Skip to main content

Evaluating Social Partnership in the Australian Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Developing Positive Employment Relations

Abstract

Over the past 2–3 decades, many western countries have pursued an employment relations (ER) agenda involving labour–management cooperation or a form of ‘partnership’; for example, the USA, Britain, Ireland and New Zealand (Ackers and Payne 1998; Kelly 2004; Johnstone et al. 2010; Macneil and Bray 2013; Cathcart 2014). Attracted by the success of partnership practices in the UK, Australian academics and policy-makers have previously investigated the viability of partnership models in the Australian context, both conceptually (Lansbury 2000; Gollan and Patmore 2006; Townsend et al. 2013) and through empirical case studies (Mitchell and O’Donnell 2007; Jones et al. 2008). Yet little research has specifically examined the role of current industrial relations practices in promoting workplace partnerships within both union and non-union settings in Australia. This chapter will thus focus on exploring the current industrial relations and regulatory context for the support of workplace partnership practices within the political and socioeconomic environment in Australia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s 89A; Re Award Simplification Decision (1997) 75 IR 272.

  2. 2.

    See Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth); Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices) Act 2005 (Cth).

  3. 3.

    The Fair Work Amendment Act 2013 also amended the Fair Work Act 2009 ‘by inserting a new provision, s.145A, which provides that all modern awards must include a term requiring employers to consult employees about a change to their regular roster or ordinary hours of work’: Re Consultation Clause [2013] FWCFB 10165 [1].

  4. 4.

    This is made clear in the amended regulations requirement that consultation must occur ‘as soon as practicable after proposing to introduce the change’: Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) Schedule 2.3 (5).

  5. 5.

    For example, a clause in an agreement did not comply with s 205 by excluding casual workers from having consultation rights: see CFMEU v St John of God Healthcare Inc [2014] FWCFB 4011; Andrew Stewart, Stewarts Guide to Employment Law (The Federation Press, 5th ed, 2015) [8.31].

  6. 6.

    Key aims mentioned in the preamble of the EU Directive 2002 are: to promote social dialogue between management and labour; to strengthen dialogue and promote mutual trust within undertakings; and to increase employee availability to undertake measures and activities to increase their employability, promote employee involvement in the operation of the future of the undertaking and increase its competitiveness.

References

  • ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (2014). Employee Earnings, Benefits and Trade Union Membership, Cat: 6306.0, Australia, August 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackers, P. (2002). Reframing employment relations: The case for neo-pluralism. Industrial Relations Journal, 31(1), 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackers, P. (2014). Rethinking the employment relationship: A neo-pluralist critique of British industrial relations orthodoxy. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(18), 2608–2625. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.667429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackers, P., & Payne, J. (1998). British trade unions and social partnership: Rhetoric, reality and strategy. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(3), 529–550. doi:10.1080/095851998341062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Psychological Society (APS) (2015). APS Stress and Wellbeing in Australia Survey 2014. Available at http://www.psychology.org.au/psychologyweek/survey/, retrieved on August 5th, 2015.

  • Badigannavar, V., & Kelly, J. (2005). Labour-management partnership in the non-union retail sector. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(8), 1529–1544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J., & Peetz, D. (2015). Australian unions and collective bargaining in 2014. Journal of Industrial Relations, 57(3), 401–421. doi:10.1177/0022185615571982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J., Price, R., Pyman, A., & Parker, J. (2015). Union power in retail: Contrasting cases in Australia and New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 40(1), 1–18. http://simsrad.net.ocs.mq.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=102964241&site=ehost-live

  • Baker, D., Johnson, M. & Denniss, R. 2014, Walking the tightrope: Have Australians achieved work/life balance? Policy Brief, The Australia Institute, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., and Ainsworth, S. (2000). http://simsrad.net.ocs.mq.edu.au/loginon Employee Participation in Australia 1983-1999ct = true&db = buh&AN = 102964241&site = ehost-livetioisatLabour Relations Law, Melbourne Law School.

