Abstract
Circulating proteins can be used to diagnose and predict disease-related outcomes. A deep serum proteome survey recently revealed close associations between serum protein networks and common disease. In the current study, 54,469 low-frequency and common exome-array variants were compared to 4782 protein measurements in the serum of 5343 individuals from the AGES Reykjavik cohort. This analysis identifies a large number of serum proteins with genetic signatures overlapping those of many diseases. More specifically, using a study-wide significance threshold, we find that 2021 independent exome array variants are associated with serum levels of 1942 proteins. These variants reside in genetic loci shared by hundreds of complex disease traits, highlighting serum proteins’ emerging role as biomarkers and potential causative agents of a wide range of diseases.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have expanded our knowledge of the genetic basis of complex disease. As of 2018, approximately 5687 GWASs have been published revealing 71,673 DNA variants to phenotype associations1. Furthermore, exome-wide genotyping arrays have linked rare and common variants to many complex traits. For example, 444 independent risk variants were recently identified for lipoprotein fractions across 250 genes2. Despite the overall success of GWAS, the common lead single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rarely point directly to a clear causative polymorphism, making determination of the underlying disease mechanism difficult3,4,5,6. Regulatory variants affecting mRNA and/or protein levels and structural variants like missense mutations can point directly to the causal candidate. Alteration of the amino acid sequence may affect protein activity and/or influence transcription, translation, stability, processing, and secretion of the protein in question7,8,9. Thus, by integrating intermediate traits like mRNA and/or protein levels with genetics and disease traits, the identification of the causal candidates can be enhanced3,4,5,6.
Proteins are arguably the ultimate players in all life processes in disease and health, however, high throughput detection and quantification of proteins has been hampered by the limitations of available proteomic technologies. Recently, a custom-designed Slow-Off rate Modified Aptamer (SOMAmer) protein profiling platform was developed to measure 4782 proteins encoded by 4137 human genes in the serum of 5457 individuals from the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility Reykjavik Study (AGES-RS)10, resulting in 26.1 million individual protein measurements. Various metrics related to the performance of the proteomic platform including aptamer specificity, assay variability, and reproducibility have already been described10. We demonstrated that the human serum proteome is under strong genetic control10, in line with findings of others applying identical or different proteomics technologies11,12. Moreover, serum proteins were found to exist in regulatory groups of network modules composed of members synthesized in all tissues of the body, suggesting that system-level coordination or homeostasis is mediated to a significant degree by thousands of proteins in blood13. Importantly, the deep serum and plasma proteome is associated with and prognostic for various diseases as well as human life span10,14,15,16,17,18,19,20.
In this work, we regressed levels of 4782 proteins on 54,469 low-frequency and common variants from the HumanExome BeadChip exome array, in sera from 5343 individuals of the deeply phenotyped AGES-RS cohort. Further cross-referencing of all significant genotype-to-protein associations to hundreds of genetic loci for various disease endpoints and clinical traits, demonstrated profound overlap between the genetics of circulating proteins and disease-related phenotypes. We highlight how triangulation of data from different sources can link genetics, protein levels, and disease(s), with the intention of cross-validating one another and pointing to the potential causal relationship between proteins and complex disease(s).
Results
Using genotype data from an exome array (HumanExome BeadChip) enriched for structural variants and tagged for many GWAS risk loci (Methods), the effect of low-frequency and common variants on the deep serum proteome was examined. Quality control filters21 and exclusion of monomorphic variants reduced the available variants to 76,891. Additionally, we excluded variants at minor allele frequency (MAF) < 0.001 as they provide insufficient power for single-point association analysis22. This resulted in 54,469 low-frequency (54%, MAF < 0.05) and common variants (46%, MAF ≥ 0.05) that were tested for association to each of the 4782 human serum protein measurements using linear regression analysis adjusted for the confounders age and sex (Methods). The current platform targets the serum proteome arising largely from active or passive secretion, ectodomain shedding, lysis, and/or cell death10,23. Figure 1 highlights the classification of the protein population targeted by the aptamer-based profiling platform, showing over 70% of the proteins are secreted or single-pass transmembrane receptors.
