Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2007; 28(6): 525-530
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-955888
Training & Testing

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Power Output Measurement during Treadmill Cycling

D. A. Coleman1 , J. D. Wiles1 , R. C. R. Davison2 , M. F. Smith3 , I. L. Swaine1
  • 1Department of Sport Science, Tourism and Leisure, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
  • 3School of Sport and Leisure, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
Further Information

Publication History

accepted after revision September 27, 2006

Publication Date:
11 May 2007 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The study aim was to consider the use of a motorised treadmill as a cycling ergometry system by assessing predicted and recorded power output values during treadmill cycling. Fourteen male cyclists completed repeated cycling trials on a motorised treadmill whilst riding their own bicycle fitted with a mobile ergometer. The speed, gradient and loading via an external pulley system were recorded during 20-s constant speed trials and used to estimate power output with an assumption about the contribution of rolling resistance. These values were then compared with mobile ergometer measurements. To assess the reliability of measured power output values, four repeated trials were conducted on each cyclist. During level cycling, the recorded power output was 257.2 ± 99.3 W compared to the predicted power output of 258.2 ± 99.9 W (p > 0.05). For graded cycling, there was no significant difference between measured and predicted power output, 268.8 ± 109.8 W vs. 270.1 ± 111.7 W, p > 0.05, SEE 1.2 %. The coefficient of variation for mobile ergometer power output measurements during repeated trials ranged from 1.5 % (95 % CI 1.2 - 2.0 %) to 1.8 % (95 % CI 1.5 - 2.4 %). These results indicate that treadmill cycling can be used as an ergometry system to assess power output in cyclists with acceptable accuracy.

Key words

SRM - ergometry - gradient - specificity

References

  • 1 Atkinson G, Nevill A M. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.  Sports Med. 1998;  26 217-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Attaway R, Bartoli W P, Pate R R, Davis J M. Physiologic and perceptual responses to exercise on a new cycle ergometer.  Can J Sports Sci. 1992;  17 56-59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bassett F A, Boulay M A. Specificity of treadmill and cycle ergometer tests in triathletes, runners and cyclists.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;  81 214-221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Burke E R, Lagenfeld M, Kirkendall D. Physiological responses to submaximal bicycle exercise: Comparison of rollers and the racer-mate windload simulator.  Aus J Sports Med Exerc Sci. 1982;  14 104-107
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Coast J R, Swain D P, Milliken M C, Clifford P S, Stricker P R, Stray-Gunderson J. Metabolic requirements of riding windload simulators as compared to cycling on the road. Burke E Medical and Scientific Aspects of Cycling. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics 1988: 109-116
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Davis R, Hull M. Measurement of pedal loading in bicycling.  J Biomech. 1981;  14 857-872
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Davison R CR, Swann D, Coleman D, Bird S. Correlates of simulated hill climb cycling performance.  J Sports Sci. 2000;  18 105-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Di Prampero P E, Cortili G, Mognoni P, Saibene F. Equatuion of motion of a cyclist.  J Appl Physiol. 1979;  47 201-206
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Faria I, Dix C, Frazer C. Effect of body position during cycling on heart rate, pulmonary ventilation, oxygen uptake and work output.  Sports Med. 1978;  22 295-299
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Field A. Discovering Statistics: Using SPSS for Windows. UK; Sage 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Firth M S. A sport-specific training and testing device for racing cyclists.  Ergonomics. 1981;  24 565-571
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hopkins W G. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science.  Sports Med. 2000;  30 1-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hopkins W G, Sachabort E J, Hawley J A. Reliability of power in physical performance tests.  Sports Med. 2001;  31 211-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jakeman P. A longitudinal study of exercise metabolism during recovery from viral illness.  Br J Sports Med. 1993;  27 157-161
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Jones S A, Passfield L. The dynamic calibration of bicycle power measuring cranks. Haake S The Engineering of Sport. Oxford; Blackwell Science 1998: 265-274
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Keen P S, Passfield L, Hale T. Indirect determination of V·O2max using a sports-specific (cycle) ergometry system (abstract).  J Sports Sci. 1991;  9 420
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kenny G P, Reardon F D, Marion A, Thoden J S. A comparative analysis of physiological responses at submaximal workloads during different laboratory simulations of field cycling.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1995;  71 409-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lockwood P A, Yoder J E, Deuster P A. Comparison and cross-validation of cycle ergometry estimates of V·O2max.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;  29 1513-1520
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Martin J C, Spirduso W W. Determinants of maximal cycling power: crank length, pedalling rate and pedal speed.  Eur J Applied Physiol. 2001;  84 413-418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Neville A. Why the analysis of performance variables recorded on a ratio scale will invariably benefit from a log transformation (editorial).  J Sports Sci. 1997;  15 457-458
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Paton C D, Hopkins W G. Tests of cycling performance.  Sports Med. 2001;  31 489-496
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Oude-Vrieklink H HE, Vissers A CA, Binkhorst R A. Oxygen consumption and speed of cycling using an air-braked simulator on a hometrainer roller.  Int J Sports Med. 1984;  5 98-101
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Shennum P, de Vries H. The effect of saddle height on oxygen consumption during bicycle ergometer work.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1976;  8 119-121
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Signorile J, Holden S, Coast J R. The feasibility of the windload simulator as an alternative to on-road training.  J Appl Sport Sci Res. 1990;  4 5-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Smith M F, Balmer J, Coleman D A, Bird S R, Davison R C. Method of lactate elevation does not affect the determination of the lactate minimum.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;  34 1744-1749
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Swain D P, Wilcox J P. The effect of cadence on the economy of uphill cycling.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;  24 1123-1127
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Tate R F, Klett G W. Optimal confidence for the variance of a normal distribution.  J Am Stat Ass. 1959;  54 674-682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Van Praagh E, Bedu M, Roddier P, Coudert J. A simple calibration method for mechanically braked cycle ergometers.  Int J Sports Med. 1992;  13 27-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Williams C A, James D VB. Science for Exercise and Sport. London; Routledge 2001
    Google Scholar

Damian A. Coleman

Department of Sport Science
Tourism and Leisure
Canterbury Christ Church University

Canterbury

Kent

CT1 1QU

United Kingdom

Phone: + 44 12 27 78 26 39

Fax: + 44 12 27 47 04 42

Email: dac1@canterbury.ac.uk

      >