  • Brown, R. (1992). Commonwealth Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 24 June, 3793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labour Statistics, Union Members in 2007, Press Release USDL 08–0092 (2008), retrieved 11 April 2008 from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.nr0.htm.

  • Bryson, A., Gomez, R., Kretschmer, T. and Willman, P. (2007). The diffusion of workplace voice and high-commitment human resource management practices in Britain, 1984–1998. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16 (3), 394–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campling, J., & Gollan, P. (1999). Bargained out: Negotiating without unions in Australia. Sydney: The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, I. (2002). Extended working hours in Australia. Labour and Industry, 13(1), 91–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cathcart, A. (2014). Paradoxes of participation: Non-union workplace partnership in John Lewis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(6), 762–780. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.743476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combet, G. (2001). Employee consultation in an Australian context: The works council debate, Speech presented at the Australian Works Councils Seminar, RMIT, 9 April, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combet, G. (2003) sented at the Australian Works Councils Seminar, RMIT, 9 April, Melbouate and Trade Unionsde Unionsouncils Seminar, RMIT (Eds.), Partnership at Work: The challenge of employee democracy, labor essays 2003. Sydney: Pluto Press, pp. 165

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook (1992). Commonwealth Parliamentary Debates, Senate, 7th May, 2517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danford, A., Richardson, M., Stewart, P., Tailby, S., & Upchurch, M. (2005). Workplace partnership and employee voice in the UK: Comparative case studies of union strategy and worker experience. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 26(4), 593–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, G. (2004). Partnership and the development of trust in British workplaces. Human Resource Management, 14 (1), 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyble, J. (2014) Workplace stress linked to lower productivity. Employee Benefits: 9/3/2014, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, A., Korman, S., & Marshall, S. (2007), Joint consultative committees in Australia: An empirical update, working paper for the Corporate Governance and Workplace Partnerships Project, University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R., & Rogers, J. (1999). What workers want. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, C. (2009). Union impact on the effective adoption of high performance work practices. Human Resource Management Review, 19(1), 39–50. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollan, P. J., & Patmore, G. (2006). Transporting the European social partnership model to Australia. Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(2), 217–256. doi:10.1177/0022185606062832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollan, P. J., Patmore, G., & Xu, Y. (2014). Regulation of employee voice. In A. Wilkinson, T. Dundon, J. Donaghey, & R. Freeman (Eds.), Handbook of research on employee voice (pp. 363–380). London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, F. (2004). Why has work effort become moreintense? Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 43(4), 709–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, G., & Peccei, R. (1998). The partnership company: benchmarks for the future. The report of the IPA survey principles, practice and performance. London: Involvement and Participation Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, G., & Peccei, R. (2001). Partnership at work: Mutuality and the balance of advantage. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(2), 207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, P., & Allen, M. (2001). Partnership as union strategy: A preliminary evaluation. Employee Relations, 23(2), 164–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, P., P. Boxall and K. Macky (2005) ‘Non-Union Voice and the Effectiveness of Joint Consultation in New Zealand’, Economic and Industrial Democracy 26(2): 229–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, J. (2015). The Australian labour market in 2014: Still ill? Journal of Industrial Relations, 57(3), 348–365. doi:10.1177/0022185615571981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P., Cooper, B. K., Pyman, A., & Teicher, J. (2012). Trust in management: the role of employee voice arrangements and perceived managerial opposition to unions. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(4), 377–391. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P., Pyman, A., Cooper, B. K., & Teicher, J. (2009). The development of alternative voice mechanisms in Australia: The case of joint consultation. Economic & Industrial Democracy, 30(1), 67–92. doi:10.1177/0143831X08099434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Involvement and Participation Association (IPA). (1997). Towards industrial partnership. London: IPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, S., Ackers, P., & Wilkinson, A. (2009). The British partnership phenomenon: A ten year review. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(3), 260–279. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2009.00101.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, S., Ackers, P., & Wilkinson, A. (2010). Better than nothing? Is non-union partnership a contradiction in terms? Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(2), 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M., & Mitchell, R. (2006), Legal origin, legal families and the regulation of labour in Australia, paper presented at the Workshop: Corporate Governance and the Management of Labour: Australian Perspectives, 8 December 2006, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M., Marshall, S., Mitchell, R. and Ramsay, I. (2008). Corporate Governance and Workplace Partnerships Case Studies, Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation and Centre for Employment and Labour Relation Law, The University of Melbourne and Department of Business Law and Taxation, Monash University. Available at http://law.unimelb.edu.au/cclsr/centre-activities/research/major-research-projects/corporate-governance-and-workplace-partnerships-project, viewed June 16th, 2015.

