Issue 16, 2023

A comparative analysis of 3D printed scaffolds consisting of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid and different bioactive mineral fillers: aspects of degradation and cytocompatibility

Abstract

Their excellent mechanical properties, degradability and suitability for processing by 3D printing technologies make the thermoplastic polylactic acid and its derivatives favourable candidates for biomaterial-based bone regeneration therapies. In this study, we investigated whether bioactive mineral fillers, which are known to promote bone healing based on their dissolution products, can be integrated into a poly(L-lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLLA-PGA) matrix and how key characteristics of degradation and cytocompatibility are influenced. The polymer powder was mixed with particles of CaCO3, SrCO3, strontium-modified hydroxyapatite (SrHAp) or tricalcium phosphates (α-TCP, β-TCP) in a mass ratio of 90 : 10; the resulting composite materials have been successfully processed into scaffolds by the additive manufacturing method Arburg Plastic Freeforming (APF). Degradation of the composite scaffolds was investigated in terms of dimensional change, bioactivity, ion (calcium, phosphate, strontium) release/uptake and pH development during long-term (70 days) incubation. The mineral fillers influenced the degradation behavior of the scaffolds to varying degrees, with the calcium phosphate phases showing a clear buffer effect and an acceptable dimensional increase. The amount of 10 wt% SrCO3 or SrHAp particles did not appear to be appropriate to release a sufficient amount of strontium ions to exert a biological effect in vitro. Cell culture experiments with the human osteosarcoma cell line SAOS-2 and human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSC) indicated the high cytocompatibility of the composites: For all material groups cell spreading and complete colonization of the scaffolds over the culture period of 14 days as well as an increase of the specific alkaline phosphatase activity, typical for osteogenic differentiation, were observed.

Graphical abstract: A comparative analysis of 3D printed scaffolds consisting of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid and different bioactive mineral fillers: aspects of degradation and cytocompatibility

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
16 Dec 2022
Accepted
29 Jun 2023
First published
29 Jun 2023

Biomater. Sci., 2023,11, 5590-5604

A comparative analysis of 3D printed scaffolds consisting of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid and different bioactive mineral fillers: aspects of degradation and cytocompatibility

T. Ahlfeld, A. Lode, A. Placht, T. Fecht, T. Wolfram, S. Grom, A. Hoess, C. Vater, C. Bräuer, S. Heinemann, G. Lauer, F. Reinauer and M. Gelinsky, Biomater. Sci., 2023, 11, 5590 DOI: 10.1039/D2BM02071H

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements