Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Behavior, Psychology and Sociology

International comparisons of weight stigma: addressing a void in the field

International Journal of Obesity volume 45, pages 1976–1985 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Background/Objectives

Despite substantial evidence documenting weight stigma toward people with higher body weight, international comparative studies are lacking in this field. The few studies that have compared weight stigma across different countries focus on explicit weight-biased attitudes rather than people’s experiences of weight stigma. The present study conducted a multinational systematic comparison of weight stigma in six countries to assess experiences and interpersonal sources of weight stigma.

Subjects/Methods

Adults (N = 13,996) enrolled in WW International (formerly Weight Watchers), residing in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the UK, and the US completed identical online anonymous surveys in the dominant language for their country. Surveys assessed their history of experiencing weight stigma, the onset of stigmatizing experiences and associated distress from stigma in different time periods, and interpersonal sources of weight stigma.

Results

More than half of participants (55.6–61.3%) across countries reported experiencing weight stigma. Participants with higher BMI were significantly more likely to report weight-stigmatizing experiences than individuals with lower BMI. In all countries, weight stigma experiences were most frequent in childhood and adolescence, with associated distress highest during these time periods. Participants in Germany reported a higher frequency of weight stigma across their whole life, but lower distress associated with stigmatizing experiences, compared to participants in the other five countries. High percentages of participants in each country experienced weight stigma from family members (76.0–87.8%), classmates (72.0–80.9%), doctors (62.6–73.5%), co-workers (54.1–61.7%), and friends (48.8–66.2%).

Conclusions

Weight stigma is prevalent for adults actively engaged in weight management across different Western countries. There were more similarities than differences in the nature, frequency, and interpersonal sources of people’s experiences of weight stigma across the six countries in this study. Findings underscore the need for multinational initiatives to address weight stigma and interventions to support individuals engaged in weight management who experience weight mistreatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Unadjusted frequency of weight-stigmatizing experiences as a function of life stage and country.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It was not permissible by law to collect race/ethnicity or sexual orientation data in France and Germany.

  2. For reference, approximate prevalence rates of adult obesity in the participating countries are as follows: Australia: 30%, Canada: 31%, France: 23%, Germany: 26%, UK: 30%, US: 37% [31].

  3. These findings replicated when modeling weight stigma as a count variable (i.e., sum of the prevalence of ever having been teased, treated unfairly, or discriminated against because of one’s weight).

References

  1. Pearl RL. Weight bias and stigma: Public health implications and structural solutions. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2018;12:146–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Puhl RM, Heuer CA. The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity. 2009;17:941–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spahlholz J, Baer N, Konig HH, Riedel-Heller SG, Luck-Sikorski C. Obesity and discrimination—a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Obes Rev. 2016;17:43–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu Y, Berry DC. Impact of weight stigma on physiological and psychological health outcomes for overweight and obese adults: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2017;74:1030–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alimoradi Z, Golboni F, Griffiths MD, Brostrom A, Lin C-Y, Pakpour AH. Weight-related stigma and psychological distress: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2020;39:2001–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brewis A, SturtzSreetharan C, Wutich A. Obesity stigma is a globalizing health challenge. Glob Health. 2018;14:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0337-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hackman J, Maupin J, Brewis A. Weight-related stigma is a significant psychosocial stressor in developing countries: evidence from Guatemala. Soc Sci Med. 2016;161:55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marini M, Sriram N, Schnabel K, Maliszewski N, Devos T, Ekehammar B, Alia I, Schnall S. Overweight people have low levels of implicit weight bias, but overweight nations have high levels of implicit weight bias. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e83543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brewis AA, Wutich A, Falletta-Cowden A, Rodriguez-Soto I. Body norms and fat stigma in a global perspective. Curr Anthropol. 2011;52:269–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brewis AA, Wutich A. A world of suffering? Biocultural approaches to fat stigma in the global contexts of the obesity epidemic. Ann Anthropol Pract. 2015;38:269–83.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Puhl RM, Latner JL, O’Brien K, Luedicke JL, Danielstottir S, Forhan M. A multi-national examination of weight bias: predictors of anti-fat attitudes across four countries. Int J Obes. 2015;39:1166–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Crandall CS, D’Anello S, Sakalli N, Lazarus E, Nejtardt GW, Feather NT. An attribution-value model of prejudice: anti-fat attitudes in six nations. Pers Soc Psychol Bul. 2001;27:30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Crandall CS, Martinez R. Culture, ideology, and anti-fat attitudes. Pers Soc Psychol Bul. 1996;22:1165–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim TJ, Makowski AC, von dem Knesebeck O. Obesity stigma in Germany and the United States—Results of population surveys. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0221214. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221214.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rubino F, Puhl RM, Cummings DE, Eckel RH, Ryan DH, Mechanick JI, et al. Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity. Nat Med. 2020;26:485–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jung F, Spahlholz J, Hilbert A, Ridele-Heller SG, Luck-Sikorski C. Impact of weight-related discrimination, body dissatisfaction, and self-stigma on the desire to weigh less. Obes Facts. 2017;10:139–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma S, Wharton S, Forhan M, Kuk J. Influence of weight discrimination on weight loss goals and self-selected weight loss interventions. Clin Obes. 2011;1:153–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Puhl R, Quinn D, Weisz B, Suh Y. The role of stigma in weight loss maintenance among U.S. adults. Ann Behav Med. 2017;5:754–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gudzune KA, Doshi RS, Mehta AK, et al. Efficacy of commercial weight-loss programs: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:501–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahern A, Wheeler GM, Aveyard P, Boyland EJ, Halfrod JCG, Mander AP. Extended and standard duration weight-loss programme referrals for adults in primary care (WRAP): A randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2017;389:P2214–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wojtanowski AC, Foster GD. Scaling science-based approaches beyond the clinic. In: JM Morton, SA Brethauer, EJ DeMaria, S Kahan, MM Hutter, editors. Quality in obesity treatment. Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2019. p117–128.

  22. Language Scientific. https://www.languagescientific.com/. Accessed 6 Sep 2020.

  23. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/a-healthy-lifestyle/body-mass-index-bmi. Accessed 20 June 2020.

  24. Pearl RL, Himmelstein MS, Puhl RM, Wadden TA, Wojtanowski AC, Foster GD. Weight bias internalization in a commercial weight management sample: Prevalence and correlates. Obes Sci Pract. 2019;5:342–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Puhl RM, Heuer C, Sarda V. Framing messages about weight discrimination: impact on public support for legislation. Int J Obes. 2011;35:863–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pearl RL, Wadden TA, Tronieri JS, Chao AM, Alamuddin N, Bakizada AM, et al. Sociocultural and familial factors associated with weight bias internalization. Obes Facts. 2018;11:157–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Puhl RM, Brownell KD. Confronting and coping with weight stigma: an investigation of overweight and obese adults. Obesity. 2006;14:1802–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Benjamin DJ, Berger JO, Johannesson M, Nosek BA, Wagenmakers E-J, Berk R, et al. Redefine statistical significance. Nat Hum Behav. 2018;2:6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Newman ML, Groom CJ, Handelman LD, Pennebaker JW. Gender differences in language use: an analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Process. 2008;45:211–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Education at a Glance 2020: OECD Indicators. 2020. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en.

  31. World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases country profiles 2018. https://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-profiles-2018/en/. Accessed Sep 2020.

  32. Udo T, Purcell K, Grilo CM. Perceived weight discrimination and chronic medical conditions in adults with overweight and obesity. Int J Clin Pract. 2016;70:1003–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Godley J. Everyday discrimination in Canada: prevalence and patterns. Can J Sociol. 2018;43:111–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sikorski C, Spahlholz J, Hartlev M, Riedel-Heller SG. Weight-based discrimination: an ubiquitary phenomenon? Int J Obes. 2016;40:333–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Daly M, Sutin AR, Robinson E. Perceived weight discrimination mediates the prospective association between obesity and physiological dysregulation: Evidence from a population-based cohort. Psychol Sci. 2019;30:1030–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dutton GR, Lewis TT, Durant N, Halanych J, Keife CI, Sidney S, et al. Perceived weight discrimination in the CARDIA study: differences by race, sex, and weight status. Obesity. 2014;22:530–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pearl RL, Wadden TA, Tronieri JS, Chao AM, Alamuddin N, Berkowitz RO. Everyday discrimination in a racially diverse sample of patients with obesity. Clin Obes. 2018;8:140–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Puhl RM, Himmelstein MS, Gorin AA, Suh YJ. Missing the target: including perspectives of women with overweight and obesity to inform stigma-reduction strategies. Obes Sci Pract. 2017;3:25–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Himmelstein MS, Puhl RM, Quinn DM. Intersectionality: an understudied framework for addressing weight stigma. Am J Prev Med. 2017;53:421–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Puhl RM, Himmelstein MS, Quinn DM. Internalizing weight stigma: prevalence and sociodemographic considerations in US adults. Obesity. 2018;26:167–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Puhl RM, Wall MM, Chen C, Austin BS, Eisenberg ME, Neumark-Sztainer D. Experiences of weight teasing in adolescence and weight-related outcomes in adulthood: a 15-year longitudinal study. Prev Med. 2017;100:173–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Manago B, Pescosolido BA, Olafsdottir S. Icelandic inclusion, German hesitation and American fear: a cross-cultural comparison of mental-health stigma and the media. Scand J Public Health. 2019;47:90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hilbert A, Braehler E, Haeuser W, Zenger M. Weight bias internalization, core self-evaluation, and health in overweight and obese persons. Obesity. 2014;22:79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pearl RL, Puhl RM. Weight bias internalization and health: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2018;19:1141–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Olson KL, Lillis J, Thomas JG, Wing RR. Prospective evaluation of internalized weight bias and weight change among successful weight-loss maintainers. Obesity. 2018;26:1888–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pearl RL, Puhl RM, Himmelstein MS, Pinto AM, Foster GD. Weight stigma and weight-related health: Associations of self-report measures among adults in weight management. Ann Beh Med. 2020;54:904–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaaa026.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank WW members who participated in this study and shared their experiences of weight stigma.

Funding

This study was funded by a grant from WW (formerly Weight Watchers) to the University of Connecticut on behalf of RMP. RLP is supported in part by a Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Development Award from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute/NIH (#K23HL140176).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Development & Family Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA

    Rebecca M. Puhl

  2. Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, USA

    Rebecca M. Puhl & Leah M. Lessard

  3. Center for Weight and Eating Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Rebecca L. Pearl & Gary D. Foster

  4. Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Rebecca L. Pearl

  5. Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA

    Mary S. Himmelstein

  6. WW International, Inc., New York, NY, USA

    Gary D. Foster

Authors
  1. Rebecca M. Puhl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leah M. Lessard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rebecca L. Pearl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mary S. Himmelstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gary D. Foster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca M. Puhl.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

GDF is an employee and shareholder of WW.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Puhl, R.M., Lessard, L.M., Pearl, R.L. et al. International comparisons of weight stigma: addressing a void in the field. Int J Obes 45, 1976–1985 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00860-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00860-z

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links