Abstract
Work on mobilities — as a collective interest of many working in human geography, sociology and cultural studies — is one such area where methodological transformation is currently high on the agenda, reflected in the number of workshops and conference sessions dedicated to this topic (RGS-IBG, 2006; RGS-IBG, 2007; CeMoRe, 2006). In light of recent calls for social scientists to work more closely with their objects of study (Latour, 2000 in Gane, 2006), many researchers argue that a new range of research practices need to be developed which attend more successfully to the experience of being on the move. Whilst I am broadly in agreement with the argument that we need to develop more creative ‘mobile methods’, in this chapter I want to take a step back by considering, and critically reflecting on the type of research that emerges from the development of these methods. More specifically I want to suggest that these methods, which often privilege particularly active dimensions of the mobile body, may be less well-equipped to get at and narrate some of the less-agentive experiences of mobility, where bodies are pacified and not engaged in any form of intentional, auto-affective action.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 David Bissell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bissell, D. (2010). Narrating Mobile Methodologies: Active and Passive Empiricisms. In: Fincham, B., McGuinness, M., Murray, L. (eds) Mobile Methodologies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230281172_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230281172_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36931-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28117-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)