Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon openaccess Fault-tolerant grid frequency measurement algorithm during transients

Many critical electric grid operations rely on accurate grid frequency measurements. Unfortunately, the measurement accuracy can be easily undermined by power system transient faults. During a power system transient fault, the power grid voltages and currents are usually highly distorted by high-frequency components. What is worse, the power grid signals could have discontinuity during some system transient faults such as phase angle jump, and the discontinuity could result in large measurement errors to state-of-the-art grid measurement algorithms. In this study, a fault-tolerant grid frequency measurement algorithm during transients is proposed. The new algorithm consists of two stages. The first stage is a transient detector, and it can detect the occurrence of system transient faults instantaneously. The second stage is the intelligent frequency estimator, and it will adapt its measurements according to the transient detector. The performance of the algorithm is evaluated under different steady-state and transient conditions. Both dependability and security of the fault-tolerant algorithm are assessed by using PSCAD simulation data and IEEE Standard test data.

References

    1. 1)
      • 22. NERC PRC-002–2: ‘Disturbance monitoring and reporting requirements’. September 2015.
    2. 2)
      • 8. Romano, P., Paolone, M.: ‘Enhanced interpolated-DFT for synchrophasor estimation in FPGAs: theory, implementation, and validation of a PMU prototype’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2014, 63, (12), pp. 28242836.
    3. 3)
      • 4. Kamwa, I., Pradhan, A.K., Joos, G.: ‘Adaptive phasor and frequency-tracking schemes for wide-area protection and control’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2011, 26, (2), pp. 744753.
    4. 4)
      • 16. de la O Serna, J.A.: ‘Dynamic phasor estimates for power system oscillations’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2007, 56, (5), pp. 16481657.
    5. 5)
      • 10. Belega, D., Petri, D.: ‘Accuracy analysis of the multicycle synchrophasor estimator provided by the interpolated DFT algorithm’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2013, 62, (5), pp. 942953.
    6. 6)
      • 17. de la O Serna, J.A.: ‘Dynamic phasor estimates for power system oscillations and transient detection’. Proc. IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2006, p. 7.
    7. 7)
      • 12. Roscoe, A.J., Abdulhadi, I.F., Burt, G.M.: ‘P and M class phasor measurement unit algorithms using adaptive cascaded filters’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2013, 28, (3), pp. 14471459.
    8. 8)
      • 11. Kamwa, I., Samantaray, S.R., Joos, G.: ‘Compliance analysis of PMU algorithms and devices for wide-area stabilizing control of large power systems’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (2), pp. 17661778.
    9. 9)
      • 21. IEEE 60255-118-1-2018 – IEEE/IEC International Standard – Measuring relays and protection equipment – Part 118-1: Synchrophasor for power systems – measurements, December 2018.
    10. 10)
      • 6. Macii, D., Petri, D., Zorat, A.: ‘Accuracy analysis and enhancement of DFT-based synchrophasor estimators in off-nominal conditions’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2012, 61, (10), pp. 26532664.
    11. 11)
      • 19. Zhan, L., Liu, Y.: ‘Improved WLS-TF algorithm for dynamic synchronized angle and frequency estimation’. Proc. IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting, National Harbor, MD, USA, 2014, pp. 15.
    12. 12)
      • 7. Premerlani, W., Kasztenny, B., Adamiak, M.: ‘Development and implementation of a synchrophasor estimator capable of measurements under dynamic conditions’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2008, 23, (1), pp. 109123.
    13. 13)
      • 2. Xia, T., Liu, Y.: ‘Single-phase phase angle measurements in electric power systems’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2010, 25, (2), pp. 844852.
    14. 14)
      • 15. Zhan, L., Liu, Y., Culliss, J., et al: ‘Dynamic single-phase synchronized phase and frequency estimation at the distribution level’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2015, 6, (4), pp. 20132022.
    15. 15)
      • 9. Derviskadic, A., Romano, P., Paolone, M.: ‘Iterative-interpolated DFT for synchrophasor estimation: a single algorithm for P- and M-class compliant PMUs’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2018, 67, (3), pp. 547558.
    16. 16)
      • 18. Platas-Garza, M.A., de la O Serna, J.A.: ‘Dynamic phasor and frequency estimates through maximally flat differentiators’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2010, 59, (7), pp. 18031811.
    17. 17)
      • 3. Mai, R., He, Z., Fu, L., et al: ‘A dynamic synchrophasor estimation algorithm for online application’, IEEE Trans. Power Del., 2010, 25, (2), pp. 570578.
    18. 18)
      • 5. Kamwa, I., Samantaray, S.R., Joos, G.: ‘Wide frequency range adaptive phasor and frequency PMU algorithms’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2014, 5, (2), pp. 569579.
    19. 19)
      • 20. NERC: ‘1,200 MW fault induced solar photovoltaic resource interruption disturbance report’. June 2017.
    20. 20)
      • 1. Phadke, A.G., Thorp, J.S.: ‘Synchronized phasor measurements and their applications’ (Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2008).
    21. 21)
      • 14. Zhan, L., Liu, Y., Liu, Y.: ‘A Clarke transformation-based DFT phasor and frequency algorithm for wide frequency range’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2018, 9, (1), pp. 6777.
    22. 22)
      • 13. Roscoe, A.J., Dickerson, B., Martin, K.E.: ‘Filter design masks for C37.118.1a-compliant frequency-tracking and fixed-filter M-class phasor measurement units’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2015, 64, (8), pp. 20962107.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-esi.2019.0126
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-esi.2019.0126
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address