Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Day that Changed Everything? ((911))

Abstract

How did September 11 affect the gun control debate in the United States? The gun control lobby attempted to use terrorism fears to promote some of their long-standing action items—such as restrictions on gun shows, and bans on .50 caliber firearms. The gun control efforts were generally unsuccessful. The pro-gun lobby gained some marginal benefit from an increase in the number of gun owners, and from greater support for “right to carry” legislation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For discussion of the various technologies of “smart guns,” see Cynthia Leonardatos, David B. Kopel, and Paul Blackman, “Smart Guns/Foolish Legislators,” Connecticut Law Review 34, (2001): 157–219.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Martin Killias, “Gun Ownership and Violent Crime: The Swiss Experience in International Perspective,” Security Journal 1, 169, 171 (1990): 169

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joseph Olson and David B. Kopel, “All the Way Down the Slippery Slope: Gun Prohibition in England, and Some Lessons for America,” Hamline Law Review 22 1999): 399.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bill Clinton, My Life (New York: Vintage Books, 2004), 928

    Google Scholar 

  5. David B. Kopel and Joseph Olson, “Preventing a Reign of Terror: Civil Liberties Implications of Terrorism Legislation” Oklahoma City Law Review 21 (1996): 247.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arnold Grossman, One Nation under Guns: An Essay on an American Epidemic (Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing, 2006), 70–71.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Richard Feldman, Ricochet: Confessions of a Gun Lobbyist (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley&Sons, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gordon Hutchinson and Todd Masson, The Great New Orleans Gun Grab (Boutte, LA: Louisiana Publishing, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fabrizio, McLaughlin and Associates, September 17–20, 2001 (800 adults, conducted between September 17 and September 20, 2001, 73% supported “training and arming all U.S. pilots with specially manufactured handguns that are designed not to penetrate an airliner’s outer skin or fuselage”); George Gallup Jr., The Gallup Poll: Public Opinion, 2001 (Lanham, MD: Rowman&Littlefield, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alexandra Marks, “Air Marshals Stretched Thin,” Christian Science Monitor 98 (December 28, 2005): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gene Healy and Robert A. Levy, “Restoring the Right to Bear Arms,” in Cato Handbook for Congress: Policy Recommendations for the 108th Congress, ed. Edward H. Crane and David Boaz (Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2003), 185.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Matthew J. Morgan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kopel, D.B., Gallant, P., Eisen, J.D. (2009). Gun Control and the Right to Arms after 9/11. In: Morgan, M.J. (eds) The Impact of 9/11 and the New Legal Landscape. The Day that Changed Everything?. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230100053_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics