Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What is eco-innovation?

  • Chapter
Eco-Innovation

Abstract

The scale of environmental problems, coupled with social inequalities and competitiveness challenges within the global economy, have raised increasing awareness of the need to change and renew existing technological production and social behavioural patterns. At best, such awareness may produce innovative responses that gradually move society along a more sustainable path. Analytical tools for such transformation have been developed in the field of environmental management, namely within frameworks such as eco-efficiency,1 industrial ecology2 and design for environment3 and more recently within the concept of eco-effectiveness,4 natural capital and biomimicry.5 Furthermore, the urgency for change has led to increasing application of the term ‘innovation’ in environmental management and policy. Despite the promise of eco-innovations, the term is also used in diverse contexts with different underlying connotations that may eventually diminish its practical value. Most commonly eco-innovation refers to new technologies that improve economic and environmental performance but also some definitions include organizational and social changes for improving competitiveness and sustainability and its social, economic and environmental pillars (see Box 2.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, for example, Schmidheiny, S. (1992) Changing Course: A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment (World Business Council for Sustainable Development).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Frosch, R. A. and Gallopoulos, N. E. (1989) ‘Strategies for Manufacturing’, Scientific American, 261 (3), 94–102;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Côte, R. (1994) ‘Designing and Operating Industrial Parks as Ecosystems’, School for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Canada;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Graedel, T. E. and Allenby, B. R. (1995) ‘Matrix approaches to abridged life cycle assessment’, Environmental Science & Technology, 29 (3), p. 134.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See, for example, Kurk, F. and Eagan, P. (2007) ‘The value of adding design-for-the-environment to pollution prevention assistance options’, Journal of Cleaner Production, XX, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Braungart, M., McDonough, W. and Bollinger, A. (2007) ‘Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions: A strategy for eco-effective product and system design’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1337–1348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hawken, P., Lovins, A. B. and Lovins, L. H. (1999) ‘Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution’, Natural Capitalism (US: Back Bay Books).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Andersen, M. M. (2008) ‘Eco-innovation: Towards a taxonomy and a theory’, paper for the DRUID Conference, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See, for example, Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G. and Soete, L. (eds) (1988), Technical Change and Economic Theory (London: Pinter);

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arthur, B. (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press);

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (2002) ‘Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16 (2), 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nelson, R. and Sampat, B. (2001) ‘Making Sense of Institutions as a Factor Shaping Economic Performance’, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 44, 3154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Berkhout, F. (2005) ‘Technological Regimes, Environmental performance and innovation systems’ in M. Weber and J. Hemmelskamp (ed.) Towards Environmental Innovation Systems (Berlin: Springer), 57–80.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Könnölä, T. and Unruh, G. C. (2007) ‘Really Changing the Course: The Limitations of Environmental Management Systems for Innovation’, The Journal of Business Strategy and the Environment, 16 (8), 525–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rothwell, R. and Gardiner, P. (1988) ‘Re-innovation and robust designs: producer and user benefits’, Journal of Marketing Management, 3(3), 372–387;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Griffin, A. (1997) ‘PDMA research on new product development practices: Updating trends, and benchmarking best practices’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14, 429–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rothwell, R. and Gardiner, P. (1988) ‘Re-innovation and robust designs: producer and user benefits’, Journal of Marketing Management, 3(3), 372–387;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Griffin, A. (1997) ‘PDMA research on new product development practices: updating trends, and benchmarking best practices’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14, 429–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. See for example: Barbiroli, G. and Raggi, A. (2003) ‘A method for evaluating the overall technical and economic performance of environmental innovations in production cycles’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 365–374;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kurk, F. and Eagan, P. (2007) ‘The value of adding design-for-the-environment to pollution prevention assistance options’, Journal of Cleaner Production, XX, 1–5;

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fiksell, J. (1997) Design for the Environment (McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jaenicke, M. (2008) ‘Ecological modernisation: new perspectives’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (5), 557–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Frosch and Gallopoulos (1989), op. cit.; Côte (1994), op. cit.; Graedel and Allenby (1995), op. cit.; Socolow, R. (ed.) (1997), Industrial Ecology and Global Change (Cambridge University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ayres, R. (1996) ‘Creating industrial ecosystems: A viable management strategy?’, International Journal of Technology Management, 12 (5/6), 608.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McDonough, W. and Braungart, M. (2002) Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things (NY: North Point Press); Braungart, McDonough and Bollinger (2007), op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Von Hippel, E. (1988) The sources of innovation (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Von Hippel, E. (2005) Democratizing Innovation (MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hienerth, C., Von Hippel, E. and Baldwin, C. Y. (2006) ‘How User Innovations Become Commercial Products: A Theoretical Investigation and Case Study’ MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 4572–06; HBS Finance Working Paper No. 876967; Harvard NOM Working Paper No. 06–13. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=876967.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Riggs, W. and Von Hippel, E. (1994) ‘Incentives to innovate and the sources of innovation: The case of scientific instruments’, Research Policy, 23 (4), 459–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Urban, G. I. and Von Hippel, E. (1988) ‘Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products’, Management Science, 34 (5), 569–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Luthje, C., Herstatt, C. and Von Hippel, E. (2005) ‘User-innovators and “local” information: The case of Mountain Biking’, Research Policy, 34: 951–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rondinelli, D. A. and London, T. (2003) ‘How Corporations and Environmental Groups Cooperate: Assessing Cross-Sector Alliances and Collaborations’, Academy of Management Executive, 17 (1), 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Midgely, D. (1977) New Products Marketing (New York: Halsted Press).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stahel, W. R. and Jackson, T. (1993) ‘Optimal Utilisation and Durability’ in Jackson, T. (ed.) Clean Production Strategies (Boca Raton, Florida: Lewis Publishers), 261–291.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Halme, M., Anttonen, M., Kuisma, M., Kontoniemi, N. and Heino, E. (2007) ‘Business models for material efficiency services: Conceptualization and application’, Ecological Economics, 63, 126–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Markides, C. (2006) ‘Disruptive innovation: in need of a better theory’, J. Prod. Innov. Manag., 23, 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mont, O. (2002) ‘Clarifying the concept of product-service system’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 10 (3), 237–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Williams, A. (2007) ‘Product service systems in the automobile industry: contribution to system innovation?’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 15 (2007), 1093–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Goedkoop, M. J., van Halen, J. G., te Riele, H. and Rommens, P. J. M. (1999) Product Service Systems, Ecological and Economic Basics (The Hague: Vrom EZ).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Linton, J. D., Klassen, R. and Jayaraman, V. (2007) ‘Sustainable supply chains: An introduction’, Journal of Operations Management, 25 (6), 1075–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. The terms ‘socio-technological transformation’ (Geels, F. W. (2002) ‘Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multilevel perspective and a case study’, Research Policy 31(89), 1257–1274);

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. ‘system innovation’ (Edqvist, C. (ed.) (1997) Systems Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organisations (London: Pinter Publishers));

    Google Scholar 

  43. and ‘transition’ (Rotmans, J., Kemp, R. and van Asselt, M. (2001) ‘More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy’, Foresight, 3(1), 15–32) have also been used to describe a similar kind of fundamental transformation processes of the co-evolution of technological and institutional systems.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. See, for example, Kemp, R. and Soete, L. (1992) ‘The greening of technological progress: An evolutionary perspective’, Futures, June, 437–455;

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jacobsson, S. and Johnson, A. (2000) ‘The Diffusion of Renewable Energy Technology: An Analytical Framework and Key Issues for Research’, Energy Policy, 28, 625–640;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Unruh, G. C. (2000) ‘Understanding Carbon Lock-in’, Energy Policy, 28, 817–830;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kline, D. (2001) ‘Positive Feedback, Lock-in, and Environmental Policy’, Policy Sciences, 34, 95–107;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Geels, F. W. (2002) ‘Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multilevel perspective and a case study’, Research Policy, 31 (89), 1257–1274;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Carlsson, B. and Jacobsson, S. (2004) ‘Dynamics of Innovation Systems: Policy-making in a Complex and Non-deterministic World’, International Workshop on Functions of Innovation Systems, Utrecht University;

    Google Scholar 

  50. Frenken, K., Hekkert, M. and Godfroij, P. (2004) ‘R&D Portfolios in Environmental Friendly Automotive Propulsion: Variety, Competition and Policy Implications’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71 (5), 485–507;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Foxon, T. J. et al (2005) ‘UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures’, Energy Policy, 33 (16), 2123–37;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Carrillo-Hermosilla, J. (2006) ‘A policy approach to the environmental impacts of technological lock-in’, Ecological Economics, 58 (4), 717–742;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Carrillo-Hermosilla, J. and Unruh, G. C. (2006), ‘Technology stability and change: an integrated evolutionary approach’, Journal of Economic Issues, XL (3), 707–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pérez, C. (1983) ‘Structural Change and Assimilation of New Technologies in the Economic and Social Systems’, Futures, 15 (4), 357–775;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Freeman, C. and Perez, C. (1988) ‘Structural crisis of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour’, in Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G. and Soete, L. (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory (London: Pinter Publishers), 38–66.; Unruh (2000), op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Paavola, J. (2007) ‘Institutions and environmental governance: A reconceptualization’, Ecological Economics, 63, 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  58. Sengupta, N. (2004) ‘Common Mistakes about Common Property’, Tenth Biennial Conference of the International Society for the Study of Common Property in Oaxaca, Mexico, 9–13 August.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Jørgensen, B. (2006) ‘Technology and Innovation in Waste Management in the Arctic: Example of an Automated Waste Collection System in Stakkevollan, Tromsø, Norway’, The 12th Mayors Conference of WWCAM, 2006 Winter Cities Forum, Changchun, China.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IE Business School, Spain

    Dr Javier Carrillo-Hermosilla

  2. Institute of Public Goods and Policies (IPP), Spain

    Dr Pablo Río del González

  3. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (JRC-IPTS), Spain

    Dr Totti Könnölä

Authors
  1. Dr Javier Carrillo-Hermosilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr Pablo Río del González
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dr Totti Könnölä
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2009 Javier Carrillo-Hermosilla, Pablo del Río González & Totti Könnölä

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., del González, P.R., Könnölä, T. (2009). What is eco-innovation?. In: Eco-Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244856_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation