Skip to main content
Log in

Perspectives on multinational enterprises in emerging economies

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multinational enterprises (MNEs) play a pivotal role in the development of many emerging economies. In consequence, they became the focus of scholarly research by economists and policy analysts. In contrast, international business scholars have been comparatively uninterested in analysing this role of MNEs. Yet they could make important contributions to these debates. First, studies taking the individual firms as starting point would enhance understanding of the interaction between MNEs and the local environment. Second, theories and research methodologies developed in international business research could provide new insights into the dynamics of MNEs in emerging economies. The objective of this paper is to motivate more international business scholars to engage in research on positive and negative spillovers from foreign direct investment (FDI) in emerging economy societies. To advance this research agenda, scholars need to analyse the specific activities and capabilities of the firms involved, and the impact of FDI on the broader social and environmental context. For management, this agenda raises the ethical question: To what extent ought businesses to care about their local stakeholders?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Even increased productivity in an industry does not necessarily imply a positive spillover: inefficient producers may be crowded out, which increases the average productivity in the remaining domestic industry even if no change has occurred in the surviving firms (Smarzynska, 2002).

  2. Thanks to an anonymous reviewer for pointing to this and other potentially negative consequences of MNE.

  3. Many economists point out that, as long as the contract is entered into voluntarily, both partners will be better off. Notably, local wages reflect outside earning opportunities, which are typically low in those countries where so-called sweatshops are located. However, this assumes ex ante full information and the absence of switching costs. Both conditions are unlikely to be fulfilled in labour markets, especially for migrant workers in developing countries. Moreover, bargaining power and even the ability to price discriminate may allow locally important employers to accrue most of the surplus created.

References

  • Aitken, B. and Harrison, A. (1999) ‘Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela’, American Economic Review 89: 605–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altenburg, T. (2000) ‘Linkages and spillovers between transnational corporations and small and medium-sized enterprises in developing countries: opportunities and policies’, in Proceedings of the UNCTAD X Special Round Table ‘TNC-SME Linkages for Development’, February, Bangkok. Geneva and New York: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E.M. and Gatignon, H. (1986) ‘Modes of foreign entry: a transaction costs analysis and propositions’, Journal of International Business Studies 17 (Fall): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T.M. and Louviere, J.J. (2003) ‘What will consumers pay for social product features?’, Journal of Business Ethics 42: 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. (1989) Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Harvard Business School Press: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos, R. (2003) ‘Entry mode, organizational learning and R&D in foreign affiliates: evidence from Japanese firms’, Strategic Management Journal 24: 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos, R., Capannelli, G. and Fukao, K. (2001) ‘Backward vertical linkages of foreign manufacturing affiliates: evidence from Japanese multinationals’, World Development 29: 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. (2004) In Defense of Globalization, Oxford University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. (2000) Entrepreneurship in the Global Firm, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, G. and Gertler, P. (2003) Technology from foreign direct investment: welfare gains through the supply chain, Cornell University and University of California at Berkeley. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M. and Kokko, A. (2002) FDI and Human Capital: A Research Agenda, OECD, OECD Development Centre: Paris Technical paper no 195.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M. and Kokko, A. (2003) The economics of foreign direct investment incentives.National Bureau for Economic Research. NBER working paper 9489, Cambridge, MA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M. and Sjöholm, F. (1999) ‘Technology transfer and spillovers: does local participation with multinationals matter?’, European Economic Review 43: 915–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J. and Casson, M. (1976) The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, Macmillan: London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J. and Casson, M. (2003) ‘The future of the multinational enterprise in retrospect and prospect’, Journal of International Business Studies 34: 219–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J., Clegg, J. and Wang, C. (2002) ‘The impact of inward FDI on the performance of Chinese manufacturing firms’, Journal of International Business Studies 33: 637–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R.E. (1974) ‘Multinational firms, competition and productivity in host country markets’, Economica 41: 176–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R.E. (1996) Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis 2nd edn) Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, P. (1994) ‘Globalization and the changing logic of collective action’, International Organization 49: 595–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.D., Hagström, P. and Sölvell, Ö. (eds.) 1998 The Dynamic Firm: The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organizations and Regions, Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, E.K.Y. (1983) Multinational Corporations, Technology and Employment, Macmillan: London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, P. and Taylor, G. (2001) ‘Globalization and the environment’, Journal of International Business Studies 32: 439–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, W.C., Mitchell, W. and Yeung, B. (2003) ‘Foreign direct investment and host country productivity: the American automotive component industry in the 1980s’, Journal of International Business Studies 34: 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990) ‘Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Wang, H. and Wheeler, D. (2002) ‘Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (1): 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Backer, K. and Sleuwagen, L. (2003) ‘Does foreign direct investment crowd out domestic entrepreneurship?’, Review of Industrial Organization 22: 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Torre, J. (1981) ‘Foreign Investment and economic development: conflict and negotiation’, Journal of International Business Studies 14: 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despres, C. and Chauvel, D. (eds.) (2000) Knowledge Horizons: The Present and the Promise of Knowledge Management, Butterworth-Heinemann: Woburn, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S. and Hoekman, B. (2000) ‘Foreign investment and productivity growth in Czech enterprises’, World Bank Economic Review 14: 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S. and Murrel, P. (2002) ‘Enterprise restructuring in transition: a quantitative survey’, Journal of Economic Literature 4 (3): 739–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T. (1999) Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics, Harvard Business School Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, G., Hart, S. and Yeung, B. (2000) ‘Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value?’, Management Science 46 (8): 1059–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (1993) Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Addison-Wesley: Wokingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskeland, G. and Harrison, A. (2002) Moving to greener pastures? Multinational and the pollution haven hypothesis. National Bureau for Economic Research. NBER Working paper 8888, Cambridge, MA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S. (2002) ‘Competition and corporate governance in transition’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (1): 101–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S. and Meyer, K.E. (eds.) (2004) Investment Strategies in Emerging Markets, Elgar: Cheltenham, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, E.X. (2002) Technological spillovers from foreign direct investment: a survey. Asian Development Bank. ERD Working Paper 33, Manila.

  • Feinberg, S.E. and Majumdar, S.K. (2001) ‘Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment in the Indian pharmaceutical industry’, Journal of International Business Studies 32: 421–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel, S. and Scott, D. (2002) ‘Compliance, collaboration, and codes of labor practice: the adidas connection’, California Management Review 45 (1): 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galunic, D.C. and Eisenhardt, K.M. (1996) ‘The evolution of intra-corporate domains: divisional charter losses in high-technology, multidivisional corporations’, Organization Science 7: 255–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, B. (ed.) (1998) Private Capital Flows and the Environment: Lessons from Latin America, Elgar: Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershenberg, I. (1987) ‘The training and spread of managerial know-how. A comparative analysis of multinationals and other firms in Kenya’, World Development 15: 931–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A (1962) Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (2003) ‘Semiglobalization and international business strategy’, Journal of International Business Studies 34: 138–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Görg, H. and Strobl, E. (2001) ‘Multinational companies and productivity spillovers: a meta-analysis with a test for publication bias’, The Economic Journal 111: 723–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. (1996) ‘Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal 17: 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, M. and Harrison, A. (1993) ‘Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment? Evidence from panel data for Morocco’, Journal of Development Economics 42: 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M.W. (ed.) (2002) Managing the Environment Across Borders: A Study of TNC Affiliate's Environmental Practices in China, Malaysia and India, Samfundslitteratur: Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, L.P., Shaw, B. and Stevenson, R. (2003) ‘Exploring the ethics and economics of global labor standards: a challenge to integrated social contract theory’, Business Ethics Quarterly 13: 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R. and Rodrik, D. (2003) ‘Economic development as self-discovery’, Journal of Development Economics 72: 603–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hejazi, W. and Safarian, A.E. (1999) ‘Trade, foreign direct investment, and R&D spillovers’, Journal of International Business Studies 30: 491–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W. (2000) ‘The institutional environment for multinational investment’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 16: 334–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. and Park, Y.-R. (1993) ‘Greenfield vs acquisition: the strategy of Japanese investors in the United States’, Management Science 39: 1054–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettige, H., Huq, M., Pargal, S. and Wheeler, D. (1996) ‘Determinants of pollution abatement in developing countries: evidence from South and Southeast Asia’, World Development 24: 1891–1904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. (1982) ‘Vertical inter-firm linkages in LDCs: a note on the Philippines’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 44: 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R., Eden, L., Lau, C. and Wright, M. (2000) ‘Strategy in emerging economies’, Academy of Management Journal 43: 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, K. and Michailova, S. (2002) ‘Diagnosing and fighting knowledge-sharing hostility’, Organizational Dynamics 31: 60–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A.B., Peterson, S.R. and Portney, P.R. (1995) ‘Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us?’, Journal of Economic Literature 33: 132–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathuria, V. (2000) ‘Productivity spillovers from technology transfer to Indian manufacturing firms’, Journal of International Development 12: 334–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J.M. (1987) Technology Creation in Latin American Manufacturing Industries, St Martin's Press: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. (1996) ‘Direct investment, experimentation, and corporate governance in transition economies’, In Frydman R, Gray CW, Rapazynski A (eds.) Corporate Governance in Central Europe and Russia, Vol. 1. Central European University Press: London and Budapest pp: 293–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, A. (1994) ‘Technology, market characteristics, and spillovers’, Journal of Development Economics 43: 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, A., Tasini, R. and Zejan, M. (1996) ‘Local technological capability and productivity spillovers from FDI in the Uruguayan manufacturing sector’, Journal of Development Studies 32: 602–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konings, J. (2001) ‘The effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firms: evidence from firm-level panel data in emerging economies’, Economics of Transition 9: 619–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosova, R. (2004) ‘Do foreign firms crowd out domestic firms? The evidence from the Czech Republic’, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan Business School.

