Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Linear system optimisation with prescribed degree of stability

Linear system optimisation with prescribed degree of stability

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The paper presents a scheme for obtaining a linear-feedback law for a linear system as a result of, minimising a quadratic-performance index; the resulting closed-loop system has the property that all its poles lie in a halfplane Re (s) < − α, where α > 0 may be chosen by the designer. The advantages of this arrangement over conventional optimal design are considered. In particular, it is shown that the reduction of trajectory sensitivity to plant-parameter variations as a result of any closed-loop control is greater for α > 0 than for α = 0, that there is inherently a greater margin for tolerance of time delay in the closed loop when α > 0, that there is greater tolerance of nonlinearity when α > 0, and that asymptotically stable bang-bang control may be achieved simply by inserting a relay in the closed loop when α > 0. The disadvantage of the scheme appears to be that, with α > 0, more severe requirements are put on the power level at which input transducers should operate than for α = 0.

References

    1. 1)
      • M. Athans , P.L. Falb . (1966) , Optimal control.
    2. 2)
      • Singer, R.A.: `The design and synthesis of linear multivariable systems with application to state estimation', 6302-8, California technical report, 1968.
    3. 3)
      • F.R. Gantmacher . (1959) , The theory of matrices.
    4. 4)
      • Y.I. Alimov . Lyapunov functions for relay control systems. Automat. Remote Control , 6 , 720 - 728
    5. 5)
      • W.M. Wonham . On pole assignment in multi-input controllable linear systems. IEEE Trans. , 660 - 665
    6. 6)
      • B.D.O. Anderson , J.B. Moore . Tolerance of nonlinearities in time-varying optimal systems. Electron. Lett. , 6 , 250 - 251
    7. 7)
      • R.E. Kalman . Contributions to the theory of optimal control. Bol. Soc. Mex., Math. , 102 - 119
    8. 8)
      • Gopinath, B., Lange, B.O.: `On the identification and control of linear systems', SUDAAR 351, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics technical report, 1968.
    9. 9)
      • J.B. Moore , B.D.O. Anderson . Applications on the multivariable Popov criterion. Internat. J. Control , 345 - 353
    10. 10)
      • B.D.O. Anderson , D.G. Luenberger . Design of multivariable feedback systems. Proc. IEE , 3 , 395 - 399
    11. 11)
      • D.V. Anosov . Stability of the equilibrium position for relay systems. Automat. Remote Control , 2 , 130 - 143
    12. 12)
      • B.D.O. Anderson . Sensitivity improvement using optimal design. Proc. IEE , 6 , 1084 - 1086
    13. 13)
      • E. Kreindler . Closed-loop sensitivity reduction of linear optimal control systems. IEEE Trans. , 254 - 262
    14. 14)
      • V.M. Popov . Hyperstability and optimality of automatic systems with several control functions. Rev. Roumaine Sci. Tech. Electrotech. Energet , 629 - 690
    15. 15)
      • J.B. Cruz , W.R. Perkins . A new approach to the sensitivity problem in multivariable feedback system design. IEEE Trans. , 216 - 223
    16. 16)
      • Anderson, B.D.O.: `The inverse problem of optimal control', SEL-66-038, California report, 1966, Technical report, 6560-3.
    17. 17)
      • Rosenbrock, H.H.: `The assignment of closed-loop poles', 20, University of Manchester Institute of Science & Technology Control Systems Centre report, 1967.
    18. 18)
      • R.E. Kalman . When is a linear control system optimal?. Trans. ASME , 1 - 10
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/piee.1969.0383
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/piee.1969.0383
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address