Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Reply to 'Critics slam Russian trial to test pig pancreas for diabetes'

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Grose, S. Nat. Med. 13, 390–391 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Patience, C., Takeuchi, Y. & Weiss, R.A. Nat. Med. 3, 282–286 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: source animal, product, preclinical, and clinical issues concerning the use of xenotransplantation products in humans (US Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC, 2003).

  4. Committee of Ministers, Council of Europe. Recommendation Rec(2003)10 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on xenotransplantation and explanatory memorandum. <http://www.coe.int/T/E/Social_Cohesion/Health/Recommendations/Rec(2003)10.asp> (2003).

  5. Paradis, K. et al. Science 285, 1236–1241 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Switzer, W.M. et al. Transplantation 71, 959–965 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, Y.G. et al. J. Clin. Invest. 114, 695–700 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Martina, Y. et al. Am. J. Transplant. 5, 1837–1847 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Oldmixon, B.A. et al. J. Virol. 76, 3045–3048 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sykes, M., D'Apice, A. & Sandrin, M. Xenotransplantation 10, 194–203 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sykes, M., Pierson, R., O'Connell, P. et al. Reply to 'Critics slam Russian trial to test pig pancreas for diabetes'. Nat Med 13, 662–663 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0607-662

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0607-662

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing