Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Conditional GWAS analysis to identify disorder-specific SNPs for psychiatric disorders

Molecular Psychiatry volume 26, pages 2070–2081 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Substantial genetic liability is shared across psychiatric disorders but less is known about risk variants that are specific to a given disorder. We used multi-trait conditional and joint analysis (mtCOJO) to adjust GWAS summary statistics of one disorder for the effects of genetically correlated traits to identify putative disorder-specific SNP associations. We applied mtCOJO to summary statistics for five psychiatric disorders from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium—schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BIP), major depression (MD), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism (AUT). Most genome-wide significant variants for these disorders had evidence of pleiotropy (i.e., impact on multiple psychiatric disorders) and hence have reduced mtCOJO conditional effect sizes. However, subsets of genome-wide significant variants had larger conditional effect sizes consistent with disorder-specific effects: 15 of 130 genome-wide significant variants for schizophrenia, 5 of 40 for major depression, 3 of 11 for ADHD and 1 of 2 for autism. We show that decreased expression of VPS29 in the brain may increase risk to SCZ only and increased expression of CSE1L is associated with SCZ and MD, but not with BIP. Likewise, decreased expression of PCDHA7 in the brain is linked to increased risk of MD but decreased risk of SCZ and BIP.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Forest plots for the four most significant SNPs in SCZ mtCOJO analysis with larger conditional effect sizes.
Fig. 2: Results from MAGMA brain cell-type enrichment analyses of raw and conditional GWAS analyses.

Similar content being viewed by others

Code availability

Scripts used to generate the results are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Lee SH, Ripke S, Neale BM, Faraone SV, Purcell SM, et al. Genetic relationship between five psychiatric disorders estimated from genome-wide SNPs. Nat Genet. 2013;45:984–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-017-0009-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bulik-Sullivan B, Finucane HK, Anttila V, Gusev A, Day FR, Loh PR, et al. An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits. Nat Genet. 2015;47:1236–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grove J, Ripke S, Als TD, Mattheisen M, Walters R, Won H, et al. Common risk variants identified in autism spectrum disorder. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1101/224774.

  4. Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Identification of risk loci with shared effects on five major psychiatric disorders: a genome-wide analysis. Lancet. 2013;381:1371–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Turley P, Walters RK, Maghzian O, Okbay A, Lee JJ, Fontana MA, et al. Multi-trait analysis of genome-wide association summary statistics using MTAG. Nat Genet. 2018;50:229–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maier R, Moser G, Chen GB, Ripke S, Cross-Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Coryell W, et al. Joint analysis of psychiatric disorders increases accuracy of risk prediction for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;96:283–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott J, Leboyer M, Hickie I, Berk M, Kapczinski F, Frank E, et al. Clinical staging in psychiatry: a cross-cutting model of diagnosis with heuristic and practical value. Br J Psychiatry J Ment Sci. 2013;202:243–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wray NR, Ripke S, Mattheisen M, Trzaskowski M, Byrne EM, Abdellaoui A, et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify 44 risk variants and refine the genetic architecture of major depression. Nat Genet. 2018;50:668–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nieuwboer HA, Pool R, Dolan CV, Boomsma DI, Nivard MG. GWIS: genome-wide inferred statistics for functions of multiple phenotypes. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99:917–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu Z, Zheng Z, Zhang F, Wu Y, Trzaskowski M, Maier R, et al. Causal associations between risk factors and common diseases inferred from GWAS summary data. Nat Commun. 2018;9:224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. The ARIC investigators. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129:687–702.

  12. Zhu Z, Zhang F, Hu H, Bakshi A, Robinson MR, Powell JE, et al. Integration of summary data from GWAS and eQTL studies predicts complex trait gene targets. Nat Genet. 2016;48:481–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88:76–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Watanabe K, Taskesen E, van Bochoven A, Posthuma D. Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Leeuw CA, Mooij JM, Heskes T, Posthuma D. MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11:e1004219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng J, Erzurumluoglu AM, Elsworth BL, Kemp JP, Howe L, Haycock PC, et al. LD Hub: a centralized database and web interface to perform LD score regression that maximizes the potential of summary level GWAS data for SNP heritability and genetic correlation analysis. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:272–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Qi T, Wu Y, Zeng J, Zhang F, Xue A, Jiang L, et al. Identifying gene targets for brain-related traits using transcriptomic and methylomic data from blood. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hannon E, Dempster E, Viana J, Burrage J, Smith AR, Macdonald R, et al. An integrated genetic-epigenetic analysis of schizophrenia: evidence for co-localization of genetic associations and differential DNA methylation. Genome Biol. 2016;17:176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Skene NG, Bryois J, Bakken TE, Breen G, Crowley JJ, Gaspar HA, et al. Genetic identification of brain cell types underlying schizophrenia. Nat Genet. 2018;50:825–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin LF, Doherty DH, Lile JD, Bektesh S, Collins F. GDNF: a glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor for midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Science. 1993;260:1130–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stromberg I, Bjorklund L, Johansson M, Tomac A, Collins F, Olson L, et al. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor is expressed in the developing but not adult striatum and stimulates developing dopamine neurons in vivo. Exp Neurol. 1993;124:401–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang S, Bellen HJ. The retromer complex in development and disease. Development. 2015;142:2392–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yagi T, Takeichi M. Cadherin superfamily genes: functions, genomic organization, and neurologic diversity. Genes Dev. 2000;14:1169–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vagnozzi AN, Pratico D. Endosomal sorting and trafficking, the retromer complex and neurodegeneration. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24:857–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bhalla A, Vetanovetz CP, Morel E, Chamoun Z, Di Paolo G, Small SA. The location and trafficking routes of the neuronal retromer and its role in amyloid precursor protein transport. Neurobiol Dis. 2012;47:126–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang H, Huang T, Hong Y, Yang W, Zhang X, Luo H, et al. The retromer complex and sorting nexins in neurodegenerative diseases. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mecozzi VJ, Berman DE, Simoes S, Vetanovetz C, Awal MR, Patel VM, et al. Pharmacological chaperones stabilize retromer to limit APP processing. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10:443–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pedrosa E, Stefanescu R, Margolis B, Petruolo O, Lo Y, Nolan K, et al. Analysis of protocadherin alpha gene enhancer polymorphism in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Res. 2008;102:210–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cordova-Palomera A, Fatjo-Vilas M, Gasto C, Navarro V, Krebs MO, Fananas L. Genome-wide methylation study on depression: differential methylation and variable methylation in monozygotic twins. Transl Psychiatry. 2015;5:e557.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Genomic dissection of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, including 28 subphenotypes. Cell. 2018;173:1705–15.e16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pardiñas AF, Holmans P, Pocklington AJ, Escott-Price V, Ripke S, Carrera N, et al. Common schizophrenia alleles are enriched in mutation-intolerant genes and in regions under strong background selection. Nat Genet. 2018; 50:381–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Stahl EA, Breen G, Forstner AJ, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies 30 loci associated with bipolar disorder. Nat Genet. 2019;51:793–803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Demontis D, Walters RK, Martin J, et al. Discovery of the first genome-wide significant risk loci for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Nat Genet. 2019;51:63–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0269-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (1087889, 1145645, 1113400, 1078901 and 1078037), and the Sylvia & Charles Viertel Charitable Foundation. The PGC has received major funding from the US National Institute of Mental Health and the US National Institute of Drug Abuse (U01 MH109528 and U01 MH1095320). We thank the research participants and employees of 23andMe, Inc. for contributing to this study. This paper would not have been possible without the generosity of participants in the many studies that comprise the final meta-analyses and the dedication of many clinicians and research staff who have collected the data and made them publically available. Acknowledgments for specific data sets are provided in the Supplementary Material.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Enda M. Byrne, Zhihong Zhu, Ting Qi, Peter M. Visscher, Jian Yang & Naomi R. Wray

  2. Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Nathan G. Skene & Jens Hjerling-Leffler

  3. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Julien Bryois & Patrick F. Sullivan

  4. MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

    Antonio F. Pardinas, Michael J. Owen, James T. R. Walters & Michael C. O’Donovan

  5. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

    Eli Stahl

  6. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

    Jordan W. Smoller

  7. Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Human Genetic Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Jordan W. Smoller

  8. Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Jordan W. Smoller

  9. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Jordan W. Smoller

  10. Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Marcella Rietschel

  11. Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    John G. McGrath, Peter M. Visscher, Jian Yang & Naomi R. Wray

  12. Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, The Park Centre for Mental Health, Wacol, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    John G. McGrath

  13. National Centre for Register-Based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    John G. McGrath

  14. Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7264, USA

    Patrick F. Sullivan

  15. Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7264, USA

    Patrick F. Sullivan

  16. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia

    Michael E. Goddard

  17. Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, Vic, 3083, Australia

    Michael E. Goddard

Authors
  1. Enda M. Byrne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhihong Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ting Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nathan G. Skene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Julien Bryois
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Antonio F. Pardinas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Eli Stahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jordan W. Smoller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Marcella Rietschel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Michael J. Owen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. James T. R. Walters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Michael C. O’Donovan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. John G. McGrath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Jens Hjerling-Leffler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Patrick F. Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Michael E. Goddard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Peter M. Visscher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Jian Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Naomi R. Wray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

Bipolar Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium

Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enda M. Byrne.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

PFS is on the advisory committee at Lundbeck, is a Scientific Advisory Board member at Pfizer and has received speaker reimbursement and grant funding from Roche. JH-L. is a Scientific Advisor at Cartana and has received grant funding from Roche.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Members of the Bipolar Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium and Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium are listed in Supplementary Information file.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Byrne, E.M., Zhu, Z., Qi, T. et al. Conditional GWAS analysis to identify disorder-specific SNPs for psychiatric disorders. Mol Psychiatry 26, 2070–2081 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0705-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0705-9

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links