Download PDF
Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10(04): 729-734
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1696667
Research Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Patient and Physician Perceptions of the Impact of Electronic Health Records on the Patient–Physician Relationship

Margaret Eberts
1   Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
2   Department of Computer Science, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Daniel Capurro
3   Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile Facultad de Medicina, Santiago, Chile
4   School of Computing and Information Systems, Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

25 May 2019

26 July 2019

Publication Date:
25 September 2019 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives Limited studies have been performed in South America to assess patient and physician perceptions of electronic health record (EHR) usage. We aim to study the perceptions of patients and physicians regarding the impact of EHRs on the patient–physician relationship.

Methods We use a survey instrument to assess the physician computer experience and opinions regarding EHR impact on various aspects of patient care. An additional survey is used to assess patient opinions related to their medical visit. Surveys are administered in two outpatient clinics in a private, academic health care network.

Results While a majority of physicians believed that EHRs have an overall positive impact on the quality of health care, many physicians had negative perceptions of the impact of EHRs on the patient–physician relationship. A majority of patients felt comfortable with their physician's use of the EHR and felt that their physician was able to maintain good personal contact while using the computer.

Conclusion Although physicians believe EHRs have a generally positive impact on the overall quality of care, the EHR's impact on the patient–physician relationship is still of concern. Patients do not perceive a negative interference from the EHR on the patient–physician relationship.

Keywords

electronic health records and systems - patient records - specific types

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This study was approved by the medical ethics board of the medical faculty of the Pontificia Universidad Catolica. There was no risk for participants in the study, participant confidential information was stored in an encrypted database, and all participant identifiers were removed during data analysis.


 

  • References

  • 1 Gadd CS, Penrod LE. Dichotomy between physicians' and patients' attitudes regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium; 2000: 275-279
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Fairley CK, Vodstrcil LA, Huffam S. , et al. Evaluation of Electronic Medical Record (EMR) at large urban primary care sexual health centre. PLoS One 2013; 8 (04) e60636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D. , et al. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012; 31 (12) 2805-2816
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 World Health Organization. Chile: eHealth Country Profile. Published 2015. Available at: http://www.who.int/goe/publications/atlas/2015/chl.pdf?ua=1&ua=1 . Accessed August 28, 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 El-Kareh R, Gandhi TK, Poon EG. , et al. Trends in primary care clinician perceptions of a new electronic health record. J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24 (04) 464-468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Sobral D, Rosenbaum M, Figueiredo-Braga M. Computer use in primary care and patient-physician communication. Patient Educ Couns 2015; 98: 1568-1576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Marmor RA, Clay B, Millen M, Savides TJ, Longhurst CA. The impact of physician EHR usage on patient satisfaction. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (01) 11-14
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Alkureishi MA, Lee WW, Lyons M. , et al. Impact of electronic medical record use on the patient-doctor relationship and communication: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2016; 31 (05) 548-560
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Zurita L, Nøhr C. Patient opinion--EHR assessment from the users perspective. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 107 (Pt 2): 1333-1336
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rosen P, Spalding SJ, Hannon MJ, Boudreau RM, Kwoh CK. Parent satisfaction with the electronic medical record in an academic pediatric rheumatology practice. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13 (02) e40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lelievre S, Schultz K. Does computer use in patient-physician encounters influence patient satisfaction?. Can Fam Physician 2010; 56 (01) e6-e12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Rethans J-J, Höppener P, Wolfs G, Diederiks J. Do personal computers make doctors less personal?. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988; 296 (6634): 1446-1448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Garrison GM, Bernard ME, Rasmussen NH. 21st-century health care: the effect of computer use by physicians on patient satisfaction at a family medicine clinic. Fam Med 2002; 34 (05) 362-368
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Buscató CR, Yuste NE, Toirán AS, Díaz SB, Font J. Opinión de profesionales y pacientes sobre la introducción de la informática en la consulta [Views of professionals and patients on the introduction of computer science into the consultation]. Aten Primaria 2005; 36: 194-197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Cork RD, Detmer WM, Friedman CP. Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure physicians' use of, knowledge about, and attitudes toward computers. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5 (02) 164-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lin TC. A computer literacy scale for newly enrolled nursing college students: development and validation. J Nurs Res 2011; 19 (04) 305-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 The Drummond Group. ONC HIT Certification Program: Test Results Summary for 2014 Edition EHR Certification. Available at: https://drummondgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Test-Results-Summary-AlertEHR-v2.6.4-CompAmb-3Dec14.pdf . Accessed March 6, 2019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Emani S, Ting DY, Healey M. , et al. Physician beliefs about the impact of meaningful use of the EHR: a cross-sectional study. Appl Clin Inform 2014; 5 (03) 789-801
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Grinspan ZM, Banerjee S, Kaushal R, Kern LM. Physician specialty and variations in adoption of electronic health records. Appl Clin Inform 2013; 4 (02) 225-240
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 O'Connell RT, Cho C, Shah N, Brown K, Shiffman RN. Take note(s): differential EHR satisfaction with two implementations under one roof. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (01) 43-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Rathert C, Porter TH, Mittler JN, Fleig-Palmer M. Seven years after Meaningful Use: physicians' and nurses' experiences with electronic health records. Health Care Manage Rev 2019; 44 (01) 30-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Jamoom EW, Heisey-Grove D, Yang N, Scanlon P. Physician opinions about EHR use by EHR experience and by whether the practice had optimized its EHR use. J Health Med Inform 2016; 7 (04) 1000240
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Detmer WM, Friedman CP. Academic physicians' assessment of the effects of computers on health care. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994; 558-562
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Electronic Medical Records in Latin America and the Caribbean. An Analysis of the Current Situation and Recommendations for the Region. Washington, DC: PAHO; 2016
    Google Scholar