Skip to main content

Forts, Curriculum, and Ethical Relationality

  • Chapter
Reconsidering Canadian Curriculum Studies

Part of the book series: Curriculum Studies Worldwide ((CSWW))

Abstract

I begin with reference to the conference theme that inspired this chapter: “An Uncommon Countenance: Provoking Past, Present, and Future Perspectives within Canadian Curriculum Studies.” I find the concept of “an uncommon countenance” as suggested by William Pinar (2008)and subsequently picked up by the conference organizers, to be an extremely important, timely, and a provocative problématique for us as curriculum scholars to engage with together. However, I’m also simultaneously curious and cautious about how the suggestion of an “uncommon countenance” for Canadian curriculum is interpreted and understood. What is at stake indenoting uncommonness in our curricular considerations? My concern isthat the condition of being “uncommon” might be misunderstood as affiliated with celebrations of diversity, difference, and cosmopolitanism that sometimes operate in an axiological void, and thus provide little meaningful guidance on how to proceed.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, Graham. 2003. Roland Barthes. London: New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland. 1972. Mythologies. Translated by Annette Lavers. New York: Hilland Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, Homi. 1990. “The Third Space.” In Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, edited by Jonathan Rutherford, 207–221. London: Lawrence and Wishert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Cynthia, & Narcisse Blood. 2009. “Love Thy Neighbour: Repatriating Precarious Blackfoot Sites.” International Journal of Canadian Studies 39–40:253–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald, Dwayne. 2011. “Indigenous Métissage: A Decolonizing Research Sensibility.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1–23. Accessed November 28, 2011.10.1080/09518398.2011.554449.

  • Donald, Dwayne. 2009a. “The Pedagogy of the Fort: Curriculum, Colonial Frontier Logics, and Indigenous Métissage.” PhD Dissertation, University of Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, Dwayne. 2009b. “The Curricular Problem of Indigenousness: Colonial Frontier Logics, Teacher Resistances, and the Acknowledgment of Ethical Space.” In Beyond Presentism: Re-Imagining the Historical, Personal, and Social Placesof Curriculum, edited by James Nahachewsky & Ingrid Johnston, 23–41. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, Enrique. 1995. The Invention of the Americas: Eclipse of “the Other” and the Myth of Modernity, translated by Michael Barber. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermine, Willie. 2007. “The Ethical Space of Engagement.” Indigenous Law Journal 6 (1): 193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, William. 2008. “Introduction.” In A Common Countenance: Stability and Change in the Canadian Curriculum, by George Tompkins, xi–xxiv. Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, William, William Reynolds, Patrick Slattery, & Peter Taubman. 1995. Understanding Curriculum: An Introduction to the Study of Historical and Contemporary Curriculum Discourses. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rylance, Rick. 1994. Roland Barthes. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David Geoffrey. 2003. “Curriculum and Teaching Face Globalization.” In International Handbook of Curriculum Research, edited by In William Pinar, 35–51. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, George. 1986. A Common Countenance: Stability and Change in the Canadian Curriculum. Scarborough, ON: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, George. 2008. A Common Countenance: Stability and Change in the Canadian Curriculum. Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Nicholas Ng-A-Fook Jennifer Rottmann

Copyright information

© 2012 Nicholas Ng-A-Fook and Jennifer Rottmann

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Donald, D. (2012). Forts, Curriculum, and Ethical Relationality. In: Ng-A-Fook, N., Rottmann, J. (eds) Reconsidering Canadian Curriculum Studies. Curriculum Studies Worldwide. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008978_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics