Abstract
Data sources
Electronic databases PubMed, Scopus and Embase were systematically searched and restricted to articles published between February 2009 and 2022.
Study selection
Studies were categorized using the modified method by the Swedish Council of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 20 studies were included, one of which was categorized as high quality (Grade A) and 19 of which were of moderate quality (Grade B). Exclusion criteria included articles with insufficient descriptions of reliability and reproducibility testing, review articles and case reports, and studies including traumatised teeth.
Data extraction and synthesis
Three independent authors examined titles, abstracts and full texts of relevant articles against the inclusion criteria. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Retrieved studies were assessed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data extracted included tooth movement performed, the appliance and force used, follow-up of subjects, changes in pulpal blood flow (PBF), tooth sensibility, expression of inflammation-related proteins, along with pulpal histology and morphology changes during tooth movement (intrusion, extrusion and tipping). Overall risk of bias was unclear.
Results
A reduction in pulpal blood flow and tooth sensibility due to the application of orthodontic forces was reported by studies included in the review. Increases in the activity of proteins and enzymes related to inflammation of the pulp was reported. Two studies reported histological changes of the pulpal tissues related to orthodontic treatment.
Conclusions
Orthodontic forces cause multiple temporary detectable changes in the dental pulp. The authors conclude there are no clear signs of permanent pulpal damage to healthy teeth due to the application of orthodontic forces.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Okuda BC, Tabbaa S, Edmonds M, Toubouti Y, Saltaji H. Direct to consumer orthodontics: Exploring patient demographic trends and preferences. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;159:210–6.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10:1.
Bondemark L, Holm AK, Hansen K, Axelsson S, Mohlin B, Brattstrom V, et al. Long-term stability of orthodontic treatment and patient satisfaction: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:181–91.
Jafarzadeh H. Laser Doppler flowmetry in endodontics: a review. Int Endod J. 2009;42:476–90.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fegan, H. Pulp fiction or pulp fact—does orthodontics damage pulpal tissue?. Evid Based Dent 24, 39–40 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00871-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00871-x