Standards for Ethics in Sport and Exercise Science Research: 2018 Update

 

 Permissions and Reprints

For publication in the International Journal of Sports Medicine (IJSM), studies involving human participants or animals must have been conducted in accordance with recognised ethical standards and national/international laws. At the very first stage of paper submission, authors are required to adhere to these and all other relevant standards and laws.

In the 21^st Century, research opportunities, approaches and environments are in a continual state of flux, and this is also the case for the associated ethical issues. In the original 2009 IJSM editorial [2], we described the ethical considerations embedded into national/international laws and provided specific guidance on the ethical issues which commonly arise in Sports Medicine research. In 2011, this information was updated to recognise the ethical principles of other professional associations and treaties when conducting research involving human participants [3]. Additional information was also provided on the use of Laboratory Animals in research, and on the links between sample size and research ethics. In the second update, published in 2013, we elaborated on the ethical issues relating to the investigation of doping agents; the use of animals for answering research questions that appear to be solely focussed on the enhancement of athletic performance; and sample size in the context of the burden to individual research participants [4]. In 2015, we updated some of the guidelines to account for the changes made to the Declaration of Helsinki in 2013, covered the use of social media in research, provided guidance on how researchers can feed back their incidental and pertinent findings to research participants, covered some of the issues relating to studies involving children, and outlined the difference between a full and pilot study in terms of desired number of participants [5].

In this, our new update for 2018 onwards, we provide the following revisions and additions, labelled with the word “Update” in bold text at various points in this paper;

• Clarification of the issues surrounding the use of a gatekeeper for accessing personal information on participants.

• Clarification of some of the requirements for research with participants who are either too young to give a valid consent (under relevant local Statute) themselves and/or who lack the mental capacity to give an informed consent.

• Clarification of the expectations for the presentation and content of information given to facilitate informed consent/assent.

• Highlighting of the obligation to breach confidentiality in certain circumstances and the importance of communicating all relevant process to the potential participant.

• Clarification on the use of person identifiable information including a reminder of the upcoming (May 2018) changes to legislation governing how personal data may be accessed and processed in research in the European Union (https://www.eugdpr.org/).

• Provision of advice surrounding the increasing calls for open access data, including the resulting data storage issues.

• Update on the ethical and legal considerations involved in secondary analysis (retrospective data) studies.

• Clarification on the use of placebos in research.

• Coverage of the expectations for studies that involve participant deception (i. e. where fully informed consent is not obtained in advance of participation).

• Elaboration of the sample size issues relevant to research ethics.

• Coverage of the issues surrounding research on contracted athletes, who are obliged to have data collected on them as part of their contract.

• Highlighting of the issues surrounding participant withdrawal from a study

• Update on the importance of study registration on a public database and the publication of study protocols

• Update on sample size issues, including the recent concerns about reproducibility of study results

• Clarification of expectations for the reporting of adverse events/reactions.

• References

• 1 Bacchetti P, Wolf LE, Segal MR, McCulloch CE. Ethics and sample size. Am J Epidemiol 2005; 161: 105-110
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. International Journal of Sports Medicine – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2009; 30: 701-702
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2014 update. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 1025-1028
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 update. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36: 1121-1124
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 3-12
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Howman D. Scientific research using elite athletes: WADA point of view. J Appl Physiol 2013; 114: 1365-1365
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Hughes J, Hunter D, Sheehan M, Wilkinson SD, Wrigley A, Hughes J. European textbook on ethics in research. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2010: 203
  Google Scholar
• 9 Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 1996: 140
  Google Scholar
• 10 Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 2010: 248
  Google Scholar
• 11 Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, National Research Council. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals – report in brief. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2010. Available at http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/materials-based-on-reports/special-products/guide_lab_animals_final.pdf
  Google Scholar
• 12 International Sociological Association. Code of Ethics. Madrid: International Sociological Association; 2001. Available at http://www.isa-sociology.org/about/isa_code_of_ethics.htm
  Google Scholar
• 13 Involve and HRA: New Health Research Authority (HRA) and INVOLVE briefing and guidance on public involvement and ethical review; Available at http://www.invo.org.uk/posttypenews/new-healthresearch-authority-hra-and-involve-briefing-and-guidance-on-publicinvolvement-and-ethical-review/?style = print
  PubMed
• 14 Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005; 2: e124
  PubMed
• 15 Kregel KC. Resource book for the design of animal exercise protocols. Committee to develop an American physiological society resource book for the design of animal exercise protocols 2006 Available via http://www.the-aps.org/pa/action/exercise/book.pdf Accessed 24 October 2013
  PubMed
• 16 Medical Research Council. MRC ethics series: Good research practice 2005. London: Medical Research Council; 2005: 1-16
  Google Scholar
• 17 Nuffield Council on Bioethics: Children and Clinical Research: Ethical Issues. . HRA Response to Report Recommendations Relevant to the Health Research Authority (HRA) and Research Ethics Committees (RECs). Available at http://www.hra.nhs.uk/documents/2015/08/ hra-response-ncob-children-clinical-research-recommendations-hrarecs- v1-0-final.pdf
  PubMed
• 18 Shephard RJ. Ethics in exercise science research. Sports Med 2002; 32: 169-183
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 The American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct Am Psychol 2002; 57: 1060-1073
  CrossrefPubMed
• 20 World Anti Doping Code. World Anti Doping Agency. Available at http://stage.wada-ama.org/Documents/World_Anti-Doping_Program/WADP-The-Code/WADA_Anti-Doping_CODE_2009_EN.pdf
  PubMed
• 21 World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013; 310: 2191-2194
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar