Abstract
No discourse on war emerges out of a vacuum: it gains resonance as a consequence of its constitutive ideals, preconceptions and values fitting with the structure of key social imaginaries. The theme of this chapter — agency — is itself a theme of liberal thought with its lead motifs of inter alia liberty, freedom of choice, equality among men before the law and so on. The subjects of liberalism, agency and internationalism constitute an amalgamation of strands that have been alluded to in previous chapters: here we zoom in on the relationship between law, politics, war and policing — a four-way relationship that constitutes the backbone of the metaphorical understanding of war as policing. The first part of the chapter will discuss how a liberal heritage can be seen to inform the contemporary discourse on war as ‘order-creating’. The eschewing of strong foundations in moral and ethical reasoning has thus not forged an abandonment of ideological claims, as is sometimes inferred, but rather new ways of expressing and justifying such claims.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
T. Todorov (2009) In Defence of the Enlightenment (London: Atlantic Books), p. 67.
C. Coker (2009) Rebooting the West: The US, Europe and the Future of the Western Alliance (Abingdon: Routledge), pp. 78–9.
J. Gray (2007) Enlightenment’s Wake, 2nd edn (Abingdon: Routledge Classics), p. 218.
L. Freedman (2005) ‘The age of liberal wars’, Review of International Studies 31, S1, p. 94.
For discussion of hypocrisy, see C. Brown (2003) ‘Selective humanitarianism: in defence of inconsistency’, in D. Chatterjee and D. Schein (eds) Ethics and Foreign Intervention (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
See also P. Bobbitt (2007) Terror and Consent: The Wars for the Twenty-First Century (London: Allen Lane).
S. Neiman (2004) Evil in Modern Thought: An Alternative History of Philosophy (Princeton: Princeton University Press), p. 3.
C. Coker (2010) Barbarous Philosophers (London: Hurst), pp. 184–9.
Coker, Rebooting the West, pp. 86–7; L. Kolakowski (1989) The Presence of Myth, trans. Adam Czerniawski (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press), p. 19.
P. Kelly (2005) Liberalism (Cambridge: Polity Press), p. 145.
M. Walzer (1994) Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press);
Brian Barry (1999) ‘International Society from a Cosmopolitical Perspective’, in D.R. Maple and T. Nardin (eds) International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
See also S. Lukes (2003) Liberals and Cannibals: The Implications of Diversity (London: Verso), pp. 36–7.
C. Mouffe (2005) On the Political (London: Routledge), pp. 10–12.
T. Blair (2007) ‘A battle for global values’, Foreign Affairs Jan./Feb.
J.N. Shklar (1986) Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), p. 1.
See Foreword by Tracy B. Strong in Carl Schmitt ([1932] 1996) The Concept of the Political, trans. J.H. Tomas (Chicago: Chicago University Press).
H. Bielefelt (1998) ‘Carl Schmitt’s critique of liberalism: systematic reconstruction and countercriticism’, in Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism, ed. David Dyzenhaus (Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press), pp. 24–5.
Shklar, Legalism pp. 124–27. See also E.H. Carr (2001) The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
C. Schmitt (2005) Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, trans. George Schwab (Chicago: Chicago University Press).
C. Coker (2008) Ethics and War in the 21st Century (Abingdon: Routledge), p. 13.
See, for instance, A. Neal (2010) Exceptionalism and the Politics of Counter-Terrorism: Liberty, Security and the War on Terror (London: Routledge).
J. Huysmans (2006) ‘International politics of exception: competing visions of international political order between law and politics’, Alternatives 31; W. Scheuerman (2006) ‘Survey article: emergency powers and the rule of law after 9/11’, Journal of Political Philosophy 14, no. 1;
R. van Munster (2004) ‘The war on terrorism: when the exception becomes the rule’, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 17.
M. Hardt and A. Negri (2000) Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press);
M. Ignatieff (2003) Empire Lite: Nation-building in Bosnia, Kosovo and Afghanistan (London: Vintage).
J. Charvet and E. Kaczynska-Nay (2008) The Liberal Project and Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
M. Kaldor (1999) New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era (Oxford: Polity Press).
Especially Beck (1999) World Risk Society (Cambridge: Polity Press).
A. Blok (2001) Honour and Violence (Cambridge: Polity Press).
G. Aijmer and J. Abbink (2000) Meanings of Violence: A Cross-Cultural Perspective (Oxford: Berg), p. xiii.
For important repudiations of such views, see M. Juergensmeyer (2001) Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence (Berkeley and Los Angeles: California University Press);
J. Stern (2003) Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill (New York: HarperCollins).
J. Mueller (2004) The Remnants of War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
O. Roy (2004) Globalized Islam: The Search for a New Ummah (New York: Columbia University Press).
Ibid. See also M. Mamdani (2005) Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: America, the Cold War and the Roots of Terror (New York: Three Leaves Press (Random House)); Mamdani (2005) ‘Whither political Islam?’ Foreign Affairs 84, no. 1.
T. Ruttig (2009) ‘The other side — dimensions of the Afghan insurgency: causes, actors and approaches to “talks”’ (Kabul: Afghanistan Analysts Network (ANA)).
Patten is quoted in John Gray (2008) ‘Normal service will be resumed: John Gray takes issue with a politician’s cheery view of the future’, The Guardian 25 Oct.
See also C. Patten (2008) What Next? Surviving the 21st Century (London: Allen Lane).
For detailed treatment of the turn of events in the months October 2002 to March 2003 and Britain’s plea for a second resolution in the UN Security Council, see A. Seldon, P. Snowdon and D. Collings (2009) Blair Unbound (London: Simon and Schuster Ltd).
P. Windsor (2002) Studies in International Relations: Essays by Philip Windsor, ed. M. Berdal (Brighton: Sussex Academic Press), pp. 77–93.
C. Schmitt (2011) Writings on War, trans. and ed. Timothy Nunan (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Mouffe, On the Political. See also C. Mouffe (2000) The Democratic Paradox (London: Verso);
E. Laclau and C. Mouffe (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (London: Verso).
B. Finel (2010) ‘A substitute for victory: adopting a new counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan’, Foreign Affairs, June; D. Kilcullen (2009) ‘Counter-insurgency redux’, Survival 48, no. 4;
D. Kilcullen (2010) Counterinsurgency (London: Hurst);
J. Nagl (2002) Counterinsurgency Lessons from Malaya and Vietnam: Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife (Westport, CT: Praeger);
R. Smith (2006) The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World (London: Penguin).
A. Cromartie (2012) ‘Field Manual 3–24 and the heritage of counterinsurgency theory’, Millennium Journal of International Studies 41, pp. 104–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Caroline Holmqvist
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holmqvist, C. (2014). On Agency: Policing Logics and War ‘Without Antagonism’. In: Policing Wars. Rethinking Political Violence Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137323613_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137323613_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-99990-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32361-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)