Skip to main content
Log in

Reasons for non-consideration of brands and the role of prior experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent anti-consumption research reveals that studying the reasons for not choosing a brand is as valuable for understanding consumer behaviour as researching their motivation for choosing brands. Taking a holistic approach (as opposed to focusing on a specific side of anti-consumption), this article explores all claimed reasons for brand non-consideration and quantifies how much each reason contributes to potential customer deficiency. An online survey examined incidences and reasons for non-consideration of 27 brands of chocolate bars by 1068 respondents. The good news for managers is that about two-thirds (57 per cent) of the reasons for non-consideration, by customers who have never experienced the brand, is directly attributable to the brand (as opposed to competition (8 per cent) or consumers themselves (27 per cent). The results demonstrate that most instances, when current category users reject brands from consideration, are within brand managers’ influence. Therefore, actions addressing specific reasons for brand non-consideration might expand a brand's customer base. This article suggests specific marketing activities that could achieve this goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abougomaah, N., Schlacter, J. and Gaidis, W. (1987) Elimination and choice phases in evoked set formation. The Journal of Consumer Marketing 4 (4): 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, J.W., Hutchinson, J.W. and Lynch, J.G. (1991) Memory and decision making. In: H. Kassarjian and T. Robertson (eds.) Handbook of Consumer Theory and Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albarracin, D. and Wyer, R.S. (2000) The cognitive impact of past behaviour: Influences on beliefs, attitudes and future behavioural decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (1): 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartol, K., Tein, M., Matthews, G. and Martin, D. (2005) Management: A Pacific Rim Focus. North Ryde, Australia: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M. and Speckart, G. (1981) Attitudes ‘cause' behaviors: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40 (2): 226–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, J. and Zins, M.A. (1979) Information format and choice task effects in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research 6: 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogomolova, S. (2010) Life after death? Analyzing post-defection consumer brand equity. Journal of Business Research 63 (1): 1135–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogomolova, S. and Romaniuk, J. (2009) Brand defection in a business-to-business financial service. Journal of Business Research 62 (3): 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colgate, M. and Hedge, R. (2001) An investigation into the switching process in retail banking services. International Journal of Bank Marketing 19 (5): 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P.R. and Sawyer, A.G. (1990) The price knowledge and search of supermarket shoppers. Journal of Marketing 54 (July): 42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • East, R., Wright, M. and Vanhuele, M. (2008) Consumer Behaviour: Applications in Marketing. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, A.S.C. (1988) Repeat-Buying: Facts, Theory and Applications. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, A.S.C. (2000) Repeat-buying: Facts, theory and applications. Journal of Empirical Generalisations in Marketing Science 5: 392–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, S.J. and Deighton, J. (1989) Managing what consumers learn from experience. Journal of Marketing 53 (2): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeffler, S. and Ariely, D. (1999) Constructing stable preferences: A look into dimensions of experience and their impact on preference stability. Journal of Consumer Psychology 8 (2): 113–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M.K., Banister, E.N. and Stephenson, C.A. (2008) Mapping symbolic (anti-) consumption. Journal of Business Research 62 (2): 148–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer, W.D. (1984) An examination of consumer decision making for a common repeat purchase product. Journal of Consumer Research 11 (3): 822–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer, W.D. and Brown, S.P. (1990) Effects of brand awareness on choice for a common, repeat-purchase product. Journal of Consumer Research 17 (2): 141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keaveney, S.M. (1995) Customer switching behavior in service industries: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing 59 (April): 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. and Keller, K.L. (2006) Marketing Management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, H. (1996) Characteristics of memory associations: A consumer-based brand equity perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing 13 (4): 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., Motion, J. and Conroy, D. (2009a) Anti-consumption and brand avoidance. Journal of Business Research 62 (2): 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.S.W., Conroy, D. and Motion, J. (2009b) Brand avoidance: A negative promises perspective. In: Advances in Consumer Research. Duluth, MN, pp. 421–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.S.W., Fernandez, K.V. and Hyman, M.R. (2009c) Anti-consumption: An overview and research agenda. Journal of Business Research 62 (2): 145–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees, G., Garland, R. and Wright, M. (2007) Switching banks: Old bank gone but not forgotten. Journal of Financial Services Marketing 12 (2): 146–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayana, C.L. and Markin, R.T. (1975) Consumer behavior and product performance: An alternative conceptualization. Journal of Marketing 39 (October): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nedungadi, P. (1990) Recall and consumer consideration sets: Influencing choice without altering brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research 17 (3): 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967) Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nenycz-Thiel, M. and Romaniuk, J. (2011) The nature and incidence of consumer rejection of supermarket private label brands. Australasian Marketing Journal 19 (2): 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R.E. and Lee, R. (1980) Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing 49 (Fall): 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C.W., Mothersbaugh, D.L. and Feick, L. (1994) Consumer knowledge assessment. Journal of Consumer Research 21 (1): 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purdy, J.M.A., Armstrong, G.A. and McIlveen, H. (2002) Three scaling methods for consumer rating of salt intensity. Journal of Sensory Studies 17 (3): 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju, P.S., Lonial, S.C. and Mangold, W.G. (1995) Differential effects of subjective knowledge, objective knowledge, and usage experience on decision making: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology 4 (2): 153–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, R.T. and Cooil, B. (1994) Reliability measures for qualitative data: Theory and implications. Journal of Marketing Research 31 (February): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, B., Riebe, E., Dawes, J.G. and Danenberg, N. (2002a) A marketing economy of scale - big brands lose less of their customer base than small brands. Marketing Bulletin 13 (May): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, B., Wright, M. and Goodhardt, G. (2002b) Purchase loyalty is polarised into either repertoire or subscription patterns. Australasian Marketing Journal 10 (3): 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1968) On judging the plausibility of theories. In: B. Van Rootselaar and J.F. Staal (eds.) Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Sciences III. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: New Holland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R.B. (1980) Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist 35 (2): 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

2has recently completed her Honours (Marketing) at the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science, University of South Australia. She also has a Bachelor of Behavioural Science (Psyc) from Flinders University. Her interests include the impact of experience on brand evaluations and consumer processes of elimination of brands from consideration sets.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bogomolova, S., Millburn, S. Reasons for non-consideration of brands and the role of prior experience. J Brand Manag 19, 304–317 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2011.41

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2011.41

Keywords

Navigation