Skip to main content

Bombay Cinema’s Aesthetic Other

Hindi Shastriya Cinema in Retrospect

  • Chapter
Bollywood and Its Other(s)
  • 218 Accesses

Abstract

The term shastriya, while aligned with an art form such as cinema, sounds extremely anomalous. Shastriya connotes the sense of something classical, used primarily within the confines of North Indian/Hindustani classical music. It is not without reason that cinema remains dissociated from epithets like these, especially since cinema’s self-imposed inferiority gets in the way. This inferiority stems primarily from the publicness of cinema, from its status as a public institution. So when Mani Kaul tried to define his cinema with a preference for a term like shastriya, it was a decisive statement against the supposed publicness of the medium. His Uski Roti (1969) was given the Sunday evening slot in television, a slot better known for the popular Bombay films. Kaul, on a lighter note, suggested a different slot for his shastriya cinema:

[I]t was as if they had shown a classical programme during Chhaya Geet. The point is not that classical music is superior to film music, it is that you cannot confuse the one with the other. They could have had a programme called Shastriya Cinema or something and shown Uski Roti there—like they have Mallikarjun Mansur on Shastriya Sangeet! (Rizvi & Amladi, 1980, pp. 9–10)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anonymous. (1983) Interview of Amol Palekar, June 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. (1979) ‘Duvidha Bores’, Free Press Journal, 22 July, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthuso, R. & Guimarães, V. (2014) ‘A Conversation with Nicole Brenez’, Cinética, 20 February, http://revistacinetica.com.br/english/198/, accessed on 13 March 2014.

  • Bhaumik, K. (2011) ‘The Persistence of Rajasthan in Indian Cinema: One Region, So Many Views’, Journal of the Moving Image, 13–39, http://www.jmionline.org/articles/2011/The_Persistence_of_R.pdf, accessed on 13 March 2014.

  • Biswas, M. (2013) ‘Film Studies, Film Practice and Asian Cinema: Points in Re-Connection’, Scribd.com, http://www.scribd.com/doc/33220837/Moinak- Biswas-New-Cinephilia, accessed on 13 March 2014.

  • Burnett, C. (2013) ‘Transnational Auteurism and the Cultural Dynamics of Influence: Mani Kaul’s Non-Representational Cinema’, Transnational Cinemas, 4.1, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cossio, C. (1998) ‘Mani Kaul’s Uski Roti: Giving Silence a Voice’, in V. Dalmia and T. Damsteegt (eds), Narrative Strategies: Essays on South Asian Literature and Film (Leiden: CNWS), 122–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, M. A. (2002) The Emergence of Cinematic Time: Modernity, Contingency, the Archive (London: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, L. (2006) Affective Communities: Anticolonial Thought and the Politics of Friendship (Ranikhet: Permanent Black).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, T. (1986) ‘The Cinema of Attractions: Early Film, Its Spectator, and the Avant-Garde’, Wide Angle, 8.3–4, 63–70, http://www.columbia.edu/itc/film/gaines/historiography/Gunning.pdf, accessed on 12 March 2014.

  • Jayamanne, L. (2013) ‘To Derail Thinking: On Shuttling Between Australia and India as a Former Ceylonese’, Cultural Studies, 27.2, 271–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (2006) ‘The Museum as Refuge for Film: The Case of Kumar Shahani’s Epic Cinema’, Post Script: Essays in Film and the Humanities, 25.3, 79–92, http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/Post-Script/172833461.html,accessed on 13 March 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (2002) ‘The Ornamentation of Nicole Kidman (Eyes Wide Shut) and Mita Vashisht (Kasba): A Sketch’, Senses of Cinema, 23, http://sensesofcinema.com/2002/23/ornament/, accessed on 13 March 2014.

  • Kapur, G. (2000) When Was Modernism: Essays on Contemporary Cultural Practice in India (New Delhi: Tulika Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, M. (1989) ‘No Way to Treat “Siddheshwari Devi”’, Interview by K. Mohamed, The Times of India, 2 November, n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1983) ‘Towards a Cinematic Object’, in A. Vasudev and P. Lenglet (eds), Indian Cinema Superbazaar (New Delhi: Vikas Publishing), 126–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, A. (1984) ‘Kumar Shahani’s Return’, The Statesman, 5 May, n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. (2014a) ‘Hacia una imagen no-tiempo: I am a Passenger …’, Transit, 6 February, http://cinentransit.com/hacia-una-imagen-no-tiempo/, accessed on 13 March 2014.

