Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09462-9, Published online 05 April 2022


The original version of this Article contained an error in the Results section under the subheading ‘Defining cut‑off values for prediction’ where,


“The parameters with the highest area under the curve (AUC) were number of total alarms (0.87, P = 0.0004), total drain time (0.82, P = 0.0017), and mean net UF of last fill (0.79, P = 0.0078.”


now reads:


“The parameters with the highest area under the curve (AUC) were number of total alarms (0.87, P = 0.0004), total drain time (0.82, P = 0.0017), and mean net UF of last fill (0.79, P = 0.0056).”


The original Article has been corrected.