  • Kaufman, B.E., Lewin, D., and Fossum, J.A. (2000). vities/research/major-research-projects/corporate-governance-and-workplace-partnerships-ptation and the Impact of the NLRAe NLRAALRA Impact o D.G. Taras (Eds.), Nonunion employee representation: History, contemporary practice, and policy, Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (2004). Social partnership agreements in Britain: Labour cooperation and compliance. Industrial Relations, 43(1), 267–292. doi:10.1111/j.0019-8676.2004.00326.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, C., & Davies, P. (2004). UK worker representation after single channel. Industrial Law Journal, 33(2), 121–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kler, P., Leeves, G., & Shankar, S. (2015). Nothing to Fear but Fear Itself: Perceptions of Job Security in Australia After the Global Financial Crisis. Social Indicators Research, 123 (123(3), 753-769. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0759-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansbury, R. D. (2000). Workplace change and employment relations reform in Australia: Prospects for a new social partnership? The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 1(1), 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansbury, R. D. (2009). Workplace democracy and the global financial crisis. The Kingsley Laffer Memorial Lecture, University of Sydney delivered on 16th March, 2009. Availabe at http://sydney.edu.au/business/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/18772/Laffer_Memorial_Lecture_160309.pdf, retrived July 22nd, 2015.

  • Lepine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & Lepine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relations among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 764–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberal-National Party Coalition (1996). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrances.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingemann, S., von Steinau-Steinrueck, R., & Mengel, A. (2003). Employment and Labour Law in Germany. Mloyment and Labour Law in Germanyd Mengel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M., & Meltz, N. M. (2000). Estimates of nonunion employee representation in the United States and Canada: How different are the two countries? In B. E. Kaufman & D. G. Taras (Eds.), Nonunion employee representation: History, contemporary practice, and policy. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobel, O. (2006). The four pillars of work law. Michigan Law Review, 104(6), 1539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneil, J., & Bray, M. (2013). Third-party facilitators in interest-based negotiation: An Australian case study. Journal of Industrial Relations, 55(5), 699–722. doi:10.1177/0022185613491681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchington, M. (1992). Interest-base. Journal of Industrial Relations, 34(3), pp. 530-722. doi:10.1177/0022185613491681litators.

  • Markey, R. (2007). Non-union employee representation in Australia: a case study of the Suncorp Metway Employee Council Inc (SMEC).Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(2), 187-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez Lucio, M., & Stuart, M. (2002). Assessing partnership: The prospects for and challenges of modernisation. Employee Relations, 24(3), 252–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, J. (2012). ‘Managerial prerogative: myth or fact’ (Paper presented at Australian Labour Law Association Conference, 16 November 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., & O’Donnell, A. (2007). What is labour law doing about ‘partnership at work’? British and Australian Developments Compared, Centre for Employment and Labour Relation Law, The University of Melbourne. Available at http://law.unimelb.edu.au/cclsr/centre-activities/research/major-research-projects/corporate-governance-and-workplace-partnerships-project, viewed June 16th, 2015.

  • Patmore, G. (2010). A legal perspective on employee participation. In A. Wilkinson, P. Gollan, M. Marchington, & D. Lewin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of participation in organizations (pp. 76–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peetz, D. (2015). Are Australian trade unions part of the solution, or part of the problem? Autralian Review of Public Affairs. Retrieved from http://www.australianreview.net/digest/2015/02/peetz.html, on September 26th, 2015.

  • Price, R., Bailey, J., & Pyman, A. (2014). Varieties of collaboration: The case of an Australian retail union. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25, 748–761. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.743477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission (2013). Looking Back on Structural Change in Australia: 2002–2012, Supplement to Annual Report 2011–12, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/speeches/2003/oq170103_en.pdf

  • Rogers, J., & Streek, W. (Eds.). (1995). Works councils: Counsultation, representation and cooperation in industrial relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R. K., & Kumar, S. (2014). Implications of stress on employees’ performance-a case study. BVIMR Management Edge, 7, 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens M. (2012). FWA: conflict breeds conflict. Australian Financial Review (July 26th).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A. (2015) Stewart’s Guide to Employment Law (2015, 5th ed, Federation Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. (1995). Financial Review (July 26lications of stress on employees’ performance-a . In. J. Rogers and W. Streeck (Eds.) Works Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Co-Operation in Industrial Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, S. (1987). An American perspective of the German worker participation model. Comparative Labor Law Journal, 8, 333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taras, G., & Kaufman, B. (2006). Non-union employee representation in North America: Diversity, controversy and uncertain future. Industrial Relations Journal, 37(5), 513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tailby, S., Richardson, M., Upchurch, M., Danford, A. and Stewart, P. (2007). Partnership with and without trade unions in the UK financial services: filling or fuelling the gap? Industrial Relations Journal, 38 (3), 210–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teicher, J., Holland, P., Pyman, A., & Cooper, B. (2007). Diversity, Conce?y, Conce?er.In B. Boxall and P. Haynes (Eds.) What workers say: Employee voice in the Anglo American workplace. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, P. (2014). Australian industrial relations in 2013. Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(3), 324–330. doi:10.1177/0022185614527981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, P. (2015). Introduction: Australian industrial relations in 2014. Journal of Industrial Relations, 57(3), 325–332. doi:10.1177/0022185615581735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, K., Wilkinson, A., & Burgess, J. (2014). Routes to partial success: Collaborative employment relations and employee engagement. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25, 915–930. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.743478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, K., Wilkinson, A., Burgess, J., & Brown, K. (2013). Has Australia’s road to workplace partnership reached a dead end? The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 29(2), 239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, P., & Lewer, J. (2013). The global financial crisis, employment relations and the labour market in Singapore and Australia. Asia Pacific Business Review, 19(2), 217–229. doi:10.1080/13602381.2013.767637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wever, K. (1995). Negotiating competitiveness: Employment relations and organizational innovation in Germany and the United States. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

Legislation

  • Directive 2009/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees [2009] OJ L 122/28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Directive 02/14/EC of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community — Joint declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on employee representation [2002] OJ L 80/29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Directive 94/45/EC of 22 September 1994 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees [1994] OJ L 254/64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Directive 97/74/EC of 15 December 1997 extending, to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Directive 94/45/EC on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees [1997] OJ L 10/22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Explanatory Memorandum, Fair Work Bill 2008 (Cth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Industrial Relations Reform Act 1993 (Cth).

    Google Scholar 

  • The National Labor Relations Act of 1935 29 USC (US).

    Google Scholar 

  • Work Choices Act 2004 (Cth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Workplace Relations and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 1996 (Cth).

    Google Scholar 

Case Law

Download references

Acknowledgment

Glenn Patmore would like to thank Rachel Varghese, Lois Pickering and Sarah Moorhead for their invaluable research assistance, proofreading and helpful comments on this chapter. This book chapter draws on and develops the author's own previous work, including Gollan and Patmore (2006) and Patmore (2010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Xu, Y., Patmore, G., Gollan, P.J. (2016). Evaluating Social Partnership in the Australian Context. In: Johnstone, S., Wilkinson, A. (eds) Developing Positive Employment Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-42772-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics