Skip to main content

The Supreme Court, Public Education, and the Fourteenth Amendment

  • Chapter
Applying Rawls in the Twenty-First Century
  • 131 Accesses

Abstract

In chapter 2, we saw that applying Rawlsian principles to issues of normative race policy yields an unexpected result. As far to the political Left as Rawls may fairly be said to be, strong forms of affirmative action cannot be derived from his theory, although strong forms of legislative reparations can be so derived. Yet what if we turn from public policy to the constitutional law of race, as embodied in leading relevant Supreme Court case law? What might it yield if, in light of Rawlsian principles, we examine key opinions in this area by select members of the Roberts Court?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, e.g., Neomi Rao, A Backdoor to Policy Making: The Use of Philosophers by the Supreme Court, 65 U. CHI. L. REV. 1371, 1371 (1998) and Thorn Brooks, Does Philosophy Deserved a Place at the Supreme Court, in Thorn Brooks, ed., RAWLS AND LAW (Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Co., 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Frank Michelman, Rawls on Constitutionalism and Constitutional Law, in Samuel Freeman, ed., THE CAMBRIDGE COMPANION TO RAWLS (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Examples include such well-established doctrines as incitement to riot, defamation, and obscenity. See generally, Kathleen Sullivan & Noah Feldman, FIRST AMENDMENT LAW (5th ed., St. Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Ludwig Wittgentein, PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laurence Tribe & Joshua Matz, UNCERTAIN JUSTICE: THE ROBERTS COURT AND THE CONSTITUTION 229 (New York: Henry Holt, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Martin D. Carcieri

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carcieri, M.D. (2015). The Supreme Court, Public Education, and the Fourteenth Amendment. In: Applying Rawls in the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137446961_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics