Abstract
To cope with toxic levels of H2S, the plant pathogens Xylella fastidiosa and Agrobacterium tumefaciens employ the bigR operon to oxidize H2S into sulfite. The bigR operon is regulated by the transcriptional repressor BigR and it encodes a bifunctional sulfur transferase (ST) and sulfur dioxygenase (SDO) enzyme, Blh, required for H2S oxidation and bacterial growth under hypoxia. However, how Blh operates to enhance bacterial survival under hypoxia and how BigR is deactivated to derepress operon transcription is unknown. Here, we show that the ST and SDO activities of Blh are in vitro coupled and necessary to oxidize sulfide into sulfite, and that Blh is critical to maintain the oxygen flux during A. tumefaciens respiration when oxygen becomes limited to cells. We also show that H2S and polysulfides inactivate BigR leading to operon transcription. Moreover, we show that sulfite, which is produced by Blh in the ST and SDO reactions, is toxic to Citrus sinensis and that X. fastidiosa-infected plants accumulate sulfite and higher transcript levels of sulfite detoxification enzymes, suggesting that they are under sulfite stress. These results indicate that BigR acts as a sulfide sensor in the H2S oxidation mechanism that allows pathogens to colonize plant tissues where oxygen is a limiting factor.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a gaseous molecule that is well known for its strong odor and toxicity. In the past few years, however, H2S has gained the status of a biological effector molecule in higher organisms, since it is produced in a regulated manner by many cell types and acts as a signaling molecule in a variety of physiological processes, both in mammals and plants1,2,3.
Microorganisms, including bacteria, also produce H2S4. Sulfur-reducing bacteria, for instance, can reduce sulfur compounds into H2S to produce energy under anaerobic conditions5. Other bacterial species, on the other hand, can also generate H2S from the protein catabolism and degradation of organic matter6.
Despite its beneficial role in preventing oxidative stress, H2S can become toxic to both mitochondria and bacterial cells, primarily because it blocks aerobic respiration through inhibition of the cytochrome c oxidase7,8,9. To circumvent such problem, bacterial cells, plant and animal mitochondria have evolved common mechanisms to eliminate H2S10,11,12,13,14,15,16.
In both plant and animal mitochondria, as well as in some bacterial species, three enzymes, including the Sulfide Quinone Oxidoreductase (SQOR), Thiosulfate Sulfur Transferase (TST) and Sulfur Dioxygenase (SDO) catalyze the oxidization of H2S into sulfite10,11,12,14,15,16. In the first enzymatic reaction catalyzed by SQOR, H2S is complexed with sulfite to form thiosulfate. The sulfane sulfur of thiosulfate is subsequently transferred to reduced glutathione (GSH) by the action of TST to form glutathione persulfide (GSSH), which is then oxidized into sulfite by the action of SDO, regenerating GSH. In human mitochondria, the malfunctioning of SDO, known as ETHE1, is the cause of Ethylmalonic Encephalopathy syndrome12,17. Because sulfite is also toxic to cells, animal mitochondria further oxidizes it into sulfate, whereas in plant pathogenic bacteria such as Xylella fastidiosa and Agrobacterium tumefaciens, sulfite is secreted to the medium by a sulfite exporter13,14,18,19.
We have shown that this mechanism of H2S detoxification in X. fastidiosa and A. tumefaciens, the causal agents of the Citrus Variegated Chlorosis (CVC) and Crown Gall disease, respectively, is encoded by the bigR operon. The bigR operon is regulated by BigR (biofilm growth-associated repressor), a winged helix-turn-helix repressor that recognizes the −10 region of the operon, blocking its transcription13,20. The repressor role of BigR is governed by the redox status of two conserved cysteines (Cys42 and Cys108) which, when oxidized into a disulfide bond, alter the conformation of the winged-helix DNA-binding region of the repressor, leading to repressor-DNA dissociation and operon activation13.
In addition to BigR, the bigR operon encodes a two-domain DUF442-ETHE1 protein, originally named Blh (β-lactamase-like hydrolase), and a TauE-related sulfite transporter13,20. Protein sequence alignments and structural modeling studies suggested that the Blh DUF442 domain might function as a rhodanese or sulfur transferase (ST), whereas its β-lactamase domain would function as an SDO similar to human ETHE113. In fact, genetic studies showed that Blh becomes critical to bacterial growth under hypoxia or under conditions where H2S is produced13. This is particularly relevant for aerobic organisms like X. fastidiosa and A. tumefaciens which colonize plant tissues where the O2 tension is low. In such environment, H2S accumulation could potentially inhibit bacterial respiration. Although the lack of Blh impairs bacterial growth under oxygen-limited conditions13, how exactly Blh enhances bacterial survival under hypoxia or H2S stress was unclear. In addition, how BigR is deactivated to derepress operon transcription was also unknown13.
Here we show that the DUF442 and ETHE1 domains of Blh display ST and SDO activities upon GSH and GSSH, respectively, producing sulfite, and that such enzymatic activities are in vitro coupled and required to maintain the O2 flux during bacterial respiration when O2 becomes limited to cells. Our data also reveal that H2S and polysulfides react with Cys108 and induce the Cys42-Cys108 disulfide bond formation in BigR, leading to repressor inactivation and operon transcription. We also present evidence suggesting that citrus plants infected with X. fastidiosa are under sulfite stress.
Results
The ETHE1 domain of Blh is an iron-containing sulfur dioxygenase
In our previous work, we provided evidence that the ETHE1 domain of Blh would function as an SDO like the mitochondrial ETHE1 protein, since the blh-defective mutant of A. tumefaciens accumulated higher levels of H2S13. In addition, based on structural modeling studies, we hypothesized that the Blh ETHE1 domain would use GSSH as a substrate13. To verify these assumptions, the recombinant ETHE1 domain of Xylella Blh, corresponding to residues 143 to 407, was purified and tested for the SDO activity upon GSSH. In agreement with the predictions, we found that O2 is consumed in the presence of GSSH and the Blh ETHE1 domain, and that sulfite is generated as a reaction product (Fig. 1a and b). Typically, ~1.3 ± 0,3 µmol O2 was consumed per mg of the ETHE1 domain per min at 25 °C (Fig. 1c).
To better characterize the kinetic properties of the Blh ETHE1 domain, the SDO reaction was performed in the presence of increased amounts of GSSH. The results indicate that the ETHE1 domain shows an ordinary Michaelis-Menten kinetics with estimated apparent Km and V max of approximately 0.18 mM GSSH and 3.4 µmol O2 mg−1 min−1, respectively (Fig. 1d). These kinetics parameters are comparable to those of other characterized SDOs11,15.
Our molecular modeling studies also suggested that a metal ion, possibly iron, could be part of the active site of the Blh ETHE1 domain13. Consistent with this, X-ray fluorescence analysis revealed higher levels of iron in the ETHE1 domain sample, relative to buffer alone or BSA (bovine serum albumin), used as negative control samples (Fig. 1e). This result is in line with the fact that iron was also found to bind the Blh-related CstB and human ETHE1 enzymes15,21.
The Blh DUF442 domain is a sulfur transferase
Protein sequence alignment and molecular modeling studies suggested that despite sharing the same fold of protein tyrosine phosphatases, the Blh DUF442 domain was not only structurally similar to the catalytic domain of the E. coli rhodanese YnjE22, but also presented a conserved rhodanese active site13. To further investigate this, the recombinant DUF442 domain of Xylella Blh (residues 1 to 141) was purified and tested for a rhodanese or sulfur transferase (ST) activity using thiosulfate as a sulfur donor and cyanide as a sulfur acceptor23. The results show that the DUF442 domain of Blh was sufficient to catalyze the transfer of the sulfane sulfur of thiosulfate to cyanide, generating thiocyanate (SCN) and sulfite as the reaction products (Fig. 2a and b). The recombinant full-length Blh also showed ST activity upon thiosulfate and cyanide which was, on average, twice of that exhibited by the DUF442 domain alone (Fig. 2a).
Because the DUF442 domain was relatively less soluble and active than the full-length Blh when expressed in E. coli cells, the kinetics properties of the DUF442 domain was determined using the full-length Blh protein. The apparent Km and V max values for the Blh ST activity were 6.2 mM thiosulfate and 18.1 µmol SCN mg−1 min−1, respectively (Fig. 2c), which are also comparable to the Km and V max values determined for the S. aureus CstB15. These data thus show that the DUF442 domain of Blh functions as a sulfur transferase and, therefore, will be referred here as the Blh ST domain.
The ST and SDO activities of Blh are coupled
We found that the ST domain of Blh can also use GSH as a sulfur acceptor to produce sulfite and GSSH when thiosulfate is the sulfur donor (Fig. 3a). Considering that the Blh ETHE1 domain uses GSSH as substrate and its SDO activity generates GSH, we tested whether the ST and SDO activities of Blh were coupled. To verify this, the ST and ETHE1 domains of Blh were purified separately and O2 consumption, as a result of the SDO activity (Fig. 1a), was measured in the reaction. The results show that O2 consumption is not significantly altered when the ST or the ETHE1 domain is added alone into the reaction mixture containing thiosulfate and GSH. However, O2 consumption increases significantly as soon as the second Blh domain is added to the reaction mixture (Fig. 3b). When the full-length Blh is used, an instant and sharper O2 consumption is observed (Fig. 3b). Together, these results confirm that the ST and SDO activities of Blh are in vitro coupled and that GSH, consumed in the ST reaction, is restored in the SDO reaction.
Blh is essential to maintain aerobic respiration under oxygen-limited conditions
We showed previously that the bigR operon is important for H2S detoxification and that Blh is required to sustain bacterial growth under O2-limited concentrations13. Given that H2S competes with O2 for cytochrome c oxidase binding, we decided to investigate the role of Blh as a sulfide oxidation enzyme, particularly when O2 becomes limited to the cells. To test this, we performed respiration assays using the wild type and corresponding blh− and bigR− deletion mutants of A. tumefaciens described previously20. The bacterial cells were incubated in medium containing glucose and O2 consumption was monitored until its full depletion.
The O2 flux, as a measure of the aerobic respiration, was in the order of 10−18 mol cell−1s−1 for the three bacteria, which is consistent with the average of O2 utilization described for other cell types24. We found that the blh− mutant showed a relatively lower O2 flux compared to the wild type cells under O2-replete conditions (above 20 nmol mL−1), whereas the bigR− mutant, on the other hand, a slightly higher O2 flux relative to the wild type cells (Fig. 4a, b and c). Interestingly however, the differences in the O2 flux between the blh− and bigR− mutants, relative to the wild type cells, increased significantly as the O2 concentration in the medium approached zero (Fig. 4d). The O2 flux of blh− cells, for instance, was approximately one tenth of that of the wild type cells at 0.2 nmol mL−1 O2, but nearly the same of that of the wild type cells at 5.0 nmol mL−1 O2 (Fig. 4d). On the other hand, the bigR− cells maintained a higher O2 flux compared to the wild type and blh− cells even at 0.2 nmol O2 mL−1 (Fig. 4d). These results thus confirm that O2 consumption is affected in the blh− mutant and that the bigR operon is critical to improve aerobic respiration under hypoxia, a condition experienced by Xylella and Agrobacterium cells inside plant tissues.
Sulfite is toxic to citrus cells and accumulates in CVC plants
The results presented in Figs 1b, 2b and 3a show that sulfite is generated by both ST and SDO activities of Blh. In contrast to mitochondria, where sulfite produced by the TST and ETHE1 pathway is further oxidized to non-toxic sulfate before it is secreted14, in A. tumefaciens, sulfite is excreted to the medium13. Because sulfite is toxic to plant cells25,26,27,28, we suspected that sulfite secreted by the action of the bigR operon could become toxic to the host plant, as bacterial colonization progresses. To explore this idea, we incubated sweet orange leaf discs in the presence of increased amounts of sulfite or sulfate. We found that sulfite, but not sulfate, caused a dose-dependent chlorosis in citrus tissues, indicating that it is toxic to citrus cells (Fig. 5a). Because sulfite caused the yellowing of the citrus leaf discs, we hypothesized that it might contribute to the CVC symptoms, since typical CVC lesions are surrounded by chlorotic halos (Fig. 5b). To investigate this, we measured the sulfite levels in symptomatic and asymptomatic CVC plants, relative to non-infected (healthy) plants. Sulfite levels in non-infected citrus leaves were in the range of 150 nmol per gram of fresh weigh (Fig. 5c), which is close to what has been reported for tomato and Arabidopsis27,28. We found that the sulfite levels were significantly higher in both symptomatic and asymptomatic leaves, relative to non-infected plants (Fig. 5c). Consistent with these results, bacterial quantification in the petioles of the corresponding leaves revealed high bacterial titles in both symptomatic and asymptomatic leaves (Fig. 5d).
To further investigate whether Xylella-infected leaves were under sulfite stress, the mRNA levels for Sulfite Reductase (SiR) and Sulfite Oxidase (SO), the principal enzymes responsible for sulfite detoxification in plants26,27,28, were examined. We found that both SiR and SO are significantly increased in leaves infected with Xylella, compared to non-infected leaves (Fig. 5e). Thus, although a clear link between sulfite levels and visible CVC symptoms could not be established, the results show a correlation between increased sulfite levels and bacterial cell population with the expression of sulfite detoxification genes in Xylella-infected plants, indicating that plants with CVC are under sulfite stress.
H2S and polysulfides oxidize BigR and activate the bigR operon
BigR has been suggested to function as a redox sensor in the sense that it loses affinity to DNA, allowing transcription of the operon, when its Cys42 and Cys108 residues form an intra-chain disulfide bond13. To investigate what molecules might induce BigR oxidation, we performed gel-shift assays in the presence of GSSH, since GSSH and other persulfides were recently shown to regulate the bigR-related cst operon in S. aureus and the sulfide-responsive regulator SqrR in Rhodobacter capsulatus15,29,30,31. Notably, we found that although GSSH abolished the BigR binding to its target DNA, the control reaction containing only the elemental sulfur also disrupted the BigR-DNA complex (Fig. 6a). This result strongly suggested that sulfide or polysulfides, reported to be present in sulfur-containing compounds, was responsible for BigR oxidization. Indeed, we found that the elemental sulfur source used in our experiments contained polysulfides, as revealed by the characteristic yellow pigmentation in alkaline solution32 (Fig. 6b). The presence of polysulfides in the elemental sulfur source was also evidenced by the absorbance curve with maximum peaks at 300 and 375 nm33 (Fig. 6c). Moreover, our elemental sulfur source also reacted with bismuth ion at alkaline pH forming a brownish-orange pigment, a strong indication of the presence of H2S or the hydrosulfide ion (HS−) in solution (Fig. 6b). These results, together with the fact that polysulfides have recently been shown to link H2S to protein thiol oxidization33, led us to investigate whether BigR could directly sense the H2S gas. To test this, recombinant BigR was incubated with gaseous H2S in a stainless-steel jar for 30 min, and the protein was subjected to gel-shift assays. We found that BigR treated with H2S no longer bound the target DNA (Fig. 6d), indicating that H2S itself can lead to BigR Cys42-Cys108 disulfide bond formation and operon activation.
Because gaseous H2S could not be employed to treat bacterial cells in ordinary bacterial growth chambers, we instead tested whether our sulfur preparations containing HS− and/or polysulfides could activate the bigR operon. Thus, A. tumefaciens cells carrying a GFP reporter gene driven by the bigR operon promoter20 were grown in the presence or absence of HS−/polysulfides. We found that the reporter cells exposed to the HS−/polysulfide solution showed increased GFP fluorescence in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6e), indicating that HS− and/or polysulfides were responsible for the operon activation, and like the H2S gas, were inducing the disulfide bond formation in BigR. To confirm this, recombinant BigR that had been incubated with gaseous H2S or the HS−/polysulfide solution was subject to mass spectrometry analysis. The results show that treatments of BigR with the H2S gas or HS−/polysulfide solution led to the incorporation of a ‘SH’ or ‘SSH’ group to the sulfur atom of Cys108, forming cysteine persulfides (Supplementary Table S1). Moreover, the peptide that shows the disulfide bond involving Cys42 and Cys10813 was also detected in BigR samples treated with gaseous H2S (Supplementary Fig. S1). Thus, considering that cysteine persulfides can serve as intermediates of disulfide bond formation when a second cysteine is nearby30,33, the results show that BigR senses sulfide species and that H2S itself is the actual modulator of BigR in vivo.
BigR is modified by sulfenic acid and glutathionylation at regulatory Cys residues
Sulfenic acid at cysteine residues has been reported to serve as an intermediate in disulfide bond formation34,35,36. In addition, H2S has been shown to react with sulfenic acid to form persulfides37. In the BigR-related transcriptional regulator HlyU from Vibrio cholera, Cys38 is modified to cysteine sulfenic acid38. Because this cysteine is structurally equivalent to Cys42 in BigR, we tested whether Cys42 in BigR could also be modified to cysteinyl sulfenic acid. Using dimedone, which specifically reacts with sulfenic acid36, we found that not only Cys42 but also Cys108 is modified to cysteine sulfenic acid (Table S1). Moreover, we found that Cys42 and Cys108 can also be linked to GSH (Table S1). Since GSH can react with cysteinyl sulfenic acid34, our results indicate that Cys42 and Cys108 in BigR can be modified to cysteinyl sulfenic acid to subsequently react with GSH or SH−.
Discussion
In our previous work, we showed that the bigR operon was required for H2S detoxification to allow bacterial growth under O2-limited conditions and suggested that Blh was implicated in the oxidization of H2S into sulfite13. Moreover, we predicted that the DUF442 and ETHE1 domains of Blh would display independent but coupled enzymatic activities and that DUF442 was structurally related to bacterial rhodaneses13. Here, we confirmed that the SDO and ST/rhodanese activities of the ETHE1 and DUF442 domains of Blh are in vitro coupled, corroborating data that show that such H2S oxidation mechanism is conserved in bacteria, plant and animal mitochondria10,11,12,14,15,16.
Our data also unveiled the fundamental question of why Blh is critical for bacterial growth under hypoxia. Since H2S blocks aerobic respiration by competing with O2 for cytochrome C oxidase binding, Blh helps to maintain a high O2 flux, especially when O2 becomes a limiting factor to the cells. Importantly, a comparative genomics study indicated that strains of X. fastidiosa possess a simple respiratory complex with just one terminal oxidase that would allow aerobic respiration only at high O2 levels, as they seem to lack cytochromes with high O2 affinity39. Thus, for aerobic organisms like X. fastidiosa and A. tumefaciens, the bigR operon becomes essential for survival, since it allows these pathogens to respire inside xylem vessels and roots where the O2 concentration can be very low40,41,42.
Because sulfite is produced by the ST and SDO reactions catalyzed by Blh, and is toxic to plant cells26,27,28, we decided to investigate whether sulfite could contribute to CVC symptoms, since it also induced chlorosis in citrus leaves (Fig. 5a). Although there was no apparent direct correlation between increased sulfite levels and typical chlorosis in CVC symptomatic leaves (Fig. 5), we found a correlation between increased sulfite levels and Xylella population with the augmented expression of Sir and SO. Thus, although further studies will still be necessary to demonstrate whether sulfite secreted by Xyllela cells would play an important role in the development of CVC symptoms, our data indicate that plants infected with Xylella are under sulfite stress.
Another fundamental question that remained unanswered was regarding the molecule responsible for BigR oxidation and operon activation in vivo. Due to its redox potential, H2S was initially not considered as a candidate13. However, in light of the work by Greiner and colleagues33 who showed that, in spite of its redox potential, H2S can lead to protein disulfide bond formation via polysulfide intermediates, we decided to investigate whether polysulfides or H2S could oxidize BigR and activate the operon. Here, we show that solutions containing HS− and/or polysulfides activated the bigR operon and induced persulfide formation at Cys108. Like the H2S-induced sulfhydration of human Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase PTP1B43, gaseous H2S flushed into solutions of BigR also induced sulfhydration of Cys108 and Cys42-Cys108 disulfide bond formation in the repressor. Notably, the sulfur atom of Cys108 is more surface exposed in the BigR 3D structure, compared with Cys42, and thus more prone to react with HS− or polysulfides to form the cysteine persulfide (Supplementary Fig. S2a). Moreover, a comparison of the crystal structures of reduced (SH) and oxidized (S-S) BigR shows that the side chain of Trp104, which sits in between Cys42 and Cys108 in reduced BigR and prevents the disulfide bond formation, flips almost 90 degrees in the oxidized BigR13 (Fig. S2a and b). It is thus possible that the initial formation of a Cys108 persulfide in reduced BigR could induce a conformational change in the Trp104 side chain opening space for the two cysteines to interact (Supplementary Fig. S2b).
It is also noteworthy that Cys42 and Cys108 can undergo S-glutathionylation and S-sulfenylation. Even though these cysteines modifications were the result of in vitro reactions with recombinant BigR, it is known that cysteine sulfenic acid can react not only with GSH, but with H2S to form cysteine persulfides, which eventually lead to disulfide bond formation between vicinal cysteines34,37,44,45. Our data thus suggest that H2S/HS− is likely to be the actual signaling molecule that activates the bigR operon via cysteine sulfhydration and disulfide or polysulfide bond formation in BigR. Therefore, instead of acting as a simple redox sensor, as previously suggested13, BigR appears to play a role as a H2S or sulfide sensor. In this regard, despite sharing similar features to the S. aureus CstR persulfide sensor29,30, BigR is phylogenetically related to the SqrR repressor recently shown to act as a sensor for H2S-derived reactive sulfur species31.
We hope that the data presented here indicating that BigR is a H2S sensor and that Blh is required for aerobic respiration under hypoxia will offer new opportunities for pathogen control.
Methods
Cloning, expression and purification of Blh and corresponding DUF442 and ETHE1 domains
The 9a5c X. fastidiosa Blh full-length gene (WP_010893291) and corresponding DUF442 and ETHE1 regions were amplified with the oligonucleotide pairs CATATGAGAATAGTAGACATC/CTCGAGTCACCATGCGGCACC, CATATGAGAATAGTAGACATC/GAGCTCGTTAGGCTTGACGTTCTAACCAGG and CATATGCAGACTCCGCGCGTTTCAGG/CTCGAGTCACCATGCGGCACC, respectively, and subcloned into the NdeI/XhoI-SacI sites of pET28a vector for the expression of recombinant 6xHis-fusion proteins. The plasmids were verified by DNA sequencing and inserted into Escherichia coli BL21 pLySE cells, which were grown at 20 °C for 30 h in ZYM5052 medium46, supplemented with kanamycin (100 µg/mL), for protein production. The cells were suspended in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 300 mM ammonium sulfate, 10% glycerol) and disrupted in a French press (25 kpsi) at 4 °C. The suspension was centrifuged and the recombinant proteins were purified on a NiNTA column (GE-Healthcare) equilibrated with lysis buffer. The column was washed with 10 column volumes of lysis buffer containing 50 mM imidazole and the proteins were eluted with lysis buffer containing 200 mM imidazole. Protein purity was verified by denaturing polyacrylamide gels and quantified on a NanoDrop. Protein yields were around 1.0, 0.6 and 4.0 mg/L for the full length Blh, ST and SDO domains, respectively.
Enzyme assays
The SDO activity of the Blh ETHE1 domain was determined by measuring the O2 consumption in the reaction mixture, as described by Hildebrandt and Grieshaber11. The purified ETHE1 domain (12 µg) was incubated at 25 °C in 2 mL (final volume) of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 1 mM GSH. The reaction started with the addition of 30 µL of a saturated acetonic sulfur solution, and O2 consumption was measured on a Hansatech oxygraph. The sulfite concentration in the reaction mixture was estimated using the MERCKOQUANT sulfite test strips (Merck-Millipore, USA) at the end of the SDO reaction. For estimation of the specific SDO activity, V max and Km values, the enzyme assays were performed with increasing amounts of GSSH (0 to 1.2 mM). The amount of GSSH obtained in the GSH/saturated acetonic sulfur solution was estimated by the methylene blue method11.
The rhodanese activity of full-length Blh or its DUF442 domain alone was determined spectrophotometrically as a measure of the iron-thiocyanate formation, using thiosulfate and cyanide as sulfur donor and acceptor, respectively23. The purified proteins (12 µg) were incubated at 25 °C for 5 min in 12 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 12 mM sodium thiosulfate and 12 mM potassium cyanate. The reaction was stopped with 1.8% formalin, followed by the addition of 100 mM iron nitrate, dissolved in 14% nitric acid, and the samples were read for absorbance at 460 nm. The amount of sulfite produced in the reaction was estimated using the sulfite test strips. For estimations of the specific enzyme activity, V max and Km of full-length Blh, the rhodanese reaction was performed varying the thiosulfate concentration from 0 to 100 mM.
The ST activity of full-length Blh or of the DUF442 domain alone was determined spectrophotometrically as a measure of sulfite production using the fuchsine method47. Purified proteins (12 µg) were incubated at 25 °C for 5 min in 50 mM acetate-buffer, pH 7.5, containing 10 mM sodium thiosulfate and 10 mM GSH. Alcoholic potassium hydroxide was added to samples at 0.16% final concentration. The samples were dissolved to 1:1 (V/V) in fuchsine reagent and read at 580 nm. A standard curve for sodium sulfite concentrations ranging from 0.4 µM to 2 mM was generated to estimate the amounts of sulfite in the samples. The coupled ST and SDO activities of Blh was determined in the oxygraph in 50 mM Tris-acetate, pH 7.4, containing 10 mM thiosulfate and 10 mM GSH, using the DUF442 and ETHE1 domains purified separately. The ST reaction started with the addition of 6 µg DUF442, and after 3 min, the ETHE1 domain (6 µg) was added to the reaction mixture. The reaction was also performed starting with the addition of the ETHE1 domain first, or using the full-length Blh as a control. O2 consumption was measured throughout the assay.
X-ray fluorescence analysis
X-ray fluorescence measurements of the ETHE1 and BSA samples were performed at the XRF beamline of the Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory (LNLS), as described previously48. A white beam of 0.1 mm high by 5 mm wide was used to excite the ETHE1 protein, or BSA, used as control, under total external reflection conditions of the X-ray beam for sample excitation. Samples were prepared by pipetting 5 µL of the purified proteins (~4 µg) onto a Perspex support. Samples dried at room temperature were measured for 300 s and the collected X-ray fluorescence spectra were evaluated using the PyMCA program49.
Respirometry assays
High-resolution respirometry assays were performed using an Oroboros 2 K oxygraph. The A. tumefaciens cells were grown in YEP medium (1.0% peptone, 1.0% yeast extract, 0.5% NaCl, 1.5% agar) at 30 °C for 48 h. Bacterial colonies were suspended in AB medium50, supplemented with 2 mM sodium phosphate and 40 mM MES, pH 5.8, and the optical density at 600 nm immediately adjusted to 1.5. Two mL of the cell suspensions containing approximately 1.0 × 107 cells were analyzed in the Oroboros equipment previously calibrated with the same medium. O2 consumption was recorded at 25 °C until its full depletion.
Sulfite toxicity assay
Leaves from Citrus sinensis (Pineapple) plants, maintained in the greenhouse, were detached and washed with sterile water. Leaf discs were excised, embedded in water solutions of sodium sulfite or sodium sulfate at 0.5, 1.0, 5.0 and 10 mM concentrations, and placed onto filter paper wet with the same solutions inside petri dishes. The leaf discs were incubated at 25 °C for 24 to 72 h under a 12 h light/12 h dark regime, after which they were photographed.
Plant inoculations and quantitative RT-PCR
Sweet orange Pineapple plants were infected with X. fastidiosa (9a5c strain) according to Almeida et al.51. Six leaves showing typical CVC symptoms, or no visible symptoms, were collected and their petioles were used for bacterial quantification. Petioles were weighed, ground in liquid nitrogen and total DNA was extracted using DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen). Bacterial population was determined by qPCR using a standard curve, as described previously52. Amplifications were performed using TaqMan PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) with 10 pmol of primers CVC-1 (TGA AGA TCA TGC AAA AAA CAA) and CCSM-1 (GCGCATGCCAAGTCCATATTT), probe TAQ-CVC-(6FAM) AACCGCAGCAGAAGCCGCTCATC (TAMRA) (Applied Biosystems) and 270 ng of DNA. Reactions were performed in triplicates using an ABI PRISM 7500 Sequence Detector System (Applied Biosystems). The Ct (threshold cycle) and DNA concentration values were correlated by linear regression.
For SiR and SO quantification, total RNA was extracted from the same collected leaves using TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The quantity and quality of the RNA samples were evaluated by denatured gel electrophoresis and absorbance at 260/280 nm. cDNA was synthesized using the SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific), following the manufacturer’s procedure. The oligonucleotides used for the amplification of the SiR (GCCTTCGCATTCGCTCTCA/CGTACGGAACGGGAAAAGC) and SO (TCGAGGATGCCGGGACTA/ACGAGGCGGCTCTTGAGA) genes (GenBank accessions XM_006470566 and XM_006469992.2, respectively) were designed using the Applied Biosystems Primer Express 2.0 software, and the amplifications were carried out using a 7500 PCR system (Applied Biosystems, USA). The citrus actin and malate translocator genes were used as internal control for normalization53,54. Total RNAs from five independent leaves were used as biological replicates, and three technical replicates for each biological sample were performed. The relative gene expression levels among samples were determined using the 7000 System SDS software v2.3 (Applied Biosystems) with default parameters
Sulfite measurements in citrus leaves
Leaf powder (250 mg fresh weight) from the same symptomatic, asymptomatic or healthy pineapple plants used for Sir and SO mRNA quantifications were incubated in 1 mL Tris-HCl pH 8.0 with 500 mM sodium sulfate solution for 10 min at 25 °C to avoid spontaneous conversion of sulfite into sulfate55. The suspensions were centrifuged at 18.000 × g for 5 min and the supernatants were collected and mixed with 3% KOH diluted in ethanol (1:1 v/v), as described by Leinweber and Monty55. Samples were centrifuged at 18.000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C and the supernatants were mixed (5:1 v/v) with fuchsine solution prepared according to Leinweber and Monty47. After 10 min incubation at room temperature, samples were measured for absorbance at 575 nm. The amount of sulfite in the samples was estimated using a sulfite calibration curve determined with freshly prepared sodium sulfite solutions47.
Detection of H2S and polysulfides in elemental sulfur sources
Saturated acetonic sulfur solutions were adjusted to pH 12 with potassium hydroxide at room temperature and inspected for the yellow color production32,33. The polysulfide solution was prepared according to Kleinjan et al.56. Elemental sulfur (0.15 g) was dissolved into 20 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, containing 60 mM ammonium sulfide and the solution was incubated for 16 h at 50 °C. Polysulfide formation was evaluated by absorbance at 300–490 nm33.
To evaluate the presence of H2S in the elemental sulfur sources, bismuth citrate was added to the saturated acetonic sulfur solutions, which were inspected for a brownish-orange color.
Incubation of BigR with gaseous H2S
Recombinant BigR was purified by affinity chromatography as previously described20. Aliquots of 0.3 mL of purified BigR (0.2 mg/mL) in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, NaCl 200 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol 10% and 200 mM imidazole, were placed inside a sealed stainless-steel jar specially designed to flow gases into the sample. Nitrogen gas at 20 psi was flushed through the system for 5 min at 1 mL/min to remove O2. Subsequently, 5.0% H2S at 20 psi was flushed at 1 mL/min through the sample for up to 1 h. After the treatment, protein samples were subjected to gel-shift and mass spectrometry analysis as described below.
Gel-shift assays
Gel-shift assays were performed as described previously20, except that the DNA-protein complexes were detected by ethidium bromide. Approximately 2 µg of BigR, purified by affinity chromatography, was incubated in binding buffer (10 mM de Tris HCl pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM de EDTA) containing GSH, GSSH, or the acetonic sulfur solution at 100 µM, for 1 h at 4 °C. The 115 bp DNA probe (300 ng) was subsequently added to the reaction and the mixtures were further incubated at 4 °C for 30 min. BigR samples previously treated with H2S gas were also incubated 4 °C for 30 min with the DNA probe. Protein-DNA complexes were resolved on 6% polyacrylamide gels in 1X TBE buffer. After the run, gels were stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light.
Mass spectrometry analyses
Recombinant BigR (50 µg) incubated with gaseous H2S or which had been treated with either the 2.0% polysulfide solution (v/v), 125 µM GSH, 5 mM hydrogen peroxide or 5 mM dimedone in phosphate-saline (PBS) buffer for 20 min at 4 °C, were resolved on SDS-gels. BigR bands were removed and digested with chymotrypsin (1 µg) for 16 h at 37 °C. The samples were reduced or not with DTT and/or alkylated with iodoacetamide for mass spectrometry analysis as described by Villén and Gygi57. The peptides derived from the chymotrypsin-digested samples were desalted by stage-tips, dried in a vacuum concentrator and reconstituted in 50 µL of 0.1% formic acid. BigR peptides mixtures incubated with gaseous H2S or which had been treated with either the 2.0% polysulfide solution (v/v), 125 µM GSH, 5 mM hydrogen peroxide were separated by C18 (100 µm x 100 mm) RP-nanoUPLC (nanoAcquity, Waters) coupled with a Q-Tof Premier mass spectrometer (Waters) with nanoelectrospray source at a flow rate of 0.6 µl/min. The gradient was 2–30% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid over 30 min for the digested proteins. The nanoelectrospray voltage was set to 3.5 kV, a cone voltage of 30 V and the source temperature was 80 °C. The instrument was operated in the ‘top three’ mode, in which one MS spectrum is acquired followed by MS/MS of the top three most-intense peaks detected. After MS/MS fragmentation, the ion was placed on exclusion list for 60 s and for the analysis of endogenous cleavage peptides, a real-time exclusion was used. The spectra were acquired using software MassLynx v.4.1 and the raw data files were converted to a peak list format (mgf) by the software Mascot Distiller v.2.6.2.0, 2017 (Matrix Science Ldt.) and searched against a customized Xylella database (6,493 sequences; 2,025,062 residues) using Mascot engine v.2.3.0 (Matrix Science Ltd.), with carbamidomethylation (+57 Da) as fixed or variable modification, and oxidation of methionine (+16 Da), polysulfide or persulfide (+32, +64, +96 and +128 Da) in cysteines, considering the additional loss of one hydrogen as variable modifications. One chymotrypsin missed cleavage and a tolerance of 0.1 Da for both precursor and fragment ions were considered. For disulfide bonds analysis, a peak list (mgf) generated by Mascot Distiller v.2.6.2.0, 2017 (Matrix Science Ldt.) was analyzed in MassMatrix software58 to automatically search Cys-Cys disulfide bonds against database containing the BigR protein sequence, according to the software instructions. The parameters for disulfide bonds analysis used in MassMatrix software were carbamidomethylation (+57.021 Da), oxidation of methionine (+15.995 Da), polysulfide or persulfide (+32, +64, +96 and +128 Da) in cysteines, considering the additional loss of one hydrogen as variable modifications, non-cleavable by enzymes, two chymotrypsin missed cleavages, and a tolerance of 0.1 Da for precursor and for fragment ions.
BigR peptides mixtures treated with 5 mM dimedone in phosphate-saline (PBS) buffer were analyzed on a ETD enabled LTQ Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled with LC-MS/MS by an EASY-nLC system (Proxeon Biosystem). Peptides were separated by a 2–30% acetonitrile gradient in 0.1% formic acid using an analytical PicoFrit ID75 μm column (New Objective) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min over 30 min. The nanoelectrospray voltage, source temperature and instrument method were set to 2.2 kV, 275 °C and data-dependent acquisition mode. The full scan MS spectra (m/z 300-1,600) were acquired in the Orbitrap analyzer after accumulation to a target value of 1e6. The resolution in the Orbitrap system was set to r = 60,000, and the five most intense peptide ions with charge states ≥2 were sequentially isolated to a target value of 50,000 and fragmented in higher-energy collisional dissociation with normalized collision energy of 40% with the resolution in the Orbitrap system was set to r = 7,500 for MS/MS. The signal threshold for triggering an MS/MS event was set to 80,000 counts and an activation time of 0.1 ms was used. Dynamic exclusion was enabled with an exclusion size list of 400, exclusion duration of 60 s, and a repeat count of 2. The raw data files were converted to a peak list format (mgf) by the software Mascot Distiller v.2.6.2.0, 2017 (Matrix Science Ldt.) using the same parameters described above with a tolerance of 10 ppm for precursor ions and 0.02 Da for fragment ions.
Reporter gene assays
GFP fluorescence, as a measure of operon activation, was determined in the C58 A. tumefaciens wild type, blh− and bigR− cells based on Barbosa and Benedetti20. Bacterial cells were grown in YEP medium for 16 h at 30 °C under agitation (200 rpm). The cells were pelleted and washed twice in 25 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 0.6% glucose. The cells were suspended in the same buffer and the optical density of the suspensions at 600 nm was adjusted to 1.0. The cells were incubated at 30 °C for 3 h at 100 rpm in the presence or absence of the polysulfide solution at 0.2%, 2.0% or 10% v/v. After the incubation, bacterial cells were visualized for GFP fluorescence on a Zeiss Imager A.2 fluorescence microscope.
References
Paul, B. D. & Snyder, S. H. H2S signaling through protein sulfhydration and beyond. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 499–407 (2012).
Stein, A. & Bailey, S. M. Redox biology of hydrogen sulfide: implications for physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology. Redox Biol. 1, 32–39 (2013).
Li, Z. G., Min, X. & Zhou, Z. H. Hydrogen sulfide: a signal molecule in plant cross-adaptation. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1621 (2016).
Clarke, P. H. Hydrogen sulphide production by bacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol. 8, 397–407 (1953).
Barrett, E. L. & Clark, M. A. Tetrathionate reduction and production of hydrogen sulfide from thiosulfate. Microbiol. Rev. 51, 192–205 (1987).
Shimada, T., Tanaka, K. & Ishihama, A. Transcription factor DecR (YbaO) controls detoxification of L-cysteine in Escherichia coli. Microbiology 162, 1698–1707 (2016).
Lloyd, D. Hydrogen sulfide: clandestine microbial messenger? Trends Microbiol. 14, 456–462 (2006).
Shatalin, K., Shatalina, E., Mironov, A. & Nudler, E. H2S: a universal defense against antibiotics in bacteria. Science 334, 986–990 (2011).
Wu, G., Wan, F., Fu, H., Li, N. & Gao, H. A matter of timing: contrasting effects of hydrogen sulfide on oxidative stress response in Shewanella oneidensis. J. Bacteriol. 197, 3563–3572 (2015).
Rohwerder, T. & Sand, W. The sulfane sulfur of persulfides is the actual substrate of the sulfur-oxidizing enzymes from Acidithiobacillus and Acidiphilium spp. Microbiology 149, 1699–1710 (2003).
Hildebrandt, T. M. & Grieshaber, M. K. Three enzymatic activities catalyze the oxidation of sulfide to thiosulfate in mammalian and invertebrate mitochondria. FEBS J. 275, 3352–3361 (2008).
Tiranti, V. et al. Loss of ETHE1, a mitochondrial dioxygenase, causes fatal sulfide toxicity in ethylmalonic encephalopathy. Nat. Med. 15, 200–205 (2009).
Guimarães, B. G. et al. Plant pathogenic bacteria utilize biofilm growth-associated repressor (BigR), a novel winged-helix redox switch, to control hydrogen sulfide detoxification under hypoxia. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 26148–26157 (2011).
Melideo, S. L., Jackson, M. R. & Jorns, M. S. Biosynthesis of a central intermediate in hydrogen sulfide metabolism by a novel human sulfurtransferase and its yeast ortholog. Biochemistry 53, 4739–4753 (2014).
Shen, J. et al. Staphylococcus aureus CstB is a novel multidomain persulfide dioxygenase-sulfurtransferase involved in hydrogen sulfide detoxification. Biochemistry 54, 4542–4554 (2015).
Birke, H., Hildebrandt, T. M., Wirtz, M. & Hell, R. Sulfide detoxification in plant mitochondria. Methods Enzymol. 555, 271–286 (2015).
Viscomi, C. et al. Combined treatment with oral metronidazole and N-acetylcysteine is effective in ethylmalonic encephalopathy. Nat Med. 16, 869–871 (2010).
Zhang, X., Vincent, A. S., Halliwell, B. & Wong, K. P. A mechanism of sulfite neurotoxicity: direct inhibition of glutamate dehydrogenase. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 43035–43045 (2004).
Niknahad., H. & O’Brien, P. J. Mechanism of sulfite cytotoxicity in isolated rat hepatocytes. Chem Biol Interact. 174, 147–154 (2008).
Barbosa, R. L. & Benedetti, C. E. BigR, a transcriptional repressor from plant-associated bacteria, regulates an operon implicated in biofilm growth. J. Bacteriol. 189, 6185–6194 (2007).
Pettinati, I., Brem, J., McDonough, M. A. & Schofield, C. J. Crystal structure of human persulfide dioxygenase: structural basis of ethylmalonic encephalopathy. Hum Mol Genet. 24, 2458–2469 (2015).
Hänzelmann, P. et al. Crystal structure of YnjE from Escherichia coli, a sulfurtransferase with three rhodanese domains. Protein Sci. 18, 2480–2491 (2009).
Banerjee, R. et al. Assay methods for H2S biogenesis and catabolism enzymes. Methods Enzymol. 554, 189–200 (2015).
Wagner, B. A., Venkataraman, S. & Buettner, G. R. The rate of oxygen utilization by cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 51, 700–712 (2011).
Nandi, P. K., Agrawal, M., Agrawal, S. B. & Rao, D. N. Physiological responses of Vicia faba plants to sulfur dioxide. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 19, 64–71 (1990).
Brychkova, G. et al. Sulfite oxidase protects plants against sulfur dioxide toxicity. Plant J. 50, 696–709 (2007).
Yarmolinsky, D., Brychkova, G., Fluhr, R. & Sagi, M. Sulfite reductase protects plants against sulfite toxicity. Plant Physiol. 161, 725–743 (2013).
Brychkova, G., Grishkevich, V., Fluhr, R. & Sagi, M. An essential role for tomato sulfite oxidase and enzymes of the sulfite network in maintaining leaf sulfite homeostasis. Plant Physiol. 161, 148–64 (2013).
Luebke, J. L., Arnold, R. J. & Giedroc, D. P. Selenite and tellurite form mixed seleno- and tellurotrisulfides with CstR from Staphylococcus aureus. Metallomics. 5, 335–342 (2013).
Luebke, J. L. et al. The CsoR-like sulfurtransferase repressor (CstR) is a persulfide sensor in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol. 94, 1343–1360 (2014).
Shimizu, T. et al. Sulfide-responsive transcriptional repressor SqrR functions as a master regulator of sulfide-dependent photosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 2355–2360 (2017).
Debiemme-Chouvy, C., Wartelle, C. & Sauvage, F. X. First evidence of the oxidation and regeneration of polysulfides at a GaAs electrode, under anodic conditions. A study by in situ UV-visible spectroelectrochemistry. J. Phys. Chem. B. 108, 18291–18296 (2004).
Greiner, R. et al. Polysulfides link H2S to protein thiol oxidation. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 19, 1749–1765 (2013).
Johansson, M. & Lundberg, M. Glutathionylation of beta-actin via a cysteinyl sulfenic acid intermediary. BMC Biochem. 8, 26 (2007).
Rehder, D. S. & Borges, C. R. Cysteine sulfenic acid as an intermediate in disulfide bond formation and nonenzymatic protein folding. Biochemistry 49, 7748–7755 (2010).
Gupta, V. & Carroll, K. S. Sulfenic acid chemistry, detection and cellular lifetime. Biochim. Biophys Acta. 1840, 847–875 (2014).
Cuevasanta, E. et al. Reaction of hydrogen sulfide with disulfide and sulfenic acid to form the strongly nucleophilic persulfide. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 26866–80 (2015).
Mukherjee, D., Datta, A. B. & Chakrabarti, P. Crystal structure of HlyU, the hemolysin gene transcription activator, from Vibrio cholerae N16961 and functional implications. Biochim. Biophys Acta. 1844, 2346–2354 (2014).
Bhattacharyya, A. et al. Draft sequencing and comparative genomics of Xylella fastidiosa strains reveal novel biological insights. Genome Res. 12, 1556–1563 (2002).
Thomson, C. J. & Greenway, H. Metabolic evidence for stelar anoxia in maize roots exposed to low o(2) concentrations. Plant Physiol. 96, 1294–1301 (1991).
van Dongen, J. T., Schurr, U., Pfister, M. & Geigenberger, P. Phloem metabolism and function have to cope with low internal oxygen. Plant Physiol. 131, 1529–1543 (2003).
Armstrong, W., Webb, T., Darwent, M. & Beckett, P. M. Measuring and interpreting respiratory critical oxygen pressures in roots. Ann. Bot. 103, 281–283 (2009).
Krishnan, N., Fu, C., Pappin, D. J. & Tonks, N. K. H2S-induced sulfhydration of the phosphatase PTP1B and its role in the endoplasmic reticulum stress response. Sci. Signal. 4, ra86 (2011).
Chung, H. S., Wang, S. B., Venkatraman, V., Murray, C. I. & Van Eyk, J. E. Cysteine oxidative posttranslational modifications: emerging regulation in the cardiovascular system. Circ. Res. 112, 382–392 (2013).
Sen, N. et al. Hydrogen sulfide-linked sulfhydration of NF-κB mediates its antiapoptotic actions. Mol Cell. 45, 13–24 (2012).
Studier, F. W. Protein production by auto-induction in high-density shaking cultures. Prot. Exp. Pur. 41, 207–234 (2005).
Leinweber, F. J. & Monty, K. J. Sulfite determination: fuchsin method. Methods Enzymol. 143, 15–17 (1987).
Balan, A. et al. The molybdate-binding protein (ModA) of the plant pathogen Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri. Protein Expr. Purif. 50, 215–222 (2006).
Solé, V. A., Papillon, E., Cotte, M., Walter, P. & Susini, J. A multiplatform code for the analysis of energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectra. Spectrochim. Acta Part B 62, 63–68 (2007).
Chilton, M. D. et al. Agrobacterium tumefaciens DNA and PS8 bacteriophage DNA not detected in crown gall tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71, 3672–3676 (1974).
Almeida, R. P. P., Pereira, E. F., Purcell, A. H. & Lopes, J. R. S. Multiplication and movement of a citrus strain of Xylella fastidiosa within sweet orange. Plant Dis. 85, 382–386 (2001).
Oliveira, A. C. et al. Quantification of Xylella fastidiosa from citrus trees by real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. Phytopathology 92, 1048–1054 (2002).
Mafra, V. et al. Reference genes for accurate transcript normalization in citrus genotypes under different experimental conditions. PLoS One 7, e31263 (2012).
de Oliveira, M. L. et al. Increased resistance against citrus canker mediated by a citrus mitogen-activated protein kinase. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 26, 1190–1199 (2013).
Brychkova, G., Yarmolinsky, D., Fluhr, R. & Sagi, M. The determination of sulfite levels and its oxidation in plant leaves. Plant Sci. 190, 123–130 (2012).
Kleinjan, W. E., de Keizer, A. & Janssen, A. J. Kinetics of the chemical oxidation of polysulfide anions in aqueous solution. Water Res. 39, 4093–4100 (2005).
Villén, J. & Gygi, S. P. The SCX/IMAC enrichment approach for global phosphorylation analysis by mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1630–1638 (2008).
Xu, H. & Freitas, M. A. A mass accuracy sensitive probability based scoring algorithm for database searching of tandem mass spectrometry data. BMC Bioinformatics. 8, 133 (2007).
Acknowledgements
We thank Jaqueline Silva and Jackeline Zanella for helping with protein expression and purification, and Romenia Domingues for helping with the mass spectrometry data acquisition. We also thank Fabio Zambello for helping with the hydrogen sulfide experiments performed at the Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory (LNLS). This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo - FAPESP (grant 2011/20468-1). CEB and NPVL received a fellowship from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and FAPESP, respectively.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.E.B. conceived and coordinated the study and wrote the paper. N.P.V.L. designed, performed and analyzed the experiments shown in all Figures. N.P.V.L., B.A.P. and A.F.P.L. designed, performed and analyzed the mass spectrometry experiments. A.C.M. and A.E.V. provided technical assistance and contributed to the experiments shown in Figure 4. C.A.P. designed, performed and analyzed the X-ray fluorescence experiments. R.C. and A.A.S. performed plant inoculations and bacterial quantification in citrus. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
de Lira, N.P.V., Pauletti, B.A., Marques, A.C. et al. BigR is a sulfide sensor that regulates a sulfur transferase/dioxygenase required for aerobic respiration of plant bacteria under sulfide stress. Sci Rep 8, 3508 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21974-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21974-x
This article is cited by
-
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) signaling in plant development and stress responses
aBIOTECH (2021)
-
Glutaredoxin-like protein (GLP)—a novel bacteria sulfurtransferase that protects cells against cyanide and oxidative stresses
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.