  • Kristof, N. and WuDunn, S. (2000) Thunder from the East: Portrait of a Rising Asia, Knopf: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle, W. (1999) ‘The drivers of foreign direct investment into research and development: an empirical investigation’, Journal of International Business Studies 30: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kugler, M. (2001) Externalities from FDI: the sectoral pattern of spillovers and linkages, University of Southampton. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. (1978) ‘Transnationals, domestic enterprises and industrial structure in LDCs: a survey’, Oxford Economic Papers 30: 217–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. (1996) Learning from the Asian Tigers: Studies in Technology and Industrial Policy, Macmillan: London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, H.W., Maznevski, M.L., Mendenhall, M.E. and McNett, J. (2004) The Blackwell Handbook of Global Management: A Guide to Managing Complexity, Blackwell: Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P.J. and Lubatkin, M. (1998) ‘Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning’, Strategic Management Journal 19: 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P.J., Salk, J.E. and Lyles, M. (2001) ‘Absorptive capacity, learning and performance in international joint ventures’, Strategic Management Journal 22: 1139–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, A.Y. and Kim, J. (2004) ‘The nation-state and culture as influenced on organizational change and innovation’, In Poole MS (ed.) Handbook of Organizational Change and Development, Oxford University Press: Oxford, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Siler, P., Wang, C. and Wei, Y. (2000) ‘Productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment: evidence from UK industry level panel data’, Journal of International Business Studies 31: 407–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z. (2002) ‘FDI and technology spillover: evidence from China’, Journal of Comparative Economics 30: 579–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles, M.A. and Salk, J.E. (1996) ‘Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: an empirical examination in the Hungarian context’, Journal of International Business Studies 27: 877–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, X. and Salomon, R. (2003) ‘Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation’, Journal of International Business Studies 34: 356–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKendrick, D.G., Doner, R.F. and Haggard, S. (2001) From Silicon Valley to Singapore: Location and Competitive Advantage in the Hard Disk Drive Industry, Stanford University Press: Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K.E. (2001) ‘Institutions, transaction costs, and entry mode choice in Eastern Europe’, Journal of International Business Studies 32: 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K.E. (2002) ‘Management challenges in privatization acquisitions in transition economies’, Journal of World Business 37: 266–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K.E. and Nguyen, H.V. (2004) ‘Foreign investment strategies and sub-national institutions in Emerging Markets: evidence from Vietnam’, Journal of Management Studies, in press.

  • Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Björkman, I., Fey, C.F. and Park, H.J. (2003) ‘MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity and HRM’, Journal of International Business Studies 34: 586–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, T.H. (2002) Beyond Sweatshops: Foreign Direct Investment and Globalization in Developing Countries, Brookings Institution: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtha, T.P., Lenway, S.A. and Hart, J.A. (2001) Managing New Industry Creation: Global Knowledge Formation and Entrepreneurship in High Technology, Stanford Business Books: Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narula, R. and Dunning, J.H. (2000) ‘Industrial development, globalization and multinational enterprises: new realities for developing countries’, Oxford Development Studies 28 (2): 141–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, K. (2000) ‘Organizational transformation during institutional upheaval’, Academy of Management Review 25: 602–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, T. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company, Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oman, C. (2000) Policy Competition for Foreign Direct Investment: A Study of Competition Among Governments Attracting FDI, OECD: Paris.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L. and Ryes, S.L. (2003) ‘Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: a meta analysis’, Organization Studies 24 (3): 403–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Rourke, D. (2003) ‘Outsourcing regulation: analyzing nongovernmental systems of labor standards and monitoring’, Policy Studies Journal 31: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palley, T.J. (2002) ‘The child labor problem and the need for international labor standards’, Journal of Economic Issues 36: 601–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patibandla, M. and Petersen, B. (2002) ‘Role of transnational corporations in the evolution of a high-tech industry: the case of India's software industry’, World Development 30: 1561–1577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M.W. (2000) Business Strategies in Transition Economies, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puffer, S.M. and McCarthy, D.J. (1995) ‘Finding the common ground in Russian and American business ethics’, California Management Review 37 (2): 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. (2001) ‘The obsolescing ‘bargaining model’? MNC-host developing country relations revisited’, Journal of International Business Studies 32: 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, Y.W. and Belot, T. (1990) Export Catalysts in Low-Income Countries, The World Bank: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1999) The New Global Economy and Developing Countries: Making Openness Work, Johns Hopkins University Press: Washington, DC Overseas Development Council, Policy Essay 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M. and d'Cruz, J. (2000) Multinationals as Flagship Firms: Regional Business Networks, Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (2003) ‘Extending the theory of the multinational enterprise: internalization and strategic management perspectives’, Journal of International Business Studies 34: 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A.G. and Smid, M. (2000) ‘The downward spiral and the US model business principles: why MNEs should take responsibility for the improvement of world-wide social and environmental conditions’, Management International Review 40: 351–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoors, K. and van der Tool, B. (2002) Foreign direct investment spillovers within and between sectors: evidence from Hungary. University of Gent, Working Paper 2002/157.

  • Shenkar, O. (2004) ‘One more time: international business in a global economy’, Journal of International Business Studies 35: 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinani, E. and Meyer, K.E. (2004) ‘Identifying spillovers of technology transfer: the case of Estonia’, Journal of Comparative Economics 32 (4), in press.

  • Sjöholm, F. (1999) ‘Productivity growth in Indonesia: the role of regional characteristics and direct foreign investment’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 47: 559–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smarzynska, B. (2002) Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers through Backward Linkages, World Bank: Washington, DC Policy Research Working Paper 2924.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spar, D. (1998) ‘The spotlight and the bottom line’, Foreign Affairs 77 (2): 7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spar, D. and Yoffie, D. (1999) ‘Multinational enterprises and the prospect for justice’, Journal of International Affairs 52: 557–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlenbruck, K. and De Castro, J. (1998) ‘Privatization from the acquirer's perspective: a mergers and acquisitions based framework’, Journal of Management Studies 35: 619–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlenbruck, K., Meyer, K.E. and Hitt, M. (2003) ‘Organizational transformation in transition economies: resource-based and organizational learning perspectives’, Journal of Management Studies 40: 257–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2000) World Investment Report 2000: Mergers and Acquisitions and Development, United Nations: Geneva.

  • United Nations Social and Economic Council (2003) ‘Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights’, United Nations. (web document: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/links/norms-Aug2003.html. accessed 15 February2004).

  • Van Tulder, R. and Kolk, A. (2001) ‘Multinationality and corporate ethics: codes of conduct in the sporting goods industry’, Journal of International Business Studies 32: 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varley, P., Mathiasen, C. and Voorhes, M. (1998) The Sweatshop Quandary: Corporate Responsibility on the Global Frontier, Investor Responsibility Research Center: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, L.T. (1998) ‘Multinational and the developing countries’, Journal of International Business Studies 29: 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, D., Hefner, F., Arpan, J., Kuhlman, J. and Folks Jr, W.R. (1995) The impact of FDI on transitional economies: the case of Coca-Cola in Poland and Romania. University of South Carolina, College of Business Administration. Centre for International Business Education and Research, Working Paper.

  • Yeung, B. (2003) ‘Introduction to the JIBS forum honouring the 25th anniversary of The Future of the Multinational Enterprise’, Journal of International Business Studies 34: 101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S.A. and George, G. (2002) ‘Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension’, Academy of Management Review 27: 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarsky, L. (1999) ‘Havens, halos and spaghetti: untangling the evidence about foreign direct investment and the environment’, In OECD (ed.) Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment, OECD: Paris, 48–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, K.H. (2001) ‘How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth in China?’, Economics of Transition 9: 679–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Arie Lewin for stimulating this research, and Evis Sinani for her research assistance. Moreover, the following colleagues have been providing helpful comments: Saul Estrin, Heather Hazard, Camilla Jensen, Mike Peng, participants of the JIBS conference New Frontiers in International Business Research at Duke University, and anonymous referees for Journal of International Business Studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus E Meyer.

Additional information

Accepted by Arie Lewin, Editor in Chief, 2004. This paper has been with the author for two revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, K. Perspectives on multinational enterprises in emerging economies. J Int Bus Stud 35, 259–276 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400084

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400084

Keywords

Navigation