  • —. (2014b) ‘Mark Rappaport’s Mozart in Love’, Fandor, 24 January, http://www.fandor.com/keyframe/mark-rappaports-mozart-in-love, accessed on 13 March 2014.

  • Menon, B. (2010) ‘Malayalam Middle Cinema and the Category of Woman’, in M. T. Pillai (ed.), Women in Malayalam Cinema: Naturalising Gender Hierarchies (Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan), 105–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagib, L. (2006) ‘Towards a Positive Definition of World Cinema’, in S. Dennison and S. H. Lim (eds), Remapping World Cinema: Identity, Culture and Politics in Film (London: Wallflower Press), 30–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikh, J. (1980) ‘Loan or Subsidy?’, Interview, Cinema Vision, 1.3, 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, N. (1972) ‘Touch of Jealousy’, Filmfare, 21 April, 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, M. M. (2003) ‘This Thing Called Bollywood’, Seminar, 525, http://www.india-seminar.com/2003/525/525%20madhava%20prasad.htm, accessed on 13 March 2014.

  • —. (1998) Ideology of the Hindi Film: A Historical Construction (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajadhyaksha, A. (2009) Indian Cinema in the Time of Celluloid: From Bollywood to the Emergency (New Delhi: Tulika).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (2007) ‘The “Bollywoodization” of the Indian Cinema: Cultural Nationalism in a Global Arena’, in P. Karsholm (ed.), City Flicks: Indian Cinema and the Urban Experience (Calcutta: Seagull Books), 111–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, S. (1976) ‘Four and a Quarter’, Our Films, Their Films (New Delhi: Orient Longman), 100–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1972) ‘Satyajit Ray Writes’, Filmfare, 25 February, 51–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, A. & Amladi, P. (1980) ‘Is There a New Cinema?’, Cinema Vision, 1.3, 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rungachary, B. (1980) ‘Mani Kaul Is More Expensive than Manmohan Desai’, Filmfare, 16 November, 35–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, M. (1972) ‘Excerpt from a Letter to a Friend’, Filmfare, 24 March, 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahani, K. (1992) ‘Why Imitate the Bold and the Beautiful?’, Interview to K. Mohamed, The Times of India, 6 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1988) ‘Figures of Film’, Second Rita Ray Memorial Lecture, Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1986) ‘Notes for an Aesthetic of Cinema Sound’, Dossier on Kumar Shahani, Framework, 30–1, n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1980) ‘The Saint Poets of Prabhat’, Filmworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1978) ‘A Meeting with Miklos Jancso’, National Centre for the Performing Arts Quarterly, 45–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B. (1972a) ‘More about the Indian “New Wave”’, Filmfare, 24 January, 21–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1972b) ‘Bikram Singh Replies’, Filmfare, 25 February, 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas, S. V. (2008) ‘Missing in the Original: Twin Dragons Remade in India’, Journal of the Moving Image, http://www.jmionline.org/articles/2008/Missing_in_the_Origi.pdf, accessed on 13 March 2014.

  • Suchenski, R. (2011) ‘Mythic and Modern: The Aesthetics of Space in the Films of Mani Kaul and Kumar Shahani’, Paper presentation, ‘CinemaSpace: A Conference on Indian Cinema and the City’, The Chao Center for Asian Studies, Rice University, 3–4 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasudevan, R. (2011) The Melodramatic Public: Film Form and Spectatorship in Indian Cinema (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (2000) ‘Shifting Codes, Dissolving Identities: The Hindi Social Film of the 1950s as Popular Culture’, in R. Vasudevan (ed.), Making Meaning in Indian Cinema (New Delhi: Oxford University Press), 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Parichay Patra

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Patra, P. (2014). Bombay Cinema’s Aesthetic Other. In: Kishore, V., Sarwal, A., Patra, P. (eds) Bollywood and Its Other(s). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137426505_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics