Abstract
Decisions made within the legal system are typically viewed as being impartial informed only by the testimony and evidence presented and legal precedent. For this reason, many scholars treat legal decisions as exogenous events, that is, that they are independent of preexisting conditions (see, for example, Baicker and Gordon 2006). However, political scientists and legal analysts have long understood that in many cases factors outside what is presented in the courtroom affect the outcomes of legal cases.1 The race, gender, and political affiliation of individuals involved in the legal process have all been found to play a role in determining legal outcomes.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Alesina, Alberto, Arnaud Devleeschauwer, William Easterly, Sergio Kurlat, and Romain Wacziarg. 2003. Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2) (June): 155–194.
American Bar Foundation. 2004. The Lawyer Statistical Report: The U.S. Legal Profession in 2000. Chicago, IL: American Bar Foundation.
American Judicature Society. 2007. Initial Selection: Courts of Last Resort. Des Moines, IA: American Judicature Society. Online: www.ajs.org/js/LastResort.pdf.
Baicker, Katherine and Nora Gordon. 2006. The Effect of State Educational Finance Reform on Total Local Resources. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8–9) (September): 1519–1535.
Besley, Timothy and Abigail Payne. 2003. Judicial Accountability and Economic Policy Outcomes: Evidence from Employment Discrimination Charges. Mimeo.
Caplan, Bryan. 2007. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton, PA: Princeton University Press.
Christianson, Scott. 2004. Innocent: Inside Wrongful Conviction Cases. New York: New York University Press.
Council of State Governments. 2004. The Book of the States. Lexington, VA: Council of State Governments.
Cross, Frank B. and Emerson H. Tiller. 1998. Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Court of Appeals. Yale Law Journal, 107: 2155–2176.
Dyke, Andrew. 2007. Electoral Cycles in the Administration of Criminal Justice. Public Choice, 133(3–4) (December): 417–437.
Farber, Daniel A. and Suzanna Sherry. 1990. A History of the American Constitution. St. Paul, MN: West.
Garrett, Thomas A. and Russell S. Sobel. 2003. The Political Economy of FEMA Disaster Payments. Economic Inquiry, 41(3) (July): 496–509.
Glaberson, William. 2005. Cases Against Rivals Were Justified, Hynes Said, The New York Times, January 6.
Glaeser, Edward. 2006. Inequality, in Barry Weingast and Donald Wittman (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
Glaeser, Edward, Jose Scheinkman, and Andrei Shleifer. 2003. The Injustice of Inequality. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1) (January): 199–222.
Grose, Christian R. 2007. Cues, Endorsements, and Heresthetic in a High-profile Election: Racial Polarization in Durham, North Carolina? PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(2) (April): 325–332.
Hanssen, F. Andrew. 2000. Independent Courts and Administrative Agencies: An Empirical Analysis of the States, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 16: 534–571.
—. 2002. On the Politics of Judicial Selection: Lawyers and State Campaigns for the Merit Plan, Public Choice, 110(January): 79–97.
—. 2004. Learning about Judicial Independence: Institutional Change in the State Courts. Journal of Legal Studies, 33(June): 431–473.
Helland, Eric and Alexander Tabarrok. 2002. The Effect of Electoral Institutions on Tort Awards, American Law and Economics Review, 4: 341–70.
—. 2006. Judge and Jury: American Tort Law on Trial. Oakland, CA: The Independent Institute.
Koppl, Roger. 2005. How to Improve Forensic Science. European Journal of Law and Economics, 20(3) (November): 255–286.
Kubik, Jeffrey D. and John R. Moran. 2003. Lethal Elections: Gubernatorial Politics and the Timing of Executions. Journal of Law & Economics, 46(1) (April): 1–26.
Lapinski, Alex. 2001. Incumbent Abraham Is Confident of Re-election as City’s District Attorney. The Daily Pennsylvanian, November 6.
Link, Bradley. 2004. Had Enough in Ohio? Time to Reform Ohio’s Judicial Selection Process. Cleveland State Law Review, 51: 123–152.
Murray, Jeff. 2007. DA Hopefuls Make Pitches to Two Clubs, Elmira Star-Gazette, August 22.
Neff, Joseph and Anne Blythe. 2007. Panel Disbars Duke Lacrosse Prosecutor. Raleigh News & Observer, June 16.
Radin, E. D. 1964. The Innocents. New York: William Morrow.
Schanzenbach, Max. 2005. Racial and Sex Disparities in Prison Sentences: The Effect of District-Level Judicial. Journal of Legal Studies, 34(1) (January): 57–92.
Sobel, Russell S. and Joshua C. Hall. 2007. The Effect of Judicial Selection Processes on Judicial Quality: The Role of Partisan Politics. Cato Journal, 27(1) (Winter): 69–82.
Smith, Joseph and Emerson Tiller. 2002. The Strategy of Judging: Evidence from Administrative Law. Journal of Legal Studies, 31: 61–82.
Tabarrok, Alexander and Eric Helland. 1999. Court Politics: The Political Economy of Tort Awards, Journal of Law and Economics, 42 (April): 157–188.
—. 2003. Race, Poverty, and American Tort Awards: Evidence from Three Data Sets. Journal of Legal Studies, 32(1) (2003): 27–58.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2004. Statistical Abstract of the United States 2004–05. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce. 2004. State Liability Systems Ranking Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
West, William F. 2007. Nifong Apologizes to 3 Players; DA Also Takes Issue With Some of AG’s Sharp Criticism, Durham Herald-Sun, April 13.
Wittman, Donald A. 1995. The Myth of Democratic Failure: Why Political Institutions Are Efficient. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2010 The Independent Institute
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sobel, R.S., Ryan, M.E., Hall, J.C. (2010). Electoral Pressures and the Legal System: Friends or Foes?. In: López, E.J. (eds) The Pursuit of Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230109490_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230109490_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-10245-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10949-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)