Skip to main content
Log in

The Determinants of Microinsurance Demand

  • Article
  • Published:
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to structure the extant knowledge on the determinants of microinsurance demand in a manner that achieves several outcomes. First is to offer a specific economic structure to the review through use of Outreville’s insurance demand framework. Second is to identify key questions that arise out of structuring the material in this way. In particular, we attempt to clarify the critical open questions in microinsurance demand through use of Outreville’s framework. Third, through comparison with literature on traditional insurance demand, we identify opportunities to understand not only the microinsurance market better, but also the traditional market. To achieve these outcomes, we review the academic literature on microinsurance demand published between 2000 and early 2014 and compare these results with evidence in the literature regarding traditional insurance markets. The review identifies 12 key factors affecting microinsurance demand, and further highlights that research focused on the role of contract performance (including basis risk and quality), trust, financial literacy and informal risk-sharing mechanisms may be most fruitful in expanding microinsurance markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Fafchamps and Lund (2003).

  2. See, among others, Dror and Jacquier (1999); Morduch (2006); Giesbert et al. (2011); Biener and Eling (2012); De Bock and Gelade (2012).

  3. See Cole et al. (2013); Giné et al. (2008); Jowett (2003); Thornton et al. (2010).

  4. See, specifically, De Bock and Gelade (2012) and Matul et al. (2013). De Bock and Gelade (2012) provide a literature review that focuses on consumer comprehension and how microinsurance demand is affected by credit availability, risk-sharing groups, and other substitutes for formal insurance. Matul et al. (2013) provide another practitioner-oriented review paper and debunk ten myths of microinsurance demand. For example, they show that gender, age and risk aversion do not affect demand significantly. Moreover, the second chapter of Morsink’s (2012) dissertation provides an excellent review of theories about insurance demand and an analysis of demand determinants in empirical microinsurance demand studies.

  5. See Outreville (2013).

  6. For a more comprehensive distinction between microinsurance and traditional insurance, see Lloyd’s (2009).

  7. See Mobarak and Rosenzweig (2012).

  8. See Jowett (2003); Arnott and Stiglitz (1991).

  9. For an example of possible contract non-performance, see Doherty and Schlesinger (1990).

  10. See Biener and Eling (2012).

  11. The take-up rate of subsidised microinsurance products is also much lower than the take-up rate of subsidised insurance products in traditional insurance markets. See, for example, Glauber (2004), who discusses take-up rates in the subsidised U.S. crop insurance (the take-up rate is 80 per cent).

  12. See Clarke (2011); Doherty and Schlesinger (1990).

  13. See Biener and Eling (2012) for the exact methodology.

  14. See Outreville (2013). We note, however, that Outreville’s focus is on cross-national evaluations, which are more focused on macro factors than on micro factors. Zietz (2003), in contrast, considers the literature on life insurance demand within specific markets, focusing on micro factors. We combine the efforts of both authors in constructing our categorisation of the literature.

  15. For instance, Zietz (2003) considers religion under personal and demographic factors. Our categories are intended to be as consistent as possible with those of Outreville (2013). We also note that we refer to empirical studies, not theory papers such as Arnott and Stiglitz (1991).

  16. For a thorough discussion, see Mossin (1968); Ehrlich and Becker (1972); De Bock and Gelade (2012), and Morsink (2012).

  17. See Cole et al. (2013).

  18. See Karlan et al. (2012).

  19. See Dercon et al. (2012).

  20. See Gaurav et al. (2011).

  21. See Thornton et al. (2010).

  22. See Fitzpatrick et al. (2011).

  23. See Bauchet (2012).

  24. See Latortue (2006).

  25. See De Bock and Gelade (2012).

  26. See Schneider and Diop (2004); Zhang et al. (2006).

  27. See Dong et al. (2009).

  28. See Akotey et al. (2011); Tadesse and Brans (2012).

  29. See Akter et al. (2008).

  30. See Babbel (1985); Browne and Kim (1993); Mantis and Farmer (1968) for a more comprehensive review, see Zietz (2003).

  31. See Marquis et al. (2004).

  32. See Aizer (2007); Baicker et al. (2012); Bansak and Raphael (2007).

  33. See Giné et al. (2008).

  34. See Huber (2012).

  35. See Cole et al. (2013); Giné et al. (2008).

  36. See Gollier (2003).

  37. See Clarke (2011).

  38. See Ito and Kono (2010).

  39. See Liu and Myers (2012).

  40. See Liu et al. (2013).

  41. We thank our reviewers for input on these questions.

  42. See Morris et al. (2000).

  43. See Jütting (2003).

  44. See Mossin (1968).

  45. For a more comprehensive review, see Zietz (2003).

  46. See Kouame and Komenan (2012).

  47. See Giesbert et al. (2011).

  48. See Binswanger (1981).

  49. See Holt and Laury (2002).

  50. See Kahneman and Tversky (1979).

  51. See Dercon et al. (2011).

  52. See Giné et al. (2008); Giesbert et al. (2011).

  53. See Outreville (2013); Zietz (2003).

  54. See Cardenas and Carpenter (2008).

  55. Note that the findings are highly contested. See, for example, Henrich et al. (2010); Tanaka et al. (2010); Harrison et al. (2010) and Delavande et al. (2011) for recent results.

  56. See Doherty and Schlesinger (1990).

  57. See Dror and Wiechers (2006).

  58. See Wakker et al. (1997).

  59. See Sommer (1996).

  60. See Outreville (2013); Beck and Webb (2003).

  61. Morsink’s (2012) dissertation offers an extensive and useful discussion of trust, peer effects and networks.

  62. See Schneider (2005).

  63. See Basaza et al. (2008).

  64. See Cai et al. (2009); Cole et al. (2013).

  65. See Zhang et al. (2006).

  66. See Dror et al. (2005); Dror and Wiechers (2006).

  67. See Patt et al. (2009, 2010).

  68. See Morsink and Geurts (2011).

  69. See Cai et al. (2011).

  70. See Giné et al. (2011).

  71. See Sorensen (2006).

  72. See Gheyssens and Günther (2012).

  73. See Cole et al. (2011).

  74. See Morsink (2012).

  75. See Eisenhauer and Halek (1999).

  76. See Bartke and Schwarze (2008); Noussair et al. (2012).

  77. See Beck and Webb (2003); Browne and Kim (1993); Feyen et al. (2013).

  78. See Lusardi and Mitchell (2011).

  79. See Cole et al. (2013); Platteau and Ontiveros (2013).

  80. See Cai et al. (2011); Gaurav et al. (2011); Giné et al. (2011).

  81. See Dercon et al. (2014).

  82. See Hill and Robles (2011).

  83. See Cai and Song (2013); Norton et al. (2012); Patt et al. (2009, 2010).

  84. See Clarke and Kalani (2012).

  85. See Bonan et al. (2012).

  86. See Schultz et al. (2013).

  87. See Bayer et al. (2009).

  88. See Akter et al. (2008); Chen et al. (2013); Huber (2012); Jehu-Appiah et al. (2012); Jowett (2003).

  89. See Cole et al. (2013); Giné et al. (2008).

  90. See Lin (2009).

  91. See Cappelletti et al. (2013); Hecht and Hanewald (2010).

  92. See Truett and Truett (1990); Li et al. (2007).

  93. See Browne and Kim (1993).

  94. For a comprehensive list of studies, see Zietz (2003).

  95. See Fafchamps and Lund (2003); Morduch (1999).

  96. See Arnott and Stiglitz (1991).

  97. See Jowett (2003).

  98. See Landmann et al. (2012).

  99. An assessable mutual is one in which the insurer is able to request additional contributions from the policyholders after conclusion of the policy contract period when full loss and cost information is available.

  100. For an extensive list of studies, see Zietz (2003).

  101. See Browne and Kim (1993); Bernheim (1991).

  102. See Rejda et al. (1987); Lewis (1989).

  103. See Cohen and Sebstad (2003); Mathauer et al. (2008).

  104. See De Allegri et al. (2006).

  105. See Criel and Waelkens (2003).

  106. See Mathauer et al. (2008).

  107. See Jehu-Appiah et al. (2012).

  108. See Nguyen and Knowles (2010).

  109. See Dror et al. (2007).

  110. See Costa and Garcia (2003).

  111. We note that the issue considered by Costa and Garcia is complex, incorporating elements of voluntary health insurance, national universal coverage, waiting lists, adverse selection and moral hazard.

  112. See Arun et al. (2012).

  113. See Arun and Bendig (2010).

  114. See Tversky and Kahneman (1974).

  115. See Cai and Song (2013).

  116. See Galarza and Carter (2010).

  117. See Johnson et al. (1993); Kunreuther (1996); Kunreuther and Pauly (2005).

  118. See Browne and Kim (1993) among others.

  119. See Cao and Zhang (2012); Chen et al. (2013).

  120. See Truett and Truett (1990).

  121. See Bernheim (1991); Chen et al. (2001).

  122. See Gandolfi and Miners (1996).

  123. See Cohen and Einav (2007).

  124. See Halek and Eisenhauer (2001).

  125. See Borghans et al. (2009); Eckel and Grossman (2008); Cohen and Einav (2007). Eckel and Grossman (2008) note that field studies often conclude that women are more risk averse than men, whereas laboratory experiment findings are less conclusive.

  126. See Chankova et al. (2008); Nguyen and Knowles (2010).

  127. See Bonan et al. (2012); De Allegri et al. (2006).

  128. See Zietz (2003).

  129. See Dror and Preker (2002).

  130. See, for example, Bonnevay et al. (2002); Dror and Armstrong (2006); Biener and Eling (2012).

  131. Older work, such as Berger et al. (1992) and Lewis and Murdock (1996), discusses the link between reinsurance availability and insurance demand, especially in the context of the U.S. liability crisis.

References

  • Aizer, A. (2007) ‘Public health insurance, program take-up, and child health’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 89 (3): 400–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akotey, O.J., Osei, K.A. and Gemegah, A. (2011) ‘The demand for micro insurance in Ghana’, Journal of Risk Finance 12 (3): 182–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akter, S., Brouwer, R., Chowdhury, S. and Aziz, S. (2008) Determinants of participation in a catastrophe insurance programme: Empirical evidence from a developing country, paper presented at the 2008 (52nd) Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Conference.

  • Arnott, R. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1991) ‘Moral hazard and nonmarket institutions: Dysfunctional crowding out of peer monitoring?’, American Economic Review 81 (1): 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arun, T. and Bendig, M. (2010) Risk management among the poor: the case of microfinancial services, IZA Discussion Paper 5174, Bonn: Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit.

  • Arun, T., Bendig, M. and Arun, S. (2012) ‘Bequest motives and determinants of micro life insurance in Sri Lanka’, World Development 40 (8): 1700–1711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbel, D.F. (1985) ‘The price elasticity of demand for whole life insurance’, The Journal of Finance 40 (1): 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baicker, K., Congdon, W.J. and Mullainathan, S. (2012) ‘Health insurance coverage and take-up: lessons from behavioral economics’, Milbank Quarterly 90 (1): 107–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansak, C. and Raphael, S. (2007) ‘The effects of state policy design features on take-up and crowd-out rates for the state children’s health insurance program’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 26 (1): 149–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartke, S. and Schwarze, R. (2008) Risk-averse by nation or by religion? Some insights on the determinants of individual risk attitudes, SOE Paper on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research No. 131, Berlin: DIW.

  • Basaza, R., Criel, B. and Van der Stuyft, P. (2008) ‘Community health insurance in Uganda: Why does enrolment remain low? A view from beneath’, Health Policy 87 (2): 172–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauchet, J. (2012) Price and information type in life microinsurance demand: Experimental evidence from Mexico, Appleton WI: Microinsurance Centre.

  • Bayer, P.J., Bernheim, B.D. and Scholz, J.K. (2009) ‘The effects of financial education in the workplace: Evidence from a survey of employers’, Economic Inquiry 47 (4): 605–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T. and Webb, I. (2003) ‘Economic, demographic, and institutional determinants of life insurance consumption across countries’, The World Bank Economic Review 17 (1): 51–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, L.A., Cummins, J.D. and Tennyson, S. (1992) ‘Reinsurance and the liability insurance crisis’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 (3): 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B.D. (1991) ‘How strong are bequest motives? Evidence based on estimates of the demand for life insurance and annuities’, Journal of Political Economy 99 (5): 899–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biener, C. and Eling, M. (2012) ‘Insurability in microinsurance markets: An analysis of problems and potential solutions’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice 37 (1): 77–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H.P. (1981) ‘Attitudes toward risk: Theoretical implications of an experiment in rural India’, The Economic Journal 91 (364): 867–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonan, J., Dagnelie, O., LeMay-Boucher, P. and Tenikue, M. (2012) Is it all about money? A randomized evaluation of the impact of insurance literacy and marketing treatments on the demand for health microinsurance in Senegal, ILO Microinsurance Innovation Facility Research Paper No. 14. Geneva: International Labour Organization.

  • Bonnevay, S., Dror, D.M., Duru, G. and Lamure, M. (2002) ‘A model of microinsurance and reinsurance’, in D.M. Dror and A.S. Preker (eds) Social Reinsurance: A New Approach to Sustainable Community Health Financing, Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 153–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borghans, L., Heckman, J.J., Golsteyn, B.H.H. and Meijers, H. (2009) ‘Gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion’, Journal of the European Economic Association 7 (2–3): 649–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M.J. and Kim, K. (1993) ‘An international analysis of life insurance demand’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 60 (4): 616–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, H., Chen, Y., Fang, H. and Zhou, L.-A. (2009) Microinsurance, trust and economic development: evidence from a randomized natural field experiment, NBER Working Paper 15396, Boston, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Cai, J. and Song, C. (2013) Do hypothetical experiences affect real financial decisions? Evidence from insurance take-up, MPRA Paper No. 46862, Munich, Germany.

  • Cai, J., Janvry, A.D. and Sadoulet, E. (2011) Social networks and insurance take up: evidence from a randomized experiment in China. ILO Microinsurance Innovation Facility Research Paper No 8, Geneva: International Labour Organization.

  • Cao, Y. and Zhang, Y. (2012) ‘Hog insurance adoption and suppliers’ discrimination: A bivariate probit model with partial observability’, China Agricultural Economic Review 4 (2): 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelletti, G., Guazzarotti, G. and Tommasino, P. (2013) ‘What determines annuity demand at retirement?’, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice 38 (4): 777–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas, J. and Carpenter, J.C. (2008) ‘Behavioural development economics: Lessons from field labs in the developing world’, Journal of Development Studies 44 (3): 311–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chankova, S., Sulzbach, S. and Diop, F. (2008) ‘Impact of mutual health organizations: Evidence from West Africa’, Health Policy and Planning 23 (4): 264–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K., Hu, W., Xiao, C. and Xing, L. (2013) Smallholder participation in hog insurance and willingness to pay for improved policies: Evidence from Sichuan province in China, ILO Microinsurance Innovation Facility Research Paper No. 28, Geneva: International Labour Organization.

  • Chen, R., Wong, K.A. and Lee, H.C. (2001) ‘Age, period, and cohort effects on life insurance purchases in the U.S.’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 68 (2): 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. (2011) A theory of rational demand for index insurance, Discussion Paper No. 572, University of Oxford, UK.

  • Clarke, D. and Kalani, G. (2012) Microinsurance decisions: Evidence from Ethiopia, ILO Microinsurance Innovation Facility Research Paper No. 19, Geneva: International Labour Organization.

  • Cohen, A. and Einav, L. (2007) ‘Estimating risk preferences from deductible choice’, The American Economic Review 97 (3): 745–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. and Sebstad, J. (2003) Reducing vulnerability: Demand for and supply of micro-insurance in East Africa, a synthesis report for MicroSave-Africa: Nairobi.

  • Cole, S., Giné, X., Tobacman, J., Topalova, P.B., Townsend, R.M. and Vickery, J.I. (2013) ‘Barriers to household risk management: Evidence from India’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 5 (1): 104–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S., Sampson, T. and Zia, B. (2011) ‘Prices or knowledge? What drives demand for financial services in emerging markets?’, The Journal of Finance 66 (6): 1933–1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, J. and Garcia, J. (2003) ‘Demand for private health insurance: How important is the quality gap?’, Health Economics 12 (7): 587–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Criel, B. and Waelkens, M.P. (2003) ‘Declining subscriptions to the Maliando Mutual Health Organisation in Guinea-Conakry (West Africa)’, Social Science & Medicine 57 (7): 1205–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Allegri, M., Sanon, M., Bridges, J. and Sauerborn, R. (2006) ‘Understanding consumers’ preferences and decision to enrol in community-based health insurance in rural West Africa’, Health Policy 76 (1): 58–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bock, O. and Gelade, W. (2012) The demand for microinsurance: A literature review, ILO Microinsurance Innovation Facility Research Paper No. 26, Geneva: International Labour Organization.

  • Delavande, A., Giné, X. and McKenzie, D. (2011) ‘Measuring subjective expectations in developing countries: A critical review and new evidence’, Journal of Development Economics 94 (2): 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dercon, S., Gunning, J. W. and Zeitlin, A. (2011) The demand for insurance under limited credibility: Evidence from Kenya, paper presented at the International Development Conference, DIAL, Paris.

  • Dercon, S., Gunning, J.W., Zeitlin, A., Cerrone, C. and Lombardini, S. (2012) Health insurance participation: Experimental evidence from Kenya, ILO Microinsurance Innovation Facility Research Paper No. 10, Geneva: International Labour Organization.

  • Dercon, S., Hill, R.V., Clarke, D., Outes-Leon, I. and Taffesse, A.S. (2014) ‘Offering rainfall insurance to informal insurance groups: Evidence from a field experiment in Ethiopia’, Journal of Development Economics 106: 132–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, N.A. and Schlesinger, H. (1990) ‘Rational insurance purchasing: Consideration of contract nonperformance’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 105 (1): 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, H., De Allegri, M., Gnawali, D., Souares, A. and Sauerborn, R. (2009) ‘Drop-out analysis of community-based health insurance membership at Nouna, Burkina Faso’, Health Policy 92 (2–3): 174–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dror, D.M. and Armstrong, J. (2006) ‘Do micro health insurance units need capital or reinsurance? A simulated exercise to examine different alternatives’, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice 31 (4): 739–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dror, D.M., Armstrong, J. and Kalavakonda, V. (2005) ‘Why micro health insurance schemes cannot forego reinsurance’, Journal of Insurance and Risk Management 4 (7): 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dror, D.M. and Jacquier, C. (1999) ‘Micro-insurance: Extending health insurance to the excluded’, International Social Security Review 52 (1): 71–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dror, D.M., Koren, R., Ost, A., Binnendijk, E., Vellakkal, S. and Danis, M (2007) ‘Health insurance benefit packages prioritized by low-income clients in India: Three criteria to estimate effectiveness of choice’, Social Science & Medicine 64 (4): 884–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dror, D.M. and Preker, A.S. (2002) Social Reinsurance: A New Approach to Sustainable Community Health Financing, Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dror, D.M. and Wiechers, T. (2006) ‘The role of insurers and reinsurers in supporting insurance for the poor’, in C. Churchill (ed.) Protecting the Poor: A Microinsurance Compendium, Geneva: International Labour Organization, pp. 174–196.

  • Eckel, C.C. and Grossman, P.J. (2008) ‘Men, women, and risk aversion: Experimental evidence’, in C.R. Plott and V. Smoth (eds) Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, vol. 1, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 1061–1076.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, I. and Becker, G.S. (1972) ‘Market insurance, self-insurance, and self-protection’, The Journal of Political Economy 80 (4): 623–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhauer, J.G. and Halek, M. (1999) ‘Prudence, risk aversion, and the demand for life insurance’, Applied Economic Letters 6 (4): 239–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fafchamps, M. and Lund, S. (2003) ‘Risk-sharing networks in rural Philippines’, Journal of Development Economics 71 (2): 261–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyen, E., Lester, R. and Rocha, R. (2013) ‘What drives the development of the insurance sector? An empirical analysis based on a panel of developed and developing countries’, Journal of Financial Perspectives 1 (1): 117–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, A., Magnoni, B. and Thornton, R.L. (2011) Microinsurance utilization in Nicaragua: A report on effects on children, retention, and health, ILO Microinsurance Innovation Facility Research Paper No. 5, Geneva: International Labour Organization.

  • Galarza, F.B. and Carter, M.R. (2010) Risk preferences and demand for insurance in Peru: A field experiment, Paper No. 61871, 2010 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, Denver, CO.

  • Gandolfi, A.S. and Miners, L. (1996) ‘Gender-based differences in life insurance ownership’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 63 (4): 683–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaurav, S., Cole, S. and Tobacman, J. (2011) ‘Marketing complex financial products in emerging markets: Evidence from rainfall insurance in India’, Journal of Marketing Research 48 (SPL): 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gheyssens, J. and Günther, I. (2012) Risk experiments in gains and losses: A case study for Benin, UNU-WIDER Working Paper No. 2012/38, Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.

  • Giesbert, L., Steiner, S. and Bendig, M. (2011) ‘Participation in micro life insurance and the use of other financial services in Ghana’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 78 (1): 7–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giné, X., Townsend, R. and Vickery, J. (2008) ‘Patterns of rainfall insurance participation in rural India’, World Bank Economic Review 22 (3): 539–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giné, X., Karlan, D. and Ngatia, M. (2011) Social networks, financial literacy and index insurance, discussion paper, New Haven: Yale Department of Economics.

  • Glauber, J.W. (2004) ‘Crop insurance reconsidered’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 (5): 1179–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollier, C. (2003) ‘To insure or not to insure? An insurance puzzle’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory 28 (1): 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halek, M. and Eisenhauer, J.G. (2001) ‘Demography of risk aversion’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 68 (1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, G.W., Humphrey, S.J. and Verschoor, A. (2010) ‘Choice under uncertainty: Evidence from Ethiopia, India and Uganda’, The Economic Journal 120 (543): 80–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, C. and Hanewald, K. (2010) Sociodemographic, economic, and psychological drivers of the demand for life insurance: Evidence from the German retirement income act, SFB 649 Discussion Paper No. 2010-034, Berlin: Humboldt-Universität.

  • Henrich, J., Heine, S.J. and Norenzayan, A. (2010) ‘The weirdest people in the world?’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2–3): 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R.V. and Robles, M. (2011) Flexible insurance for heterogenous farmers: results from a small scale pilot in Ethiopia, IFPRI Discussion Paper 1092, Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

  • Holt, C.A. and Laury, S.K. (2002) ‘Risk aversion and incentive effects’, American Economic Review 92 (5): 1644–1655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, F. (2012) Determinants of microinsurance demand: Evidence from a micro life scheme in Indonesia, Master’s thesis, Aalto University School of Economics, Helsinki.

  • Ito, S. and Kono, H. (2010) ‘Why is the take-up of microinsurance so low? Evidence from a health insurance scheme in India’, Developing Economies 48 (1): 74–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehu-Appiah, C., Aryeetey, G., Agyepong, I., Spaan, E. and Baltussen, R. (2012) ‘Household perceptions and their implications for enrolment in the national health insurance scheme in Ghana’, Health Policy and Planning 27(3): 222–233.

  • Johnson, E.J, Hershey, J., Meszaros, J. and Kunreuther, H. (1993) ‘Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7 (1): 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jowett, M. (2003) ‘Do informal risk sharing networks crowd out public voluntary health insurance? Evidence from Vietnam’, Applied Economics 35 (10): 1153–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jütting, J.P. (2003) ‘Do community-based health insurance schemes improve poor people’s access to health care? Evidence from rural Senegal’, World Development 32 (2): 273–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) ‘Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk’, Econometrica 47 (2): 263–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlan, D., Osei-Akoto, I., Osei, R. and Udry, C. (2012) Agricultural decisions after relaxing credit and risk constraints, ILO Microinsurance Innovation Facility Research Paper No. 23, Geneva: International Labour Organization.

  • Kouame, E.B.H. and Komenan, A.N. (2012) Risk preferences and demand for insurance under price uncertainty: An experimental approach for cocoa farmers in Côte d’Ivoire, ILO Microinsurance Innovation Facility Research Paper No. 13, Geneva: International Labour Organization.

  • Kunreuther, H. (1996) ‘Mitigating disaster losses through insurance’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 12 (3): 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H. and Pauly, M. (2005) ‘Insurance Decision Making and Market Behavior’, Foundations and Trends® in Microeconomics 1 (2): 63–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landmann, A., Vollan, B. and Frölich, M. (2012) Insurance versus savings for the poor: Why one should offer either both or none, IZA Discussion Paper 6298, Bonn: Institut zur Zukunft der Arbeit.

  • Latortue, A. (2006) ‘The role of donors’, in C. Churchill (ed.) Protecting the Poor: A Microinsurance Compendium, Geneva: International Labour Organization, pp. 470–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C.M. and Murdock, K.C. (1996) ‘The role of government contracts in discretionary reinsurance markets for natural disasters’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 63 (4): 567–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, F.D. (1989) ‘Dependents and the demand for life insurance’, American Economic Review 79 (3): 452–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., Moshirian, F., Nguyen, P. and Wee, T. (2007) ‘The demand for life insurance in OECD countries’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 74 (3): 637–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, F.-T. (2009) ‘Does the risk aversion vary with different background risk of households?’, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 34: 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. and Myers, R.J. (2012) The dynamics of insurance demand under liquidity constraints and insurer default risk, IFPRI Discussion Paper 1174, Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

  • Liu, Y., Chen, K., Hill, R. and Xiao, C. (2013) Borrowing from the insurer: An empirical analysis of demand and impact of insurance in China, ILO Microinsurance Innovation Facility Research Paper No. 34, Geneva: International Labour Organization.

  • Lloyd’s (2009) ‘Insurance in developing countries: Exploring opportunities in microinsurance’, 360° Risk Insight Report, London: Lloyd’s.

  • Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O.S. (2011) Financial literacy and planning: Implications for retirement wellbeing, NBER Working Paper No. 17078, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Mantis, G. and Farmer, R.N. (1968) ‘Demand for life insurance’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 35 (2): 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, M.S., Buntin, M.B., Escarce, J.J., Kapur, K. and Yegian, J.M. (2004) ‘Subsidies and the demand for individual health insurance in California’, Health Services Research 39 (5): 1547–1566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathauer, I, Schmidt, J.O. and Wenyaa, M (2008) ‘Extending social health insurance to the informal sector in Kenya. An assessment of factors affecting demand’, International Journal of Health Planning Management 23 (1): 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matul, M., Dalal, A., De Bock, O. and Gelade, W. (2013) Why people do not buy microinsurance and what can we do about it, Microinsurance Innovation Facility Research Paper No. 20, Geneva: International Labour Organization.

  • Mobarak, A.M. and Rosenzweig, M. (2012) Selling formal insurance to the informally insured, Yale Economics Department Discussion Paper No. 97, New Haven: Yale Department of Economics.

  • Morduch, J. (1999) ‘Between the state and the market: Can informal insurance patch the safety net?’, World Bank Research Observer 14 (2): 187–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morduch, J. (2006) ‘Microinsurance: The next revolution?’, in A. Banerjee, R. Bénabou and D. Mookherjee (eds) Understanding Poverty, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 337–355.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S.S., Carletto, C., Hoddinott, J. and Christiaensen, L.J.M. (2000) ‘Validity of rapid estimates of household wealth and income for health surveys in rural Africa’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 54 (5): 381–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsink, K. (2012) Weathering the storm: The demand for and impact of microinsurance, Dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede.

  • Morsink, K. and Geurts, P. (2011, November) Informal trust building factors and the demand for microinsurance, working paper, 7th Annual International Microinsurance Conference, Rio de Janeiro.

  • Mossin, J. (1968) ‘Aspects of rational insurance purchasing’, Journal of Political Economy 76 (4): 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H. and Knowles, J. (2010) ‘Demand for voluntary health insurance in developing countries: The case of Vietnam’s school-age children and adolescent student health insurance program’, Social Science & Medicine 71 (12): 2074–2082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, M., Osgood, D., Diro, R. and Gebremichael, M. (2012, August) Do experimental games increase take-up rates for index insurance? a randomized control trial approach, paper presented at the 2012 Annual Meeting Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Pennsylvania.

  • Noussair, C., Trautmann, S., Kuilen, G. van de and Nathaneal, V. (2012) ‘Risk aversion and religion’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 47 (2): 165–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Outreville, J.F. (2013) ‘The relationship between insurance and economic development: 85 empirical papers for a review of the literature’, Risk Management and Insurance Review 16 (1): 71–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patt, A., Peterson, N., Carter, M., Velez, M., Hess, U. and Suarez, P. (2009) ‘Making index insurance attractive to farmers’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 14 (8): 737–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patt, A., Suarez, P. and Hess, U. (2010) ‘How do smallholder farmers understand insurance, and how much do they want it? Evidence from Africa’, Global Environmental Change 20 (1): 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platteau, J.P. and Ontiveros, D.U. (2013) Understanding and information failures in insurance: Evidence from India, Development Research Working Paper No. 07/2013, La Paz, Bolivia: INESAD.

  • Rejda, G.E, Schmidt, J.R. and McNamara, M. (1987) ‘The impact of social security tax contributions on group life insurance premiums’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 54 (4): 712–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, P. (2005) ‘Trust in micro-health insurance: an exploratory study in Rwanda’, Social Science & Medicine 61 (7): 1430–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, P. and Diop, F. (2004) ‘Community-based health insurance in Rwanda’, in A.S. Preker and G. Carrin (eds) Health Financing for Poor People—Resource Mobilization and Risk Sharing, Washington DC: The World Bank, pp. 251–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, E., Metcalfe, M. and Gray, B. (2013) The impact of health insurance education on enrollment of microfinance institution clients in the Ghana National Health Insurance scheme, Northern region of Ghana, ILO Microinsurance Innovation Facility Research Paper No. 33, Geneva: International Labour Organization.

  • Sommer, D.W. (1996) ‘The impact of firm risk on property-liability insurance prices’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 63 (3): 501–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, A.T. (2006) ‘Social learning and health plan choice’, RAND Journal of Economics 37 (4): 929–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadesse, M. and Brans, M.V. (2012) ‘Risk, coping mechanisms, and factors in the demand for micro-insurance in Ethiopia’, Journal of Economics and International Finance 4 (4): 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, T., Camerer, C.F. and Nguyen, Q. (2010) ‘Risk and time preferences: Linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam’, The American Economic Review 100 (1): 557–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, R.L., Hatt, L.E., Field, E.M., Islam, M., Sol Diaz, F. and González, M.A. (2010) ‘Social security health insurance for the informal sector in Nicaragua: A randomized evaluation’, Health Economics 19 (S1): 181–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truett, D.B. and Truett, L.J. (1990) ‘The demand for life insurance in Mexico and the United States: A comparative study’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 57 (2): 321–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974) ‘Judgment and uncertainty: Heuristics and biases’, Science 185 (4157): 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakker, P., Thaler, R. and Tversky, A. (1997) ‘Probabilistic insurance’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 15 (1): 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Wang, H., Wang, L. and Hsiao, W. (2006) ‘Social capital and farmer’s willingness-to-join a newly established community-based health insurance in rural China’, Health Policy 76 (2): 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zietz, E.N. (2003) ‘An examination of the demand for life insurance’, Risk Management and Insurance Review 6 (2): 159–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan T Schmit.

Appendix

Appendix

Table A1

Table A1 Complete list of all studies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eling, M., Pradhan, S. & Schmit, J. The Determinants of Microinsurance Demand. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 39, 224–263 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2014.5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2014.5

Keywords

Navigation