Abstract
I begin with reference to the conference theme that inspired this chapter: “An Uncommon Countenance: Provoking Past, Present, and Future Perspectives within Canadian Curriculum Studies.” I find the concept of “an uncommon countenance” as suggested by William Pinar (2008)and subsequently picked up by the conference organizers, to be an extremely important, timely, and a provocative problématique for us as curriculum scholars to engage with together. However, I’m also simultaneously curious and cautious about how the suggestion of an “uncommon countenance” for Canadian curriculum is interpreted and understood. What is at stake indenoting uncommonness in our curricular considerations? My concern isthat the condition of being “uncommon” might be misunderstood as affiliated with celebrations of diversity, difference, and cosmopolitanism that sometimes operate in an axiological void, and thus provide little meaningful guidance on how to proceed.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, Graham. 2003. Roland Barthes. London: New York: Routledge.
Barthes, Roland. 1972. Mythologies. Translated by Annette Lavers. New York: Hilland Wang.
Bhabha, Homi. 1990. “The Third Space.” In Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, edited by Jonathan Rutherford, 207–221. London: Lawrence and Wishert.
Chambers, Cynthia, & Narcisse Blood. 2009. “Love Thy Neighbour: Repatriating Precarious Blackfoot Sites.” International Journal of Canadian Studies 39–40:253–279.
Donald, Dwayne. 2011. “Indigenous Métissage: A Decolonizing Research Sensibility.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1–23. Accessed November 28, 2011.10.1080/09518398.2011.554449.
Donald, Dwayne. 2009a. “The Pedagogy of the Fort: Curriculum, Colonial Frontier Logics, and Indigenous Métissage.” PhD Dissertation, University of Alberta.
Donald, Dwayne. 2009b. “The Curricular Problem of Indigenousness: Colonial Frontier Logics, Teacher Resistances, and the Acknowledgment of Ethical Space.” In Beyond Presentism: Re-Imagining the Historical, Personal, and Social Placesof Curriculum, edited by James Nahachewsky & Ingrid Johnston, 23–41. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Dussel, Enrique. 1995. The Invention of the Americas: Eclipse of “the Other” and the Myth of Modernity, translated by Michael Barber. New York: Continuum.
Ermine, Willie. 2007. “The Ethical Space of Engagement.” Indigenous Law Journal 6 (1): 193–203.
Pinar, William. 2008. “Introduction.” In A Common Countenance: Stability and Change in the Canadian Curriculum, by George Tompkins, xi–xxiv. Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.
Pinar, William, William Reynolds, Patrick Slattery, & Peter Taubman. 1995. Understanding Curriculum: An Introduction to the Study of Historical and Contemporary Curriculum Discourses. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Rylance, Rick. 1994. Roland Barthes. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Smith, David Geoffrey. 2003. “Curriculum and Teaching Face Globalization.” In International Handbook of Curriculum Research, edited by In William Pinar, 35–51. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Tomkins, George. 1986. A Common Countenance: Stability and Change in the Canadian Curriculum. Scarborough, ON: Prentice-Hall.
Tomkins, George. 2008. A Common Countenance: Stability and Change in the Canadian Curriculum. Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2012 Nicholas Ng-A-Fook and Jennifer Rottmann
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Donald, D. (2012). Forts, Curriculum, and Ethical Relationality. In: Ng-A-Fook, N., Rottmann, J. (eds) Reconsidering Canadian Curriculum Studies. Curriculum Studies Worldwide. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008978_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008978_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43589-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00897-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)