Abstract
The term shastriya, while aligned with an art form such as cinema, sounds extremely anomalous. Shastriya connotes the sense of something classical, used primarily within the confines of North Indian/Hindustani classical music. It is not without reason that cinema remains dissociated from epithets like these, especially since cinema’s self-imposed inferiority gets in the way. This inferiority stems primarily from the publicness of cinema, from its status as a public institution. So when Mani Kaul tried to define his cinema with a preference for a term like shastriya, it was a decisive statement against the supposed publicness of the medium. His Uski Roti (1969) was given the Sunday evening slot in television, a slot better known for the popular Bombay films. Kaul, on a lighter note, suggested a different slot for his shastriya cinema:
[I]t was as if they had shown a classical programme during Chhaya Geet. The point is not that classical music is superior to film music, it is that you cannot confuse the one with the other. They could have had a programme called Shastriya Cinema or something and shown Uski Roti there—like they have Mallikarjun Mansur on Shastriya Sangeet! (Rizvi & Amladi, 1980, pp. 9–10)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anonymous. (1983) Interview of Amol Palekar, June 12.
Anonymous. (1979) ‘Duvidha Bores’, Free Press Journal, 22 July, 9.
Arthuso, R. & Guimarães, V. (2014) ‘A Conversation with Nicole Brenez’, Cinética, 20 February, http://revistacinetica.com.br/english/198/, accessed on 13 March 2014.
Bhaumik, K. (2011) ‘The Persistence of Rajasthan in Indian Cinema: One Region, So Many Views’, Journal of the Moving Image, 13–39, http://www.jmionline.org/articles/2011/The_Persistence_of_R.pdf, accessed on 13 March 2014.
Biswas, M. (2013) ‘Film Studies, Film Practice and Asian Cinema: Points in Re-Connection’, Scribd.com, http://www.scribd.com/doc/33220837/Moinak- Biswas-New-Cinephilia, accessed on 13 March 2014.
Burnett, C. (2013) ‘Transnational Auteurism and the Cultural Dynamics of Influence: Mani Kaul’s Non-Representational Cinema’, Transnational Cinemas, 4.1, 3–24.
Cossio, C. (1998) ‘Mani Kaul’s Uski Roti: Giving Silence a Voice’, in V. Dalmia and T. Damsteegt (eds), Narrative Strategies: Essays on South Asian Literature and Film (Leiden: CNWS), 122–35.
Doane, M. A. (2002) The Emergence of Cinematic Time: Modernity, Contingency, the Archive (London: Harvard University Press).
Gandhi, L. (2006) Affective Communities: Anticolonial Thought and the Politics of Friendship (Ranikhet: Permanent Black).
Gunning, T. (1986) ‘The Cinema of Attractions: Early Film, Its Spectator, and the Avant-Garde’, Wide Angle, 8.3–4, 63–70, http://www.columbia.edu/itc/film/gaines/historiography/Gunning.pdf, accessed on 12 March 2014.
Jayamanne, L. (2013) ‘To Derail Thinking: On Shuttling Between Australia and India as a Former Ceylonese’, Cultural Studies, 27.2, 271–89.
—. (2006) ‘The Museum as Refuge for Film: The Case of Kumar Shahani’s Epic Cinema’, Post Script: Essays in Film and the Humanities, 25.3, 79–92, http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/Post-Script/172833461.html,accessed on 13 March 2014.
—. (2002) ‘The Ornamentation of Nicole Kidman (Eyes Wide Shut) and Mita Vashisht (Kasba): A Sketch’, Senses of Cinema, 23, http://sensesofcinema.com/2002/23/ornament/, accessed on 13 March 2014.
Kapur, G. (2000) When Was Modernism: Essays on Contemporary Cultural Practice in India (New Delhi: Tulika Books).
Kaul, M. (1989) ‘No Way to Treat “Siddheshwari Devi”’, Interview by K. Mohamed, The Times of India, 2 November, n.p.
—. (1983) ‘Towards a Cinematic Object’, in A. Vasudev and P. Lenglet (eds), Indian Cinema Superbazaar (New Delhi: Vikas Publishing), 126–32.
Malik, A. (1984) ‘Kumar Shahani’s Return’, The Statesman, 5 May, n.p.
Martin, A. (2014a) ‘Hacia una imagen no-tiempo: I am a Passenger …’, Transit, 6 February, http://cinentransit.com/hacia-una-imagen-no-tiempo/, accessed on 13 March 2014.
—. (2014b) ‘Mark Rappaport’s Mozart in Love’, Fandor, 24 January, http://www.fandor.com/keyframe/mark-rappaports-mozart-in-love, accessed on 13 March 2014.
Menon, B. (2010) ‘Malayalam Middle Cinema and the Category of Woman’, in M. T. Pillai (ed.), Women in Malayalam Cinema: Naturalising Gender Hierarchies (Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan), 105–21.
Nagib, L. (2006) ‘Towards a Positive Definition of World Cinema’, in S. Dennison and S. H. Lim (eds), Remapping World Cinema: Identity, Culture and Politics in Film (London: Wallflower Press), 30–7.
Parikh, J. (1980) ‘Loan or Subsidy?’, Interview, Cinema Vision, 1.3, 20.
Patel, N. (1972) ‘Touch of Jealousy’, Filmfare, 21 April, 51.
Prasad, M. M. (2003) ‘This Thing Called Bollywood’, Seminar, 525, http://www.india-seminar.com/2003/525/525%20madhava%20prasad.htm, accessed on 13 March 2014.
—. (1998) Ideology of the Hindi Film: A Historical Construction (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).
Rajadhyaksha, A. (2009) Indian Cinema in the Time of Celluloid: From Bollywood to the Emergency (New Delhi: Tulika).
—. (2007) ‘The “Bollywoodization” of the Indian Cinema: Cultural Nationalism in a Global Arena’, in P. Karsholm (ed.), City Flicks: Indian Cinema and the Urban Experience (Calcutta: Seagull Books), 111–37.
Ray, S. (1976) ‘Four and a Quarter’, Our Films, Their Films (New Delhi: Orient Longman), 100–7.
—. (1972) ‘Satyajit Ray Writes’, Filmfare, 25 February, 51–3.
Rizvi, A. & Amladi, P. (1980) ‘Is There a New Cinema?’, Cinema Vision, 1.3, 4–13.
Rungachary, B. (1980) ‘Mani Kaul Is More Expensive than Manmohan Desai’, Filmfare, 16 November, 35–7.
Sen, M. (1972) ‘Excerpt from a Letter to a Friend’, Filmfare, 24 March, 51.
Shahani, K. (1992) ‘Why Imitate the Bold and the Beautiful?’, Interview to K. Mohamed, The Times of India, 6 December.
—. (1988) ‘Figures of Film’, Second Rita Ray Memorial Lecture, Unpublished.
—. (1986) ‘Notes for an Aesthetic of Cinema Sound’, Dossier on Kumar Shahani, Framework, 30–1, n.p.
—. (1980) ‘The Saint Poets of Prabhat’, Filmworld.
—. (1978) ‘A Meeting with Miklos Jancso’, National Centre for the Performing Arts Quarterly, 45–9.
Singh, B. (1972a) ‘More about the Indian “New Wave”’, Filmfare, 24 January, 21–3.
—. (1972b) ‘Bikram Singh Replies’, Filmfare, 25 February, 53.
Srinivas, S. V. (2008) ‘Missing in the Original: Twin Dragons Remade in India’, Journal of the Moving Image, http://www.jmionline.org/articles/2008/Missing_in_the_Origi.pdf, accessed on 13 March 2014.
Suchenski, R. (2011) ‘Mythic and Modern: The Aesthetics of Space in the Films of Mani Kaul and Kumar Shahani’, Paper presentation, ‘CinemaSpace: A Conference on Indian Cinema and the City’, The Chao Center for Asian Studies, Rice University, 3–4 November.
Vasudevan, R. (2011) The Melodramatic Public: Film Form and Spectatorship in Indian Cinema (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
—. (2000) ‘Shifting Codes, Dissolving Identities: The Hindi Social Film of the 1950s as Popular Culture’, in R. Vasudevan (ed.), Making Meaning in Indian Cinema (New Delhi: Oxford University Press), 99–120.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Parichay Patra
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Patra, P. (2014). Bombay Cinema’s Aesthetic Other. In: Kishore, V., Sarwal, A., Patra, P. (eds) Bollywood and Its Other(s). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137426505_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137426505_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49085-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-42650-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)