Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Evaluation of reliability worth and value of lost load

Evaluation of reliability worth and value of lost load

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings - Generation, Transmission and Distribution — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Customers' perceptions of reliability may not always reflect the level of reliability purported by traditional reliability indices. This has been recognised and efforts have been made by the electricity supply industry (ESI) in the United Kingdom to relate ‘reliability investment’ with customers' marginal benefits obtained from such investment. A difficulty encountered during such earlier and recent efforts has been the lack of appropriate valuation of these benefits. With a view to correcting this paucity, the authors have conducted studies, based on customer surveys, aimed at assessing the customer outage costs (COC) due to electric service interruptions. The incremental values of these costs, ΔCOC, following reliability investment are considered proxies of reliability worth and customers' marginal benefits. The results of these studies have provided a very good insight into customers' concerns regarding supply interruptions, but most importantly a coherent method for evaluating the customer benefits (ΔCOC) has been developed and the required generic data for such evaluation generated. Using these data, a consistent method for calculating the value of lost load (VOLL) is also developed.

References

    1. 1)
      • R.N. Allan . VOLL – fact or fiction. Power Eng. J. , 1
    2. 2)
      • ‘The regional electricity companies share offers –mainprospectus’, November 1990.
    3. 3)
      • R. Billinton , R.N. Allan . (1988) Reliability assessment of large electric power systems.
    4. 4)
      • NGC: ‘A review of transmission security standards’,August1994.
    5. 5)
      • The Electricity Council: ‘Guide to investment appraisal–Area Boards’, December 1985.
    6. 6)
      • R. Billinton , R.N. Allan . (1984) Reliability evaluation of power systems.
    7. 7)
      • G. Wacker , R. Billinton . Customer cost of electric service interruptions. Proc. IEEE , 6 , 919 - 930
    8. 8)
      • Electricity Council: ‘Report on reliability investmentin radialHV distribution systems withoverhead lines’. A.C.E Report No. 67, 1979.
    9. 9)
      • OFFER: ‘Report on constrained-on plant’, October1992.
    10. 10)
      • Allan, R.N., So, T.Y.P., Da Silva, M.G.: `Reliability analysis of power system networks', October 1993, Users manual for RELNET version 4.1.
    11. 11)
      • Kariuki, K.K.: `Assessment of customer outage costs due to electric service interruptions', October 1995, PhD, UMIST.
    12. 12)
      • Goushleff, D.C.: `Use of interruption costs in regional supply planning', 80–301–K, Ontario Hydro Report, .
    13. 13)
      • Electricity Council: ‘Report on application of engineeringrecommendationP.2/5 securityof supply’. A.C.E Report No. 51, 1979.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-gtd_19960191
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-gtd_19960191
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address