Abstract
Although the effect of population differentiation on the forensic use of DNA profiles has been the subject of controversy for some years now, the debate has largely failed to focus on the genetical questions directly relevant to the forensic context. We re-analyse two published data sets and find that they convey much the same message for forensic inference, in contrast with the dramatically differing conclusions of the original authors. The analysis is likelihood-based and combines information across loci and across populations without assuming constant genetic differentiation. Our results suggest that the relevant genetic correlation coefficients are too large to be ignored in forensic work: although DNA profile evidence is typically very strong, the effect of genetic correlations can be important in some cases. Such correlations can, however, be accommodated in an appropriate assessment of evidential strength so that population genetic issues should not present a barrier to the efficient and fair use of DNA profile evidence.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Balding, D J, and Donnelly, P. 1995a. Inference in forensic identification. J R Statist Soc A, 158, 21–53.
Balding, D J, and Donnelly, P. 1995b. Inferring identity from DNA profile evidence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 92, 11741–11743.
Balding, D J, and Nichols, R A. 1994. DNA profile match probability calculation, how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. Forensic Sci Int, 64, 125–140.
Balding, D J, and Nichols, R A. 1995. A method for quantifying differentiation between populations at multi-allelic loci and its implications for investigating identity and paternity. Genetica, 96, 3–12.
Balding, D J, Greenhalgh, M, and Nichols, R A. 1996. Population genetics of STR loci in Caucasians. Int J Leg Med, 108, 300–305.
Barbujani, G, Nasidze, I S, and Whitehead, G N. 1994. Genetic diversity in the Caucasus. Hum Biol, 66, 639–668.
Brookfield, J F Y. 1995. The effect of relatedness on likelihood ratios and the use of conservative estimates. Genetica, 96, 13–19.
Budowle, A, and Monson, K L. 1994. Greater differences in forensic DNA profile frequencies estimated from racial groups than from ethnic subgroups. Clin Chim Acta, 228, 3–18.
Budowle, B, Monson, K L, and Giusti, A M. 1994. A reassessment of frequency estimates of PVUII-generated VNTR profiles in a Finnish, an Italian, and a general US Caucasian database — no evidence of ethnic subgroups affecting forensic estimates. Am J Hum Genet, 55, 533–539.
Buffery, C, Burridge, F, Greenhalgh, M, Jones, S, and Willot, G. 1991. Allele frequency distributions of four variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) loci in the London area. Forensic Sci Int, 52, 53–64.
Cavalli-Sforza, L L, Menozzi, P, and Piazza, A. 1994. The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Evett, I W. 1992. Evaluating DNA profiles in the case where the defence is ‘it was my brother’. J Forens Sci Soc, 32, 5–14.
Krane, D E, Allen, R W, Sawyer, S A, Petrov, D A, and Hartl, D L. 1992. Genetic differences at four DNA typing loci in Finnish, Italian, and mixed Caucasian populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 89, 10583–10587.
Metropolis, N, Rosenbluth, A W, Rosenbluth, M N, Teller, A H, and Teller, E. 1953. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. Chem Phys, 21, 1087–1092.
Morton, N E. 1992. The genetic structure of forensic populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 89, 2556–2560.
National Research Council, 1996. The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington DC.
Nichols, R A, and Balding, D J. 1991. Effects of population structure on DNA fingerprint analysis in forensic science. Heredity, 66, 297–302.
Rannala, B, and Hartigan, J A. 1996. Estimating gene flow in island populations. Genet Res, 67, 147–158.
Sawyer, S A, Podleski, A, Krane, D E, and Hartl, D L. 1996. DNA fingerprinting loci do show population differences. Am J Hum Genet, 59, 272–274.
Slatkin, M, and Barton, N H. 1989. A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow. Evolution, 43, 1349–1368.
Smith, A F M, and Roberts, G O. 1993. Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. J R Statist Soc B, 55, 3–24.
Takahata, N. 1983. Gene identity and genetic differentiation of popluations in the finite island model. Genetics, 104, 497–512.
Thompson, W C. 1995. Subjective interpretation, laboratory error and the value of forensic DNA evidence: three case-studies. Genetica, 96, 153–168.
Weir, A S. 1994. The effect of inbreeding on forensic calculations. Ann Rev Genet, 28, 597–621.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balding, D., Nichols, R. Significant genetic correlations among Caucasians at forensic DNA loci. Heredity 78, 583–589 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1997.97
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1997.97
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Statistical considerations in forensic science: a review
Journal of the Korean Statistical Society (2021)
-
Bayesian spatial modeling of genetic population structure
Computational Statistics (2008)
-
Recent developments in genetic data analysis: what can they tell us about human demographic history?
Heredity (2004)