Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring rationales for branding a university: Should we be seeking to measure branding in UK universities?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although branding is now widespread among UK universities, the application of branding principles in the higher education sector is comparatively recent and may be controversial for internal audiences who question its suitability and efficiency. This article seeks to investigate how and whether the effectiveness of branding activity in the higher education sector should be evaluated and measured, through exploratory interviews with those who often drive it: UK University marketing professionals. Conclusions suggest that university branding is inherently complex, and therefore application of commercial approaches may be over-simplistic. While marketing professionals discuss challenges, they do not necessarily have a consistent view of the objectives of branding activity although all were able to clearly articulate branding objectives for their university, including both qualitative and, to some extent, quantitative metrics. Some measures of the real value of branding activity are therefore suggested, but a key debate is perhaps whether the objectives and role of branding in higher education need to be clarified, and a more consistent view of appropriate metrics reached? Various challenges in implementing branding approaches are also highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argenti, P. and Druckenmiller, B. (2004) Reputation and the corporate brand. Corporate Reputation Review 6 (4): 368–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakewell, J. and Gibson-Sweet, M.F. (1998) Strategic marketing in a changing environment – Are the new UK universities in danger of being ‘stuck in the middle’? International Journal of Educational Management 12 (3): 108–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beerli Palacio, A., Diaz.Meneses, G. and Perez Perez, P.J. (2002) The configuration of the university image and its relationship with the satisfaction of students. Journal of Educational Administration 40 (5): 486–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R., Ali-Choudhury, R. and Savani, S. (2007) Defining the components of a university brand: A qualitative investigation. Paper presented at the International Conference of Higher Education Marketing; 2–4 April 2008, Krakow, Poland.

  • Binsardi, A. and Ekwulugo, F. (2003) International marketing of British education: Research on the students’ perception and the UK market penetration. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 21 (5): 318–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, M. (2003) Higher education: Marketing in a quasi-commercial service industry. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 8 (2): 134–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. and Bell, E. (2003) Business Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulotaite, N. (2003) University heritage – An institutional tool for branding and marketing. Higher Education in Europe XXVIII (4): 449–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunzel, D. (2007) Universities sell their brands. Journal of Product and Brand Management 16 (2): 152–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapleo, C. (2004) Interpretation and implementation of reputation/brand management by UK university leaders. International Journal of Educational Advancement 5 (1): 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapleo, C. (2005) Do universities have ‘successful’ brands? The International Journal of Educational Advancement 6 (1): 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapleo, C. (2007) Barriers to brand building in UK universities. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Management 12 (February): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chisnall, P. (1992) Marketing Research. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christy, R. and Wood, M. (1999) Researching possibilities in marketing. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 2 (3): 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daymon, C. and Holloway, I. (2004) Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relations and Marketing Communications. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Chernatony, L., D'all Olmo Riley, F. and Harris, F. (1998) Criteria to assess brand success. Journal of Marketing Management 14: 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Chernatony, L. and McDonald, M. (2005) Creating Powerful Brands. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Chernatony, L. and Segal-Horn, S. (2003) The criteria for successful service brands. European Journal of Marketing 37 (7/8): 1095–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2006) An Introduction to Qualitative Research, 3rd edn. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, P. (2001) Higher education as a market: A problem or solution? Studies in Higher Education 26 (1): 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M.R.V. (1999) The pursuit of value through qualitative market research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 2 (2): 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B.J., Fam, K. and Llane, V. (2003) Branding universities in Asian markets. Journal of Product & Brand Management 15 (7): 466–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, E. (2005) Qualitative research in marketing: Road-map for a wilderness of complexity and unpredictability. European Journal of Marketing 39 (3/4): 309–327, Quote page 309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankinson, G. (2004) Relational network brands: Towards a conceptual model of place brands. Journal of Vacation Marketing 10 (2): 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HEFCE. (2008) Counting What is Measured or Measuring What Counts? – League Tables and Their Impact on Higher Education Institutions in England. HEFCE Issues Paper, April 2008/14. HEFCE, Bristol, UK. Quote page 54.

  • Hemsley-Brown, J. and Goonawardana, S. (2007) Brand harmonization in the international higher education market. Journal of Business Research 60: 942–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemsley-Brown, J. and Oplatka, I. (2006) Universities in a competitive marketplace – A systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management 19 (4): 316–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeffler, S. and Keller, K. (2003) The marketing advantages of strong brands. Brand Management 10 (6): 421–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D. (2002) Why do brands cause trouble? A dialectical theory of consumer culture and branding. Journal of Consumer Research 29 (June): 70–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, C. (2006) Universities: A prime example of branding gone wrong. Journal of Product and Brand Management 15 (7): 466–467, Quote page 466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K.L. (2003) Strategic Brand Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, M. (2002) Relationship marketing on the internet: The case of top and lower ranked universities and colleges. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 9: 81–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie, A. (2007) Branding higher education: Equivalence and difference in developing identity. Journal of Business Research 60 (9): 990–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maringe, F. and Foskett, N. (2002) Marketing university education: The South African experience. Higher Education Review 34 (3): 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGivern, Y. (2003) The Practice of Market and Social Research; An Introduction. London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melewar, T.C. and Akel, S. (2005) The role of corporate identity in the higher education sector. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 10 (1): 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mighall, R. (2008) Rewards for town and gown. Brand Strategy (July): 34–35.

  • Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. USA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millward Brown International. (1996) The Good Health Guide. Warwick, UK: Millward Brown International.

  • Opoku, R., Abratt, R. and Pitt, L. (2006) Communicating brand personality: Are the websites doing the talking for the top South African Business Schools? Brand Management 14 (1–2): 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rankin Frost, A. and Cooke, C. (1999) Brand v reputation: Managing an intangible asset. Journal of Brand management 7 (2): 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, H. (2003) University strategy in an age of uncertainty: The effect of higher education funding on old and new universities. Higher Education Quarterly 57 (1): 24–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper, S. and Davies, G. (2007) The corporate brand: Dealing with multiple stakeholders. Journal of Marketing Management 23 (1–2): 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, J. (2006) On the pragmatics of qualitative assessment: Designing the process for content analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 22 (1): 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamp, R. (2004) The new challenge of branding buy-in. Education News, Winter 2004, p. 7.

  • Temple, P. (2006) Branding higher education: Illusion or reality? Perspectives 10 (1): 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, M. (1982) The key informant technique. In: R. Burgess (ed.) Field Research: A Sourcebook and Field Manual. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veloutsou, C, Lewis, J.W. and Paton, R.A. (2004) University selection: Information requirements and importance. The International Journal of Educational Management 18 (3): 160–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waeraas, A. and Solbakk, M. (2008) Defining the essence of a university: Lessons from higher education branding. Higher Education 57 (4): 449–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young and Rubicam. (1994) Brand Asset Valuation. London: Young & Rubicam.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Portsmouth University Business School, Richmond Building, Portland Street, Portsmouth, PO1 3DE, UK

    Chris Chapleo

Authors
  1. Chris Chapleo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Chapleo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chapleo, C. Exploring rationales for branding a university: Should we be seeking to measure branding in UK universities?. J Brand Manag 18, 411–422 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2010.53

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2010.53

Keywords

Search

Navigation