Studies have provided rich data on global preferences for how autonomous vehicles should act in collisions. We describe a framework for incorporating such preferences in policy. Preferences should inform the design of autonomous vehicles only after being screened for bias and only to the degree to which they match major ethical theories.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Trolleys, crashes, and perception—a survey on how current autonomous vehicles debates invoke problematic expectations
AI and Ethics Open Access 17 April 2023
-
Experimental philosophical bioethics and normative inference
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Open Access 01 August 2021
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Awad, E. et al. Nature 563, 59–64 (2018).
Kanellopoulou, N. SCRIPT-ed 1, 217–223 https://script-ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/1-1-Kanellopoulou.pdf (2004).
Sikora, J. & Lewins, F. Health Sociol. Rev. 16, 68–78 (2007).
Nordfalk, F., Olejaz, M., Jensen, A. M. B., Skovgaard, L. L. & Hoeyer, K. Transplant. Res. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13737-016-0035-2 (2016).
Rawls, J. Philos. Rev. 60, 177–197 (1951).
Rawls, J. Oxf. J. Leg. Stud. 7, 1–25 (1987).
Luetge, C. Philos. Technol. 30, 547–558 (2017).
Arora, C., Savulescu, J., Maslen, H., Selgelid, M. & Wilkinson, D. BMC Med. Ethics 17, 69 (2016).
Dunn, M., Sheehan, M., Hope, T. & Parker, M. Camb. Q. Healthc. Ethics 21, 466–480 (2012).
Acknowledgements
J.S. and C.G., through their involvement with the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, received funding through from the Victorian State Government through the Operational Infrastructure Support (OIS) Program. J.S. was supported by the Wellcome Trust (WT 104848/Z/14/Z) and (WT203132/Z/16/Z). All the funding bodies provided support for research on themes developed within this paper. The funders had no role in the conceptualization, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Savulescu, J., Kahane, G. & Gyngell, C. From public preferences to ethical policy. Nat Hum Behav 3, 1241–1243 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0711-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0711-6
This article is cited by
-
How virtue signalling makes us better: moral preferences with respect to autonomous vehicle type choices
AI & SOCIETY (2023)
-
Trolleys, crashes, and perception—a survey on how current autonomous vehicles debates invoke problematic expectations
AI and Ethics (2023)
-
Conscientious Objection, Conflicts of Interests, and Choosing the Right Analogies. A Reply to Pruski
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry (2021)
-
Experimental philosophical bioethics and normative inference
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics (2021)