MR Enterography in Crohnʼs Disease: Comparison of Contrast Imaging with Diffusion-weighted Imaging and a special Form of Color Coding

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose

We compared contrast-enhanced MR enterography with diffusion-weighted sequences to evaluate the validity of diffusion-weighted sequences for activity assessment in Crohnʼs disease compared to endoscopy. In addition, we investigated a new color-coded image post-processing technique in comparison with standard sequences and endoscopy.

Materials and Methods

Included were 197 MR enterographies (2015–2017) performed by using standardized examination protocols. The intestine was divided into 7 segments, which were compared separately. The accuracy of the MR examinations with regard to disease activity was validated using the Seo and MaRIA score and endoscopy findings. In addition, the image data were post-processed using a color-coded evaluation method (DCE tool on OsiriX).

Results

The comparison between contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted sequences showed a highly significant correlation for all bowel sections with a mean Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.876 (0.809–0.928). The color-coded image post-processing showed a sensitivity of 83.2 % and a specificity of 70.5 % in comparison with the MaRIA score. In comparison to endoscopy, a sensitivity of 81.3 % and a specificity of 70.5 %. In comparison with endoscopy, the MaRIA score showed a sensitivity of 80.2 % and a specificity of 84.0 % at a cut-off of 7. The visual score according to Seo showed a sensitivity of 85.7 % with a specificity of 77.0 % in the contrast-weighted examination and a sensitivity of 87.9 % and a specificity of 71.8 % for diffusion weighted images.

Conclusion

Diffusion-weighted sequences are as good as contrast-weighted sequences for assessing inflammatory activity in Crohnʼs disease. Contrast is often helpful for assessing complications, but this was not the purpose of this study. Visual imaging using color-coded data sets was similarly good at detecting inflammation.

Key points:

• MR enterography is possible without contrast using diffusion-weighted imaging with comparable high informative value.

• Inflammatory activity in MR correlates sufficiently well with endoscopy

• The MaRIA and Seo scores are comparable in their validity.

• The colored representation of inflamed bowel sections is a promising technique.

Citation Format

• Jakob M, Backes M, Schaefer C et al. MR Enterography in Crohnʼs Disease: Comparison of Contrast Imaging with Diffusion-weighted Imaging and a special Form of Color Coding. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 1119 – 1131

Publication History

Received: 11 June 2021

Accepted: 16 March 2022

Article published online:
15 June 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

• Literatur

• 1 Griffin N, Grant LA, Anderson S. et al. Small bowel MR enterography: problem solving in Crohnʼs disease. Insights Imaging 2012; 3: 251-263 DOI: 10.1007/s13244-012-0154-3.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Albert JG, Martiny F, Krummenerl A. et al. Diagnosis of small bowel Crohnʼs disease: a prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging and fluoroscopic enteroclysis. Gut 2005; 54: 1721-1727 DOI: 10.1136/gut.2005.069427.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Schreyer AGLD, Koletzko S, Hoffmann JC. et al. Aktualisierte S3-Leitlinie zur Diagnostik des M. Crohn – Radiologische Untersuchungstechniken. RöFo 2010; 182 (02) 116-121
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Friedrich C, Fajfar A, Pawlik M. et al. Magnetic resonance enterography with and without biphasic contrast agent enema compared to conventional ileocolonoscopy in patients with Crohnʼs disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012; 18: 1842-1848 DOI: 10.1002/ibd.22843.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Golder SK, Schreyer AG, Endlicher E. et al. Comparison of capsule endoscopy and magnetic resonance (MR) enteroclysis in suspected small bowel disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006; 21: 97-104 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-005-0755-0.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Jensen MD, Nathan T, Rafaelsen SR. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of capsule endoscopy for small bowel Crohnʼs disease is superior to that of MR enterography or CT enterography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9: 124-129 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.10.019.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Cansu A, Bekircavusoglu S, Oguz S. et al. Can diffusion weighted imaging be used as an alternative to contrast-enhanced imaging on magnetic resonance enterography for the assessment of active inflammation in Crohn disease?. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99: e19202 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019202.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Soydan L, Demir AA, Ozer S. et al. Can MR Enterography and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Predict Disease Activity Assessed by Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohnʼs Disease?. J Belg Soc Radiol 2019; 103: 10 DOI: 10.5334/jbsr.1521.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Kim KJ, Lee Y, Park SH. et al. Diffusion-weighted MR enterography for evaluating Crohnʼs disease: how does it add diagnostically to conventional MR enterography?. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2015; 21: 101-109 DOI: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000222.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Stanescu-Siegmund N, Nimsch Y, Wunderlich AP. et al. Quantification of inflammatory activity in patients with Crohnʼs disease using diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in MR enteroclysis and MR enterography. Acta Radiol 2017; 58: 264-271 DOI: 10.1177/0284185116648503.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Chatterji M, Fidler JL, Taylor SA. et al. State of the Art MR Enterography Technique. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 30: 3-11 DOI: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000263.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Kanda T, Fukusato T, Matsuda M. et al. Gadolinium-based Contrast Agent Accumulates in the Brain Even in Subjects without Severe Renal Dysfunction: Evaluation of Autopsy Brain Specimens with Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy. Radiology 2015; 276: 228-232 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142690.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Sardanelli F, Cozzi A, Trimboli RM. et al. Gadolinium Retention and Breast MRI Screening: More Harm Than Good?. Am J Roentgenol 2020; 214: 324-327 DOI: 10.2214/Am J Roentgenol.19.21988.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Rimola J, Ordas I, Rodriguez S. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of Crohnʼs disease: validation of parameters of severity and quantitative index of activity. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011; 17: 1759-1768 DOI: 10.1002/ibd.21551.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Seo N, Park SH, Kim KJ. et al. MR Enterography for the Evaluation of Small-Bowel Inflammation in Crohn Disease by Using Diffusion-weighted Imaging without Intravenous Contrast Material: A Prospective Noninferiority Study. Radiology 2016; 278: 762-772 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150809.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 University of California, Los Angeles/Kyung Sung.. Im Internet (Stand: 28.12.2021): http://kyungs.bol.ucla.edu/software/DCE_tool/DCE_tool.html
  PubMed
• 17 Daperno M, DʼHaens G, Van Assche G. et al. Development and validation of a new, simplified endoscopic activity score for Crohnʼs disease: the SES-CD. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 505-512 DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)01878-4.
  Google Scholar
• 18 Rimola J, Alvarez-Cofino A, Perez-Jeldres T. et al. Comparison of three magnetic resonance enterography indices for grading activity in Crohnʼs disease. J Gastroenterol 2017; 52: 585-593 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-016-1253-6.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Tielbeek JA, Makanyanga JC, Bipat S. et al. Grading Crohn disease activity with MRI: interobserver variability of MRI features, MRI scoring of severity, and correlation with Crohn disease endoscopic index of severity. Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201: 1220-1228 DOI: 10.2214/Am J Roentgenol.12.10341.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Minordi LM, Larosa L, Papa A. et al. Assessment of Crohnʼs Disease Activity: Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Comparison with Clinical and Endoscopic Evaluations. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2019; 28: 213-224 DOI: 10.15403/jgld-183.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Lee JH, Park YE, Seo N. et al. Magnetic resonance enterography predicts the prognosis of Crohnʼs disease. Intest Res 2018; 16: 445-457 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2018.16.3.445.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

• Supplementary Material