CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2009; 03(01): 50-56
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697405
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Influence of Different Drinks on the Colour Stability of Dental Resin Composites

Fulya Toksoy Topcu
a   Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Dental Sciences Center, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Ankara, Turkey
,
Gunes Sahinkesen
b   Baskent University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey
,
Kivanc Yamanel
b   Baskent University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey
,
Ugur Erdemir
c   Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Elif Aybala Oktay
a   Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Dental Sciences Center, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Ankara, Turkey
,
Seyda Ersahan
a   Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Dental Sciences Center, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Ankara, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the discolouration effects of artificial saliva, granule lemon juice, coffee (without sugar), coca cola, sour cherry juice, fresh carrot juice and red wine on resin-based composite materials that are commonly used in restorative dentistry.

Methods: Colour of four brands of resin composites (Filtek Z 250 (3M Espe), Filtek Supreme (3M Espe), Quadrant (Cavex), Charisma (Heraeus-Kulzer)) of A2 shade was measured after one day of immersion in eight different solutions. Colour measurements were obtained by using a XL-20 Trismus Colourimeter and colour differences (�E) were estimated. For statistical evaluation, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Dunnett and Tukey tests were used at a significance level of 0.05.

Results: For the four restorative materials tested, the lowest ΔE values were observed in the artificial saliva, while ΔE values were the highest in red wine group. When comparing the four different restorative materials, Filtek Supreme exhibited the least colour changes whereas Filtek Z250 was the least colour-stable.

Conclusions: Dental resin composites and drinking solutions were significant factors that may affect the colour stability. After immersion for one day, all materials showed visible colour changes. The red wine solution exhibited more staining than others in three groups. Filtek Supreme showed significantly the least colour change due to its nano particle sizes. (Eur J Dent 2009;3:50-56)

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Um CM, Ruyter IE. Staining of resin-based veneering materials with coffe and tea. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 377-386
  • 2 Yannikakis SA, Zissis AJ, Polyzois GL, Caroni C. Colour stability of provisional resin restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 533-539
  • 3 Ruyter IE. Composites-characterization of composite filling materials: reactor response. Adv Dent Res 1988; 2: 122-129
  • 4 Asmussen E. Factors affecting the colour stability of restorative resins. Acta Odontol Scand 1983; 41: 11-18
  • 5 Satou N, Khan AM, Matsumae I, Satou J, Shintani H. In vitro colour change of composite-based resins. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 384-387
  • 6 Raptis CN, Powers JM, Fan PL. et al Staining of composite resins by cigarette smoke. J Oral Rehabil 1982; 9: 367-371
  • 7 Gross MD, Moser JB. A colourimetric study of coffee and tea staining of four composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 1977; 4: 311-322
  • 8 Khokhar ZA, Razzoog ME, Yaman P. Colour stability of restorative resins. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 733-737
  • 9 CIE (Commission International de l’Eclairage). Colourimetry technical report. CIE Publication No.15. 2nd ed.. Vienna, Austria: Bureau Central de la CIE; 1986. (corrected reprint 1996)
  • 10 Canay Ṣ, Hersek N, Tulunoglu I, Uzun G. Evaluation of colour and hardness changes of soft lining materials in food colourant solutions. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 821-829
  • 11 Seghi RR, Gritz MD, Kim J. Colourimetric changes in composites resulting from visible-light-initiated polymerization. Dent Mater 1990; 6: 133-137
  • 12 Okubo SR, Kanawati A, Richards MW, Childress S. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 642-648
  • 13 Wilson NH, Burke FJ, Mjor IA. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 245-248
  • 14 Inokoshi S, Burrow MF, Kataumi M, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Opacity and colour changes of tooth coloured restorative materials. Oper Dent 1996; 21: 73-80
  • 15 Leibrock A, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Behr M, Handel G. Colour stability of visible light-curing hybrid composites. Eur J Prosthod Restor Dent 1997; 5: 125-130
  • 16 Vargas MA, Kirchner HL, Diaz-Arnold AM, Beck VL. Colour stability of ionomer and resin composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 166-171
  • 17 Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Influence of illuminating and viewing aperture size on the colour of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2004; 20 (01) 16-123
  • 18 Yap AU, Sim CP, Loh WL, Teo JH. Human-eye versus computerized colour matching. Oper Dent 1999; 24: 358-363
  • 19 Abu-Bakr N, Han L, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. Colour stability of compomer after immersion in various media. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12: 258-263
  • 20 Ferracane JL, Berge HX, Condon JR. In vitro aging of dental composites in water: effect of degree of conversion, filler volume and filler-matrix coupling. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 42: 465-472
  • 21 Deepa CS, Krishnan VK. Effect of resin matrix ratio, storage medium and time upon the physical properties of a radiopaque dental composite. J Biomater Appl 2000; 14: 296-315
  • 22 Van Groeningen G, Jongebloed W, Arends J. Composite degradation in vivo. Dent Mater 1986; 2: 225-227
  • 23 Dietschi D, Campanile G, Holz J, Meyer JM. Comparison of the colour stability of ten new-generation composites: An in vitro study. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 353-362
  • 24 Douglas WH, Craig RG. Resistance to extrinsic stains by hydrophobic composite resin systems. J Dent Res 1982; 61: 41-43
  • 25 Khan Z, von Fraunhofer JA, Razavi R. The staining characteristics, transverse strength and microhardness of a visible light cured tenture base material. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57: 384-386
  • 26 Kalachandra S, Turner DT. Water sorption of polymethacrylate networks: Bis-GMA/TEGDMA copolymers. J Biomed Mater Res 1987; 21: 329-338
  • 27 Mazato S, Tarumi H, Kato S, Ebisu S. Water sorption and colour stability of composites containing the antibacterial monomer MDPB. J Dent 1999; 27: 279-283
  • 28 Arima T, Hamada T, McCabe JF. The effects of crosslinking agents on some properties of HEMA-based resins. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1597-1601
  • 29 Oysaed H, Ruyter IE. Water sorption and filler characteristic of composites for use in posterior teeth. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 1315-1318
  • 30 Patel SB, Gordan VV, Barrett AA, Shen C. The effect of surface finishing and storage solutions on the colour stability of resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135: 587-594
  • 31 Maalhagh-Fard A, Wagner WC, Pink FE, Neme AM. Evaluation of surface finish and polish of eight provisional restorative materials using acrylic bur and abrasive disc with and without pumice. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 734-739
  • 32 Rueggeberg FA, Craig RG. Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light cured composite. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 932-937
  • 33 Villalta P, Lu H, Okte Z, Garcia-Godoy F, Powers JM. Effects of staining and bleaching on colour change of dental composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95: 137-142
  • 34 Guler AU, Yilmaz F, Kulunk T, Guler E, Kurt S. Effects of different drinks on stainability of resin composite provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 118-124
  • 35 Türkün LS, Leblebicioglu EA. Stain retention and surface characteristics of posterior composites polished by one-step systems. Am J Dent 2006; 19: 343-347
  • 36 Türkün LS, Türkün M. Effect of bleaching and repolishing procedures on coffee and tea stain removal from three anterior composite veneering materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004; 16: 290-301