Download PDF
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016; 76(08): 875-881
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-106895
Original Article
GebFra Science
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The International Endometriosis Evaluation Program (IEEP Study) – A Systematic Study for Physicians, Researchers and Patients

Das internationale Endometriose-Evaluations-Programm (IEEP-Studie) – eine systematische Studie für Kliniker, Forscher und Patientinnen
S. Burghaus   *
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
,
T. Fehm   *
4   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
,
P. A. Fasching
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
8   Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
,
S. Blum
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
,
S. K. Renner
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
,
F. Baier
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
,
T. Brodkorb
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
,
C. Fahlbusch
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
,
S. Findeklee
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
,
L. Häberle
2   Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
,
K. Heusinger
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
,
T. Hildebrandt
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
,
J. Lermann
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
,
O. Strahl
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
,
G. Tchartchian
3   Certified Centre for Endometriosis at the MIC Klinik, Berlin, Germany
,
B. Bojahr
3   Certified Centre for Endometriosis at the MIC Klinik, Berlin, Germany
,
A. Porn
4   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
,
M. Fleisch
5   HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
,
S. Reicke
6   MIC Centre, Women Health Clinic Dr. Geisenhofer, Munich, Germany
,
T. Füger
6   MIC Centre, Women Health Clinic Dr. Geisenhofer, Munich, Germany
,
C.-P. Hartung
7   Rems-Murr-Klinik, Schorndorf, Germany
,
J. Hackl
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
,
M. W. Beckmann
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
,
S. P. Renner
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 11 February 2016
revised 18 April 2016

accepted 18 April 2016

Publication Date:
25 August 2016 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction: Endometriosis is a heterogeneous disease characterized by a range of different presentations. It is usually diagnosed when patients present with pain and/or infertility, but it has also been diagnosed in asymptomatic patients. Because of the different diagnostic approaches and diverse therapies, time to diagnosis can vary considerably and the definitive diagnosis may be delayed, with some cases not being diagnosed for several years. Endometriosis patients have many unmet needs. A systematic registration and follow-up of endometriosis patients could be useful to obtain an insight into the course of the disease. The validation of biomarkers could contribute to the development of diagnostic and predictive tests which could help select patients for surgical assessment earlier and offer better predictions about patients who might benefit from medical, surgical or other interventions. The aim is also to obtain a better understanding of the etiology, pathogenesis and progression of the disease. Material and Methods: To do this, an online multicenter documentation system was introduced to facilitate the establishment of a prospective multicenter case-control study, the IEEP (International Endometriosis Evaluation Program) study. We report here on the first 696 patients with endometriosis included in the program between June 2013 and June 2015. Results: A documentation system was created, and the structure and course of the study were mapped out with regard to data collection and the collection of biomaterials. Conclusion: The documentation system permits the history and clinical data of patients with endometriosis to be recorded. The IEEP combines this information with biomaterials and uses it for scientific studies. The recorded data can also be used to evaluate clinical quality control measures such as the certification parameters used by the EEL (European Endometriosis League) to assess certified endometriosis centers.

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung: Das Erkrankungsbild der Endometriose ist sehr heterogen. Die Diagnosestellung erfolgt häufig im Zusammenhang mit Schmerzen und/oder Sterilität. Es können aber auch keine Beschwerden vorhanden sein. Dies führt dazu, dass die Zeit bis zur definitiven Diagnose aufgrund verschiedener Diagnostik- und Behandlungsansätze unterschiedlich lang sein kann und die Diagnose teilweise hierdurch verzögert wird. Die Validierung von Biomarkern könnte zur Entwicklung eines diagnostischen und prädiktiven Tests beitragen, um besser beurteilen zu können, ob und von welcher Therapie eine Patientin profitiert. Material und Methoden: Um diese Fragestellungen zu beantworten, wurde multizentrisch ein onlinebasiertes Dokumentationssystem eingeführt, das zur Implementierung einer prospektiven multizentrischen Fall-Kontroll-Studie, der IEEP (International Endometriosis Evaluation Program)-Studie, beiträgt. Im Zeitraum von Juni 2013 bis Juni 2015 wurden die anamnestischen und klinischen Daten von 696 Patientinnen erfasst. Ergebnisse: Durch die Implementierung konnten der Ablauf und die Strukturierung der Studie, insbesondere die Datenerhebung und die Biomaterialsammlung, etabliert werden. Schlussfolgerung: In dem Dokumentationssystem ist es möglich, anamnestische und klinische Daten von Patientinnen mit Endometriose so zu dokumentieren, um sowohl in Kombination mit Biomaterialien wissenschaftliche Fragestellungen im Rahmen der IEEP-Studie zu beantworten, als auch Daten zu Zertifizierungszwecken zu erheben.

Key words

endometriosis - biomarker - epidemiology - diagnostics - case control study

Schlüsselwörter

Endometriose - Biomarker - Epidemiologie - Diagnostik - Fallkontrollstudie

* These two authors have contributed equally to this paper.


Supporting Information

 

  • References

  • Hudelist G, Fritzer N, Thomas A. et al. Diagnostic delay for endometriosis in Austria and Germany: causes and possible consequences. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 3412-3416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Duffy JM, Arambage K, Correa FJ. et al. Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 4: CD011031-CD011031
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Ebert AD, Ulrich U, Keckstein J. et al.; Endometriosis Research Foundation. Implementation of certified endometriosis centers: 5-year experience in German-speaking Europe. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2013; 76: 4-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich U, Buchweitz O, Greb R. et al.; for the German and Austrian Societies for Obstetrics and Gynecology. National German guideline (S2k): guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis: long version – AWMF Registry No. 015-045. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2014; 74: 1104-1118
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Chapron C, Cravello L, Chopin N. et al. Complications during set-up procedures for laparoscopy in gynecology: open laparoscopy does not reduce the risk of major complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 1125-1129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Guo SW, Wang Y. The prevalence of endometriosis in women with chronic pelvic pain. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2006; 62: 121-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • van Dijk LJ, Nelen WL, DʼHooghe TM. et al. The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis: an electronic guideline implementability appraisal. Implement Sci 2011; 6: 7-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Renner SP, Rix S, Boosz A. et al. Preoperative pain and recurrence risk in patients with peritoneal endometriosis. Gynecol Endocrinol 2010; 26: 230-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Muzii L, Marana R, Caruana P. et al. Postoperative administration of monophasic combined oral contraceptives after laparoscopic treatment of ovarian endometriomas: a prospective, randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 588-592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Busacca M, Somigliana E, Bianchi S. et al. Post-operative GnRH analogue treatment after conservative surgery for symptomatic endometriosis stage III–IV: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 2399-2402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Kavallaris A, Chalvatzas N, Hornemann A. et al. 94 months follow-up after laparoscopic assisted vaginal resection of septum rectovaginale and rectosigmoid in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 283: 1059-1064
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Mahmood TA, Templeton A. Prevalence and genesis of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 544-549
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • de Ziegler D, Borghese B, Chapron C. Endometriosis and infertility: pathophysiology and management. Lancet 2010; 376: 730-738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Yamashita Y, Ueda M, Takehara M. et al. Influence of severe endometriosis on gene expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-6 in granulosa cells from patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 865-871
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Kissler S, Hamscho N, Zangos S. et al. Uterotubal transport disorder in adenomyosis and endometriosis–a cause for infertility. BJOG 2006; 113: 902-908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Vercellini P, Somigliana E, Viganò P. et al. Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: a pragmatic approach. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 254-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio dellʼEndometriosi. Relationship between stage, site and morphological characteristics of pelvic endometriosis and pain. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 2668-2671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Barbosa CP, Souza AM, Bianco B. et al. Frequency of endometriotic lesions in peritoneum samples from asymptomatic fertile women and correlation with CA125 values. Sao Paulo Med J 2009; 127: 342-345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Moen MH, Stokstad T. A long-term follow-up study of women with asymptomatic endometriosis diagnosed incidentally at sterilization. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 773-776
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Weiss G, Maseelall P, Schott LL. et al. Adenomyosis a variant, not a disease? Evidence from hysterectomized menopausal women in the Study of Womenʼs Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 201-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Burghaus S, Klingsiek P, Fasching PA. et al. Risk factors for endometriosis in a German case-control study. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2011; 71: 1073-1079
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Fassbender A, Burney RO. O DF, et al. Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 130854-130854
    PubMedGoogle Scholar