Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Epidemiology

Does food store access modify associations between intrapersonal factors and fruit and vegetable consumption?

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

Existing theoretical frameworks suggest that healthy eating is facilitated by an individual’s ability, motivation and environmental opportunities. It is plausible, although largely untested, that the importance of factors related to ability and motivation differ under varied environmental conditions. This study aimed to determine whether the magnitude of associations between fruit and vegetable consumption and intrapersonal factors (ability and motivation) were modified by differences in access to stores selling these items (environmental opportunities).

Subjects/Methods: 

Cross-sectional analysis of 4335 women from socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods in the state of Victoria, Australia. Self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption was assessed against a number of ability- and motivation-related factors. To examine whether associations were modified by store access, interactions with access to supermarkets and greengrocers within 2 km of participants’ households were tested.

Results:

Of the two factors related to ability and seven factors related to motivation, almost all were associated with fruit and vegetable consumption. In general, associations were not modified by store access suggesting that these factors were not tempered by environmental opportunities.

Conclusions:

This study provides little support for the hypothesis that the importance of intra-personal factors to fruit and vegetable consumption is modified by food store access. Further research on this topic is required to inform behaviour change interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. King T, Kavanagh AM, Jolley D, Turrell G, Crawford D . Weight and place: a multilevel cross-sectional survey of area-level social disadvantage and overweight/obesity in Australia. Int J Obes (Lond) 2006; 30: 281–287.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Krokstad S, Ernstsen L, Sund ER, Bjorngaard JH, Langhammer A, Midthjell K et al. Social and spatial patterns of obesity diffusion over three decades in a Norwegian county population: the HUNT Study. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McLaren L . Socioeconomic status and obesity. Epidemiol Rev 2007; 29: 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Y, Beydoun MA . The obesity epidemic in the United States–gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and geographic characteristics: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Epidemiol Rev 2007; 29: 6–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization (WHO) Diet, nutrition, and the prevention of chronic diseases. World Health Organisation: Geneva. WHO Technical Report Series 916, 2003.

  6. Giskes K, Turrell G, Patterson C, Newman B . Socio-economic differences in fruit and vegetable consumption among Australian adolescents and adults. Public Heath Nutr 2002; 5: 663–669.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Giskes K, Avendano M, Brug J, Kunst AE . A systematic review of studies on socioeconomic inequalities in dietary intakes associated with weight gain and overweight/obesity conducted among European adults. Obes Rev 2010; 11: 413–429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mishra G, Ball K, Arbuckle J, Crawford D . Dietary patterns of Australian adults and their association with socioeconomic status: results from the 1995 National Nutrition Survey. Eur J Clin Nutr 2002; 56: 687–693.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Steinmetz KA, Potter JD . Vegetables, Fruit, and Cancer Prevention: a Review. J Am Diet Assoc 1996; 96: 1027–1039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tamers SL, Agurs-Collins T, Dodd KW, Nebeling L . US and France adult fruit and vegetable consumption patterns: an international comparison. Eur J Clin Nutr 2009; 63: 11–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Swan G . Findings from the latest National Diet and Nutrition Survey. Proc Nutr Soc 2004; 63: 505–512.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Australian Bureau of Statistics Australian Health survey: First Results, 2011-12 Cat no 4364055001. ABS: Canberra, 2012.

  13. Thornton LE, Crawford DA, Ball K . Neighbourhood socioeconomic variation in women's diet: the role of nutrition environments. Eur J Clin Nutr 2010; 64: 1423–1432.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubowitz T, Heron M, Bird CE, Lurie N, Finch BK, Basurto-Dávila R et al. Neighborhood socioeconomic status and fruit and vegetable intake among whites, blacks, and Mexican Americans in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 87: 1883–1891.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stokols D . Establishing and maintaining healthy environments. Toward a social ecology of health promotion. Am Psychol 1992; 47: 6–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brug J . Determinants of healthy eating: motivation, abilities and environmental opportunities. Fam Pract 2008; 25: i50–i55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ball K, Crawford D, Mishra G . Socio-economic inequalities in women's fruit and vegetable intakes: a multilevel study of individual, social and environmental mediators. Public Heath Nutr 2006; 9: 623–630.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thornton LE, Bentley RJ, Kavanagh AM . Individual and area-level socioeconomic predictors of fast food purchasing. J Epidemiol Community Health 2011; 65: 873–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Caspi CE, Sorensen G, Subramanian SV, Kawachi I . The local food environment and diet: A systematic review. Health Place 2012; 18: 1172–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rothschild ML . Carrots, sticks, and promises: A conceptual framework for the management of public health and social issue behaviors. J Mark 1999; 63: 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kremers SP, de Bruijn GJ, Visscher TL, van Mechelen W, de Vries NK, Brug J . Environmental influences on energy balance-related behaviors: a dual-process view. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2006; 3: 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brug J, Kremers SP, Lenthe F, Ball K, Crawford D . Environmental determinants of healthy eating: in need of theory and evidence. Proc Nutr Soc 2008; 67: 307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ball K, Cleland V, Salmon J, Timperio A, McNaughton SA, Thornton L et al. Cohort Profile: the Resilience for Eating and Activity Despite Inequality (READI) study. Int J Epidemiol 2013; 42: 1629–1639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Australian Bureau of Statistics Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA). (Australian Bureau of Statistics: Canberra): Australian Bureau of Statistics: Canberra, 2003.

  25. Thornton LE, Pearce JR, Kavanagh AM . Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to assess the role of the built environment in influencing obesity: a glossary. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011; 8: 71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Glanz K, Basil M, Maibach E, Goldberg J, Snyder D . Why Americans eat what they do: taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. J Am Diet Assoc 1998; 98: 1118–1126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lunenburg FC . Expectancy theory of motivation: motivating by altering expectations. Int J Manag Bus Adm 2011; 15: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  28. ESRIArcGIS 9.3. Redlands, CA 2008.

  29. Thornton LE, Pearce JR, Macdonald L, Lamb KE, Ellaway A . Does the choice of neighbourhood supermarket access measure influence associations with individual-level fruit and vegetable consumption? A case study from Glasgow. Int J Health Geogr 2012; 11: 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Charreire H, Casey R, Salze P, Simon C, Chaix B, Banos A et al. Measuring the food environment using geographical information systems: a methodological review. Public Health Nutr 2010; 13: 1773–1785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cummins S, Flint E, Matthews SA . New neighborhood grocery store increased awareness of food access but did not alter dietary habits or obesity. Health Aff 2014; 33: 283–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sadler RC, Gilliland JA, Arku G . A food retail-based intervention on food security and consumption. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013; 10: 3325–3346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R . The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 2011; 6: 42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Matthews SA, Moudon AV, Daniel M . Work group II: using geographic information systems for enhancing research relevant to policy on diet, physical activity, and weight. Am J Prev Med 2009; 36: S171–S176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. McKinnon RA, Reedy J, Handy SL, Rodgers AB . Measuring the food and physical activity environments: shaping the research agenda. Am J Prev Med 2009; 36: S81–S85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Story M, Giles-Corti B, Yaroch AL, Cummins S, Frank LD, Huang TT et al. Work group IV: future directions for measures of the food and physical activity environments. Am J Prev Med 2009; 36: S182–S188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pearson AL, Pearce J, Kingham S . Deprived yet healthy: neighbourhood-level resilience in New Zealand. Soc Sci Med 2013; 91: 238–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ball K, Abbott G, Cleland V, Timperio A, Thornton L, Mishra G et al. Resilience to obesity among socioeconomically disadvantaged women: the READI study. Int J Obesity 2012; 36: 855–865.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Thornton LE, Jeffery RW, Crawford DA . Barriers to avoiding fast food consumption in an environment supportive of unhealthy eating. Public Health Nutr 2012; 16: 2105–2113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Boone-Heinonen J, Gordon-Larsen P, Kiefe CI, Shikany JM, Lewis CE, Popkin BM . Fast food restaurants and food stores: longitudinal associations with diet in young to middle-aged adults: the CARDIA study. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 1162–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Thornton LE, Lamb KE, Ball K . Employment status, residential and workplace food environments: associations with women's eating behaviours. Health Place 2013; 24: 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The READI study was funded by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Strategic Award, ID 374241. KEL is supported by a Deakin University Alfred Deakin Postdoctoral Research Fellowship. KB is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Principal Research Fellowship, ID 1042442. We are grateful to the READI research staff who assisted with the management of the survey data and the GIS measures used in this study.

Disclosure

The funding agencies had no role in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing the report and the decision to submit the report for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L E Thornton.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on European Journal of Clinical Nutrition website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thornton, L., Lamb, K., Tseng, M. et al. Does food store access modify associations between intrapersonal factors and fruit and vegetable consumption?. Eur J Clin Nutr 69, 902–906 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.287

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.287

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links