Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Prostate cancer

New types of radiotherapy improve cancer outcome but at what cost?

New and very expensive forms of radiotherapy, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy, have taken over the localized prostate cancer market. But is there enough evidence to justify their increased utilization and if so, how can we possibly afford them?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Sox, H. & Greenfield, S. Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies [online], (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sheets, N. C. et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, proton therapy, or conformal radiation therapy and morbidity and disease control in localized prostate cancer. JAMA 307, 1611–1620 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Pollack, A. et al. Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 53, 1097–1105 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dearnaley, D. P. et al. Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 8, 475–487 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zietman, A. L. et al. Randomized trial comparing conventional-dose with high-dose conformal radiation therapy in early-stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: long-term results from proton radiation oncology group/american college of radiology 95–09. J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 1106–1111 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Trinh, Q. D. et al. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur. Urol. 61, 679–685 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen, P. L. et al. Cost implications of the rapid adoption of newer technologies for treating prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 1517–1524 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zietman, A. L. The Titanic and the Iceberg: prostate proton therapy and health care economics. J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 3565–3566 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goitein, M. & Cox, J. D. Should randomized clinical trials be required for proton radiotherapy? J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 175–176 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carreyrou, J. & Tamman, M. A device to kill cancer, lift revenue. Wall Street Journal [online], (2010).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Declan G. Murphy.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, D., Williams, S. & Cooperberg, M. New types of radiotherapy improve cancer outcome but at what cost?. Nat Rev Urol 9, 415–417 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2012.137

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2012.137

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing