Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in Kuwait

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between corporate governance characteristics and voluntary disclosure in the annual reports of 170 Kuwaiti companies listed on the Kuwait Stock Exchange in 2007. We first identified four major corporate governance characteristics: proportion of non-executive directors to total number of directors on the board; proportion of family members to total number of directors on the board; role duality; and a voluntary audit committee. We then used univariate and multivariate regression analyses to examine the relationship between these characteristics and voluntary disclosure in annual reports. Using a self-disclosure index to measure voluntary disclosure, the average level of voluntary disclosure by sample companies is 19 per cent, indicating some improvement over the sample companies in an earlier study by Al-Shammari (2008), who found 15 per cent voluntary disclosure. This result suggests a trend toward more transparency by Kuwaiti companies. The results indicate that only the existence of a voluntary audit committee is significantly and positively related to the extent of voluntary disclosure. The result is robust with respect to controls for company size, leverage, auditor type and industry memberships. These results indicate the need to improve Kuwaiti market transparency through additional constraints on corporate governance characteristics. It is believed that this result will prove useful to regulators, preparers of financial statements and investors. Specifically, users of accounting information like investors may consult the findings to understand Kuwaiti companies better when diversifying their investment portfolios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For robustness tests, three alternative regression specifications were estimated. The first model was run with a transformed logarithm voluntary disclosure index to ensure that the dependent variable lies between 0 and 1, whereas the second was estimated with rank transformation of the voluntary disclosure indices of the sample companies and independent continuous variables. The third model was an OLS regression after removing the only two outliers in the sample. These procedures have been used in past studies (Wallace et al, 1994; Wallace and Naser, 1995; Owusu-Ansah, 1998; Naser et al, 2002; Al-Shammari, 2008). The results of these models were unchanged as compared to the main model in Table 4. Therefore, they were not reported in the table.

References

  • Abbott, L., Park, Y. and Parker, S. (2000) The effect of audit committee activity and independence on corporate fraud. Managerial Finance 26 (11): 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah, S.N. and Mohd-Nasir, N. (2004) Accrual management and the roles of boards of directors and audit committees among Malaysian listed companies: Evidence during the Asian financial crisis. IIUM Journal of Management and Economics 12 (1): 49–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adhikari, A. and Tondkar, R. (1992) Environmental factors influencing accounting disclosure requirements of global stock exchanges. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 4 (2): 75–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shammari, B. (2008) Voluntary disclosure in Kuwait corporate annual reports. Review of Business Research 8 (1): 62–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shammari, B. (2009) Corporate governance and corporate performance: Evidence from Kuwait. Journal of Corporate Ownership and Control 7 (3): 334–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arab Monetary Fund. (2007) Arab Monetary Fund Quarterly Report. Abu Dhabi: Arab Monetary Fund Press.

  • Ball, R. and Foster, G. (1982) Corporate financial reporting: A methodological review of empirical research. Journal of Accounting Research 20 (Supplement): 161–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonn, I. (2004) Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from Australia. Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 10 (1): 14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, J. and Elias, N. (2007) Corporate governance in developing economies? The case of Egypt. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (4): 430–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzby, S.L. (1975) Company size, listed versus unlisted stock, and the extent of financial disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research 13 (1): 16–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carcello, J.V. and Nagy, A.L. (2004) Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 23 (2): 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Bank of Kuwait. (2008) Economic report. Kuwait: Central Bank of Kuwait press.

  • Cheng, E. and Courtenay, S. (2006) Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure. International Journal of Accounting 41: 262–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, C.W. and Wong-Boren, A. (1987) Voluntary financial disclosure by Mexican corporations. Accounting Review 62 (3): 533–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P.A. (1993) Factors affecting the formation of audit committees in major UK listed companies. Accounting and Business Research 23 (91A): 421–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, T.E. (1989) Voluntary corporate disclosure by Swedish companies. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 1 (2): 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, T.E. (1991) An assessment of voluntary disclosure in the annual reports of Japanese corporations. International Journal of Accounting 26 (3): 174–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, T.E. (1992) The impact of size, stock market listing and industry type on disclosure in the annual reports of Japanese listed corporations. Accounting and Business Research 22 (87): 229–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelo, L.E. (1981) Auditor size and auditor quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (3): 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Depoers, F. (2000) A cost-benefit study of voluntary disclosure: Some empirical evidence from French listed companies. European Accounting Review 9 (2): 245–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeZoort, F.T. (1997) An investigation of audit committee's oversight responsibilities. Abacus 33 (2): 208–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eng, L.L. and Mak, Y.T. (2003) Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22 (4): 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F. and Jensen, M.C. (1983) Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 25 (June): 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M.A. (1979) The impact of size, stock market listing and auditors on voluntary disclosure in corporate annual reports. Accounting and Business Research 9 (36): 273–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forker, J.J. (1992) Corporate governance and disclosure quality. Accounting and Business Research 22 (86): 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, J., Mayer, C. and Renneboog, L. (2001) Who discipline management in poorly performing companies. Journal of Financial Intermediation 10 (3/4): 209–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazali, N. and Weetman, P. (2006) Perpetuating traditional influences: Voluntary disclosure in Malaysia. Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation 15 (2): 226–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D.N. (2003) Basic Econometrics, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gul, F.A. and Leung, S. (2004) Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 23 (5): 351–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haniffa, R.M. and Cooke, T.E. (2002) Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Abacus 38 (3): 317–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haniffa, R.M. and Hudaib, M. (2006) Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 33 (7/8): 1034–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin, B. and Weisbach, M. (1991) The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management 20 (4): 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. and Wong, K. (2001) A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 10 (2): 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M., Perera, M.H.B. and Rahman, A.R. (1995) Voluntary disclosure in the annual reports of New Zealand companies. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting 6 (1): 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M., Tan, L.M. and Adams, M. (1994) Voluntary disclosure in an emerging capital market: Some empirical evidence from companies listed on the KLSE. International Journal of Accounting 29 (4): 334–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (3): 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joh, S.W. (2003) Corporate governance and firm profitability: Evidence from Korea before the economic crisis. Journal of Financial Economics 68 (2): 287–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiel, G. and Nicholson, G.J. (2003) Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review 11 (3): 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakhal, F. (2005) Voluntary earnings disclosures and corporate governance: Evidence from France. Review of Accounting and Finance 4 (3): 64–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leftwich, R.W., Watts, R. and Zimmerman, J. (1981) Voluntary corporate disclosure: The case of interim reporting. Journal of Accounting Research 19 (Supplement): 50–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, S. and Horwitz, B. (2004) Director ownership and voluntary segment disclosure: Hong Kong evidence. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 15 (3): 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S., Matolcsy, Z. and Chow, D. (2007) The association between board composition and different types of voluntary disclosure. European Accounting Review 16 (3): 555–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, K. and Downing, S. (1999) Governance and performance. Journal of General Management 24 (3): 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, C.L. and Shrives, P.J. (1991) The use of disclosure indices in accounting research: A review article. British Accounting Review 23 (3): 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, D.A. (1996) Audit committee performance: An investigation of the consequences associated with audit committee. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 15 (1): 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, G.K., Roberts, C.B. and Gray, S.J. (1995) Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by US, UK and Continental European multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 26 (3): 555–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molz, R. (1988) Managerial domination of board of directors and financial performance. Journal of Business Research 16 (3): 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naser, K., Al-Khatib, K. and Karbhari, Y. (2002) Empirical evidence on the depth of corporate information disclosure in developing countries: The case of Jordan. International Journal of Commerce and Management 12 (3/4): 122–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., Wasserman, W. and Kunter, M. (1983) Applied Regression Models. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, D. and Ahmed, K. (1995) Disclosure quality in corporate annual reports of non-financial companies in Bangladesh. Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies 3: 149–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owusu-Ansah, S. (1998) The impact of corporate attributes on the extent of mandatory disclosure and reporting by listed companies in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Accounting 33 (5): 605–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owusu-Ansah, S. (2000) Noncomplaince with corporate annual report disclosure requirements in Zimbabwe. Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies 4: 289–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owusu-Ansah, S. and Yeoh, J. (2005) The effect of legislation on corporate disclosure practices. Abacus 41 (1): 92–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstein, S. and Wyatt, J.G. (1990) Outside directors, board independence and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 26 (2): 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, J.J. and Lau, C.M. (2001) Board composition, leadership structure and performance in Chinese listed companies. Asian Pacific Journal of Management 18 (2): 245–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vafeas, N. and Theodorou, E. (1998) The relationship between board structure and firm performance in the UK. British Accounting Review 30 (4): 283–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R.S.O. and Naser, K. (1995) Firm-specific determinants of the comprehensiveness of mandatory disclosure in the corporate annual reports of firms listed on the stock exchange of Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 14 (4): 311–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R.S.O., Naser, K. and Mora, A. (1994) The relationship between the comprehensiveness of corporate annual reports and firm characteristics in Spain. Accounting and Business Research 25 (97): 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R. and Zimmerman, J. (1978) Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. Accounting Review 53 (1): 112–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, C. and Laing, D. (2001) Governance structure, director independence and corporate performance in the UK. European Accounting Review 13 (2): 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, H. and Yuan, J. (2007) Ownership structure, board composition and corporate voluntary disclosure: Evidence from listed companies in China. Managerial Auditing Journal 22 (6): 604–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Editor and two anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions that have improved the quality of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

1earned his PhD at the University of Western Australia, Perth in 2005. Currently he is an assistant professor at the College of Business Studies, the Public Authority for Applied Education and Training, Kuwait. His research interests are in enforcement and compliance with international financial reporting standards by the Middle Eastern countries, voluntary disclosure, corporate governance and cost of quality reporting. He has published in International Journal of Accounting, Journal of International Business and Economics, Review of Business Research, Journal of Corporate Ownership and Control, and the Middle East Business and Economic Review.

2earned his PhD at the University of Wollongong, Australia in 2000. Currently he is an associate professor at the College of Business Studies, the Public Authority for Applied Education and Training, Kuwait. His research interests are in consumer evaluation by banks, stock market efficiency and voluntary disclosure. He has published in the Middle East Business and Economic Review, the Scientific Journal of Administrative Development, and the International Journal of Business Strategy.

APPENDIX

APPENDIX

Voluntary disclosure index checklist

illustration

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Shammari, B., Al-Sultan, W. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in Kuwait. Int J Discl Gov 7, 262–280 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2010.3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2010.3

Keywords

Navigation