Applying a Bonferroni corrected significance threshold of P < 1.92 × 10−10 (0.05/54469/4782) we detected 5451 exome array variants that were associated with variable levels of 1942 (2138 aptamers) serum proteins (Supplementary Data 1 and Fig. 2), of which 2021 exome variants were independent affecting 1942 (2135 aptamers) proteins (Supplementary Data 2). Supplementary Data 1 lists all associations at P-value < 1 × 10−6, or 10,200 exome array variants affecting 2780 (3104 aptamers) human proteins. These protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) were cis and/or trans acting including several trans acting hotspots with pleiotropic effects on multiple co-regulated proteins (Fig. 2). Secreted proteins were enriched for pQTLs (P-value < 0.0001) as compared to non-secreted proteins using 10,000 permutations to obtain the empirical distribution of the χ2 test of equality of proportions (Supplementary Fig. 1). This implies that secreted proteins are subject to different, and possibly stronger, genetic control than other proteins identified by the current platform. Supplementary Data 3 summarizes various pathogenicity prediction scores for all independent study-wide significant pQTLs in Supplementary Data 2, using the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor (VEP)24,25. Next, we cross-referenced all the 5451 study-wide significant pQTLs with a comprehensive collection of genetic loci associated with diseases and clinical traits from the curated PhenoScanner database26, revealing that 60% of all pQTLs were linked to at least one disease-related trait (Supplementary Data 4). We have shown in our previous studies that genetic loci affecting several serum proteins exhibit pleiotropy in relation to complex diseases10. An example of a possible pleiotropic effect mediated by the variant rs2251219 within the gene PBRM1 affecting multiple proteins and sharing genetics with various diseases and clinical features is illustrated in Fig. 3. Supplementary Figure 2 depicts the relationship between all proteins and some quantitative traits associated with rs2251219. Table 1 highlights a selected set of pQTLs that share genetics with diseases of different etiologies including disorders of the brain, metabolism, immune, cardiovascular system, and cancer. In the sections that follow, we give examples of serum pQTLs that overlap disease risk loci and demonstrate how different data sources can cross-validate one another. Although data triangulation can be used to infer directional consistency, it cannot tell whether the relationship is causal or reactive to a given outcome. As a result, we used two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis on highlighted examples to test support for a protein’s causality to an outcome.
Variable levels of the anti-inflammatory protein TREM2 were associated with two distinct genomic regions (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 3). This included the missense variant rs75932628 (NP_061838.1: p.R47H) in TREM2 at chromosome 6 (Fig. 4b), known to confer a strong risk of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD)27. The variant was also associated with IGFBPL1 (P = 3 × 10−18) in serum (Supplementary Data 1), a protein recently implicated in axonal growth28. Intriguingly, the region at chromosome 11 associated with soluble TREM2 levels harbors variants adjacent to the genes MS4A4A and MS4A6A including rs610932 known to influence genetic susceptibility for LOAD29 (Table 1 and Fig. 4a, b). The variant rs610932 was also associated with the proteins GLTPD2 and A4GALT (Supplementary Data 1). The alleles increasing the risk of LOAD for both the common variant rs610932 and the low-frequency variant rs75932628 were associated with low levels of soluble TREM2 (Fig. 4b). Consistently, we find that the high-risk allele for rs75932628 was associated with accelerated mortality post-incident LOAD in the AGES-RS (Fig. 4c). It is of note that the levels of TREM2 in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) reflect the activity of brain TREM2-triggered microglia4,30, while high levels of CSF TREM2 have been associated with improved cognitive functioning31. Supplementary Figure 4 highlights the correlation (Spearman rank) between the different proteins affected by the LOAD risk loci at chromosomes 6 and 11. The accumulated data show a directionally consistent effect at independent risk loci for LOAD converging on the same causal candidate TREM2. Furthermore, a two-sample MR analysis using genetic instruments across the TREM2 and MS4A4A/MS4A6A loci and GWAS associations for LOAD in Europeans as outcome32 provided evidence that variable TREM2 protein levels are causally related to LOAD (P = 5.3 × 10−5) (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Data 5). The instrument rs7232 (Fig. 4d), an independent variant associated with TREM2 (Supplementary Data 2), is a missense variant in MS4A6A that has previously been linked to LOAD (Supplemental Data 4), but the MS4A cluster has recently been shown to modulate the production of soluble TREM233. This could imply that the variant is directly involved in the pathogenesis of LOAD. In summary, these results demonstrate that the effect of genetic drivers on major brain-linked diseases like LOAD can be readily detected in serum to both inform on the causal relationship and the directionality of the risk mediating effect. This would also suggest that serum may be an accessible proxy for microglia function, and cognition.
Variable levels of the cell adhesion protein SVEP1 are associated with variants located at chromosomes 1 and 9 (Supplementary Data 1, Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 5). Genetic associations to SVEP1 levels at chromosome 9 include the low-frequency missense variant rs111245230 in SVEP1 (NP_699197.3: pD2702G) (Fig. 5b), which was recently linked to coronary heart disease (CHD), blood pressure, and type-2-diabetes (T2D)34. In total, we found four conditionally independent missense mutations in SVEP1 that were associated with SVEP1 serum levels (Supplementary Data 2). The CHD and T2D risk allele (C) of rs111245230 were associated with elevated levels of SVEP1, and SVEP1 levels were elevated in T2D patients (OR = 1.20, 8 × 10−5) and predictive of incident CHD (OR = 1.21, 8 × 10−9) (Fig. 5c). Furthermore, high SVEP1 levels were positively associated with systolic blood pressure (β = 0.266, P = 4 × 10−9) (Fig. 5c), but not with diastolic blood pressure (β = 0.028, P = 0.535) (Fig. 5c). Consistently, higher serum levels of SVEP1 were associated with increased mortality post-incident CHD in the AGES-RS (HR = 1.28, P = 3 × 10−9) (Fig. 5d). The variants at chromosome 1 linked to SVEP1 levels (Fig. 5a), have not previously been linked to any disease. Given the currently available GWAS summary statistics, a two-sample MR analysis using cis-variants on chromosome 9 for SVEP1 as instruments and GWAS associations for T2D35 support a causal relationship of SVEP1 with the disease (P = 5.7 × 10−6) (Fig. 5e, Supplementary Data 5), but not with CHD36 or systolic blood pressure37 (P > 0.05) (Supplementary Data 5). Our data triangulation and causal tests integrating genetics, serum protein levels, and disease(s), indicate that SVEP1 may be a therapeutic target for T2D.
The ILMN exome array contains several tags related to previous GWAS findings38, including many risk loci for cancer. For example, 21 loci have been associated with melanoma39 and 50 loci with colorectal cancer40. The exome array variant rs910873 located in an intron of the GPI transamidase gene PIGU was previously linked to melanoma risk41. The reported candidate gene PIGU is the gene most proximal to the lead SNP rs910873 and maybe a novel candidate gene involved in melanoma. However, a more biologically relevant candidate is the agouti-signaling protein (ASIP) gene that is located 314 kb downstream of the lead SNP rs910873. ASIP is a competitive inhibitor of MC1R42 and is thus strongly biologically implicated in melanoma risk43. We found that the melanoma risk allele for rs910873 was associated with elevated ASIP serum levels (P = 5 × 10−179) (Fig. 6a, Table 1), while the variant had no effect on other proteins measured with the current proteomic platform (Supplementary Data 1). Interestingly, the pQTL rs910873 is also an eQTL for ASIP gene expression in skin44, showing the directionally consistent effect on the mRNA and protein. Importantly, we found that serum ASIP levels were supported as causally related to malignant melanoma (P = 1.1 × 10−17) using a two-sample MR analysis on the protein-to-outcome causal sequence of events (Fig. 6b, Supplementary Data 5). Our data point to the ASIP protein underlying the risk at rs910873, thus providing supportive evidence for the hypothesis that ASIP mediated inhibition of MC1R results in suppression of melanogenesis and increased risk of melanoma45. An additional example is the susceptibility variant rs1800469 for colorectal cancer46, which is a proxy to the pQTL rs2241714 (r2 = 0.978) (Table 1 and Fig. 6c). While the TMEM91 gene was the reported candidate gene for the colorectal cancer risk at the rs1800469 (Table 1), we find that the risk variant affected three proteins in either cis (B3GNT8 and TGFB1) or trans (B3GNT2) (Fig. 6c, d). Intriguingly, all three proteins have previously been implicated in colorectal cancer47,48,49. Due to a lack of available and powered GWAS summary statistics data, we were unable to formally test the causality of these proteins to colorectal cancer. In conclusion, while we cannot rule out PIGU as a candidate gene for malignant melanoma, these findings point to an alternate, and possibly more biologically relevant candidate, ASIP.
We outlined the construction of the serum protein network in our previous report and identified common genetic variants underlying the network structure10. This included a targeted study of the effects of common cis and cis-to-trans acting variants on levels of serum proteins. Previously, we discovered that 80% of cis pQTL effects and 74% of trans pQTL effects were replicated across different populations and proteomics platforms measuring common variants10. We estimated the novelty of pQTL findings reported in the present study at both SNP–protein and locus-protein levels (see Supplementary Note 1 for details). In brief, using all conditionally independent study-wide significant associations (Supplementary Data 2) and a linkage disequilibrium (LD) threshold of r2 < 0.5 for novel associations, the current study’s SNP–protein associations are 76.8% novel compared to Emilsson et al.10, 75.5% novel compared to Sun et al.11, and 59.3% novel compared to all published pQTL studies (Supplementary Fig. 6A, Supplementary Data 6 and Supplementary Note 1). Similarly, in comparison to our companion GWAS paper50 and using the same LD threshold for novel associations, we find that 48.4% were exome-array-specific (Supplementary Fig. 6B, Supplementary Note 1). By combining all unique and common SNP–protein signatures from both companion studies, we obtain 6362 SNP–protein associations, of which 60.0% (at LD threshold of r2 < 0.5) are novel when compared to external pQTL datasets (Supplementary Note 1, Supplementary Fig. 6C). Finally, when estimating novelty at the locus–protein level, we find that 321 out of 881 loci and 762 out of 3103 locus–protein associations identified in the current study are novel compared to our companion paper50 (Supplementary Data 7, Supplementary Note 1). When the two companion studies were combined, they yielded 404 new loci and 1950 new locus-protein associations, which were not found in previous pQTL publications (Supplementary Data 6, Supplementary Data 7, and Supplementary Note 1).
We report here that many of the measured serum proteins under genetic control share genetics with a variety of clinical features, including major diseases arising from various body tissues. This is in line with a recent population-scale survey of human-induced pluripotent stem cells, demonstrating that pQTLs are 1.93-fold enriched in disease risk variants compared to a 1.36-fold enrichment for eQTLs12, underscoring the added value in pQTL mapping. We reaffirm widespread associations between genetic variants and their cognate proteins as well as distant trans-acting effects on serum proteins and demonstrate that many proteins are often involved in mediating the biological effect of a single causal variant affecting complex disease. Protein coding variants may cause technical artifacts in both affinity proteomics and mass spectrometry51,52. Systematic conditional and colocalization studies have shown, however, that pQTLs powered by common missense variants being artefactual are not a common event using the aptamer-based technology11,53, however, given the enrichment of missense variants in the present study, it may occur in some cases.
We note that with the ever-increasing availability of large-scale omics data aligned with the human genome, cross-referencing different datasets can result in findings that occurred by sheer chance. Hence, a systematic colocalization analysis has been proposed for identifying shared causal variants between intermediate traits and disease endpoints54. This is, however, not feasible for the application of the exome array given its sparse genomic coverage. Instead, multi-omics data triangulation to infer consistency in directionality, the approach used in the present study, can enhance confidence in the causal call and offer insights and guidelines for experimental follow-up studies. In fact, the causal calls for TREM2 (LOAD), SVEP1 (T2D), and ASIP (malignant melanoma) were validated, using a two-sample MR analysis. These analyses found no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy (Supplementary Data 5), nor did they demonstrate that the causal estimates were dependent on a single genetic instrument (Supplementary Fig. 7). We previously asserted that serum proteins are intimately connected to and may mediate global homeostasis10. The accumulated data show that serum proteins are under strong genetic control and closely associated with diseases of different aetiologies, which in turn suggests that serum proteins may be significant mediators of systemic homeostasis in human health and disease.
Methods
Study population
The AGES-RS55 was approved by the NBC in Iceland (approval number VSN-00-063), and by the National Institute on Aging Intramural Institutional Review Board, and the Data Protection Authority in Iceland. AGES-RS is a single-center prospective population-based study of deeply phenotyped subjects (5764, mean age 75 ± 6 years) and survivors of the 40-year-long prospective Reykjavik study (N ∼18,000), an epidemiologic study aimed to understand aging in the context of gene/environment interaction by focusing on four biologic systems: vascular, neurocognitive (including sensory), musculoskeletal, and body composition/metabolism. Descriptive statistics of this cohort as well as the detailed definition of the various disease endpoints and relevant phenotypes measured have been published10,55.
Genotyping platform
Study samples were processed on the exome-wide genotyping array Illumina HumanExome BeadChip v1.0 (San Diego, CA, USA) for all AGES-RS participants at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston genotyping center as previously described56. The exome array was enriched for exonic variants selected from over 12,000 individual exome and whole-genome sequences from different study populations38 and includes as well tags for previously described GWAS hits, ancestry informative markers, mitochondrial SNPs, and human leukocyte antigen tags38. A total of 244,883 variants were included on the exome array. Genotype call and quality control filters including call rate, heterozygosity, sex discordance, and principal component analysis outliers were performed as previously described2,21. Variants with call rate <90% or with Hardy–Weinberg P values < 1 × 10−7 were removed from the study. Totally, 76,891 variants were detected in at least one individual of the AGES-RS cohort. Of these variants, 54,469 had a MAF > 0.001 and were examined for association against each of the 4782 human serum protein measurements (see below).
Protein measurements
Each protein has its own detection reagent selected from chemically modified DNA libraries, referred to as SOMAmers57. The design and quality control of the SOMApanel platform’s custom version to include proteins known or predicted to be present in the extracellular milieu have been described in detail elsewhere10. Briefly, though, the aptamer-based platform measures 5034 protein analytes in a single serum sample, of which 4782 SOMAmers bind specifically to 4137 human proteins (some proteins are identified by more than one aptamer) and 250 SOMAmers that recognize non-human targets (47 non-human vertebrate proteins and 203 targeting human pathogens)10. Consistent target specificity across the platform was indicated by direct (through mass spectrometry) and/or indirect validation of the SOMAmers10. Both sample selection and sample processing for protein measurements were randomized, and all samples were run as a single set to prevent batch or time of processing biases.
Statistical analysis
Prior to the analysis of the proteins measurements, we applied a Box–Cox transformation on all proteins to improve normality, symmetry and to maintain all protein variables on a similar scale58. In the association analysis, we obtained residuals after controlling for sex, age, potential population stratification using principal component (PCs) analysis59, and for all single-variant associations to serum proteins tested under an additive genetic model applying linear regression analysis (protein ∼SNP + age + sex + PC1 + PC2 + ….PC5). We report both variants to protein associations at P < 1 × 10−6 for suggestive evidence and Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons by adjusting for the 54,469 variants and 4782 human protein analytes where single variant associations with P < 1.92 × 10−10 were considered study-wide significant (Supplementary Data 1). P-values corresponding to the estimated effect size and standard errors of the genotypes were recalculated to increase accuracy. Independent genetic signals were found through a stepwise conditional and joint association analysis for each protein analyte separately with the GCTA-COJO (v1.92.4beta2) software60,61. We conditioned on the current lead variant listed in Supplementary Data 1, defined as the variant with the lowest P-value, and then kept track of any new variants that were not in LD (the default GCTA-COJO option r2 < 0.9 for co-linearity) with previously chosen lead variants and reported findings at P < 1 × 10−6 (Supplementary Data 2). In the joint model, all conditionally significant SNPs for each protein analyte were combined in the regression model.
Supplementary Data 3 summarizes, through the use of VEP (v104.0)24,25, various pathogenicity prediction scores for all independent study-wide significant pQTLs in Supplementary Data 2, including the Likelihood Ratio Test62, Variant Effect Scoring Tool63, MutationAssessor64, and MutationTaster65.
To test whether the percentage of secreted proteins among pQTLs is equal to the percentage of secreted proteins among non-pQTLs, 10,000 permutations were performed to obtain the empirical distribution of the χ2 test of equality of proportions. Our null and alternate hypotheses were:
H0: P(pQTL | Secreted) = P(pQTL | Not Secreted) and H1: P(pQTL | Secreted) > P(pQTL | Not Secreted) The test statistics calculated from our data was compared to the quantiles of this distribution to obtain P(Data | H0) (Supplementary Fig. 1).
We applied the “TwoSampleMR” R package66 to perform a two-sample MR analysis to test for causal associations between protein and outcome (protein-to-outcome). For different outcomes, we used GWAS associations for LOAD in Europeans32, malignant melanoma in European individuals from the UK biobank data (UKB-b-12915)67, T2D in Europeans35, CHD in Europeans36, and systolic blood pressure in Europeans37. Genetic variants (SNPs) associated with serum protein levels at a genome-wide significant threshold (P < 5 × 10−8) identified in the AGES-RS dataset and filtered to only include uncorrelated variants (r2 < 0.2) were used as instruments. More to the point, genetic instruments within the cis window for each aptamer were then clumped such that variants in high LD (r2 ≥ 0.2) within a 10 Mb region were combined using the LD structure of the AGES-RS population. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method68 was used for the MR analysis, with P-values < 0.05 considered significant. For sensitivity analyses, we used the intercept term from MR Egger regression69 to determine whether there was evidence of horizontal pleiotropy, and Cochran’s Q-statistic70 to evaluate heterogeneity of genetic instruments. A leave-one-out analysis was also performed to see the effect of individual SNPs on the causal estimate. A bi-directional MR analysis was also attempted but not concluded as there were no overlapping SNPs between the exome GWAS and the GWAS’ for LOAD, malignant melanoma, and T2D after we had filtered them for significant associations.
For the associations of individual proteins to different phenotypic measures, we used linear or logistic regression or Cox proportional hazards regression, depending on the outcome being continuous, binary, or a time to an event. Given the consistency in terms of sample handling including time from blood draw to processing (between 9 and 11 am), same personnel handling all specimens, and the ethnic homogeneity of the population we adjusted only for age and sex in all our regression analyses. All statistical analysis was performed using R version 3.6.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and RStudio (v1.1.456).
