Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Socio-economic inequalities in hypertension burden and cascade of services: nationwide cross-sectional study in Nepal

Abstract

With an aim to examine the socio-economic inequalities in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, this study analyzed 14,823 adults, 15 years or older with blood pressure measured, in the 2016 Nepal Demographic Health Survey. Multi-variable logistic regression and Lorenz curves were used to explore the inequalities. The prevalence of hypertension was 19.5% (95% CI: 18.3–20.7). Further, of the total hypertensive, the prevalence of hypertension awareness, treatment and control was 40.0% (95% CI: 37.5–42.6), 20.2% (95% CI: 18.0–22.2) and 10.5% (95% CI: 8.8–12.2), respectively. Participants with secondary (OR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.20–1.76) and higher education (OR:1.42, 95% CI: 1.10–1.83), compared to those with no education/preschool, and those in urban residency (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.09–1.50) compared to rural areas, and in province-4 (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.14–1.96) and province-5 (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.04–1.72), compared to province-1, had higher odds of being hypertensive. Household wealth status showed a positive association with prevalence, awareness, and treatment of hypertension (p-trend < 0.001). Those from richest category were 1.7 times more likely to be hypertensive, were more aware of hypertension (3.2 times), received treatment (5.1 times), and had controlled hypertension (1.6 times), compared to the poorest category. Adjusting for body mass index, completely ameliorate the effect on hypertension prevalence (p-trend = 0.57) and altered nominally awareness (p-trend < 0.0001), treatment (p-trend < 0.0001), and control (p-trend = 0.099). Urban hypertensive females, at the lowest wealth quintile, received poor care services; only 12% were aware of their hypertension status, 7% received treatment, and only 4% had controlled hypertension. These socio-economic inequalities warrant interventions aiming at preventing hypertension and increasing coverage of services for those higher at risk. Future studies need to explore socio-economic and geographic disparities in disease burden and cascade of services.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. WHO. Causes of death 2008: data sources and methods. Geneva: Department of Health Statistics and Informatics, World Health Organization; 2011. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/cod_2008_sources_methods.pdf.

  3. Vaidya A, Pathak RP, Pandey MR. Prevalence of hypertension in Nepalese community triples in 25 years: a repeat cross-sectional study in rural Kathmandu. Indian Heart J. 2012;64:128–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vaidya A, Pokharel PK, Nagesh S, Karki P, Kumar S, Majhi S. War veterans of Nepal and their blood pressure status: a population-based comparative study. J Hum Hypertens. 2007;21:900–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pandey M, Dhungel S. Prevalence of hypertension in an urban community of Nepal. JNMA. 1983;21:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chataut J, Adhikari RK, Sinha NP. The prevalence of and risk factors for hypertension in adults living in central development region of Nepal. Kathmandu. Univ Med J. 2011;9:13–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. WHO. Nepal STEPS noncommunicable disease risk factors survey 2005. Geneva: World Health Organization; Society for Local Integrated Development Nepal; Central Bureau of Statistics, Nepal; Government of Nepal; 2005.

  8. Aryal KK, Neupane S, Mehata S, Vaidya A, Singh S, Paulin F, et al. Non communicable diseases risk factors: STEPS Survey Nepal 2013. Kathmandu: Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC); 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TA, Taylor S. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2008;372:1661–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hosseinpoor AR, Bergen N, Mendis S, Harper S, Verdes E, Kunst A, et al. Socioeconomic inequality in the prevalence of noncommunicable diseases in low-and middle-income countries: results from the World Health Survey. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moser KA, Agrawal S, Smith GD, Ebrahim S. Socio-demographic inequalities in the prevalence, diagnosis and management of hypertension in India: analysis of nationally-representative survey data. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e86043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Busingye D, Arabshahi S, Subasinghe AK, Evans RG, Riddell MA, Thrift AG. Do the socioeconomic and hypertension gradients in rural populations of low-and middle-income countries differ by geographical region? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43:1563–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Subramanian S, Corsi DJ, Subramanyam MA, Davey Smith G. Jumping the gun: the problematic discourse on socioeconomic status and cardiovascular health in India. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:1410–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Grotto I, Huerta M, Sharabi Y. Hypertension and socioeconomic status. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2008;23:335–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoang VM, Byass P, Dao LH, Nguyen TK, Wall S. Risk factors for chronic disease among rural Vietnamese adults and the association of these factors with sociodemographic variables: findings from the WHO STEPS survey in rural Vietnam, 2005. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007;4:A22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grotto I, Huerta M, Grossman E, Sharabi Y. Relative impact of socioeconomic status on blood pressure lessons from a large-scale survey of young adults. Am J Hypertens. 2007;20:1140–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Le C, Chongsuvivatwong V, Geater A. Contextual socioeconomic determinants of cardiovascular risk factors in rural south-west China: a multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gregory CO, Dai J, Ramirez-Zea M, Stein AD. Occupation is more important than rural or urban residence in explaining the prevalence of metabolic and cardiovascular disease risk in Guatemalan adults. J Nutr. 2007;137:1314–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. CBS. National Population and Housing Census 2011 (National Report). Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commission Secretariat, Government of Nepal; Kathmandu 2012.

  20. Mehata S, Shrestha N, Mehta R, Vaidya A, Rawal LB, Bhattarai N, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Nepal: data from nationally representative population-based cross-sectional study. J Hypertens. 2018;36:000-.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ministry of Health and Population Nepal, New ERA. Nepal demographic and health survey, 2016. Kathmandu: Population Division, Ministry of Health and Population; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363:157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jeon Y-J, Kim CR, Park J-S, Choi K-H, Kang MJ, Park SG, et al. Health inequalities in hypertension and diabetes management among the poor in urban areas: a population survey analysis in south Korea. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Christiani Y, Byles J, Tavener M, Dugdale P. Assessing socioeconomic inequalities of hypertension among women in Indonesia’s major cities. J Hum Hypertens. 2015;29:683.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Biswas T, Islam MS, Linton N, Rawal LB. Socio-economic inequality of chronic non-communicable diseases in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0167140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kennedy BP, Kawachi I, Prothrow-Stith D. Income distribution and mortality: cross sectional ecological study of the Robin Hood index in the United States. BMJ. 1996;312:1004–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jadoo M. Geospatial analysis with PROC GMAP. North Carolina, USA. https://www.analyticsncsuedu/sesug/2016/RV-278_Final_PDFpdf.

  29. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Himmelfarb CD, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:e127–e248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Prince MJ, Ebrahim S, Acosta D, Ferri CP, Guerra M, Huang Y, et al. Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control among older people in Latin America, India and China: a 10/66 cross-sectional population-based survey. J Hypertens. 2012;30:177–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ogunsina K, Dibaba DT, Akinyemiju T. Association between life-course socio-economic status and prevalence of cardio-metabolic risk ractors in five middle-income countries. J Glob Health. 2018;8:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bishwajit G. Nutrition transition in South Asia: the emergence of non-communicable chronic diseases. F1000Research. 2015;4:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tripathy JP, Thakur JS, Jeet G, Chawla S, Jain S. Alarmingly high prevalence of hypertension and pre-hypertension in North India-results from a large cross-sectional STEPS survey. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0188619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mishra SR, Neupane D, Bhandari PM, Khanal V, Kallestrup P. Burgeoning burden of non-communicable diseases in Nepal: a scoping review. Glob Health. 2015;11:32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Asian Development Bank. Poverty in Nepal: ADB. Mandaluyong, Philippines. https://www.adb.org/countries/nepal/poverty.

  36. Allen L, Williams J, Townsend N, Mikkelsen B, Roberts N, Foster C, et al. Socioeconomic status and non-communicable disease behavioural risk factors in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5:e277–e89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Razak F, Subramanian S. Commentary: Socioeconomic status and hypertension in low-and middle-income countries: can we learn anything from existing studies? Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43:1577–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xiaohui H. Urban-rural disparity of overweight, hypertension, undiagnosed hypertension, and untreated hypertension in China. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2008;20:159–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhai S, McGarvey ST. Temporal changes and rural-urban differences in cardiovascular disease risk factors and mortality in China. Hum Biol. 1992;64:807–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Acharya M, Acharya B, Sharma S. Women in Nepal: country briefing paper. Manila: Asian Development Bank; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ghimire S, Shrestha N, Callahan K. Barriers to dietary salt reduction among hypertensive patients. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2018;16:124–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Neupane D, Shrestha A, Mishra SR, Bloch J, Christensen B, McLachlan CS, et al. Awareness, prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension in western Nepal. Am J Hypertens. 2017;30:907–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Karmacharya BM, Koju RP, LoGerfo JP, Chan KCG, Mokdad AH, Shrestha A, et al. Awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Nepal: findings from the Dhulikhel Heart Study. Heart Asia. 2017;9:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kathmandu Post. 744 new local units come into effect Kathmandu: Kathmandu Post; 2018. http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com/news/2017-03-15/744-new-local-units-come-into-effect.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiva Raj Mishra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, S.R., Ghimire, S., Shrestha, N. et al. Socio-economic inequalities in hypertension burden and cascade of services: nationwide cross-sectional study in Nepal. J Hum Hypertens 33, 613–625 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-019-0165-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-019-0165-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links