Skip to main content

Getting In, Getting Out and Getting Back: Conducting Long-term Research in Immigration Detention Centres

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reflexivity and Criminal Justice

Abstract

In this chapter, we document challenges we face in conducting ongoing research on everyday life in immigration removal centres (IRCs) many of which relate to the highly contested nature of these sites. Immigration detention is frequently in the news, yet rarely the topic of independent academic scrutiny. The Home Office and the private companies who manage these sites of confinement hardly ever allow researchers into them, leaving most of those who write about such places dependent on NGOs, former detainees or evidence gleaned from conversations in the visits halls. We are the exception to the rule, having obtained and retained permission to enter IRCs to conduct independent academic research in 2009. In this chapter, drawing on interviews and field notes with and about staff, we explore some of the tensions inherent in maintaining a working relationship over a long period of time and in these complex research sites. Though aspects of our experience are specific to IRCs, some will apply to other, long-term research projects in custody.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Each centre runs a shop in which detainees can purchase everyday products as well as lodge mail orders for Argos. The shop is usually staffed by ‘civilian’ officers (i.e. not DCOs). IRCs vary in what they say they do with the profit; some invest it back into the centre, others do not.

  2. 2.

    This is not his real name. All participants cited in this article have been given pseudonyms.

  3. 3.

    “‘Why are you here?’ Jamil challenged Mary. ‘Who let you in? Maybe you’re from UKBA and everything I tell you, you will go and tell them. I know how the system works. Why should I talk to you?’” (Uganda, BH, in Bosworth 2014: 59).

References

  • Aas, K. F., and Bosworth, M. (Eds.) (2013) Borders of Punishment: Migration, Citizenship and Social Exclusion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2000) Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Post-Coloniality, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, M. (2014) Researching ‘Bogus’ Asylum Seekers, ‘Illegal’ Migrants and ‘Crimmigrants’. In K. Lumsden and A. Winter (Eds.) Reflexivity in Criminological Research: Experiences with the Powerful and the Powerless, London: Palgrave: 162–177.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M., Campbell, D., Bonita, D., Ferranti, S.M. and Santos, M. (2005) ‘Doing Prison Research: Views from Inside’, Qualitative Inquiry, 11(2): 249–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M. (2014) Inside Immigration Detention, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M. (2013. Can Immigration Detention be Legitimate? In K.F. Aas and M. Bosworth (Eds.) Borders of Punishment: Migration, Citizenship and Social Exclusion, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 149–165.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M. (2012) ‘Subjectivity and Identity in Detention: Punishment and Society in a Global Age’, Theoretical Criminology 16(2): 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M. (2007) Immigration Detention in Britain. In M. Lee (Ed.), Human Trafficking, Collumpton: Willan Publishing: 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M. (1999) Engendering Resistance: Agency and Power in Women’s Prisons, Aldershot: Ashgate Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M. and Kellezi, B. (2015) Quality of Life in Detention: Results from the MQLD Questionnaire Data Collected in IRC Campsfield House, IRC Yarl’s Wood, IRC Colnbrook and IRC Dover, September 2013 – August 2014, Oxford: Centre for Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M. and Kellezi, B. (2014) Citizenship and Belonging in a Women’s Immigration Detention Centre. In C. Phillips & C. Webster (Eds.) New Directions in Race, Ethnicity and Crime, Abingdon: Routledge: 80–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M. and Kellezi, B. (2013) ‘Developing a Measure of the Quality of Life in Detention’, Prison Service Journal 205: 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M. and Kellezi, B. (2012) Quality of Life in Detention: Results from the MQLD Questionnaire Data Collected in IRC Yarl’s Wood, IRC Tinsley House and IRC Brook House, August 2010 – June 2011, Oxford: Centre for Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M., Kellezi, B. and Slade, G. (2012) Quality of Life in Detention: Results from Questionnaire Data Collected in IRC Morton Hall, Oxford: Centre for Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M. and Slade, G. (2014) ‘In Search of Recognition: Gender and Staff-Detainee Relations in a British Immigration Detention Centre’, Punishment & Society 16(2): 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M. and Turnbull, S. (2015) Immigration Detention and the Expansion of Penal Power in the UK. In K. Reiter & A. Koenig (Eds.) Extreme Punishment: 50, London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2009) The Prisoner Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGenova, N. (2010) The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space and the Freedom of Movement. In N. De Genova and N. Peultz (Eds.), The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space and the Freedom of Movement, Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 33–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. (2014) ‘Living with Uncertainty: Indefinite Immigration Detention’, Journal of Legal Anthropology 1(3): 263–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. (2010) ‘These People Could be Anyone: Fear, Contempt (and Empathy) in a British Immigration Removal Centre’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(6): 881–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. (2012) Border Watch: Cultures of Immigration Detention and Control, London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah-Moffat, K. (2011) Criminological Cliques: Narrowing Dialogues, Institutional Protectionism and the Next Generation. In M. Bosworth & C. Hoyle (Eds), What is Criminology?, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 440–455.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • HMIP. (2002) An Inspection of Campsfield House Immigration Removal Centre, London: HMIP.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMIP and ICIBI. (2012) The Effectiveness and Impact of Immigration Detention Casework: A Joint Thematic Review, London: HMIP & ICIBI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, E. (2015) Punish and Expel: Border Control, Nationalism, and the New Purpose of the Prison, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. and Williams, L. (2012) ‘Immigration Detention in the Community: Research on the Experiences of Migrants Released from Detention Centres in the UK’, Population, Space and Place 18(6): 710–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A. (2010) Being a Criminologist: Investigation as a Lifestyle and Living. In M. Bosworth and C. Hoyle (Eds.) What is Criminology?, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 518–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A. (2004) Prisons and Their Moral Performance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patenaude, A. L. (2004) ‘No Promises, But I’m Willing to Listen and Tell What I Hear: Conducting Qualitative Research Among Prison Inmates and Staff’, The Prison Journal, 84(4 suppl): 69S-91S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, J. (2009) Detained Lives: The Real Cost of Indefinite Immigration Detention, London: LDSG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips, C. (2010) The Multicultural Prison, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, S. and Massa, E. (2012) ‘Why Immigration Detention is Unique’, Population, Space and Place 18(6): 677–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. (2000) ‘The “Society of Captives” in the Era of Hyperincarceration’, Theoretical Criminology 4(3): 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Bottoms, A.E. and Hay, W. (1996) Prisons and the Problem of Order, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2008) ‘The Curious Eclipse of Prison Ethnography in the Age of Mass Incarceration’, Ethnography 3(4): 371–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bosworth, M., Kellezi, B. (2017). Getting In, Getting Out and Getting Back: Conducting Long-term Research in Immigration Detention Centres. In: Armstrong, S., Blaustein, J., Henry, A. (eds) Reflexivity and Criminal Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54642-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54642-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54641-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54642-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics