Skip to main content

Electoral Pressures and the Legal System: Friends or Foes?

  • Chapter
The Pursuit of Justice

Abstract

Decisions made within the legal system are typically viewed as being impartial informed only by the testimony and evidence presented and legal precedent. For this reason, many scholars treat legal decisions as exogenous events, that is, that they are independent of preexisting conditions (see, for example, Baicker and Gordon 2006). However, political scientists and legal analysts have long understood that in many cases factors outside what is presented in the courtroom affect the outcomes of legal cases.1 The race, gender, and political affiliation of individuals involved in the legal process have all been found to play a role in determining legal outcomes.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Alesina, Alberto, Arnaud Devleeschauwer, William Easterly, Sergio Kurlat, and Romain Wacziarg. 2003. Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2) (June): 155–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Bar Foundation. 2004. The Lawyer Statistical Report: The U.S. Legal Profession in 2000. Chicago, IL: American Bar Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Judicature Society. 2007. Initial Selection: Courts of Last Resort. Des Moines, IA: American Judicature Society. Online: www.ajs.org/js/LastResort.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baicker, Katherine and Nora Gordon. 2006. The Effect of State Educational Finance Reform on Total Local Resources. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8–9) (September): 1519–1535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, Timothy and Abigail Payne. 2003. Judicial Accountability and Economic Policy Outcomes: Evidence from Employment Discrimination Charges. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, Bryan. 2007. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton, PA: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christianson, Scott. 2004. Innocent: Inside Wrongful Conviction Cases. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of State Governments. 2004. The Book of the States. Lexington, VA: Council of State Governments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, Frank B. and Emerson H. Tiller. 1998. Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Court of Appeals. Yale Law Journal, 107: 2155–2176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyke, Andrew. 2007. Electoral Cycles in the Administration of Criminal Justice. Public Choice, 133(3–4) (December): 417–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber, Daniel A. and Suzanna Sherry. 1990. A History of the American Constitution. St. Paul, MN: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, Thomas A. and Russell S. Sobel. 2003. The Political Economy of FEMA Disaster Payments. Economic Inquiry, 41(3) (July): 496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaberson, William. 2005. Cases Against Rivals Were Justified, Hynes Said, The New York Times, January 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, Edward. 2006. Inequality, in Barry Weingast and Donald Wittman (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, Edward, Jose Scheinkman, and Andrei Shleifer. 2003. The Injustice of Inequality. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1) (January): 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grose, Christian R. 2007. Cues, Endorsements, and Heresthetic in a High-profile Election: Racial Polarization in Durham, North Carolina? PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(2) (April): 325–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen, F. Andrew. 2000. Independent Courts and Administrative Agencies: An Empirical Analysis of the States, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 16: 534–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2002. On the Politics of Judicial Selection: Lawyers and State Campaigns for the Merit Plan, Public Choice, 110(January): 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2004. Learning about Judicial Independence: Institutional Change in the State Courts. Journal of Legal Studies, 33(June): 431–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helland, Eric and Alexander Tabarrok. 2002. The Effect of Electoral Institutions on Tort Awards, American Law and Economics Review, 4: 341–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2006. Judge and Jury: American Tort Law on Trial. Oakland, CA: The Independent Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppl, Roger. 2005. How to Improve Forensic Science. European Journal of Law and Economics, 20(3) (November): 255–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubik, Jeffrey D. and John R. Moran. 2003. Lethal Elections: Gubernatorial Politics and the Timing of Executions. Journal of Law & Economics, 46(1) (April): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapinski, Alex. 2001. Incumbent Abraham Is Confident of Re-election as City’s District Attorney. The Daily Pennsylvanian, November 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Bradley. 2004. Had Enough in Ohio? Time to Reform Ohio’s Judicial Selection Process. Cleveland State Law Review, 51: 123–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Jeff. 2007. DA Hopefuls Make Pitches to Two Clubs, Elmira Star-Gazette, August 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, Joseph and Anne Blythe. 2007. Panel Disbars Duke Lacrosse Prosecutor. Raleigh News & Observer, June 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin, E. D. 1964. The Innocents. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schanzenbach, Max. 2005. Racial and Sex Disparities in Prison Sentences: The Effect of District-Level Judicial. Journal of Legal Studies, 34(1) (January): 57–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, Russell S. and Joshua C. Hall. 2007. The Effect of Judicial Selection Processes on Judicial Quality: The Role of Partisan Politics. Cato Journal, 27(1) (Winter): 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Joseph and Emerson Tiller. 2002. The Strategy of Judging: Evidence from Administrative Law. Journal of Legal Studies, 31: 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabarrok, Alexander and Eric Helland. 1999. Court Politics: The Political Economy of Tort Awards, Journal of Law and Economics, 42 (April): 157–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2003. Race, Poverty, and American Tort Awards: Evidence from Three Data Sets. Journal of Legal Studies, 32(1) (2003): 27–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2004. Statistical Abstract of the United States 2004–05. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Chamber of Commerce. 2004. State Liability Systems Ranking Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, William F. 2007. Nifong Apologizes to 3 Players; DA Also Takes Issue With Some of AG’s Sharp Criticism, Durham Herald-Sun, April 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, Donald A. 1995. The Myth of Democratic Failure: Why Political Institutions Are Efficient. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Edward J. López

Copyright information

© 2010 The Independent Institute

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sobel, R.S., Ryan, M.E., Hall, J.C. (2010). Electoral Pressures and the Legal System: Friends or Foes?. In: López, E.J. (eds) The Pursuit of Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230109490_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics