Abstract
This study examines how structural aspects of online brand communities can contribute to the brand building capacity of the community using network theory. Predictions about the degree to which various structural factors are associated with emotional attachment to the community and other outcome measures are made. Results show that several structural characteristics play an important role in creating emotional attachment and contributing to relationship maintenance. Thus, the findings support the use of network theory for understanding how brand communities operate. It is also found that certain structural factors have a profound impact on attachment to the community and intention to re-purchase the brand. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen, I. (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Process 50: 179–211.
Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U.M. and Hermann, A. (2005) The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of Marketing 69 (3): 19–34.
Aron, A. and Westbay, L. (1996) Dimensions of the prototype of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (3): 535–551.
Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Benjamin, B.R. (1998) Three scenarios for the future of technology and strong democracy. Political Science Quarterly 113 (4): 573–589.
Borgatti, S.P. (2005) Centrality and network flow. Social Networks 27: 55–71.
Bowlby, J. (1980) Attachment and Loss: Loss-sadness and Depression. New York: Basic Books.
Burt, R.S. (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R.S. (1997) The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (2): 339–365.
Butler, B.S. (2001) Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Information Systems Research 12 (4): 346–362.
Coleman, J.C. (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–S120.
Davis, S. and Meyer, C. (1998) Blur: The Speed of Change in the Connected Economy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
DeShields, O.W., Kara, A. and de los Santos, G. (2000) Homophily effects in personal communication moderated by spokesperson's credibility. In: F. Van Gorp Cooley (ed.) Marketing in a Global Economy: AMA International Marketing Educators Conference, 28 June – 1 July 2000, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Dindia, K. (2000) Relational maintenance. In: C. Hendrick and S.S. Hendrick (eds.) Close Relationships: A Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 287–300.
Etzioni, A. and Etzioni, O. (1999) Face-to-face and computer-mediated communities, a comparative analysis. Information Society 15 (4): 241–248.
Fernback, J. (1999) There is a there there: Notes toward a definition of cybercommunity. In: S. Jones (ed.) Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 203–220.
Freeman, L. (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40: 35–41.
Freeman, L. (1979) Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1: 215–239.
Ganesan, S. (1994) Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing 58: 1–19.
Granovetter, M. (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510.
Greve, H.R. (1995) Jumping ship: The diffusion of strategy abandonment. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (3): 444–473.
Hagel, J.I. and Armstrong, A.G. (1997) Net Gain Expanding Markets through Virtual Communities. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Henderson, J.C. (1990) Plugging into strategic partnerships: The critical is connection. Sloan Management Review 31 (3): 7–15.
Hoyer, W.D. and MacInnis, D.J. (2004) Consumer Behavior. New York City, NY: Houghton Mifflin Corp.
Jarvenppa, S.L. and Todd, P.A. (1997) Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 1 (2): 59–88.
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3 (3): 383–397.
Kollock, P. (1994) The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment and trust. American Journal of Sociology 100 (2): 313–345.
Lawler, E.J. and Yoon, J.K. (1996) Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review 61 (1): 89–108.
Marsden, P.V. (1993) The reliability of network density and composition measures. Social Networks 15 (4): 399–421.
Marsden, P.V. and Campbell, K.E. (1984) Measuring tie strength. Social Forces 63 (2): 482–501.
McAlexander, J.H., Schouten, J.W. and Koenig, F.H. (2002) Building brand community. Journal of Marketing 66 (1): 38–54.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. and Cook, J. (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27 (1): 415–444.
Milgram, S. (1967) Small-world problem. Psychology Today 1 (1): 61–67.
Muniz, A.M. and O'Guinn, T.C. (2001) Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research 27 (4): 412–432.
Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994) Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Oliver, C. (1991) Strategic responses to institutional pressures. Academy of Management Review 16 (1): 145–179.
Park, C.W. and MacInnis, D.J. (2006) What's in and what's out: Questions over the boundaries of the attitude construct. Journal of Consumer Research 33 (1): 16–18.
Paxton, P. and Moody, J. (2003) Structure and sentiment: Explaining attachment to group. Social Psychology Quarterly 66: 34–47.
Prahalad, C.K. and Ramaswamy, V. (2003) The new frontier of experience innovation. Sloan Management Review 44 (4): 12–18.
Proctor, C.H. and Loomis, C.P. (1951) Analysis of sociometric data. In: M. Johada, M. Deutsch and S.W. Cook (eds.) Research Methods in Social Relations. New York: Dryden Press, pp. 561–585.
Rowley, T.J. (1997) Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review 22 (4): 887–910.
Scott, J. (1991) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage.
Shimp, T.A. and Madden, T.J. (1988) Consumer-object relations: A conceptual framework based analogously on Sternberg's triangular theory of love. Advances in Consumer Research 15: 163–168.
Stafford, L. and Canary, D.J. (1991) Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 8 (2): 217–242.
Stokowski, P.A. (1994) Leisure in Society: A Network Structural Perspective. New York: Mansell Publishing.
Szulanski, G. (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter): 27–43.
Tyre, M. and von Hippel, E. (1997) The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organization Science 8 (1): 71–83.
Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Application. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wellman, B. (1999) The network community: An introduction. In: B. Wellman (ed.) Networks in the Global Community. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Wellman, B. and Frank, K. (2001) Network capital in a multi-level world: Getting support in personal communities. In: N. Lin, K. Cook and R. Burt (eds.) Social Capital: Theory and Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 233–273.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
1earned her PhD in Marketing from the Korea University Business School in Seoul, Korea, where she works as a research associate. Her research interests include social network theory, consumer choice modeling and the study of brand communities. Her research method interests include structural equation modelling and network data analysis using NetMiner.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, H., Lee, DH., Taylor, C. et al. Do online brand communities help build and maintain relationships with consumers? A network theory approach. J Brand Manag 19, 213–227 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2011.33
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2011.33