Impact of Body Weight, Height, and Obesity on Selection of Skin Entry Point for Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Prospective evaluation of the effect of physical parameters like height, weight and abdominal girth on different skin entry points in transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) in lower lumbar discs.

Methods This prospective study involved 174 patients with unilateral radicular pain or discogenic back pain, central, paracentral disc herniations and lateral canal stenosis at the level from L3 to S1 radiologically confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and failed conservative trial for 6 weeks. All patients underwent measurements of height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and abdominal girth preoperatively. All the four possible entry points, i.e., 45 to 45, posterolateral (PL), tip of spinous process (TOSP), and dorsum of the facet joint, were marked and point midway between PL and TOSP (PL-TOSP) skin entry was used.

Results The change in the value, i.e., distance from midline of all the entry points with physical parameters like height, weight, BMI, and abdominal circumference was statistically significant. The visual analog scale score decreased from a preoperative value of 7.98 to 1.84 at 6 months follow-up. The Oswestry disability index score improved from 72.53 to 16.26.

Conclusion The entry point in TELD is not a fixed value as it varies with the physical parameters like weight and abdominal girth of the patient. PL-TOSP is a safe entry point for common pathologies like central, paracentral herniations and lateral canal stenosis in lower lumbar levels and can be predicted preoperatively by proposed formula.

Publication History

Article published online:
24 August 2022

© 2022. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

• References

• 1 Yeung AT. The evolution and advancement of endoscopic foraminal surgery: one surgeon's experience incorporating adjunctive technologies. SAS J 2007; 1 (03) 108-117
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Kambin P, Savitz MH. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy: an alternative to open disc surgery. Mt Sinai J Med 2000; 67 (04) 283-287
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Kambin P. NASS. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy. Spine J 2003; 3 (Suppl. 03) 60S-64S
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Kambin P. Posterolateral percutaneous lumbar discectomy and decompression: arthroscopic microdiscectomy. In: Arthroscopic Microdiscectomy Minimal Intervention in Spinal Surgery. Baltimore, Maryland, and Munich, Germany: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1991: 67-99
  Google Scholar
• 5 Yue JJ, Long W. Full endoscopic spinal surgery techniques: advancements, indications, and outcomes. Int J Spine Surg 2015; 9: 17
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Kapetanakis S, Gkasdaris G, Angoules AG, Givissis P. Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy using transforaminal endoscopic spine system technique: pitfalls that a beginner should avoid. World J Orthop 2017; 8 (12) 874-880
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Choi G, Lee SH, Bhanot A, Raiturker PP, Chae YS. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations: extraforaminal targeted fragmentectomy technique using working channel endoscope. Spine 2007; 32 (02) E93-E99
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Choi G, Lee SH, Lokhande P. et al. Percutaneous endoscopic approach for highly migrated intracanal disc herniations by foraminoplastic technique using rigid working channel endoscope. Spine 2008; 33 (15) E508-E515
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Kambin P, Gellman H. Percutaneous lateral discectomy of the lumbar spine a preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; (174) 127-132
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Yeung AT. Minimally invasive disc surgery with the Yeung Endoscopic Spine System (YESS). Surg Technol Int 1999; 8: 267-277
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Yeung AT, Yeung CA. Advances in endoscopic disc and spine surgery: foraminal approach. Surg Technol Int 2003; 11: 255-263
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Tsou PM, Alan Yeung C, Yeung AT. Posterolateral transforaminal selective endoscopic discectomy and thermal annuloplasty for chronic lumbar discogenic pain: a minimal access visualized intradiscal surgical procedure. Spine J 2004; 4 (05) 564-573
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Gore S, Yeung A. The “inside out” transforaminal technique to treat lumbar spinal pain in an awake and aware patient under local anesthesia: results and a review of the literature. Int J Spine Surg 2014; 8: 28
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Ahn Y. Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical tips to prevent complications. Expert Rev Med Devices 2012; 9 (04) 361-366
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Ruetten S, Komp M, Godolias G. An extreme lateral access for the surgery of lumbar disc herniations inside the spinal canal using the full-endoscopic uniportal transforaminal approach-technique and prospective results of 463 patients. Spine 2005; 30 (22) 2570-2578
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Datar GP, Shinde AB, Bommakanti K. Technical consideration of transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery for central herniation. Indian J Pain 2017; 31: 86-93
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 17 Yeung AT, Tsou PM. Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine 2002; 27 (07) 722-731
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Osman SG, Marsolais EB. Endoscopic transiliac approach to L5-S1 disc and foramen. A cadaver study. Spine 1997; 22 (11) 1259-1263
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Patgaonkar P, Datar G, Agrawal U. et al. Suprailiac versus transiliac approach in transforaminal endoscopic discectomy at L5-S1: a new surgical classification of L5-iliac crest relationship and guidelines for approach. J Spine Surg 2020; 6 (Suppl. 01) S145-S154
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Choi K-C, Lee DC, Park C-K. Modified endoscopic access for migrated and foraminal/extraforaminal disc herniation. In: Kim J-S, Lee JH, Ahn Y. eds. Endoscopic Procedures on the Spine. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2020: 159-173
  Google Scholar
• 21 Krzok G. Transpedicular endoscopic surgery for highly downmigrated L5-S1 disc herniation. Case Rep Med 2019; 2019: 5724342
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Hoogland T. Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy with forminoplasty for lumbar disc herniation. Surg Tech Orthop 2003; 1-6
  Google Scholar
• 23 Lee JH, Jeon GR, Ro JH, Byoen GJ, Kim TK, Kim KH. Evaluation of an experimentally designed stereotactic guidance system for determining needle entry point during uniplanar fluoroscopy-guided intervention. Korean J Pain 2012; 25 (02) 81-88
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Ahn SS, Kim SH, Kim DW. Learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy based on the period (early vs. late) and technique (in-and-out vs. in-and-out-and-in): a retrospective comparative study. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2015; 58 (06) 539-546
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Kim HS, Sharma SB, Wu PH. et al. Complications and limitations of endoscopic spine surgery and percutaneous instrumentation. Indian Spine J 2020; 3: 78-85
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar