Skip to main content

Responses to Lavoie, King, and Dow on What Is Post Keynesianism and Who Is a Post Keynesian

  • Chapter
Interpreting Keynes for the 21st Century

Abstract

Lavoie, King, and Dow share one common theme in their criticism of my review of King’s (2001) book A History of Post Keynesian Economics. They all object, in different ways and in different degrees to (1) my definition of the boundary lines that encompass Post Keynesian economics and (2) who, in the 21st century, should be entitled to be labeled a Post Keynesian.

Paper published in the Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27, Spring 2005.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Davidson, P. Money and the Real World, London, Macmillan, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. “Post Keynesian Economics: Solving the Crisis in Economic Theory”, in Public Interest, 1980, pp. 151–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. International Money and the Real World, London, Macmillan, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. “The Marginal Product Curve is Not the Demand Curve for Labor and Lucas’s Labor Supply Function is Not the Supply Curve for Labor in the Real World”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 6, 1983, pp. 105–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. “Setting the Record Straight on a History of Post Keynesian Economics”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 25, 2003–4, pp. 245–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch R. and Fischer, S. Economics, New York, McGraw Hill, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, S. C. Macroeconomic Thought: A methodological Approach, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. “Keynes, Einstein and Scientific Revolution”, in Keynes, Money and the Open Economy, Essayed in honor of Paul Davidson, Vol. 1, edited by Philip Arestis, Cheltenham, Elgar, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. L. “ISLM: An Explanation”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 2, 1981, pp. 139–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, New York, Harcourt, Brace, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. “Preface to German language edition”. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Berlin, Duncker and Humblot, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. “Relative Movements of Real Wages and Output”, The Economic Journal, 49, reprinted in The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. VII, edited by D. Moggridge, London, Macmillan, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidelsky, R. John Maynard Keynes, the Economist as Saviour, London, Macmillan, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.W. “Alternative Approaches to Macroeconomics”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 1976, pp. 343–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. “Theoretical Issues in Macroeconomic”, in Issues in Contemporary Macroeconomics and Distribution, edited by G. Feiwel, Albany, State University of New York Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub, E. R. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science, Durham, Duke University Press, 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2007 Paul Davidson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davidson, P. (2007). Responses to Lavoie, King, and Dow on What Is Post Keynesianism and Who Is a Post Keynesian. In: Interpreting Keynes for the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286559_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics