large displacement field ( = ~3.1 V/nm) in this study. Although there are several conventions for , we adopt the most widely used definition of in this study14, where εBG, εTG, dBG, dTG, VBG and VTG are the dielectric constants, the insulator thickness and the gate voltages for back- and top-gate insulators, respectively. is the charge neutrality point to give the minimum resistance in the top-gated region.
To suppress the hysteresis in drain current—gate voltage curves, the SiO2 surface was converted to be hydrophobic (siloxane group) by annealing the SiO2/Si substrate in a 100% O2 atmosphere at 1000 °C prior to the graphene transfer36. Then, the conventional back-gated bilayer graphene FETs containing source and drain electrodes were fabricated on ~90 nm SiO2/n+-Si substrates by the mechanical exfoliation of Kish graphite. This device was annealed under Ar/H2 gas flow at 300 °C for 3 hours to remove the resist residue on the bilayer graphene channel. Subsequently, Y2O3, with a thickness of ~6 nm, was deposited on bilayer graphene FETs by the thermal evaporation of Y metal in the O2 atmosphere at PO2 = 10−1 Pa35. Then, high-pressure annealing was carried out in a 100% O2 atmosphere at ~100 atm and 300 °C. Finally, the top gate electrode was patterned, followed by annealing at 300 °C for 30 s under 0.1% O2 gas flow. The lack of a Raman D band measured through Y2O3 indicated that no detectable defects were introduced into the bilayer graphene by the high-pressure O2 annealing, as shown in Supplementary Fig. S1c.
Estimation of EG by C-V and I-V
We first focus on the capacitance measurement to determine EG through the CQ extraction. Figure 1a shows the total capacitance (CTotal) between the source and top gate electrodes, obtained by sweeping VTG at different VBG, which were measured at the frequency of 1 MHz in a vacuum of ~1 × 10−5 Pa at 20 K. Figure 1b is the counter plot of CTotal. The CTotal reduction at the Dirac point with increasing VBG indicates the decrease in the DOS by the gap formation because of the strong contribution of CQ. The hysteresis in the bidirectional C-V curves is quite small (~0.1 V for a VTG = ±4 V sweep)35. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S2, the frequency dependence of CTotal is clearly observed in the gap region, suggesting the existence of trap sites. The gradual saturation of the capacitance with increasing frequency from 200 kHz to 1 MHz suggests that CTotal measured at 1 MHz is close to the ideal capacitance without any response to the trap site. Therefore, the C-V measurement in Fig. 1a was carried out at 1 MHz.
The slope of the dotted black line at the charge neutrality point of = 0.75, 9 in Fig. 1b corresponds to the capacitive coupling ratio between the top gate and back gate, that is, −0.0412 = −CBG/CTG. Using CBG = 0.038 μFcm−2 for SiO2 with dBG = 90 nm and εBG = 3.9, CTG is estimated to be 0.93 μFcm−2. In the course of this study, the typical CTG value is ~1.2 μFcm−2, depending on the Y2O3 thickness. The CTG value is considerably high compared with those reported previously for both monolayer and bilayer graphene, as shown in Fig. 1c. Based on CTG and CBG, the white dotted lines indicate the constant , whose values are shown at the periphery of the counter plot of Fig. 1b. The maximum at the Dirac point in this study is ~3.1 V/nm, which is quite high compared with other reports.
The simplified equivalent circuit model of the device is shown in Fig. 2a, where Vch and Cpara are the charging voltage and the parasitic capacitance. The Fermi energy (EF) and the band structure of bilayer graphene are independently controlled by changing VTG and VBG. It should be noted that the contribution of CBG is implicitly involved in CTotal through CQ and Vch, in Fig. 2a. Based on the equivalent circuit of Fig. 1a, CQ was extracted along the constant lines, i.e., the constant band structure, by using Cpara as a fitting parameter. Figure 2b shows CQ as a function of EF for different constant values. At = 0 V/nm, the extracted CQ is fitted reasonably well with the theoretical value for bilayer graphene calculated by the tight-binding model37 by selecting Cpara = 0.91 μFcm−2. The charging energy required to induce carriers in bilayer graphene is denoted by EF, which is expressed as EF = eVch. Vch can be expressed by the equation for a series combination of capacitors according to , where and are defined as = CTotal−Cpara and = VTG−VDP, respectively. VDP is the Dirac point voltage. The detailed calculation method is explained in Supplementary Fig. S3. The CQ value at the Dirac point for = 0 V/nm is consistent well with the theoretical value because the DOS for bilayer graphene at the Dirac point is larger than the residual carriers induced externally by the charged impurities at the SiO2 surface38. With increasing , the reduction of CQ is clearly observed because the scattering issue, which strongly contributes to the conductivity in I-V, can be neglected in C-V. It should be emphasized that the DOS within the gap region almost reaches zero, which is not observed in the previous report for bilayer graphene with the h-BN top gate33. Moreover, the van Hove Singularity (vHS) is also observed near the valence band edge, as shown by arrows. The appearance of the vHS is asymmetric, that is, a valence band edge for negative and a conduction band edge for positive (not shown in Fig. 2b), which is consistent with previous data33. This phenomenon is explained by the near-layer capacitance enhancement effect39. Figure 2c shows EG as a function of absolute value for , determined from the C-V data. EG was defined as the energy between inflection points for the conduction and valence sides in Fig. 2b. EG is roughly ~300 mV at = 2.5 V/nm.
We now consider the transport properties for the same device. Figure 3a shows the conductivity (σ) measured as a function of VTG for different VBG at 20 K. The conductivity at the Dirac point decreases with increasing VBG, again indicating the band gap opening. The maximum Ion/Ioff is ~3 × 103 for = ~3.1 V/nm. Figure 3b shows the maximum mobility as a function of for different regions of pnp, ppp and so on, whose positions are shown in Supplementary Fig. S4a. In terms of the determination of carrier mobility using the Drude model (σ = enμ), the carrier density (n) is estimated by the integration of the differential capacitance of , that is, , because of the large contribution of CQ. Otherwise, n is overestimated. However, the carrier density at the access region between the source (drain) and topgate is assumed to be consistent with that at the main channel region just below the topgate electrode for the mobility estimation. Shortening this access region by the self-alignment process40 is important to extract the mobility more precisely and to improve the device performance.
Moreover, the subthreshold swing (S) is plotted as a function of temperature, as shown in Fig. 3c. The S value (~600 mV/dec) extrapolated to room temperature is considerably larger than the theoretical lower limit of 60 meV/dec at room temperature41, suggesting the large contribution of the gap states. Figure 3d compares the present mobility and Ion/Ioff at 20 K with previously reported data. All the data for Ion/Ioff are selected at 20 K from the literature, while the temperature for the mobility is not limited to 20 K. The mobility in the present study is not very high because it includes the contact resistance. In contrast, Ion/Ioff in the present study is quite high in spite of the direct deposition of high-k oxide on bilayer graphene without any organic buffer layer.
To determine EG from the viewpoint of the transport, we study the temperature dependence of σ at different ranging from 0 to 3.1 V/nm. Figure 4a shows the temperature dependence of σ as a function of VTG−VDP at VBG = −60 V. So far, the temperature dependence of the conductivity in bilayer graphene is explained by the sum of three terms, the thermal activation (TA) at the high temperature region, nearest neighbor hopping (NNH) at the intermediate temperature range and variable range hopping (VRH) in a two-dimensional system of localized states at the low temperature region, as follows17,18,
where , and are prefactors and E0, T0 and kB are the activation energy, the hopping energy and the Boltzmann constant. Since the lowest temperature in this study is 20 K, the contribution of VRH may not be observed. The conductivity at the Dirac point is plotted as a function of temperature and fitted by two combinations of TA + NNH and TA + VRH, as shown in Fig. 4b,c, respectively. All the conductivity data are well fitted with respect to T−1 for TA + NNH, while the plot with respect to T−1/3 does not show clear linear behavior below T = 100 K. The present data can be explained by TA + NNH for the temperature range above 20 K. This is consistent with the previous report where VRH was observed at below 5 K13,17,18. Extracted EG and E0 are plotted as a function of in Fig. 2c, respectively, along with the results obtained in infrared absorption studies14. EG determined by I-V is reasonably consistent with the previous infrared absorption data, while EG determined by C-V is slightly larger. This difference is discussed later. Moreover, E0 increases with and reaches 2.8 meV at = 3.1 V/nm, which is high compared with previous reports18.
Estimation of Dit and τ it
To gain insight into the interface properties, the gap states in the electrostatically opened-band gap are quantitatively analyzed using the conductance method. The equivalent circuit of the device is shown in the left of Fig. 5a, where Rit and Cit are the resistance and capacitance associated with the interface traps, their product CitRit is defined as τit and Rs is the series resistance. It should be noted that Rit and Cit have been neglected due to roughly no electrical communication of carriers with trap sites at 1 MHz in Fig. 2a. Here, when this equivalent circuit is converted into Cp, in parallel with Gp, as shown in the right of Fig. 5a, the relation between Gp and Dit can be given as the following42,
where ω = 2πf (f: measured frequency). Finally, Dit and τit can be obtained as and , where f0 is the frequency at . The accurate estimation of Dit is possible because Gp/ω does not include CQ, which is the advantage of the conductance method. However, if there is leakage conductance (Gleak), indicated by the dotted line in the left of Fig. 5a, it is quite difficult to separate the two conductance contributions. The key issue to extract Dit quantitatively is the fabrication of a highly reliable top gate insulator on bilayer graphene without any leakage current. This has been achieved by the high-pressure O2 post-deposition annealing of Y2O3.
Figure 5b shows Gp/ω as a function of f for EF from −74 to −28 meV, where the band structure was fixed as constant at = −1.5 V/nm, i.e., EG = ~150 meV. It should be emphasized that Gp was measured under the constant band structure along the constant line by controlling VTG and VBG at the same time. To prevent the contribution of a minority carrier response to the conductance, especially for small band gap semiconductors, the measurement temperature was lowered as much as possible, i.e., 20 K (kBT = ~1.7 meV). This quite low temperature is only possible in bilayer graphene because the majority carriers do not freeze due to the doping by the external gate control, unlike substitutionally doped semiconductors. The more detailed measurement conditions are described in the method section. Clear peaks were observed in the Gp/ω-f relation, suggesting the detection of a trap-detrapping sequence of carriers with gap states. The τit value is evaluated to be ~4 μs. In Fig. 2a, it is assumed that the contribution of Cit is roughly negligible in CTotal, measured at 1 MHz. According to this τit value, this assumption is roughly, but not completely, reasonable. Therefore, EG estimated by C-V may be slightly overestimated due to the contribution of Cit. Figure 5c shows Dit as a function of EG for different . Dit is in the range from the latter half of 1012 to 1013 eV−1cm−2. The energy dependence of Dit is not so obvious. Although this value is slightly smaller than that for MoS243, it is larger compared with those of Si44. The large amount of gap states at the interface of high-k oxide/bilayer graphene limits Ion/Ioff at present. The much lower Dit could be achieved for dual-gate bilayer graphene heterostructure with h-BN.
In general, the conductance method is applied to the metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) capacitor, where the current is injected from the back side through the semiconductor substrate, whose series resistance, including back side contact, can be removed by measuring the impedance at the high-frequency limit (see Method). The interface trap conductance can be precisely measured. In contrast, in the present FET structure, the carriers are injected from the side of the channel through the source and drain43,45. The channel resistance may contribute to Gp in the equivalent circuit. To avoid this, a device with a relatively short channel was used at the expense of the channel area, which increased Cpara in this study compared with typical value of ~0.2 μFcm−2 35. Supplementary Figure S5b compares τit with the channel time constant (τch = RDPCDP, where RDP and CDP are the measured resistance and capacitance at the Dirac point), suggesting that τit is dominant. Therefore, the present Dit measurement is reliable.
Finally, let us discuss the origin of the gap states. As mentioned before, no detectable defects are observed by the Raman D band. Therefore, the trap sites formed by defects are ignored in this discussion. Two possible origins are discussed here, as shown in Fig. 5d. One is the external origin, that is, the border trap46. The carriers in bilayer graphene electrically communicate with trap sites, such as the oxygen vacancy (dotted box) at the surface of oxides, because π electrons stay on the surface of bilayer graphene. The other is the internal origin. The local breakdown of A-B stacking47,48 results in the stacking of two monolayers49, leading to the different band structure. In this case, EF stays within EG at some momentum space, while the real states exist at another momentum space, which may macroscopically act as gap states. Here, let us consider the dominant origin of the gap states. From the viewpoint of the time constant, the former origin will be a more time-consuming process than the latter because the rate limiting process is the tunneling between bilayer graphene and trap sites at the oxide surface50. On the other hand, if A-B stack breaking is the dominant origin of the gap states, Dit should decrease with increasing , which is consistent with the observation in Fig. 2b. This, however, does not appear to be clear in the conductance measurement in Fig. 5c because other devices show almost no difference in Dit for different . If T0 in VRH is extracted at the low temperature region below 5 K, the dependence of Dit can be discussed more in detail because T0 is inversely proportional to the density of states for the localized states51. Further detailed measurements are required to understand the dependence of Dit. Although it is difficult to determine the dominant origin of the gap states at present, the quantitative recognition of the current status for Dit in this study does provide the realistic comparison with other semiconductor channels in terms of the interface quality.
Conclusions
We have succeeded in extracting critical information on the interface quality, that is, Dit and τit for gap states. At the large displacement field of ~3 V/nm, they are in the range from the latter half of 1012 to 1013 eV−1cm−2 and ~4 μs, respectively. The large amount of gap states at the interface of high-k oxide/bilayer graphene limits the Ion/Ioff ratio at present. Many trials to characterize the interface properties for other 2D layered channels, as well as bilayer graphene, will help in understanding the origin of the gap states. The improvement of gap states below ~1011 eV−1cm−2 is the first step for bilayer graphene devices to be a promising candidate for future nanoelectronic applications.
Methods
The transport measurement of the device was performed using a Keysight B1500A semiconductor analyzer in a Nagase low-temperature prober in a vacuum of ~10−5 Pa. The capacitance measurement and conductance method under the constant conditions were performed by controlling both the Keysight 4980 A LCR meter and the Keithley 2450 source meter for the back gate. The top gate electrode was connected to the high terminal, while the source and drain electrodes was connected to the low terminal. For the conductance measurement, Gp should be measured accurately by reducing the contribution of Rs in the equivalent circuit in the right side of Fig. 5a. Therefore, ozone treatment was performed for 5 min before the metal deposition to remove the resist residue at the source/drain contact52, which reduces the contact resistance. Then, Rs was estimated as follows. For the equivalent circuit in Fig. 5a (right), the impedance (Z) is given by . Therefore, Rs at the accumulation side was estimated to be 29.4 kΩ by taking the high-frequency limit (ω→∞), as shown in Supplementary Fig. S5a. Finally, Gp can be accurately estimated by removing Rs in the equivalent circuit in the right side of Fig. 5a. For the Dit measurement at the valence band side, EF is scanned along negative (−1.5 and −3 V/nm). The access region modulated only by the back gate is always p-type (black line on the dashed-dotted vertical line at VTG = 0 V in Fig. 1b), from which a hole is injected into the main channel under the top gate to ensure majority carrier response and vice versa for the conduction band side at the positive . Therefore, Dit distributed throughout EG can be measured using the single FET device, unlike the MOS capacitor.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Kanayama, K. and Nagashio, K. Gap state analysis in electric-field-induced band gap for bilayer graphene. Sci. Rep. 5, 15789; doi: 10.1038/srep15789 (2015).
References
Ferain, I., Colinge, C. A. & Colinge, J. -P. Multigate transistors as the future of classical metal-oxide-semiconductor filed-effect transistors. Nature 479, 310–316 (2011).
Yan, R. -H. Ourmazd, A. & Lee, K. F. Scaling the Si MOSFET: From bulk to SOI to bulk. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 39, 1704–1710 (1992).
Santos, E. J. G. & Kaxiras, E. Electric-field dependence of the effective dielectric constant in graphene. Nano Lett. 13, 898–902 (2013).
Santos, E. J. G. & Kaxiras, E. Electrically driven tuning of the dielectric constant in MoS2 layers. ACS nano 7, 10741–10746 (2013).
Radisavljevic, B. et al. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nature Nanotech. 6, 147–150 (2011).
Li, S.-L. et al. Thickness-dependent interfacial coulomb scattering in atomically thin field-effect transistors. Nano Lett. 13, 3546–3552 (2013).
Li, L. et al. Black phosphorus filed-effect transistors. Nature Nanotech. 9, 372–377 (2014).
Liu, H. et al. Phosphorene: An unexplored 2D Semiconductor with a high hole mobility. ACS nano 8, 4033–4041 (2014).
Feng, W., Zheng, W., Cao, W. & Hu, P. Back gated multilayer InSe transistors with enhanced carrier mobilities via the suppression of carrier scattering from a dielectric interface. Adv. Mater. 26, 6587–6593 (2014).
Zhu, W., Perebeinos, V., Freitag, M. & Avouris, P. Carrier scattering, mobilities and electrostatic potential in monolayer, bilayer and trilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 80, 235402 (2009).
Low, T. et al. Tunable optical properties of multilayer black phosphorus thin films. Phys. Rev. B 90, 075434 (2014).
Peelaers, H. & Van de Walle, C. G. Effects of strain on band structure and effective masses in MoS2 . Phys. Rev. B 86, 241401(R) (2012).
Oostinga, J. B., Heersche, H. B., Liu, X., Morpurgo, A. F. & Vandersypen, M. K. Gate-induced insulating state in bilayer graphene devices. Nature Mater. 7, 151–157 (2008).
Zhang, Y. et al. Direct observation of a widely tunable bandgap in bilayer graphene. Nature 459, 820–823 (2009).
Miyazaki, H., Tsukagoshi, K., Kanda, A., Otani, M. & Okada, S. Influence of disorder on conductance in bilayer graphene under perpendicular electric field. Nano Lett. 10, 3888–3892 (2010).
Xia, F., Farmer, D. B., Lin, Y. -M. & Avouris, P. Graphene field-effect transistors with high on/off current ratio and large transport band gap at room temperature. Nano Lett. 10, 715–718 (2010).
Taychatanapat, T. & Jarillo-Herrero, P. Electronic transport in dual-gated bilayer graphene at large displacement fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 16601 (2010).
Zou, K. & Zhu, J. Transport in gapped bilayer graphene: The role of potential fluctuations. Phys. Rev. B 82, 081407(R) (2010).
Yan, J. & Fuhrer, M. S. Charge transport in dual gated bilayer graphene with corbino geometry. Nano Lett. 10, 4521–4525 (2010).
Szafranek, B. N., Schall, D., Otto, M., Neumaier, D. & Kurz, H. Electrical observation of a tunable band gap in bilayer graphene nanoribbons at room temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 112103 (2010).
Yu, W. J., Liao, L., Chae, S. H., Lee, Y. H. & Duan, X. Toward tunable band gap and tunable Dirac point in bilayer graphene with molecular doping. Nano Lett. 11, 4759–4763 (2011).
Szafranek, B. N., Schall, D., Neumaier, D. & Kurz, H. High on/off ratios in bilayer graphene field effect transistors realized by surface doping. Nano Lett. 11, 2640–2643 (2011).
Szafranek, B. N., Fiori, G., Schall, D., Neumaier, D. & Kurz, H. Current saturation and voltage gain in bilayer graphene field effect transistors. Nano Lett. 12, 1324–1328 (2012).
Lee, K., Fallahazad, B., Min, H. & Tutuc, E. Transport gap in dual-gated graphene bilayers using oxides as dielectrics. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 60, 103–108 (2013).
Ohta, T., Bostwick, A., Seyller, T., Horn, K. & Rotengerg, E. Controlling the electronic structure of bilayer graphene. Science 313, 951–954 (2006).
Mak, K. F., Lui, C. H., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. Observation of an electric-field-induced band gap in bilayer graphene by infrared spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 256405 (2009).
Kuzmenko, A. B. et al. Infrared spectroscopy of electronic bands in bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 79, 115441 (2009).
Nishi, Y. Study of silicon-silicon dioxide structure by electron spin resonance I. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 10, 52–62 (1971).
Poindexter, E. H., Caplan, P. J., Deal, B. E. & Razouk, R. R. Interface states and electron spin resonance centers in thermally oxidized (111) and (100) silicon wafers. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 879–884 (1981).
Poindexter, E. H. MOS interface states: overview and physicochemical perspective. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 4, 961–969 (1989).
Fang, T., Konar, A., Xing, H. & Jena, D. Carrier statistics and quantum capacitance of graphene sheets and ribbon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 092109 (2007).
Ye, J. et al. Accessing the transport properties of graphene and its multilayers at high carrier density. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13002–13006 (2011).
Young, A. F. et al. Electronic compressibility of layer-polarized bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 85, 235458 (2012).
Henriksen, E. A. & Eisenstein, J. P. Measurement of the electronic compressibility of bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 82, 041412(R) (2010).
Kanayama, K., Nagashio, K., Nishimura, T. & Toriumi, A. Large Fermi energy modulation in graphene transistors with high-pressure O2-annealed Y2O3 topgate insulators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 083519 (2014).
Nagashio, K., Yamashita, T., Nishimura, T., Kita, K. & Toriumi, A. Electrical transport properties of graphene on SiO2 with specific surface structures. J. Appl. Phys. 110, 024513 (2011).
Koshino, M. Electronic transport in bilayer graphene. New J. Phys. 11, 095010 (2009).
Nagashio, K., Nishimura, T. & Toriumi, A. Estimation of residual carrier density near the Dirac point in graphene through quantum capacitance measurement. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 173507 (2013).
Young, A. F. & Levitov, S. Capacitance of graphene bilayer as a probe of layer-specific properties. Phys. Rev. B 84, 085441 (2011).
Farmer, D. B., Lin, Y. -M. & Avouris, P. Graphene field-effect transistors with self-aligned gates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 013103 (2010).
Wouters D. J., Colinge J. -P. & Maes, H. E. Subthreshold slope in thin-film SOI MOSFET’s. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 37, 2022–2033 (1990).
Nicolian, E. H. & Brews, J. R. MOS Physics and Technology. Wiley, New York, 1982.
Zhu, W. et al. Electronic transport and device prospects of monolayer molybdenum disulphide grown by chemical vapor deposition. Nature Communications 5, 3087 (2014).
White, M. H. & Cricchi, J. R. Characterization of Thin-oxide MNOS memory transistors. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 19, 1280–1288 (1972).
Takei, K. et al. High quality interfaces of InAs-on-insulator filed-effect transistors with ZrO2 gate dielectrics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 153513 (2013).
Yuan, Y. et al. A distributed bulk-oxide trap model for Al2O3 InGaAs MOS devices. IEEE Trans. Electron devices 59, 2100–2106 (2012).
Kim, K. S. et al. Coexisting massive and massless Dirac fermions in symmetry-broken bilayer graphene. Nature Mater. 12, 887–892 (2013).
Lin, J. et al. AC/AB stacking boundaries in bilayer graphene. Nano Lett. 13, 3262–3268 (2013).
Koshino, M. Electronic transmission through AB-BA domain boundary in bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 88, 115409 (2013).
Heiman, F. P. & Warfield, G. The effect of oxide traps on the MOS capacitance. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 12, 167–178 (1965).
Mott, N. F. & Davis, E. A. Electronic processes in non-crystalline materials. Clarendon press, Oxford, 1971.
Li, W. et al. Ultraviolet/ozone treatment to reduce metal-graphene contact resistance. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 183110 (2013).
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge Profs. Toriumi, Watanabe, Drs. Kasamatsu, Ando and Minamitani and Mr. Mori for their helpful suggestions. We are grateful to Covalent Materials for kindly providing the Kish graphite. This research was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas and for Challenging Exploratory Research by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.N. conceived the experiment. K.K. and K.N. fabricated the devices, carried out the measurements and performed data analysis. K.N. wrote the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Kanayama, K., Nagashio, K. Gap state analysis in electric-field-induced band gap for bilayer graphene. Sci Rep 5, 15789 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15789
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15789
This article is cited by
-
Difference in gating and doping effects on the band gap in bilayer graphene
Scientific Reports (2017)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.