We compared our pQTL results to 19 previously published proteogenomic studies (Supplementary Data 5), including the protein GWAS in the INTERVAL study11, and we previously reported genetic analysis of 3219 AGES-RS cohort participants10. In the previous proteogenomic analysis of AGES-RS participants, one cis variant was reported per protein using a locus-wide significance threshold, as well as cis-to-trans variants at a Bonferroni corrected significance threshold. Due to these differences in reporting criteria, we only considered the associations in previous AGES-RS results that met the current study-wide P-value threshold. For all other studies, we retained the pQTLs at the reported significance threshold. In addition, we performed a lookup of all independent pQTLs from the current study available in summary statistics from the INTERVAL study, considering them known if they reached a study-wide significance in their data. We calculated the LD structure between the reported significant variants for all studies, using 1000 Genomes v3 EUR samples, but using AGES-RS data when comparing to previously reported AGES-RS results. We considered variants in LD at r2 > 0.5 to represent the same signal across studies. The comparison was performed on protein level, by matching the reported Entrez gene symbol from each study.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The custom-design Novartis SOMAscan is available through a collaboration agreement with the Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research (lori.jennings@novartis.com). Data from the AGES-RS study are available through collaboration (AGES_data_request@hjarta.is) under a data usage agreement with the IHA. All-access to data is controlled via the use of a subject-signed informed consent authorization. The time it takes to respond to requests varies depending on the nature and circumstances of the request, but it will not exceed 14 working days. All data supporting the conclusions of the paper are presented in the main text and freely available as a supplement to this manuscript (Supplementary Information and Supplementary Data).
References
Buniello, A. et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D1005–D1012 (2019).
Liu, D. J. et al. Exome-wide association study of plasma lipids in >300,000 individuals. Nat. Genet. 49, 1758–1766 (2017).
Schadt, E. E. Molecular networks as sensors and drivers of common human diseases. Nature 461, 218–223 (2009).
Zhang, B. et al. Integrated systems approach identifies genetic nodes and networks in late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 153, 707–720 (2013).
Emilsson, V. et al. Genetics of gene expression and its effect on disease. Nature 452, 423–U422 (2008).
Chen, Y. Q. et al. Variations in DNA elucidate molecular networks that cause disease. Nature 452, 429–435 (2008).
Pires, D. E., Chen, J., Blundell, T. L. & Ascher, D. B. In silico functional dissection of saturation mutagenesis: Interpreting the relationship between phenotypes and changes in protein stability, interactions and activity. Sci. Rep. 6, 19848 (2016).
Ho, J. E. et al. Common genetic variation at the IL1RL1 locus regulates IL-33/ST2 signaling. J. Clin. Investig. 123, 4208–4218 (2013).
Interleukin-6 Receptor Mendelian Randomisation Analysis, C. et al. The interleukin-6 receptor as a target for prevention of coronary heart disease: a mendelian randomisation analysis. Lancet 379, 1214–1224 (2012).
Emilsson, V. et al. Co-regulatory networks of human serum proteins link genetics to disease. Science 361, 769–773 (2018).
Sun, B. B. et al. Genomic atlas of the human plasma proteome. Nature 558, 73–79 (2018).
Mirauta, B. A. et al. Population-scale proteome variation in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Elife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57390 (2020).
Lamb, J. R., Jennings, L. L., Gudmundsdottir, V., Gudnason, V. & Emilsson, V. It’s in our blood: a glimpse of personalized medicine. Trends Mol. Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2020.09.003 (2020).
Emilsson, V., Gudnason, V. & Jennings, L. L. Predicting health and life span with the deep plasma proteome. Nat. Med. 25, 1815–1816 (2019).
Lehallier, B. et al. Undulating changes in human plasma proteome profiles across the lifespan. Nat. Med. 25, 1843–1850 (2019).
Williams, S. A. et al. Plasma protein patterns as comprehensive indicators of health. Nat. Med. 25, 1851–1857 (2019).
Nakamura, A. et al. High performance plasma amyloid-beta biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 554, 249–254 (2018).
Dodgson, S. E. There will be blood tests. Cell 173, 1–3 (2018).
Cohen, J. D. et al. Detection and localization of surgically resectable cancers with a multi-analyte blood test. Science 359, 926–930 (2018).
Kristensen, S. L. et al. Prognostic value of N-terminal Pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels in heart failure patients with and without atrial fibrillation. Circ. Heart Fail. https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.117.004409 (2017).
Peloso, G. M. et al. Association of low-frequency and rare coding-sequence variants with blood lipids and coronary heart disease in 56,000 whites and blacks. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 94, 223–232 (2014).
Richards, A. L. et al. Exome arrays capture polygenic rare variant contributions to schizophrenia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 25, 1001–1007 (2016).
