Imaging in Spinal Trauma

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ro.2006.05.003Get rights and content

Section snippets

Indications for Imaging

There have been multiple studies investigating the necessity of imaging in trauma of the cervical spine. The general goal of these guidelines is to accurately predict which patients are at risk of cervical spine fractures, avoiding the potentially disastrous consequences of not diagnosing a cervical spine fracture. The secondary benefit of such guidelines is to reduce unnecessary examinations. The two largest studies are the NEXUS study and the Canadian C-spine study.

NEXUS (National Emergency

Plain Films versus CT

Plain films have been shown to be inferior to CT with respect to fracture detection in a number of studies,5, 6, 7, 8 although there are no randomized controlled trials comparing the two modalities; as such, a trial would be ethically unacceptable. A recent meta-analysis by Holmes and Akkinepalli9 showed that pooled sensitivities for plain radiography was 52% and for CT was 98% for identifying patients with cervical spine injury.

The question arises as to when it is appropriate to utilize CT as

Radiation Exposure

A subject that is often given little consideration in deciding how the cervical spine should be imaged is the relative radiation exposure between the different modalities. A study in the UK demonstrated that most doctors underestimate the dose of radiation from most diagnostic tests.15 Estimates from our institution are that the effective radiation dose from a CT of the cervical spine is 2.5 mSv compared with 0.04 mSv from a single radiograph of the cervical spine (standard three view would be

The Role of MRI

The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in acute spinal trauma is to evaluate neurological symptoms and suspected ligamentous disruption.4 MRI can directly visualize the spinal cord, allowing assessment of spinal cord compression, contusion, and hemorrhage. In acute traumatic myelopathy19 lesions such as epidural hematoma, acute disc prolapse, and ligamentous disruption are demonstrated to advantage. These entities are important to recognize as prompt surgical correction has the potential

Imaging of the Thoracolumbar Spine

There are no validated criteria for imaging the thoracolumbar spine. AP and lateral radiographs have been the traditional method of screening for injury in the thoracolumbar spine in trauma patients. As with imaging of the cervical spine, CT is being used with increasing frequency and there is increasing evidence that it is more accurate than plain radiography.

Trauma patients often undergo CT scanning of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis and the data obtained from this scan can be used to assess

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (29)

  • E.L. Grogan et al.

    Cervical spine evaluation in urban trauma centerslowering institutional costs and complications through helical CT scan

    J Am Coll Surg

    (2005)
  • J.R. Hoffman et al.

    Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma

    N Engl J Med 343

    (2000)
  • I.G. Stiell et al.

    The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients

    JAMA

    (2001)
  • I.G. Stiell et al.

    The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma

    N Engl J Med

    (2003)
  • American College of Radiology Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging. Appropriateness criteria for suspected cervical...
  • M.M. Griffen et al.

    Radiographic clearance of blunt cervical spine injuryplain radiograph or computed tomography scan?

    J Trauma

    (2003)
  • D.B. Nunez et al.

    Cervical spine traumahow much more do we learn by routinely using helical CT?

    Radiographics

    (1996)
  • C.C. Blackmore et al.

    Helical CT in the primary trauma evaluation of the cervical spinean evidence-based approach

    Skeletal Radiol

    (2000)
  • J.H. Woodring et al.

    Limitations of cervical radiography in the evaluation of acute cervical trauma

    J Trauma

    (1993)
  • J.F. Holmes et al.

    Computed tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injurya meta-analysis

    J Trauma

    (2005)
  • J.A. Hanson et al.

    Cervical spine injurya clinical decision rule to identify high-risk patients for helical CT screening

    AJR Am J Roentgenol

    (2000)
  • R.H. Daffner

    Identifying patients at low risk for cervical spine injurythe Canadian C-spine rule for radiography

    JAMA

    (2001)
  • R.H. Daffner

    Cervical radiography for trauma patientsa time-effective technique?

    AJR Am J Roentgenol

    (2000)
  • R.H. Daffner

    Controversies in cervical spine imaging in trauma patients

    Emerg Radiol

    (2004)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Role of CT scan in theranostic and management of traumatic spinal cord injury

      2018, Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Sagittal cross section images make it possible to assess injury at noncontiguous levels. MRI also allows assessment of ligaments, disk, and soft tissues, as well as the spinal cord, conus medullaris, and cauda equine (Phal and Anderson, 2006; Rostamzadeh et al., 2015). The main objective of the study is to determine prevalence of TSCI in patients referred to the main trauma center in Tehran, Iran, with respect to the demographic characteristics of the patients to assess the role of CT scan in determination of fracture types and severity of the injury among the TSCI patients.

    • Spinal cord imaging

      2017, Neurological Aspects of Spinal Cord Injury
    • Diagnostic imaging in mass casualty events

      2016, Orthopedics in Disasters: Orthopedic Injuries in Natural Disasters and Mass Casualty Events
    • Traumatic myelopathy: Current concepts in imaging

      2014, Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology
    • Core radiology: A visual approach to diagnostic imaging

      2013, Core Radiology: A Visual Approach to Diagnostic Imaging
    View full text