Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Optimal design of low-voltage distribution networks for CO2 emission minimisation. Part II: Discrete optimisation of radial networks and comparison with alternative design strategies

Optimal design of low-voltage distribution networks for CO2 emission minimisation. Part II: Discrete optimisation of radial networks and comparison with alternative design strategies

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This study extends the model for optimal environmental design of distribution systems presented in Part I to network analyses. In particular, a specific algorithm is developed to apply the proposed circuit design for CO2 emission minimisation to radial networks, the great majority of low-voltage ones, taking into account the presence of only discrete capacities available for cable selection. The implementation of the network design algorithm is illustrated for a realistic large low-voltage urban network in a UK framework. The results found are compared to two benchmark networks designed according to a peak-based minimum investment strategy and an optimal economic strategy that minimises the network life-cycle cost. The specific emission reduction cost due to larger asset investment when applying an optimal environmental design strategy is then quantified with respect to the two alternative strategies. In addition, the results are checked against different discount rates that indicate the attitude of the network operator towards the cost of capital. The analyses illustrated provide clear-cut insights on the environmental and economic implications of adopting different design strategies (in particular, the optimal environmental one introduced here) and represent a key asset for network operators and policy makers in the path towards designing more sustainable energy systems.

References

    1. 1)
      • H.L. Willis . (2004) Power distribution planning reference book.
    2. 2)
      • Strbac, G., Jenkins, N., Green, T.: `Future network technologies', Report to DTI Centre for Distributed Generation and Sustainable Electrical Energy, UK, June 2006.
    3. 3)
      • British Standard BS 7870-3.40:2001, LV and MV polymeric insulated cables for use by distribution Utilities – Part 3: Specification for distribution cables of rated voltage 0.6/1 kV – Section 3.40: XLPE insulated, copper wire waveform concentric cables with solid aluminium conductors, UK, 2001 (confirmed December 2007).
    4. 4)
      • S. Curcic , G. Strbac , X.-P. Zhang . Effect of losses in design of distribution circuits. IEE Proc. Gener. Transm. Distrib. , 343 - 349
    5. 5)
      • G.J. Anders , M. Vainberg , D.J. Horrocks , S.M. Foty , J. Motlis . Parameters affecting economic selection of cable sizes. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. , 1661 - 1667
    6. 6)
      • OFGEM, Electricity Distribution Price Control Review. Appendix – The losses incentive and quality of service, UK, June 2004, available at http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/NETWORKS/ELECDIST/PRICECNTRLS/DPCR4/Documents1/7483-14504e.pdf, accessed May 2009.
    7. 7)
      • Willis, H.L., Scott, W.G.: `Advanced engineering methods for optimizing and integrating distribution planning with demand side management and dispersed generation', 38thRural Electric Power Conf., 24–26 April 1994, p. A1/1–A1/9, paper no. 94 A1.
    8. 8)
      • P. Mancarella , C.K. Gan , G. Strbac . Optimal design of low voltage distribution networks for CO2 emission minimisation. Part I. Model formulation and circuit continuous optimisation. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib.
    9. 9)
      • Committee on Climate Change: ‘Climate change committee's report: building a low-carbon economy – the UK's contribution to tackling climate change’, UK, 1 December 2008, available at http://www.theccc.org.uk, accessed May 2009.
    10. 10)
      • Jones, C.I., McManus, M.: `Life cycle energy and carbon assessment of 11 kV electricity overhead lines and underground power cables', Report for WPD, SERT, July 2008, University of Bath, UK.
    11. 11)
      • A.M. Borbely , J.F. Kreider . (2001) Distributed generation. The power paradigm for the new millennium.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • OFGEM, Electricity Distribution Price Control Review: Final Proposals, UK, November 2004, available at http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/Networks/ElecDist/PriceCntrls/DPCR4/Documents1/8944-26504.pdf, accessed May 2009.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2009.0291
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2009.0291
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address