Armengaud, J., Christie-Oleza, J. A., Clair, G., Malard, V. & Duport, C. Exoproteomics: exploring the world around biological systems. Expert Rev. Proteomics 9, 561–575 (2012).
McLaren, W. et al. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol. 17, 122 (2016).
McLaren, W. et al. Deriving the consequences of genomic variants with the Ensembl API and SNP effect predictor. Bioinformatics 26, 2069–2070 (2010).
Staley, J. R. et al. PhenoScanner: a database of human genotype-phenotype associations. Bioinformatics 32, 3207–3209 (2016).
Jonsson, T. et al. Variant of TREM2 associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 107–116 (2013).
Guo, C. et al. IGFBPL1 regulates axon growth through IGF-1-mediated signaling cascades. Sci. Rep. 8, 2054 (2018).
Hollingworth, P. et al. Common variants at ABCA7, MS4A6A/MS4A4E, EPHA1, CD33 and CD2AP are associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 43, 429–435 (2011).
Suarez-Calvet, M. et al. sTREM2 cerebrospinal fluid levels are a potential biomarker for microglia activity in early-stage Alzheimer’s disease and associate with neuronal injury markers. EMBO Mol. Med. 8, 466–476 (2016).
Ewers, M. et al. Increased soluble TREM2 in cerebrospinal fluid is associated with reduced cognitive and clinical decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Transl. Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aav6221 (2019).
Kunkle, B. W. et al. Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat. Genet. 51, 414–430 (2019).
Deming, Y. et al. The MS4A gene cluster is a key modulator of soluble TREM2 and Alzheimer’s disease risk. Sci. Transl. Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aau2291 (2019).
Myocardial Infarction, G. et al. Coding Variation in ANGPTL4, LPL, and SVEP1 and the risk of coronary disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 374, 1134–1144 (2016).
Mahajan, A. et al. Fine-mapping type 2 diabetes loci to single-variant resolution using high-density imputation and islet-specific epigenome maps. Nat. Genet. 50, 1505–1513 (2018).
Nikpay, M. et al. A comprehensive 1,000 Genomes-based genome-wide association meta-analysis of coronary artery disease. Nat. Genet. 47, 1121–1130 (2015).
Evangelou, E. et al. Genetic analysis of over 1 million people identifies 535 new loci associated with blood pressure traits. Nat. Genet. 50, 1412–1425 (2018).
Huyghe, J. R. et al. Exome array analysis identifies new loci and low-frequency variants influencing insulin processing and secretion. Nat. Genet. 45, 197–201 (2013).
Ransohoff, K. J. et al. Two-stage genome-wide association study identifies a novel susceptibility locus associated with melanoma. Oncotarget 8, 17586–17592 (2017).
Lu, Y. et al. Large-scale genome-wide association study of east asians identifies loci associated with risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.066 (2018).
Brown, K. M. et al. Common sequence variants on 20q11.22 confer melanoma susceptibility. Nat. Genet. 40, 838–840 (2008).
Blanchard, S. G. et al. Agouti antagonism of melanocortin binding and action in the B16F10 murine melanoma cell line. Biochem. 34, 10406–10411 (1995).
Taylor, N. J. et al. Inherited variation at MC1R and ASIP and association with melanoma-specific survival. Int. J. Cancer 136, 2659–2667 (2015).
GTEx Consortium. The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues. Science 369, 1318–1330 (2020).
Wolf Horrell, E. M., Boulanger, M. C. & D’Orazio, J. A. Melanocortin 1 receptor: structure, function, and regulation. Front. Genet. 7, 95 (2016).
Zhang, B. et al. Large-scale genetic study in East Asians identifies six new loci associated with colorectal cancer risk. Nat. Genet. 46, 533–542 (2014).
Calon, A. et al. Dependency of colorectal cancer on a TGF-beta-driven program in stromal cells for metastasis initiation. Cancer Cell 22, 571–584 (2012).
Venkitachalam, S. et al. Biochemical and functional characterization of glycosylation-associated mutational landscapes in colon cancer. Sci. Rep. 6, 23642 (2016).
Ishida, H. et al. A novel beta1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (beta3Gn-T8), which synthesizes poly-N-acetyllactosamine, is dramatically upregulated in colon cancer. FEBS Lett. 579, 71–78 (2005).
Gudjonsson, A. et al. A genome-wide association study of serum proteins reveals shared loci with common diseases. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27850-z (2022).
Solomon, T. et al. Identification of common and rare genetic variation associated with plasma protein levels using whole-exome sequencing and mass spectrometry. Circ. Genom. Precis. Med. 11, e002170 (2018).
Smith, J. G. & Gerszten, R. E. Emerging affinity-based proteomic technologies for large-scale plasma profiling in cardiovascular disease. Circulation 135, 1651–1664 (2017).
Zheng, J. et al. Phenome-wide Mendelian randomization mapping the influence of the plasma proteome on complex diseases. Nat. Genet. 52, 1122–1131 (2020).
Liu, B., Gloudemans, M. J., Rao, A. S., Ingelsson, E. & Montgomery, S. B. Abundant associations with gene expression complicate GWAS follow-up. Nat. Genet. 51, 768–769 (2019).
Harris, T. B. et al. Age, gene/environment susceptibility-Reykjavik study: multidisciplinary applied phenomics. Am. J. Epidemiol. 165, 1076–1087 (2007).
Grove, M. L. et al. Best practices and joint calling of the HumanExome BeadChip: the CHARGE Consortium. PLoS ONE 8, e68095 (2013).
Candia, J. et al. Assessment of variability in the SOMAscan assay. Sci. Rep. 7, 14248 (2017).
Max Kuhn, K. J. Applied Predictive Modeling. (Springer, 2013).
Price, A. L. et al. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 38, 904–909 (2006).
Yang, J. et al. Conditional and joint multiple-SNP analysis of GWAS summary statistics identifies additional variants influencing complex traits. Nat. Genet. 44, s361–s363 (2012). 369–375.
Yang, J., Lee, S. H., Goddard, M. E. & Visscher, P. M. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 76–82 (2011).
Chun, S. & Fay, J. C. Identification of deleterious mutations within three human genomes. Genome Res. 19, 1553–1561 (2009).
Carter, H., Douville, C., Stenson, P. D., Cooper, D. N. & Karchin, R. Identifying Mendelian disease genes with the variant effect scoring tool. BMC Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-s3-s3 (2013).
Reva, B., Antipin, Y. & Sander, C. Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: application to cancer genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, e118 (2011).
Schwarz, J. M., Rödelsperger, C., Schuelke, M. & Seelow, D. MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat Methods 7, 575–576 (2010).
Hemani, G. et al. The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. Elife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34408 (2018).
Sudlow, C. et al. UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 12, e1001779 (2015).
Burgess, S., Butterworth, A. & Thompson, S. G. Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genet. Epidemiol. 37, 658–665 (2013).
Burgess, S. & Thompson, S. G. Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 32, 377–389 (2017).
Bowden, J. et al. Improving the accuracy of two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization: moving beyond the NOME assumption. Int. J. Epidemiol. 48, 728–742 (2019).
MacArthur, J. et al. The new NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS Catalog). Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D896–D901 (2017).
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the contribution of the Icelandic Heart Association (IHA) staff to AGES-RS, as well as the involvement of all study participants. The National Institute on Aging (NIA) contracts N01-AG-12100 and HHSN271201200022C for V.G. financed the study. V.G. received funding from the NIA (1R01AG065596), and IHA received a grant from Althingi (the Icelandic Parliament). The Icelandic Research Fund (IRF) funded V.E. and Va.G. with grants 195761-051, 184845-053, and 206692-051, while Va.G. received a postdoctoral research grant from the University of Iceland Research Fund. M.A.K. was funded by Open Targets and by the Wellcome Trust Grant 206194.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
V.E. and Vi.G. designed the study. A.G., Va.G., E.F.G., T.J, B.G.J., J.R.L., M.A.K., M.I., J.R.S., T.A., and V.E. performed data analysis. L.L.J., L.J.L., J.H.L., and N.M.M. provided expertise in a variety of areas, including proteomics data and function, and contributed to the discussion. V.E. and Vi.G. supervised the project. V.E. wrote the first draft of the paper, with all coauthors contributing to data interpretation, paper editing, and revision.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The study was supported by the Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research, and protein measurements for the AGES-RS cohort were performed at SomaLogic. J.R.L. and L.L.J. are employees and stockholders of Novartis. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Jeffrey Thompson and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Emilsson, V., Gudmundsdottir, V., Gudjonsson, A. et al. Coding and regulatory variants are associated with serum protein levels and disease. Nat Commun 13, 481 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28081-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28081-6
This article is cited by
-
SVEP1 is an endogenous ligand for the orphan receptor PEAR1
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Proteomic analysis of diabetes genetic risk scores identifies complement C2 and neuropilin-2 as predictors of type 2 diabetes: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study
Diabetologia (2023)
-
A genome-wide association study of serum proteins reveals shared loci with common diseases
Nature Communications (2022)
-
A proteogenomic signature of age-related macular degeneration in blood
Nature Communications (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.