Mothers' Satisfaction with Planned Vaginal and Planned Cesarean Birth

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

We sought to describe maternal satisfaction with childbirth among women planning either cesarean or vaginal birth. We enrolled primiparous women planning cesarean birth and a comparison group planning vaginal birth. After delivery, the maternal subjective experience was assessed with a visual analogue satisfaction scale and the Salmon questionnaire, with scale scores for these aspects of the maternal experience of birth: fulfillment, distress, and difficulty. The sample included 160 women planning vaginal birth and 44 women planning cesarean. Eight weeks postpartum, women planning cesarean reported higher satisfaction ratings (p = 0.023), higher scores for fulfillment (p = 0.017), lower scores for distress (p = 0.010), and lower scores for difficulty (p < 0.001). The least favorable scores were associated with unplanned cesarean (n = 48). Women planning cesarean reported a more favorable birth experience than women planning vaginal birth, due in part to low satisfaction associated with unplanned cesarean. Maternal satisfaction with childbirth may be improved by efforts to reduce unplanned cesarean, but also by support for maternal-choice cesarean.

REFERENCES

• 1 Morgan B M, Bulpitt C J, Clifton P, Lewis P J. Analgesia and satisfaction in childbirth (the Queen Charlotte's 1000 Mother Survey).  Lancet. 1982;  2 808-810
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Capogna G, Alahuhtat S, Celleno D et al.. Maternal expectations and experiences of labour pain and analgesia: a multicentre study of nulliparous women.  Int J Obstet Anesth. 1996;  5 229-235
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Rijnders M, Baston H, Schönbeck Y et al.. Perinatal factors related to negative or positive recall of birth experience in women 3 years postpartum in the Netherlands.  Birth. 2008;  35 107-116
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Wiklund I, Edman G, Andolf E. Cesarean section on maternal request: reasons for the request, self-estimated health, expectations, experience of birth and signs of depression among first-time mothers.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;  86 451-456
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Christiaens W, Bracke P. Assessment of social psychological determinants of satisfaction with childbirth in a cross-national perspective.  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007;  7 26
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Salmon P, Miller R, Drew N C. Women's anticipation and experience of childbirth: the independence of fulfillment, unpleasantness and pain.  Br J Med Psychol. 1990;  63 (Pt 3) 255-259
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Ford E, Ayers S, Wright D B. Measurement of maternal perceptions of support and control in birth (SCIB).  J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009;  18 245-252
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Wijma K, Wijma B, Zar M. Psychometric aspects of the W-DEQ; a new questionnaire for the measurement of fear of childbirth.  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;  19 84-97
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 NCHS Dataline.  Public Health Rep. 2006;  121 208-210
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 MacDorman M F, Menacker F, Declercq E. Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes.  Clin Perinatol. 2008;  35 293-307 v
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Salmon P, Drew N C. Multidimensional assessment of women's experience of childbirth: relationship to obstetric procedure, antenatal preparation and obstetric history.  J Psychosom Res. 1992;  36 317-327
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Stadlmayr W, Amsler F, Lemola S et al.. Memory of childbirth in the second year: the long-term effect of a negative birth experience and its modulation by the perceived intranatal relationship with caregivers.  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;  27 211-224
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Bettes B A, Coleman V H, Zinberg S et al.. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge, perception, and practice patterns.  Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  109 57-66
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy U M Consortium on Safe Labor et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;  203 326 e1-e326 e10
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Stadlmayr W, Schneider H, Amsler F, Bürgin D, Bitzer J. How do obstetric variables influence the dimensions of the birth experience as assessed by Salmon's item list (SIL-Ger)?.  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;  115 43-50
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Green J M, Baston H A. Have women become more willing to accept obstetric interventions and does this relate to mode of birth? Data from a prospective study.  Birth. 2007;  34 6-13
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Zwelling E. The emergence of high-tech birthing.  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;  37 85-93
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Schindl M, Birner P, Reingrabner M, Joura E A, Husslein P, Langer M. Elective cesarean section vs. spontaneous delivery: a comparative study of birth experience.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;  82 834-840
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Waldenström U, Hildingsson I, Rubertsson C, Rådestad I. A negative birth experience: prevalence and risk factors in a national sample.  Birth. 2004;  31 17-27
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Ayers S, Pickering A D. Do women get posttraumatic stress disorder as a result of childbirth? A prospective study of incidence.  Birth. 2001;  28 111-118
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Goodman P, Mackey M C, Tavakoli A S. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction.  J Adv Nurs. 2004;  46 212-219
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Victoria L HandaM.D. M.H.S. 

Professor, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

4940 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21224

Email: vhanda1@jhmi.edu