Download PDF
Eur J Pediatr Surg 2014; 24(05): 398-402
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1351391
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy versus Conventional Thyroidectomy in Pediatric Patients

Luigi De Napoli
1   Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
,
Claudio Spinelli
1   Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
,
Carlo Enrico Ambrosini
1   Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
,
Luca Tomisti
2   Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
,
Carlotta Giani
2   Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
,
Paolo Miccoli
1   Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

17 February 2013

26 June 2013

Publication Date:
02 September 2013 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) proved to be safe and effective in the treatment of both benign and malignant disease. The aim of the present study is to compare MIVAT approach with conventional approach for total thyroidectomy in a group of 99 pediatric patients operated in the Department of General Surgery of the University of Pisa between March 2007 and July 2012.

Patients A total of 99 pediatric patients under the age of 18 years with thyroid disease referred to our Department to undergo total thyroidectomy. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique performed: 34/99 (34.3%) patients (MIVAT group [MG]) and 65/99 (65.7%) patients, (conventional group [CG]) who underwent total thyroidectomy, respectively, with MIVAT approach and conventional approach.

Results In MG mean operative time for total thyroidectomy was 40 ± 6.57 minutes (range 30–60 min); postoperative hospital stay was 1 day for 18 patients (53%), 2 days for 12 patients (35.25%), 3 days for 4 patients (11.8%); transient hypoparathyroidism (hypoPTH) was observed in 12 cases (35.3%) and permanent hypoPTH in 2 cases (5.9%); transient postoperative unilateral vocal cord palsy was observed in 2 patients (5.9%). In CG mean operative time for total thyroidectomy was 49.3 ± 12.9 minutes (range 30–80 min); postoperative hospital stay was 1 day for 16 patients (24.6%), 2 days for 40 patients (61.5%), 3 days for 8 patients (12.3%), and 4 days for 1 patient (1.6%); transient hypoPTH was observed in 23 cases (35.4%) and permanent hypoPTH in 4 cases (6.1%), who needed therapy with calcitriol and calcium carbonate; transient postoperative unilateral vocal cord palsy was observed in 4 patients (6.1%). There were no cases of permanent vocal cord paralysis in both groups. The correlation between two groups of patients showed that mean operative time was significantly lower in MG (p = 0.0007).

Conclusion Pediatric patients of MG showed a significantly lower operative time and postoperative hospital stay with respect to pediatric patients of CG if compared with conventional technique. This result with the evidence of similar degree of completeness and rate of postoperative complications make MIVAT a valid option for the treatment of pediatric patients when performed by a well-trained staff in a third referral center.

Keywords

MIVAT - pediatric patients - conventional thyroidectomy
 

  • References

  • 1 Miccoli P, Berti P, Conte M, Bendinelli C, Marcocci C. Minimally invasive surgery for thyroid small nodules: preliminary report. J Endocrinol Invest 1999; 22 (11) 849-851
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Sgourakis G, Sotiropoulos GC, Neuhäuser M, Musholt TJ, Karaliotas C, Lang H. Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: is there any evidence-based information?. Thyroid 2008; 18 (7) 721-727
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mamais C, Charaklias N, Pothula VB, Dias A, Hawthorne M, Nirmal Kumar B. Introduction of a new surgical technique: minimally invasive video-assisted thyroid surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 2011; 36 (1) 51-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Radford PD, Ferguson MS, Magill JC, Karthikesalingham AP, Alusi G. Meta-analysis of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. Laryngoscope 2011; 121 (8) 1675-1681
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Terris DJ, Angelos P, Steward DL, Simental AA. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: a multi-institutional North American experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 134 (1) 81-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bellantone R, Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M , et al. Video-assisted thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Surg Endosc 2003; 17 (10) 1604-1608
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Seybt MW, Terris DJ. Minimally invasive thyroid surgery in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2011; 120 (4) 215-219
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Miccoli P, Elisei R, Materazzi G , et al. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for papillary carcinoma: a prospective study of its completeness. Surgery 2002; 132 (6) 1070-1073 , discussion 1073–1074
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Miccoli P, Berti P, Bendinelli C, Conte M, Fasolini F, Martino E. Minimally invasive video-assisted surgery of the thyroid: a preliminary report. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2000; 385 (4) 261-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Shimizu K, Akira S, Jasmi AY , et al. Video-assisted neck surgery: endoscopic resection of thyroid tumors with a very minimal neck wound. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 188 (6) 697-703
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bellantone R, Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Rubino F, Boscherini M, Perilli W. Minimally invasive, totally gasless video-assisted thyroid lobectomy. Am J Surg 1999; 177 (4) 342-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Terris DJ. Effect of video-assisted thyroidectomy on the risk of early postthyroidectomy voice and swallowing symptoms. World J Surg 2008; 32 (5) 701
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Princi P , et al. Safety of video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional surgery. Head Neck 2005; 27 (1) 58-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, D'alatri L , et al. Video-assisted thyroidectomy significantly reduces the risk of early postthyroidectomy voice and swallowing symptoms. World J Surg 2008; 32 (5) 693-700
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Miccoli P, Pinchera A, Materazzi G , et al. Surgical treatment of low- and intermediate-risk papillary thyroid cancer with minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94 (5) 1618-1622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Terris DJ, Gourin CG, Chin E. Minimally invasive thyroidectomy: basic and advanced techniques. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (3) 350-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Miccoli P, Elisei R, Donatini G, Materazzi G, Berti P. Video-assisted central compartment lymphadenectomy in a patient with a positive RET oncogene: initial experience. Surg Endosc 2007; 21 (1) 120-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Miccoli P, Minuto MN, Ugolini C, Pisano R, Fosso A, Berti P. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for benign thyroid disease: an evidence-based review. World J Surg 2008; 32 (7) 1333-1340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar