Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Indirect estimates of body composition are useful for groups but unreliable in individuals

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of the body mass index (BMI) in identifying individuals classified as overweight or obese based on estimates of body fat percentage (BF%) obtained by the deuterium dilution (BF%DD) method. In addition, to assess the accuracy of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and skinfold thickness (SFT) measurements in the estimation of body composition of Australians at the individual and group level.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.

SUBJECTS: One hundred and seventeen healthy Australian volunteers of European descent, comprising of 51 males and 66 females, ranging in age from 19 to 77 y.

MEASUREMENTS: BMI was calculated from body weight and height. Fat-free mass (FFM) was estimated from measures of total body water (TBW) using deuterium dilution (FFMDD), SFT using the equations of Durnin and Womersley (Br J Nutr 1974; 32: 77–97) (FFMSFT), and BIA using the equations of Lukaski et al (J Appl Physiol 1986; 60: 1327–1332) (FFMLU), Segal et al (Am J Clin Nutr 1988; 47: 7–14) (FFMSe) and Heitmann (Eur J Clin Nutr 1990; 44: 831–837) (FFMHe). Estimates of fat mass (FM) were calculated as the difference between body weight and FFM, while BF% was calculated by expressing FM as a percentage of body weight.

RESULTS: BMI had poor sensitivity and positive predictive value in identifying individuals as being overweight/obese as classified by BF%DD. Furthermore, estimates of FFM (and hence FM) from BIA or SFT could not be used interchangeably with DD, without the risk of considerable error at the individual level. At the group level errors were relatively smaller, though statistically significant. While FFMSFT could be corrected by the addition of the bias (1.2 kg in males and 0.8 kg in females), no simple correction was possible with BIA estimates of FFM for any of the equations used. However, an accurate prediction of FFMDD was possible from the combination of FFMHe, biceps SFT and mid-arm circumference in both males and females. The bias of this prediction was small (<0.15 kg), statistically non-significant in both sexes, and unrelated to the mean FFM obtained by the two methods. The revision of Heitmann's estimate of FFM using anthropometric variables described in this study had the best sensitivity (79%), specificity (96%) and positive predictive value (92%) in identifying overweight/obese individuals in comparison to the other equations tested.

CONCLUSION: BMI was a poor surrogate for body fatness in both males and females. The currently recommended equations for the prediction of body composition from SFT and BIA provided inaccurate estimates of FFM both at the individual and group level as compared to estimates from DD. However, Heitmann's equations, when combined with measures of the biceps SFT and mid-arm circumference, provided better estimates of FFM both at the individual and group level.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organisation (WHO) . Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic WHO: Geneva 1997.

  2. Norgan NG . Population differences in body composition in relation to the body mass index Eur J Clin Nutr 1994 48 (Suppl 3): S10–S25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rush EC, Plank LD, Laulu MS, Robinson SM . Prediction of percentage body fat from anthropometric measurements: comparison of New Zealand European and Polynesian young women Am J Clin Nutr 1997 66: 2–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gurrici S, Hartriyanti Y, Hautvast JG, Deurenberg P . Relationship between body fat and body mass index: differences between Indonesians and Dutch Caucasians Eur J Clin Nutr 1998 52: 779–783.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deurenberg P, Yap M, van Staveren WA . Body mass index and percent body fat: a meta analysis among different ethnic groups Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998 22: 1164–1171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gurrici S, Y Hartriyanti Y, Hautvast JGAJ, Deurenberg P . Differences in the relationship between body fat and body mass index between two different Indonesian ethnic groups: the effect of body build Eur J Clin Nutr 1999 53: 468–472.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brodie D, Moscrip V, Hutcheon R . Body composition measurement: a review of hydrodensitometry, anthropometry, and impedance methods Nutrition 1998 14: 296–310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lukaski HC, Bolonchuk WW, Hall CB, Siders WA . Validation of tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance method to assess human body composition J Appl Physiol 1986 60: 1327–1332.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Khaled MA, Lukaski HC, Watkins CL . Determination of total body water by deuterium NMR Am J Clin Nutr 1987 45: 1–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Segal KR, Van Loan M, Fitzgerald PI, Hodgdon JA, Van Itallie TB . Lean body mass estimation by bioelectrical impedance analysis: a four-site cross-validation study Am J Clin Nutr 1988 47: 7–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heitmann BL . Evaluation of body fat estimated from body mass index, skinfolds and impedance. A comparative study Eur J Clin Nutr 1990 44: 831–837.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Foster KR, Lukaski HC . Whole-body impedance—what does it measure? Am J Clin Nutr 1996 64 (Suppl 3): 388S–396S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Durnin JV, Womersley J . Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 y Br J Nutr 1974 32: 77–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wattanapenpaiboon N, Lukito W, Strauss BJ, Hsu-Hage BH, Wahlqvist ML, Stro-d DB . Agreement of skinfold measurement and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) methods with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in estimating total body fat in Anglo-Catic Australians Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998 22: 854–860.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Callaway CW, Chumlea WC, Bouchard C, Himes JH, Lohman TG, Martin AD, Mitchell CD, Mueller WH, Roche AF, Seefeldt VD . Circumferences. In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R (eds) Anthropometric standardisation reference manual Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL 1988, pp 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harrison GG, Buskirk ER, Lindsay Carter JE, Johnston FE, Lohman TG, Pollock ML, Roche AF, Wilmore J . Skinfold thicknesses and measurement technique. In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell RI(eds) Anthropometric standardisation reference manual. Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL 1988, pp 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Piers LS, Soares MJ, McCormack LM, O'Dea K . Is there evidence for an age-related reduction in metabolic rate? J Appl Physiol 1998 85: 2196–2204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pace N, Rathburn EN . Studies on body composition. III. The body water and chemically combined nitrogen content in relation to fat content J Biol Chem 1945 158: 685–691.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sergi G, Perini P, Bussolotto M, Zurlo F, Malvasi L, Carraro R, Del Prato S, Giantin V, Enzi G . Body composition study in the elderly: comparison between tritium dilution method and dual photon absorptiometry J Gerontol 1993 48: M244–248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lukaski HC . Methods for the assessment of human body composition: traditional and new Am J Clin Nutr 1987 46: 537–556.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bland JM, Altman DG . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1986 1 (8476): 307–310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Kjellstrom T . Basic epidemiology World Health Organization: Geneva 1993.

  23. Hannan WJ, Wrate RM, Cowen SJ, Freeman CP . Body mass index as an estimate of body fat Int J Eat Disord 1995 18: 91–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Malina RM, Katzmarzyk PT . Validity of the body mass index as an indicator of the risk and presence of overweight in adolescents Am J Clin Nutr 1999 70: 131S–136S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Heitmann BL . Body fat in the adult Danish population aged 35-65 y: an epidemiological study Int J Obes 1991 15: 535–545.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gallagher D, Visser M, Sepúlveda D, Pierson RN, Harris T, Heymsfield SB . How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex, and ethnic groups? Am J Epidemiol 1996 143: 228–289.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Allison DB, Gallagher D, Heo M, Pi-Sunyer FX, Heymsfield SB . Body mass index and all-cause mortality among people age 70 and over: the Longitudinal Study of Aging Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1997 21: 424–431.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Douchi T, Ijuin H, Nakamura S, Oki T, Yamamoto S, Katanozaka M, Nagata Y . The relation between body-fat distribution and lipid metabolism in postmenopausal women J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1996 22: 353–358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Marshall JD, Hazlett CB, Spady DW, Conger PR, Quinney HA . Validity of convenient indicators of obesity Hum Biol 1991 63: 137–153.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schaefer F, Georgi M, Wühl E, Scharer K . Body mass index and percentage fat mass in healthy German schoolchildren and adolescents Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998 22: 461–469.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pietrobelli A, Faith MS, Allison DB, Gallagher D, Chiumello G, Heymsfield SB . Body mass index as a measure of adiposity among children and adolescents: a validation study J Pediatr 1998 132: 204–210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rutishauser IH, Pasco JA, Wheeler CE . The influence of body build on estimates of body composition from anthropometric measurements in premenopausal women Eur J Clin Nutr 1995 49: 248–255.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tagliabue A, Cena H, Trentani C, Lanzola E, Silva S . How reliable is bio-electrical impedance analysis for individual patients? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1992 16: 649–652.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ghosh S, Meister D, Cowen S, Hannan WJ, Ferguson A . Body composition at the bedside Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1997 9: 783–788.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lukaski HC . Comparison of proximal and distal placements of electrodes to assess human body composition by bioelectrical impedance Basic Life Sci 1993 60: 39–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Caton JR, Mole PA, Adams WC, Heustis DS . Body composition analysis by bioelectrical impedance: effect of skin temperature Med Sci Sports Exerc 1988 20: 489–491.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Brodie DA, Eston RG, Coxon AY, Kreitzman SN, Stockdale HR, Howard AN . Effect of changes of water and electrolytes on the validity of conventional methods of measuring fat-free mass Ann Nutr Metab 1991 35: 89–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gallagher M, Walker KZ, O'Dea K . The influence of a breakfast meal on the assessment of body composition using bioelectrical impedance Eur J Clin Nutr 1998 52: 94–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fogelholm M, Sievänen H, Kukkonen-Harjula K, Oja P, Vuori I . Effects of meal and its electrolytes on bioelectrical impedance Basic Life Sci 1993 60: 331–332.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pinilla JC, Webster B, Baetz M, Reeder B, Hattori S, Liu L . Effect of body positions and splints in bioelectrical impedance analysis J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1992 16: 408–412.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

LSP was the recipient of a postdoctoral research fellowship from Deakin University, Australia. He is currently supported by a grant (981019) from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia. MJS is the recipient of a Kellogg's Senior Lectureship. We wish to thank Ms Leanne L McCormack, Mr Mark Lutschini, Dr Karen Walker, Ms Connie Karschimkus, Ms Olga Strommer and Ms Bronwyn Diffey for their assistance with the project, Ms Gail Dyson for assistance with the NMR analyses, and Dr Kevin G Rowley for useful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to LS Piers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piers, L., Soares, M., Frandsen, S. et al. Indirect estimates of body composition are useful for groups but unreliable in individuals. Int J Obes 24, 1145–1152 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801387

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801387

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links